<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Who Should Answer The Phone?</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:00:43 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Who Should Answer The Phone?</title>
            <description>Hillary thinks she should answer the phone. Barack thinks he should answer the phone. Both candidates think the decision should be based on their experience. I guess that means we have to go with the person who has actual experience dealing with terrorists. According to this article by Ben Smith at Politico, Barack has dined with terrorists, socialized with terrorists and accepted campaign donations from terrorists. Just a thought. Trying to be fair and all. You know, openminded. Maggie...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:15:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Hannity was all over that connection late last week, Maggie.
It is scary to think that anyone who cohorts with known domestic terrorists could possibly rise to the position of presidential candidate.. Truly amazing.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70329</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70329</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:46:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Apparently I'm not really good at this "<em>conveying my point with sarcasm</em>" thing.  I was trying to draw attention to Obama's link to the Weather Underground!  It's in the article in the Flash Traffic.

Do you people actually think I'd give Obama credit for ANYTHING over ANYONE?

JimB, I need a drink (wanted to say I need a "stiff one" but that would just have JTG posting pics of Sailors again....wait, now that I think of.....).]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70316</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70316</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:56:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                First time I saw the original ad, I thought &quot;wow.. McCain&apos;s finally stepping up his campaign and exploiting his military service like he should!&apos;  and then... HILLARY APPEARED ON THE SCREEN.

WHAT THE??????

Sorry, but something makes me think the only 3am call she&apos;s ever taken was either from Bill asking her to let him back into the house, or a wrong number- neither of which have any affect on national security.
FEH!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70307</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70307</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:38:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                There are those on the Right who are suggesting that Senator Clinton, knowing the End Is Near, has shifted her focus to 2012 - and put out these ads precisely to undermine Senator Obama in order to secure a McCain win this time around.

I think that some people think too hard, myself, but it would fit in the view of Senator Clinton as an afcionado of Niccolò Machiavelli.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70299</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70299</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:37:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from GeoSTI on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                *posting from a dark, dank lab*

After watching the Clinton ad, a thought struck my roommates and myself: In the general election, if it is Barak v McCain, the same ad should be used, with McCain at the end picking up.

Not that I&apos;m the biggest fan of his, but decidely the lesser of two weevils.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70298</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70298</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:21:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2008-03-04</title>
            <description>
                I think I&apos;d rather the phone go unanswered thank yo0u very much.

I hate solicitation calls ;)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70293</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/who_should_answ.html#comment-70293</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:29:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

