<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Patti and the Angels Receive More Kudos</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:57:59 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Patti and the Angels Receive More Kudos</title>
            <description>Patti Bader, leader, motivator and facilitator of literally hundreds of thousands of &quot;troop support&quot; volunteers has again received national attention. Her husband writes:For founding Soldiers Angels and other exemplary work that she does to make the world a better place, Patti has just been notified that she is the recipient of the VFW 2008 James E. Van Zandt Citizenship Award. From the VFW web site: James E. &quot;Jimmy&quot; Van Zandt was Commander-in-Chief of the VFW three times, and a veteran of three wars (World War I, World War II, and the Korean War). He served as an enlisted man in...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:00:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                This is not an attack on you, nor is it an attack on Patti.
I just want the focus to get back to the soldiers and away from the self-promotion.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71447</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71447</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:53:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I won't speak to the appropriateness of the current overall level of promotion of Patti, but since I <i>did</i> encourage this latest escapade, I feel the need to speak in my defense.  Here's why I thought the attention was a good thing for the troops (and you know, I'm ALL about supporting our servicemembers in word and deed): attention to Patti means attention to SA, which means attention to the reasons for SA's existence--the troops and their families--and an opportunity to encourage people to join/donate/create, resulting in greater capacity to meet the needs of troops and their families.  

Maybe I'm being too idealistic, but that's my take on things.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71426</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71426</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:14:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                Fuzzy... that&apos;s EXACTLY the kind of thing I&apos;m talking about.  I&apos;ve received countless requests to &quot;go vote for Patti!  The most wonderful mother in the world!!&quot;  And I&apos;ve done so exactly ZERO times.  
If you read the stories of the other mothers, you&apos;ll see that they were nominated for far less glamorous reasons than the national accolades Patti has received.

This whole &quot;promote Patti to promote SA&quot; is getting REALLY out of hand.  The soldiers aren&apos;t the ones getting the attention; she is.  And isn&apos;t the whole idea behind SA is to focus on the SOLDIERS???

(and yes, I do remember our conversation)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71413</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71413</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:17:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                Sorry about that Mike (and John).  I thought I had a sentence at the end of that comment that thank him for continuing to support Valour-IT.

AFSis, I remember our conversation on the subject, and I hope you remember my reaction. :) Regarding &quot;wonderful mother, I agree that there are many unsung parental heroes out there (I&apos;d put my own mother near the top of the list, and there are many I know who would join her there). I was contacted by someone outside Soldiers&apos; Angels regarding the &quot;America&apos;s Favorite Mom&quot; contest, and was asked to go behind her back to ask her son to nominate her (which I successfully did) with the idea that it would boost the visibility of Soldiers&apos; Angels.  As far as I understand things, that&apos;s exactly what SA hopes to do with Patti&apos;s participation.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71411</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71411</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:50:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                100% SPOT ON, MIKE.
V-IT is as far as I will go with SA anymore.  It&apos;s unique, and it works, but I&apos;m sick and tired of being hounded for money that I just don&apos;t have.  It makes me more likely to *NOT* donate.  And I&apos;m sick and tired of hearing about how Patti&apos;s the most wonderful mother in the world for starting SA- she&apos;s not.  I know plenty of other mothers (and fathers) who are just as deserving of that title who will never receive even a fraction of the attention she gets.

My .02.
Let the Sis-Bashing begin.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71410</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71410</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:29:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;d like to point out what Fuzzy was trying to say but didn&apos;t explicitly - if you give money to Project Valour-IT for example, or any other specific project, that money goes to the project and not into the funds that SA uses for overhead, mailings, etc.

You give to PV-IT, it gets spent on PV-IT.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71409</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71409</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:13:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                Mike is a pretty constant PV-IT giver, Fuzzy.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71406</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71406</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:00:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I hear you, Mike--I'm not crazy about it, either.  It apparently brings in a lot of money, though.  If you want to support one of the great things Soldiers' Angels is doing, my suggestion is that you choose a project that you can donate to directly, and do it through either a Paypal button specifically for the project (on the project/team page on the their website), or with a check (and a note saying it goes to a particular project) to one of the addresses on their <strong><a href="http://soldiersangels.org/index.php?page=donate" rel="nofollow">donation page</a></strong>.

That way your money will go only to what you want it to.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71405</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71405</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:57:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MikeL on 2008-03-31</title>
            <description>
                I think she&apos;s done GREAT work.  I do, however, believe she could make better use of the money by not mailing out all the crap thaht she does.  Of late, I&apos;ve just taken the free stamp and thrown the other stuff away.  As a rule, I don&apos;t give money to charities  thaht ask for it.  I pretty much know who I want to support and why. I&apos;ll continue to support VALOUR-IT, because I see the immediate result AND trust the blog sponsors who&apos;re pushing it.  Truly, my best wishes to Patti - but I&apos;m tired of the mail.  Just sayin&apos;.  ML
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71402</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/03/patti_and_the_a.html#comment-71402</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

