<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for H&amp;I Fires* 2 FEB 2008</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:03:22 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>H&amp;I Fires* 2 FEB 2008</title>
            <description>Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That&apos;s only polite. You&apos;re advertising here, we should get an ad at your place... Time to add a new caveat, because from email it&apos;s not clear to some folks (mind you, if you don&apos;t read this it won&apos;t matter...) Being an open post, people (collectively, the Denizens) other than I post in the H&amp;I. They sign their work (most of the time) - keep that in mind when you want...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:43:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Heh. Inserting comments from the email causes me to not see all the comments before I insert my own.

So, you two are wondering if Matt is InfoOp&apos;ing us, eh?

Well, it seems a rather tedious and retail approach to take - unless Mike is like a rash over all the blogs that brought up the topic.

He&apos;s very good at it, if he *is* a gov&apos;t shill.  Most of them sound like Public Affairs geeks.

I think he&apos;s doing here what I do on foreign blogs... provide context where there is none, or it&apos;s hard to get.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69297</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69297</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:17:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Matt - thank you for the input... I suspect that your advice works well applied both directions, too!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69296</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69296</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:11:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Heh.  It occurred to me to wonder... 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69292</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69292</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:20:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-02-03</title>
            <description>
                I just gotta ask...is Matt like the official British government agent for combating (mis)information on the internet?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69291</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69291</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:08:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-02-02</title>
            <description>
                I didn&apos;t say anything about them taking over, I was thinking in terms of a disintegration of common values and a love of country.  

I&apos;ll go back and take a look to make sure I understood, but I read more than headlines.  I clicked on the embedded links in the link I gave, and followed everything right back to original articles.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69290</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69290</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:29:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Matt W on 2008-02-02</title>
            <description>
                You must stop reading the headlines in UK right-wing blogs and newspapers.  If only for the sake of your blood pressure.

The UK government has authorised a new Inspectorate (which will be routinely vetted by OFSTED - the Office of Standards in Education).  This new Inspectorate will cover about 110 private schools (roughly 50 private CHRISTIAN and 60 private Muslim schools.  Please note that it&apos;s going to cover CHRISTIAN schools as well as Muslim

The fact that it&apos;s still overseen by OFSTED is reassuring - 50% of private schools have an arrangement where they don&apos;t get vetted by the state.  

As for the &quot;British educators now actively discourage teaching of patriotism&quot;.  This is another ... um...  possible misinterpretation.

The UK government is about to introduce a new curriculum for British History which will promote patriotism via an examination of certain aspects of British history (including immigration, the Commomwealth, Empire, the extension of the vote and women&apos;s rights).  One report - the one that generated this hysteria - has recommended against promoting UNQUESTIONING patriotism (repeat unquestioning)

Muslims represent only 2.8% of the UK population (1.5 million).  We&apos;re not very worried about them taking over. 


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69289</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/02/hi_fires_2_feb_1.html#comment-69289</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:13:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

