Archive Logo.jpg

May 6, 2008

"That little empty space on his lapel…"

That’s what Richard Cohen of the WaPo likes best about Barack Obama. (My thanks to Stanley Kurtz for this little nugget over at The Corner.)

It is where other politicians wear the American flag pin, a kitschy piece of empty symbolism that tells you nothing about that particular person except that he or she thinks like everyone else. Obama’s flag, invisible to the naked eye, is the Jolly Roger of a politician thinking for himself.

Well.

I imagine those who think like Mr. Cohen would probably expect me to have spotted the missing “kitschy piece of empty symbolism” immediately, being one of those dim-bulb military vets who reflexively look for every politician’s overt display of patriotism.

I never thought to look, frankly.

But now that it has been brought to my attention, I listened to the Narrative, both Obama’s and his opponents, and thought it rather silly (on both sides).

I thought Obama’s response petty and self-absorbed. Sort of like one of his wife’s campaign speeches. C’mon, dude. The Orwellian true-patriotism-is-best-demonstrated-by-a-conscious-rejection-of-one-of-its-most-common-symbols shtick was as clumsy as it was transparent. If most Democrats think like that, whoa; I’m in a very different country. Then again, maybe they do.

As for his critics: guys, pick more important things to tag the opponent with, OK? There are plenty. And I’m not even talking about Pastor Jeremiah. Obama’s record in the Senate is a good place to start (Hint: a McCain-like compromiser he ain't). His position on the Second Amendment, anyone? But I digress…

“Kitschy.” Hmmm. From Wikipedia: “…any art that is pretentious to the point of being in bad taste, and also commercially produced items that are considered trite or crass.” So. A senior commentator in one of the nation’s leading newspapers finds the American flag lapel pin to be “pretentious,” “bad taste,” “trite,” and “crass.”

I cannot agree, though I am not surprised that Mr. Cohen would think it so. Affection for America, for the freedoms it guarantees, the benefits one enjoys living in it, the opportunities and successes it has offered and awarded Mr. Cohen is so…80s.

I find the phrase “empty symbolism” particularly telling. Does Richard Cohen seriously believe the flag of the United States is an empty symbol? This is not just a cheap shot by a smug left-wing scribbler pandering to his like-minded readers who subscribe to the Post. (Well, yeah, it is, actually. –Ed.) It defies reason.

Hundreds of thousands have risked their lives for the opportunity to pledge allegiance to it. It is the symbol of a nation that holds dear that the rule of law is supreme to the rule of men. It is a symbol of a nation that produced leaders committed to a government, “…of the people, by the people, for the people…” It is the symbol of a nation that replaces its leaders on a regular basis by peaceful means. It is a nation where the average standard of living, for even its poorest citizens (even Michelle, poor dear), is one of the highest on the planet. It is a nation that dominates the world in the advancement of science and technology. And it is a nation that was born with an obscenely ugly institution of slavery, then cleansed itself of that great blemish by force of arms and then reinvented its national psyche to not only allow, but enthusiastically encourage, an American of African descent to run for its highest office.

I know I’m wasting my breath (but electrons are cheap) but I found this particular rant breathtaking in its arrogance, ingratitude, smugness, pretentious self-righteousness and stupidity.

Moreover, I think Mr. Cohen missed the irony of his story’s point, that to wear the pin is political “pandering.” In a way, the pin does represent a new low in pandering by its conspicuous absence. It panders to a significant portion of Barack Obama’s base supporters who think it too “kitschy.”

Right, Mr. Cohen?

Dusty | Permalink | Comments (15) | TrackBack (0) | Media Morons

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8819

Comments on "That little empty space on his lapel…"
Argent briefed on May 6, 2008 11:53 PM
It is where other politicians wear the American flag pin, a kitschy piece of empty symbolism that tells you nothing about that particular person except that he or she thinks like everyone else. Obama’s flag, invisible to the naked eye, is the Jolly Roger of a politician thinking for himself.

Well that's a nasty emotional hook isn't it? Ahh yes right at the beginning. So then Kitsch? The flag is not 'pretentious' or 'empty symbolism'. It's clearly and honestly the flag symbolic of the United States. Which, last time I checked, was a dinky die nation whether you loved it or not.

The rest of Kitsch is really about opinion and it's worthy to note Kitsch is actually in fashion in some ways. Maybe there's an argument there. Maybe something about wrapping one self in the flag or about non standard flags. Now if, as the author says in his article, Obama makes the argument about not wanting to show false patriotism like Nixon or others, and Obama is telling the truth there, then his action of removing the pin shows he is being true to himself and is not patriotic. Otherwise he'd leave it on and be true to the values the symbol represents. A bit disturbing for a Presidential Candidate IMO.

"tells you nothing about that particular person except that he or she thinks like everyone else"

Utter rubbish. Wearing a flag does indeed say very little except that one is trying to be associated with the symbolism. It says nothing about what a person thinks beyond that, for example their motivation for such association. But one can make educated guesses when politicians are involved. Even those that are wearing the symbol because they believe in it are only thinking along similar lines in the meaning of that symbolism. There's plenty more diversity of thought out there. And even if one does have the same thought as others it isn't always a bad thing.

Murray briefed on May 7, 2008 12:19 AM

I wear one with crossed US/NZ flags.

It saves telling people my political leanings.

Of course one idiot was silly enough to ask me why I wore it when I standing in front of the Marines memorial on waterfront in Wellington.

So much easier to just point than explain.

Shame in other copuntries they think I'm Australian.

Argent briefed on May 7, 2008 12:41 AM

...and wots de problim wit dat?

let's see.. No Helen, more sun, less cold, less wind, all the same companies and much better wine.

Of course free of charge special deal today only you get Mr Rudd, sunburn, heat exhaustion, all the same companies and inferior seafood.

BillT briefed on May 7, 2008 4:23 AM

Obama’s flag, invisible to the naked eye, is the Jolly Roger of a politician thinking for himself.

In Richard Cohen's world, pirates emulate Jack Sparrow (sorry -- *Captain* Jack Sparrow) and Singapore is, of course, located somewhere south of Santo Domingo. Cohen ignores the fact that those who flew the Jolly Roger did so because they thought more *of* themselves than *for* themselves...

John of Argghhh! briefed on May 7, 2008 6:45 AM

Heh. My thought when I read Dusty's intro was... "oh, gad, the only thing more painful than a blowhard berating people for not wearing a flag pin is the earnest sophomoric explanation of why *not* wearing a flag is a more sublime form of self-expression."

Which is what Dusty said, essentially.

Heh. Like many of us here, I wore my flag on my sleeve.

I wear a Rotary, Soldier's Angels, or NRA pin on my lapel.

fdcol63 briefed on May 7, 2008 8:07 AM

Is the American public now going to elect a pirate as their president?

God help us!

John of Argghhh! briefed on May 7, 2008 8:41 AM

Frank, you poor deluded fool, sucked in by the Rethuglican Spin Machine.

We already have a pirate as President!

Bush invaded Iraq to loot their oil for his buddy (and sock-puppet master) Cheney.

And blew up the WTC so as to have an excuse to hoodwink the Congress.

Really. Get with the program fella.

fdcol63 briefed on May 7, 2008 9:01 AM

Thanks, John, for enlightening me.

I was apparently confused by the helpful information presented by the Dems. Instead of being jolly pirates, I thought Bush and Cheney were hapless morons controlled by the evil Über-Führer Rove in the Illuminati / Babylonian Brotherhood conspiracy to give the world over to the reptile aliens from the 4th Dimension.

LOL

John of Argghhh! briefed on May 7, 2008 9:34 AM

Da nada, buddy. No charge.

Murray briefed on May 7, 2008 3:25 PM

Flies.

When they're big enough to have squadron markings I draw the line!

BillT briefed on May 8, 2008 2:19 AM

For those of you who have just joined us, Murray's comment is a continuation of the Sur'n Hemispherical Discussion of Insular Oddities.

Time lapse between postings is due to the fact that it's Autumn down there and Murray's struggling against that hibernation thang...

fdcol63 briefed on May 8, 2008 7:06 AM

Bill, thanks. I didn't wanna highlight my continued confusion by asking, "WTF?!"

BTW ... here in FL we have to evade palmetto bugs.

Murray briefed on May 8, 2008 3:23 PM

Hey if you guys choose to live at the bottom of the world thats your business.

I was refering to the down side of being Austalian (WHICH I'M NOT). Honking big flies and lots of them.

John of Argghhh! briefed on May 8, 2008 3:31 PM

Hmmm. I don't think Argent is Austalian, either.

Now, AustRalian, that he is.

Weren't the Austalians a Star Trek species? Oh, wait, that was Thalian. Never mind.

Murray briefed on May 9, 2008 5:25 PM

Freak.

Post a comment









Remember personal info?