<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Veterans you *do* want for neighbors...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:33:23 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Veterans you *do* want for neighbors...</title>
            <description>The New York Times has bravely spoken out to speak that which no one may do - criticize the military [/sarcasm] and pointed out 121 instances of the hundreds of thousands of returning OIF/OEF vets who were somehow involved in killing people (including traffic accidents and self-defense and other indicators of homicidal behavior). I&apos;ve got some examples of veterans who you do want for neighbors... and how they are *still* conducting AAR&apos;s on their work. A two parter. The second one is the post above this. From an email: First up - some retired SOF guys who conduct After Action...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:09:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2008-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, the perp should be brought back to say thank you.  Ungrateful idiot.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69067</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69067</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:05:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Kevin on 2008-01-26</title>
            <description>
                Kat

Naaah, no danger of &apos;pass through&apos; any perp this stupid had to have a maximum of skull thickness, commonly known as a &apos;bone-head&apos;.  Besides, and I am only guessing here, I would expect this Spec Ops warrior probably had hollow-points loaded, not that useless military issue ball crap.

And again, note the charges filed, if he&apos;d have used a real caliber, the board woulda  never brought the issue before them.

Perp request; &quot;You&apos;re gonna have to kill me.&quot;

Rather obliging sort, that Green Beret.

Wunner if the perp had the decency to say; &quot;Thank you?&quot;


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69041</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69041</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:34:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2008-01-26</title>
            <description>
                BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA....... that is hilarious.  Only SF would bring charges like that.  Love it!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69034</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69034</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:27:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-01-26</title>
            <description>
                Kevin, the problem with clean up due to larger caliber along with the possibility of injuring neighbors with a pass through was brought up.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69031</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69031</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:39:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-01-26</title>
            <description>
                Love it!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69027</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69027</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:26:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Kevin on 2008-01-26</title>
            <description>
                He got a raw deal.  I would think a practical defense would be that there was less clean up on the battlefield as a result of his choosing a lesser caliber pistol.

Can you imagine the mess had he used a .45?  Brain pan and gray matter all over instead of a neat lil&apos; hole.

UCMJ boards just don&apos;t think practically.  THEY didn&apos;t have to clean up the perps mess. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69024</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/veterans_you_do.html#comment-69024</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:09:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


