previous post next post  

Jericho: The Revolution Begins

[Kat]

Is anyone else out there a "Jericho" fan?

When I first saw this "new" flag of the "Allied States of America", I thought, "WTF?" And, for the last few episodes, every time they show it, every time they take down the flag of the United States and put up the new flag, I can't help but have a feeling of queasy unease.

I guess that's the first question I would ask if we would have to reconstitute ourselves, would we choose a new flag? The Iraqis have tried to do it twice without much success.

I've been watching Jericho since the beginning. I don't know what other people think about it, but I thought it was an interesting exercise in what would happen if something happened to the central government in Washington DC. That thought exercise has interested me since a few months after the attacks on 9/11.

I have to say, while I realized what the targets were (finance, defense, government), it took me a while to really understand that, if they could have, if the final attack on the capitol had not been thwarted over a Pennsylvania field, they could have placed the United States in a seriously weakened political and economic position.

I played a game with myself about what the political fallout would have been. Would the states seek more power in the vacuum? Would we "balkanize" or return to some "Articles of Confederation"? Or, would we retain our constitutional concepts of government, adhering to those original principles until such a time as the central government could be re-organized? Would we accept, without question, the order of succession? Even it it meant, as in the Battle Star Galactic, the Secretary of Education? Would we organize immediately for new elections for congress?

Would our military command be capable of re-organizing for defense? Would we draw back forces to defend the "homeland" more closely? Or, would we, as we have done, take the fight to the enemy wherever he was? If we felt the need to deploy the National Guard across the country to maintain order or give assistance on a large scale, how long would we allow any form of martial law to be maintained? Would state governments, a new central government or any political entities be willing to give up any temporary power they might gain?

Who would come to our military and economic aid? Would our NATO allies ban together to defend us? Be willing to go the distance for a nation that had lost some of its formal programs? Who (international states) would seek to take advantage of our potentially confused and weakened state? Would it result in internal revolution or external world war?

As in Jericho, what would day to day life be like in neighborhoods, small towns and cities? Would people band together to form ad hoc security, governance and general assistance? Or, having accepted that most towns have put together an "emergency response" system, would we sit back and expect someone to organize for us, provide for us, food, energy, health and security?

One thing that I recognize is that I don't live in Jericho. Jericho is a small town with people who still live a somewhat "Jacksonian" life of independence and self-reliance. The town of Jericho, with neighboring towns being at least twelve or more miles away, is somewhat insulated from outsiders forming a bit of a buffer. Though, the end of last season certainly showed what could happen if communities would have to fight for or share limited resources.

I live in a suburb, near the city. Communities are much more closely situated, though the people are not so close personally. How much more intense would such a scenario be under those geographic and demographic pressures? What would internal migration look like? Would people migrate to cities where they knew other people were and believed had more supplies? Would others migrate out to escape the demographic pressures?

How would we view our personal assets? Would we see them as mementos? Or as potential currency in an economy that might resort to old style half-currency/half bartering?

What would our nation look like?

In Jericho's recent episode, those who sought political power joined with corporate power entities supported by private security companies to take and consolidate power. They used their power to strip local merchants of their freedom to trade, attempted to limit availability of products, including medicine, in order to control the population. They also attempted to use their "emergency powers" to take out any rivals or threats to their power through extra-judicial killings and imprisonment.

A small group of people got together in the local tavern and began to discuss the costs and benefits of Revolution. They talked about "taxation without representation" and the rights of free people. When someone asked what they were talking about doing, one woman spoke up and said, "Boston Tea Party."

Then the program went "Boston Massacre" with the killing of a deaf girl in her own house, along with her unarmed sister-in-law, by the very same "government" security forces who came into the house without legal writ or reason, violating privacy of the citizen and the legal protections against search and seizure.

Some might see some of the overtones of leftist and libertarian fantasies of a black ops, internal government grab for power shared by corporations and the recently minted "evils" of private security companies from Iraq, as a total detractor against the over all story. Then again, they portray the "citizen soldiers" of the professional army as honorable and still believing in serving and defending the people and the constitutional concepts.

It does portray the average citizen as being re-invigorated to our original ideas.

It is interesting that the town is organizing in a way that resembles our founding. Loyalists and Rebels.

The Revolution Begins

I can't wait for them to tear that "new" flag of the "Allied States of America" down.

32 Comments

Nicely put. Anybody who's anybody is a Jericho fan. Madam-at-Arms got me hooked. And every time I see that sideways-striped flag it's like an itch I can't scratch, except instead of scratching I want to tear that p.o.s. down! I want to reach through the TV screen and hear the satisfying velcro "rrrrrip!" as I pull that "flag" patch right off of MAJ Beck's shoulder!
   
There are a lot of Jericho fans, we just don't show up on the Neilsen ratings. I've put a summary and link to your article in our Jericho blog/news archive. Gwen http://www.jericho-kansas.com
 
I dont think the IRS/Accounant/Sister inlaw was dead at the end of the episode. Look like she was on O2 and will probly recover to help bring down J+R. still this season looks to be another great show.
 
Hi dagamore, Mimi is not dead, but she will need an operation. The next episode will show that. Gwen http://www.jericho-kansas.com
 
We've seen "The Postman". We all know what will happen when the central government of the US collapses: Dedicated US Postal Service employees will run things! Amid cries of ..... "Death to FedEx"! LOL
 
Heh. This post brought out some lurkers...! So, I'm apparently the *only* person here who *doesn't* watch Jericho. With the current workload, it's blog/read/research or watch TV. Not both. TV lost.
 
I have a few shows that I watch every week and only because of TIVO. Jericho and Lost. When they are on NCIS, CIS and Shark on Sunday. I watch it WHILE I do the research for the internet. But, it's about 1 hour a night for TV. Probably why I haven't drank any one's Kool-aid ;) But, Jericho, is it. Yeah, Consul at Arms, I have the same feeling. The first time, I just kept saying "why would they do that?" and "that flag is WRONG!". You know, the Jericho folks flew the American flag all the way through every tribulation and that's what they believed in even when they thought they were the only ones. I think that's pretty cool of the show to show that kind of American patriotism. But, it was like a needle grinding across a record when they put that other flag up and yes, when I see it on the Soldiers arms, I get the same feeling: RIP THAT THING OFF!
 
Oh, I'm sure that for Hollywood writers, the vertical stripes symbolize the prison bars of fascist Amerikkka created by the jingoistic patriotism and nationalism that flags represent.
 
I have never watched it. I saw the commercials and wasn't interested in a show along the lines of "I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords" or whatever country it was that attacked us. The Allied States of America thing makes me uneasy just from reading it, as does the taking down of Old Glory and replacing it with some writer's contrived thing. If they want to do a show about a revolution brewing in America, set it in Boston in late 1773-1774. I know it's just a TV show, but still....
 
Sigh - I miss the simpler times of watching Northern Exposure. No Geopolitical Nefariousness; just a complex tapestry of human interactions.
 
Nope, you're not alone in not watching it, Armorer. Jeopardy is about the only show The Wife and I do religiously. A day we don't get at least 90% of the questions between us is a bad day. Did BSG for a while, but then they moved it to Sun nights at 10pm. Non-starter. We do watch Heroes though, but not religiously, and we may have to start sneaking into the office to use the highspeed connection to watch that online. Don't watch Lost. Don't watch South Park. Jess watches lots of reruns of CSI. We're a video game, anime, and books family. And now, since we're losing cable(I'm not going to pay a 25 dollar increase in rent and a fifty dollar increase in cable), we'll watch even less tv. I'll have to set up my radio for disaster alerts and stuff instead of using the tv for that. Dang it, now that means having to buy ginourmous rabbit ears.
 
You're killing me!!!! My sister was away on business this week so I have to wait until we are together to watch it (saved in the DVR).
 
You're killing me!!!! My sister was away on business this week so I have to wait until we are together to watch it (saved in the DVR).
TIVO is sometimes your friend and sometimes your worst enemy. LOL
 
Ry - a $50 increase in cable? Monthly? That seems steep even for corporate wolves!
 
What is "Jericho?" I know where the old one is.... With grandchildren, a wife, hundreds of thousands of books unread and music from hundreds of years not listened to, uh... what's television? ;) Alan
 
I am afraid that the necessary philosophical underpinnings to necessary reestablish viable constitutional rule are absent in the general population. This is independent of any fictional calamity situation. We have abandoned the foundations of a constitutional republic. The governed are ignorant of "inherent rights" and the political classes have been working hard since at least the 1870's to exploit that ignorance, with the real assault beginning with Teddy Roosevelt's trust busting. You would have to go a long way to find a public high school graduate who had to read "The Federalist Papers", and good luck finding any that can identify John Locke in a line up. We are a debauched society and it won't be a foreign attack that turns out the lights. Sorry to say. You don't get flush toilets, drinkable water, and a dearth of dungeons by happy accident. It takes principles and hard work to live free, and our ruling class has worked hard to remove both from the mix. The majority of Western populations increasingly accepts the supposition that "rights" exist at the pleasure of the government. I have read a lot of Jared Diamond, and agree with very little of his conclusions, but I believe he is pretty close to the mark with his "kleptocracy" theory.
 
Oh, I'm sure that for Hollywood writers, the vertical stripes symbolize the prison bars of fascist Amerikkka created by the jingoistic patriotism and nationalism that flags represent.
No...it's the "new direction" of the country.
 
Well, I've read both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, as has my son. I couldn't pick Locke out of a line-up, but I could pick him out of a philosophy line up. And Boq - yeah, gimme stuff like Northern Exposure again. I liked that enough I bought the DVDs. 'Men in Trees' is a pale imitation.
 
John - I believe that "what works best for the most" is what will float to the top in any situation. Where there is no embarrassment of riches to redistribute, local populations will either stand up and defend themselves and their resources or they will cease to be populations - they will be conquered and assimilated or destroyed. Oh geeze... I'm trying to give history lessons at Castle Arrrgh. I have lost thyroid function and the last couple of days my meds have seemingly abandoned their post. Weight is depressing (really pressing) but it's the loss of mental acuity that really sucks. I think that small town America will fare better in a collapse, at least where body counts are concerned. I believe that of all the states, Utah would function as a state longer than any other state in the nation. Never watched Jericho, btw. I believe we've got more pressing problems than the scenario they run with there.
 
I am afraid that the necessary philosophical underpinnings to necessary reestablish viable constitutional rule are absent in the general population.
You know, I actually disagree with that. I've been reading considerably about the "Jacksonian" side of our nation and I believe that there does exist some definite strata of our society that comprehends it fairly well, even if many of them haven't read Locke or Smith, etc. As egregious as it sounds, there is something really fantastic about how far and wide the primaries have been covered for the election this year. I think it at least gives people an idea of the process. I don't know if a reconstituted United states would look like the old one. Then again, would we want it to? I mean, we would start out in a different position than our founders. We would already have universal suffrage, no slavery and a history of electioneering. On the other hand, it might not be that we don't have enough people who understand the process, but that we would have too many, comparatively speaking, who would be demanding their voices be heard and believing they understood the process, even slightly. As opposed to our founders who were much smaller in population, had limited representation and based suffrage on property. Until Jackson that is. So, I disagree with you. It's not that we don't have enough. It is that we would have too many.
 
TMJ - with ya on the whole fargin' thyroid thing. Especially the feeling stupid part. I hate nukes.
 
kat - A pleasure to be so reasonably disagreed with. And bear with me if I am imprecise; a scholarly knowledge of the founders or the philosophical leading lights of representative self rule is not essential; "what works" ALWAYS transcends "things academics think should work". Locke, Smith, Jefforson and such didn't create truth so much as chronicle and explain basic principles. Yes, there are a lot of Jacksonians running around out here, and yes, an upheaval would possibly bring them to the forefront and their worth would shine through. My contention is that we have shifted from a freedom society to a custodial society. We have given up justice and moral in favor of legal and expedient. And the situation that permits such aberration of representative government is fast disappearing; easily exploitable discretionary wealth available for redistribution is ceasing to be one of our problems, and at a pace very few seem to appreciate, or at any rate willing to acknowledge. I regard the enactment of Castle Doctrine laws, beginning in Florida, as the third shining philosophical moment of my life, with the embrace of the Laffer Curve in economics and Reagan's "Evil Empire" speech being the first two. The lights are dim, but nowhere near out.
 
My contention is that we have shifted from a freedom society to a custodial society. We have given up justice and moral in favor of legal and expedient.
I would agree only to an extent. Thinking back, having read some historical commentaries, biographies and autobiographies, the idea of the law, justice and morality being three different things was apparent and complained about plenty even at our founding. I think we often like to believe that our founders were more pure of thought or less burdened by "modern morality" than we were, but I don't think that is true. I've argued in the past regarding "inherent right to self defense" that our founders actually confronted the very same ideas that we do today, even if the details of who and what are different. It didn't make them any more or less moral than we are. thus, I disagree that we have lost anything that we may not have had much of in the first place. Meaning that, we have long understood that the laws that govern us are meant to be "blind" to insure justice, but blind justice isn't always moral. In fact, I think she is the coldest whore on the planet, but extremely effective with her sword. We built it that way over years even before the revolution. Morality is for the citizen and the preacher, politican and the doctor. Not for the lawyer.
And the situation that permits such aberration of representative government is fast disappearing;
I'm not following you there. ARe you talking about the size of our population? Or something else?
easily exploitable discretionary wealth available for redistribution is ceasing to be one of our problems, and at a pace very few seem to appreciate, or at any rate willing to acknowledge.
that I agree with. I think many people do not understand that you can't simply maintain the distribution system as it is or expand it without it becoming a whole different politico-economic system than that which has sufficed us all these years. Mind you, I am a constant agent for change, but not quite that change. That becomes a different danger. On the other hand, the problem might be that that population suddenly has the bottom drop out of it at some point and we are like a giant Japan, population wise, if you get my meaning.
 
Kat, many of your questions were answered to some degree in Pat Frank's Alas Babylon from the 1950's. You are probably too young to have read that yarn. Jericho is a good watch, but I keep hearing echoes. For me it is a case of catching it when they run a half dozen or so episodes on cable on a weekend.
 
Pat Frank's Alas Babylon from the 1950's.
I'll see if the local library or e-books has it on stock to read. Thank you for mentioning it. I have not read it before.
 
Pertinent to this discussion, I think, is the state of what is called the "Gen-Y" demographic, at least here in the US. At a recent conference that my company hosted, we heard a keynote presentation by a noted speaker on this topic, a member himself of the Gen-Y group who's been highlighted on "60 Minutes" and "20/20". His speech was aimed at educating CEOs and other top management staff about how to hire and retain members of this demographic, but IMHO, it really turned out to be an indictment of the permissive parenting skills of many liberals in the audience as well as their support for many of the trendy educational philosophies of the past 20-30 years. I know we've seen great examples of the heroism, industriousness, and leadership ability of what I would call "the select few" - the exceptions - among this generation in the military serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. But I really worry about what the future holds in store for us as a country and culture when the majority of this age group is running things. Dumbing down America, indeed! I know every generation traditionally professes little faith in the succeeding generation, but my theory is this: It's like "half-life". You never really dumb down to zero, but at a certain point the issue becomes moot. You're close enough. For any who are interested, I'll make the video of this speech available to you in a few weeks when we post it on our website. It will be educational ... and worrisome.
 
Back from the doc... kat - The two phrases you quoted are actually addressing the same idea: we've been so tremendously productive, so wealthy as a society, and and achieved such a high standard of living that we take for granted the amount of debt carried by government, the amount of debt carried by individuals (maybe not so much the latter, lately, eh?), and see the coming Democrat entitlement tsunami without flinching. We can't afford it. Any of it. Not forever. Speaking of Gen-Y: I hope they are better than we were. Their time is NOW, and I hope they have the guts and wisdom to discount the vast majority of "conventional wisdom" and legacy politicians and establish a little sanity. All speaking on the widest possible scope, of course. There are great and good in every generation; the last two have just been weighted pretty light is all.
 
I'll join the group that has not watched Jericho. I am not opposed to the show, and would probably watch, it's just not on my radar. I haven't had time to work and read and visit my favorite blogs enough lately, so adding new TV shows isn't gonna happen. Boq & John - Right there with you guys on Northern Exposure. That show was a breath of fresh air, and I miss it !
 
I admit, I liked Northern Exposure and only made it through four episodes of "Men in Trees" before dumping it.
 
I watched a few episodes of "Jericho," but my level of interest never rose high enough to make it a regular part of my TV-watching. There are only two shows on my "don't miss if I can help it" list: "NCIS" and "NUMB3RS". I thought about trying to pick up "Jericho" when it restarted a couple of months ago, but the teasers made every episode look like some variant on "sterling noble townsfolk fighting back against evil outsiders who want to make them part of a New American Empire." End of that idea. Blech. The most interesting riff I've seen/read on the "rebuilding society after a cataclysm" plotline is the Nantucketers Trilogy by S.M. Stirling: Island in the Sea of Time, On the Oceans of Eternity, and Against the Tide of Years. The basic premise is that one fine spring day in 1998, the island of Nantucket and an area of ocean around it gets transported back in time about three thousand years. Five thousand or so late-twentieth-century humans, a complete cross-section of American culture as of that time, abruptly plopped into the middle of the late Bronze Age.
 
"Ry - a $50 increase in cable? Monthly? That seems steep even for corporate wolves!" Ja, wohl. The complex went to all digital cable. To keep the same channels we get now for $5/month we'd have to pay $5/month for the cable box and then $50/month for a package deal that has 90% of channels we never watch. There's cheaper packages, but those packages don't carry the channels (alla 9) that we watch regularly, at all. So, until 2009 we go with rabbit ears for news and broadcast tv shows we like (Heroes, Big Bang Theory), NETFLix for other stuff, and we have about 4 months worth of reading if all I did was read.
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.