previous post next post  

H&I* Fires, 27 MAY 2008

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

Time to add a new caveat, because from email it's not clear to some folks (mind you, if you don't read this it won't matter...) Being an open post, people (collectively, the Denizens) other than I post in the H&I. They sign their work (most of the time) - keep that in mind when you want to flame someone in email please - if it doesn't say "The Armorer" or "John" then I didn't write it! And honestly - if you don't like something said or posted... leave a comment, and hash it out (within the context of The Rulez which are clearly posted on the comment form, I would add).

********************************
Well, for the last eight years, we've been subjected to comedy routines and books about President Bush's malapropisms and occasional mushmouth. Looks like, if Senator Obama convinces the electorate of his Presidential Gravitas, the comics will have just as much fun, if in a slightly different way.

No doubt the Rethuglican Attack Machine (sekritly directed by Karl Rove) will be watching for more dead people voting this upcoming election. Heh. Nothing like an Chicago politician and dead people... but this man has Powerz! He's raising zombies in New Mexico, too. Oh, by the way, Senator - Memorial Day is for the dead... it's Veteran's Day for the living. Not that it didn't stop the whole lot of you from politicizing the fargin' holiday. Faugh. -the Armorer

*********************************
I know someone is going to blast me, messily and angrily, for disagreeing on this. It isn’t good sportsmanship at all. It’s stupid and the rewarding cheaters (who can say cheaters never win, eh, if this is what now constitutes good sportsmanship?).

Sorry, stepping out of bounds to get around someone who had boxed you in because you made bad tactical mistakes in your race does not mean you won. Actually, you lose when you do that. Just like takedowns outside the circle in wrestling don’t count and touchdowns where you run part of the way out of bounds to avoid getting your clock cleaned get called back. I can’t believe this was even appealed. She lost even though she was the stronger runner, and rightly so. She got frustrated, cheated to overcome someone else’s brilliant gamesmanship (or fell prey to the random vagaries of the race or even paid the price for being a drafter during the race.) and got caught. Giving her the medal isn’t good sportsmanship. It’s stupid.

Don’t turn silliness into sportsmanship, please. It’s hard enough teaching the young ones how to play by the rules without having moving goal posts to contend with as it is.
--ry
*************************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to that particular topic. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".

12 Comments

No, really, tell us how you truly feel, Armorer. I know, it's not funny. A day that shouldn't be used for domestic politics and chust thumping like that...was. Still, I couldn't pass up the op. to turn that back on John. Sure, I'll pay for it(oi, I will pay for it), but you can't pass chances like that up, not if you're gollum.
 
We are teetering on being afflicted with at least four years of what amounts to a looping "Saturday Night Live" sketch... I am old. I remember when SNL was funny.
 
While I understand your pique, Ry, if the others want to swap around their medals, hug, and sing kum-by-yah, that's okay with me. If would not be okay with me if the results of the race were officially overturned. If the participants want it that way, unofficially, amongst themselves, okay. Number two is just admitting she got spanked, and didn't want to win on a technical issue, regardless of how important the issue is. As a state champion myself, I admit I wouldn't be very proud of a distinction that came on a technical issue like that - but your point is well taken, like 'em or not, there are rules like that for a reason, not to gain an unfair advantage. It's a semi-empty gesture - Nelson is still going to get the credit. I'd save my ire for someone trying to overturn the official results, especially by lawsuit or something. This is among the athletes themselves, they know who won and who didn't. Heh. Until I read the article, I thought this was going to be about Danica Patrick's problems at Indy!
 
Mmmm....Danica Patrick.....
 
Snerk. Bloodspite - mind outta the gutter man!
 
..and LTC DuBois (MI, Ret) knew full well that young Juan Rico only placed fourth in that race...
 
I think you miss where I'm annoyed, BB. That ESPN is running this as a great example of sportsmanship(meaning that more people should be like this). That's wrong to encourage that. If you move the goal posts on what good sportsmanship like that you've got the, excuse please, was from psychological research(not mine either---no Castle Felines rending the rear upholstery of gollum, thanks), situation where girls change the rules of a game to make it 'more fair' instead of a single, universal rule for everyone(which is fair) as they walk in the door of the competition. I'm miffed at the media coverage. Damn it, kids are confused between the 'I's get's mine' of Allen Iverson-types and this rather silly example held up as what sportsmanship should be. It's an incredibly selfless gesture, to be sure. It's the girl who finished second understanding that the other girl was a much stronger runner(but that doesn't mean better). Distance running is a tactical endeavor. Much more cerebral than sprints. The girl who came in second probably, I'll withold that util I can see some tape of the event, deserved to win because she manipulated the conditions of the race to *her* advantage. Gamesmanship is part of the equation, not just raw ability. (Which is why I disagree with the statement of the athletes know who won as you intend it. No, this action shows they don't really understand who won. Part of all games is using what you have in your favor to maximum advantage, and if your strategy infuriates someone into doing something stupid, like breaking the rules, well, tough. That's part and parcel of gamesmanship. Like you never frustrated an opponent by doing something, repeatedly, that drove him angry to the point of stupidity.) Mmmm....Danica Patrick..... RBBH wants to know if BSBH wants to borrow the 14" cast iron skillet. RBBH says so long as it comes back forensically clean we'll eat the shipping charges(we'll what?!) Wait, did MajMike just drop a Heinlein reference(speaking of Heinlein, why is Green Hills of Earth on the floor of your garage, Armorer?) ?
 
Ry, I have to disagree on the sportsmanship angle, especially if she was "boxed in". Many sports have quite poor contact rules and/or balking rules, track especially. What this should do is prompt a review of the rules of the sport, something which is needed in many now a-days. As long as it doesn't become like fencing, with a new rule each year a-la Calvin ball. I think the Major's got it. The others did not feel they earned their rewards and *gasp*, tried to correct it, even unofficially. This IS something to be proud of in this day and age, where the need to EARN something is better than receiving it without any struggle. Which brings me to Danica, oddly enough. She's pretty, but lacks talent required to move to a higher league. Her results do stem from her small stature, both in height and more importantly in an all-spec series, weight. CART/INDY min weight is car-only, not car+ driver. She won't stand a chance in something like F1 (where she will look like a giant next to Ferrari's number 2). And there is the whole "can just turn left" issue. Even NASCAR has the Glen.
 
Yes it's not good sportsmanship. All the same it's Ok for them to do that. Why does this matter to you so much? Bad sportsmanship is the norm in sports and that's mostly how the spectators like it. Armorer, politicians politicize, it's their job. The reason many of us avoid it is because it usually involves a great deal of dishonorable behavior.
 
Ok ok....no me volunteering for hr uh..pit crew...or to look under her hood, or ball bearing adjustments or pistons, or rocker arms or rods or...uh yea...anyway Especially that now I know Rye's D6 is playing overwatch for my warden I have to be careful! :)
 
Geo, dude, I'm walking on a bum knee because of how badly the contact rules are in track. Trust me, I know of what I speak. Boxing someone in is part of the tactical game of distance running. It's smart. It's taking their strength, the ability to push the pace high for a long time, without surrendering the advantage to us quick twitch muscle freaks. Look, I was a drafter too. Someone who ran just behind the leader instead of trying to lead the race myself and then booked it the last 300 m of the race. IT's part and parcel of the game. Just because you've got an amazing kick doesn't mean the game has to be arranged just so for you to use it to your advantage. That's abusing the rules too, for undo advantage. The best way for a grunter to win is to box someone like me in and hold on hoping for a mass at the finish. What, are they going to institute a rule saying that I can't draft, saving my energy the entire race, only to kick people down in the last 300m then to offset my undo advantage? That's the only way a grunter, someone who's got endurance for days but no real high gear, is going to win. If they don't, dude, I'm going to win every damn time. I'm just going to let the grunter do all the hard work for 90% of the race and then sprint ahead at the end. And, yeah, leading a race is damn hard work. It's a lot easier to be just off their shoulder or totaly in their wind shadow. And I've not gotten into the psychological effects of drafting someone either. Like I said, vagaries of the race. It happens. Sometimes someone plans to box you in, sometimes it simply happens. That doesn't mean you get to break the rules to escape. Hell frackin' no. If you're really that cool you slwo down, drop back, go gonzo up the outside, hope you've got enough left in the tank, and vomit when you cross the line(heck, she won by more than 5 seconds, that's totally within her capabilities). Sometimes you'll lose. Chance is part of it after all. John's got a different perspective. He outclassed so many of his opponents in wrestling that he doesn't seem to get how some of us lesser beings would have to gameplan him, to offset his natural advantages of size and speed, and put the fight on our terms so we'd have a snowball's chance of winning. Which is also part of the game too, afterall. If you want nothing but pure talent go for sprints of 400m or less where you're always in one lane. No tactics involved. No, that these girls coughed up their medals shows they don't understand how the game is played. They *got* played. Their whole conception of racing is the kick at the end, it would seem. He with the better kick is the best. balls. There's other ways of winning. And if the chick was so good why didn't she go back up the outside instead of cheating? No, they got played. I wouldn't complain if it *was* someone admitting they really didn't win, but this isn't. Though I agree about fencing. THe rule I always hated in saber was the elimnation of the fleche and the arm cocked grants right of way rule. Yeah, like that's fair. He's got right of way, indefinitly, and can just back me off the piste. (But that just shows how long I've been out of fencing, huh?)
 
Ry, I think we're on the same page, at least on the whole "system needs reformation" bit. I'm not a runner, so other than the rules explained to me by some of the more lanky types, all I know is that the penalties for contact and balking are similar to horse racing, where any contact, even something that in motorsports would be considered a racing incident, results in a full DSQ. I wasn't there, so I'm not sure if going up and to the outside was an option, or what her options of maneuver were. If she could have dropped back, then powered ahead (I'm assuming that 5 seconds is a large margin in running of this distance, again, massive ignorance on my part), then the others did get played. You're right, even if she could have dropped and then re-gained, she still broke the rules. I'm just used to sports where the goal is to push that line with the rules. That's what judges and stewards are for. I *think* they've fixed the arm-cocked rule in sabre, but I'm a foilist (that hasn't been in it for 2 years due to an issue with knee+metal piste), so grain of salt. The point close to this topic is the elimination of the yellow cards for accidental corps-a-corps, since it used to be that even the slightest contact, no matter the cause, warranted a penalty. This change did benefit the bigguns like me though.
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.