previous post next post  

Things You Used To See In The MSM

Such as this one:

February 8, 2007 • In Iraq, improvised explosive devices pose a constant threat to security forces. The makeshift bombs are stashed on the sides of roads, buried in trash or hidden just about anywhere. The U.S. military has sought to train Iraqi security forces to handle them on their own.

But things don't always go as planned.

U.S. Army Sgt. Ryan Lord hadn't driven his Humvee more than 50 yards out of Forward Operating Base Warrior when he came upon Iraqi police standing in the middle of the road. An IED had been spotted up ahead, they told the Americans.

In most cases, that means a U.S. explosives ordnance team comes in to defuse the bomb. But in this case, an Iraqi explosives team is on the case.

The Iraqi police start shooting at the potential bomb, hoping to set it off. But to no avail. The convoy continues to sit and wait. An hour passes. As Sgt. Lord watches, the Iraqi police move closer to the suspected bomb.

The first IED turns out to be a fake. To the surprise of the American soldiers, this emboldens the Iraqi police, who are now focusing on the second suspected bomb.

"Oh, he kicked it," says an American soldier watching.

"The second one must have been safe," Lord says, "because they went over to it, kicked it over, and then threw it across the road."

An hour and a half after first stopping, the convoy moves on.

That was newsworthy-by-MSM-definition because it showcases the US *failure* to

a. instill a healthy respect for IEDs in the local Iraqi cops *and*

b. teach them the proper method of IED neutralization.

However, take note of the glossed-over facts that

a. Iraqi police have taken on the task that *used* to be reserved for US EOD folks *and*

b. shooting an IED (from a distance, naturally) is an accepted field-expedient method of dealing with one of the beasts.

And now, I'll bet a two-liter plastic bottle of generic agua caliente that you won't see this one:

Kirkuk, Mar 12, [2008] (VOI) - Police forces on Wednesday defused a roadside bomb placed near a bridge in central Kirkuk, north Iraq, a security source said.

Kirkuk police forces on Wednesday evening discovered a rocket tied to wires near the directorate of Accounting at a bridge in central Kirkuk,” a security source, who requested anonymity, told Aswat al-Iraq - Voices of Iraq - (VOI)

The source added “the explosives expert defused the rocket.”

Kirkuk lies 250 km north-east of Baghdad.

Heh. Same area, same local cops. But *not* newsworthy, because it shows they've learned the *professional* way to deal with IEDs. They're not still in the learning stage -- now they *know* and they're applying that knowledge.

"B-b-b-but Bill, they're still planting IEDs -- that means The Surge Isn't Working!"

That's like saying NYC's Rodent Control program isn't working because there are still rats in the sewers. I've got cop buddies who remember when they *used* to promenade down Broadway, following the trash trucks...

9 Comments

The MSM's motto: If the story doesn't meet the spin, don't put it in. At times, when I'm more positive, I have hopes that the influence of new media and history will prove just how much bias we've had pushed down our throats by the MSM. And then I remember what a stranglehold liberals still maintain within journalism, broadcast media, academia, and Hollyweird. Until that changes, they will continue to spin the historical narrative according to their liberal bias to advance their own agendas. All while gullible Obamaniacs accept it as the complete truth. TGIF. LOL
 
If it doesn't bleed, vomit, spew, or otherwise meet a certain level of negativity they are not "informing" us.
 
but what about the mutiny of shiite troops who were supposed to attack positions of the Sadr Army? Do I read about it here? If not, was there a good reason for that? I like to know, because I try to read info from both camps and make up my mind myself.
 
eric: mutiny and desertion are practiced as a fine art in Iraqi military culture (see Desert Storm and OIF battle reports for quantification). "going over to the other side" has varying degrees of "gone" to it, and i wouldn't put overly much stock in any report that breathless exclaims that "all" the members of a unit "mutinied". my brief assessment of the sparse reports i had seen would be thus: "guys who never could have passed a decent background check" may have walked off their current job in order to report back in to whomever their real allegiance was due. such is life.
 
Eric...there are multiple reports that say different things. According to Kaboomjournal.blogspot.com (I can't link right this second), there were reports that police and others "defected" and handed over their weapons, but LT G said he made the rounds of the check points in his sector and they were all covered. He notes that, if any did, they did not effect his over all area and may have been very limited. The alleged mutiny as reported by "police and army officials in Basra" I say alleged because many of the "officials" in Basra are also Sadr mahdi army or have sympathies to that cause. Noting that an alleged battalion refused to fight is pretty big not to be also validated by the American military. I would look there first before I accept that it was an entire battalion of the army. The police, on the otherhand, I would believe. In 2005, Steven Vincent, author of In the Red Zone, was murdered in Basra and his interpreter critically wounded because his daily dispatches noted the "criminals", the corruption, and, most importantly, the police being infiltrated by Mahdi militia who posted signs of Sadr and were going around at night kidnapping and killing people for their "un-Islamic" behavior, dress, etc. Does the possibility of the Basra police "mutinying" against attacking Sadr bother me or portend something that we didn't know already? Nope. however, I would look to Centcom to see if they have any confirmation of the number, size and organizatoin within the Iraqi army that did or did not "mutiny" before I would accept Basra/Mahdi propaganda that is basically trying to portray even the Iraqi Army under Sadr's control. Best article I've seen today about the Basra affair is right here: Planning Gaps for Assault on Basra
 
Maj Mike...guess we had the same thoughts on that subject. "reports of large scale mutiny are highly questionable".
 
And..a little more explanation and comparison of what allegedly happened in Basra to the alleged "mutiny"
A British military official said that Mr. Maliki had brought 6,600 reinforcements to Basra to join the 30,000 security personnel already stationed there, and a senior American military official said that he understood that 1,000 to 1,500 Iraqi forces had deserted or underperformed. That would represent a little over 4 percent of the total.
Context. and even then there is the qualifier of "he understood" which means he is getting his information from a secondary source as well.
 
thank you all and long live the internet!
 
thx for the numbers kat... now to apply the "Iraqi fudge factor" calculation to it.. "about 4% loss" = "bodaciously fantastic attendance today" = "slightly less than a recruiting drive" all in all i would say that was a great show of force.