<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Why vigilance (and informed, vice emotional, voting) matters.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:56:21 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Why vigilance (and informed, vice emotional, voting) matters.</title>
            <description>I&apos;m not a fan of the death penalty, which makes me a minority around here among the people who have expressed an opinion one way or another on the subject, but Justice Scalia&apos;s shot at Justice Stevens in the recent decision regarding Kentucky&apos;s Death Penalty methods was, well, interesting. But actually none of this really matters. As JUSTICE STEVENS explains, &quot; &apos;objective evidence, though of great importance, [does] not wholly determine the controversy, for the Constitution contemplates that in the end our own judgment will be brought to bear on the question of the acceptability of the death penalty under...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:01:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                See?  And I didn&apos;t ban ya or nuthin&apos;!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72208</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72208</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:56:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from HomefrontSix on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                I promise no f-bombs. But I disagree with you completely on the issue of the death penalty. In fact, I don&apos;t think it&apos;s employed nearly enough. 


To each, their own.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72204</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72204</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:08:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JimC on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                While I respect and wish your riposte was correct I believe the Supremes and the courts in general are an oligarchy. The Supremes of Kansas uphold courts ordering the leveeing of taxes and the taxes are leveed seems to me to obviate the need for the legislature.  Courts taking over the administration of school systems and leveeing taxes for that system in Missouri would also seem to make my point.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72200</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72200</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:22:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                Kat - as long as the F-Bomber wing of the commentariat will stick to nerf-weapons, certainly.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72199</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72199</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:56:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                No, I said we in danger of dropping into an oligarchy, and many politicians of both parties have strong incentives to push it that way - and always have.

Hence, we&apos;ve got to be... vigilant.  And at times, that means we&apos;ve got to suck up our side not being in power.

Because, in the longer run, I believe the greater good of all of us is served by that.

Keep &apos;em tied up in knots, it reduces the mischief they can cause.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72196</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72196</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:54:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JimC on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                John, you realize you just intimated that this country has essentially devolved into an oligarchy.  I, of course, have thought so for some time but it is nice to have confirmation.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72194</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72194</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:51:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-04-18</title>
            <description>
                Ooh!  Ooh!  Can we start a fight over the death penalty?  Apparently, yesterday&apos;s flag controversy wasn&apos;t deadly enough for ya&apos;. ;)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72192</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/04/why_vigilance_m.html#comment-72192</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:34:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

