<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-23T17:03:59Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Live from Iraq: Interview with 3iD CoS</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=8660" title="Live from Iraq: Interview with 3iD CoS" />
    <published>2008-01-28T09:31:18Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-26T15:04:43Z</updated>
    <title>Live from Iraq: Interview with 3iD CoS</title>
    <summary>[Posted by FbL. Update: Part II is up] Last Friday I had the pleasure of spending about half an hour interviewing Colonel Mark McKnight, 3rd Infantry Division Chief of Staff, currently deployed to Iraq. Topics included security for Ashura, CLCs, the media, and challenges ahead. Unfortunately I didn&apos;t have the capacity to record our phone conversation, but I was able to quickly type many of his statements as I listened. Most of his answers weren&apos;t exactly terse, but he was rather succinct, so we were able to cover a lot of ground. Soldiers of 3ID (Task Force Marne) have been...</summary>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Global War on Terror (GWOT)" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>[Posted by FbL.  Update:  <strong><a href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/live_from_iraq.html">Part II</a></strong> is up]  </p>

<p>Last Friday I had the pleasure of spending about half an hour interviewing <strong><a href="http://www.taskforcemarne.com/command-corner/19-command-profiles/48-Colonel-Mark-McKnight">Colonel Mark McKnight</a></strong>, 3rd Infantry Division Chief of Staff, currently deployed to Iraq.  Topics included security for Ashura, CLCs, the media, and challenges ahead.  Unfortunately I didn't have the capacity to record our phone conversation, but I was able to quickly type many of his statements as I listened.  Most of his answers weren't exactly terse, but he was rather succinct, so we were able to cover a lot of ground.</p>

<p>Soldiers of 3ID  (<strong><a href="http://www.taskforcemarne.com">Task Force Marne</a></strong>) have been in Iraq since early 2007.  Their area of operations comprises a band along the southern part of Baghdad  Province, running from the Najaf/Karbala region eastward to the Iranian border.    COL McKnight described the northern edge of their AO as "the non-urban areas of Baghdad," and said that a significant part of their mission has been to "block accelerants [of violence] into Baghdad" so that the city can be cleaned up, though they do not operate in urban Baghdad itself.</p>

<p>Overarching COL McKnight's statements was something we are hearing from other military leaders in Iraq--that lots of very good things are happening, but we must not lose sight of how much is still to be done.  When I asked him to identify the most important thing America needed to know about what is happening in Iraq today, this was the issue he raised. There is a great deal of progress in evidence "every day," he emphasized, but added very seriously, “There are long days ahead.  There is an enemy over here that is determined to take the future away from the Iraqi people," that has not given up yet.  Attacks are down, but there is “frankly, an <i>evil</i> still out there...that doesn’t hesitate to kill families, women and children.  It's not over, over here.”</p>

<p>I asked about the recent conclusion of a <strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080120/wl_mideast_afp/iraqunrestreligionshiiteashura_080120213348;_ylt=ApKu7M5.A.IxykYnDKwQ1tJX6GMA">safe and successful Ashura</a></strong> and what factors had made it so. COL McKnight told me there were no "significant incidents" throughout the entire AO of 3ID, nor any indications that major attacks were broken up.  He credited the peaceful passage of Ashura to the efforts of the Iraqi Security Forces (police and army), pointing out that the two most important Shiite holy cities--Karbala and Najaf--were patrolled and protected entirely by Iraqis.  He was happy to report that in general, the Iraqis took the lead in security preparations and activities throughout 3rd ID's AO.</p>

<p>But according to COL McKnight, the biggest factor in a successful Ashura was that the Iraqi people have "tired of violence, didn’t want to put up with it."  He described an "increasing marginalization of extremist organizations” because the population will no longer tolerate the violence and bloodshed they have suffered.  "The people stood up to put a stop to it."</p>

<p>Along with the greater numbers of soldiers available due to the surge, and the increasing capability of Iraqi Security Forces, COL McKnight gave a great deal of credit for the Ashura success to the existence of Concerned Local Citizens groups (CLCs).  These neighborhood/tribe-level organizations provide security at checkpoints and significant locations or events.  But more importantly, they “hinder extremists’ ability to move among the population.”  He reiterated this several times, describing CLC activities as a kind of force-multiplier where there is "difficult terrain"--small villages, places without a strong coalition presence, etc.</p>

<p>The CLC groups are a "bottom-up evolution," CLC being a generic designation for what has been called <strong><em><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080127/wl_afp/iraqunrestawakening_080127180503;_ylt=Am8x92Tu2zfaZFs1FdQPNAJX6GMA">Awakening</a></em> </strong>and <strong><em><a href="http://kaboomwarjournal.blogspot.com/2008/01/pay-day.html">Sawha</a></em></strong>, among other titles.  They are a result of Iraqis coming forward and asking for assistance in ridding their neighborhoods of violent extremists.   Group members are paid by the coalition for services, but there are plans to wean them off that and into a formal relationship with the Iraqi government (McKnight called it "reconciling" them with the central government).</p>

<p>According to COL McKnight, the ultimate vision is to form CLCs into a kind of Civil Service Corps by training them for jobs in construction and other such trades.  There is also an effort to shift selected CLC members into a provisional policeman status, or even into the Iraqi Army.  COL McKnight reported that all of these plans are in their "infancy," but that there <i>is</i> movement in these directions.</p>

<p>I asked the colonel about reports that <strong><a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1705939,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-world">funding for CLC activities</a></strong> is becoming a problem, mentioning both the congressional budget battles in the U.S. and reports of changes in funding priorities at upper military leadership levels.  He agreed that there had been "some restrictions given," but that it "hadn't had a large impact," and pointed again to the efforts to transfer CLCs to Iraqi administration.  In general, he didn't seem to think it was a worrisome issue.</p>

<p>On the tactical side, I asked about reports of <strong><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/01/12/iran.iraq/">increases in EFPs</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080124/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_battle_for_mosul_1;_ylt=AoWg02vzsrLhabyjss7ZEPZX6GMA">suicide bombers</a></strong>.  He responded that they have seen "no indication of Iranian involvement" in either training or supplying within their AO, and that there has been "an across-the-board reduction in attacks."  In fact, Thursday's Operations Report was "zero attacks in the AO" for the day.  Neither are they reporting attacks on schools, or suicide bombings by females, as seen in <strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080122/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_080119205241;_ylt=Au72XJ9keAvEjOAGm58VCJZX6GMA">other</a> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080116/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq"></a><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080116/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq">locales</a></strong>.</p>

<p><em>This is the first of a two-part report of the interview.  For more from Task Force Marne/3ID's leadership, check out an extensive <strong><a href="http://www.taskforcemarne.com/video-audio/871-Major-General-Rick-Lynch-with-The-Institute-for-Study-of-War">video interview with Major General Lynch</a></strong>, and the transcript of the latest blogger's roundtable with <strong><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/BloggerAssets/2008-01/01250809354320080124_BGCardon_transcript.pdf">Brigadier General Cardon</a></strong> (pdf file). BG Cardon's topics include Ashura (great anecdotes on pg 4), and CLCs (page 6, bottom).</em></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-comment:69132</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html#comment-69132" />
    <title>Comment from Cannoneer No. 4 on 2008-01-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cannoneer No. 4</name>
        <uri>http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/the-law-west-of-the-hindu-kush/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/the-law-west-of-the-hindu-kush/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=48782" rel="nofollow">Dialing 100 in Jalalabad provides quick access to emergency responders 24 hours a day. </a>

Sorry.  Wrong number]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-29T15:44:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-29T15:44:26Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-comment:69099</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html#comment-69099" />
    <title>Comment from Cannoneer No. 4 on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cannoneer No. 4</name>
        <uri>http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/the-law-west-of-the-hindu-kush/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/the-law-west-of-the-hindu-kush/">
        <![CDATA[Morphing the CLC's into an Iraqi Service Corps along the lines of the <a href="http://8tharmy.korea.army.mil/pao/ROK%20Steady/APR04ROKSTEADY.pdf" rel="nofollow">Korean Service Corps</a> sounds good, but they don't have the work ethic of Koreans.  CLC's ought to make good <a href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/cat_this_is_no_sht.html" rel="nofollow">Ruff Puffs</a>, though.

<a href="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/the-law-west-of-the-hindu-kush/" rel="nofollow">Meanwhile, over in Afghanistan, Kabul and CSTC-A would just as soon the citizens call 911.</a>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T14:05:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T14:05:27Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-comment:69094</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html#comment-69094" />
    <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>kat-missouri</name>
        <uri>http://themiddleground.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://themiddleground.blogspot.com">
        I imagine that, for all the hooping and hollering about possible escalation of war with Iran, the Iranians took us very seriously when some folks started beating the war drums.  Odierno and others were very specific about Iranian involvement and the multiple captured IRGC agents in Iraq was actually grounds for war, if we&apos;d wanted to.

Not to mention the very bad mistake of taking the Brit Sailors hostage.  Their actions made them persona non gratas.  Then there was that little visit by Putin that lots of folks thought was Putin showing support for Iran, but may have included the &quot;hey, knock it off or I can&apos;t protect you in the UN&quot; message.

Add to that that, with the Anbar Awakening and decrease in AQI capabilities, the Mahdi Army and Muqtada came back into our cross hairs.  They didn&apos;t fair very well in Najaf in 2004 and their actions in Karbala late last year put them right on the edge of contempt even by the Shia.  Sistani was getting tired of protecting him and many were pointing to his &quot;Iranian&quot; connections.

Keeping in mind the long Iraq-Iran war in the 80&apos;s, wherein many Shia actually fought the Iranians and considered other Shia who sided with them to be traitors, that had some bad connotations for ol&apos; Mookie and the Mahdi.  He didn&apos;t have any choice but to call certain parts of his organization &quot;rogue&quot; and allow us to take them out.  He&apos;s much weaker now.  He played his last card withdrawing from the government and maliki simply replaced him.  He found out that Maliki was strong enough without his support and he only existed at our liesure.

All that makes running EFPs into Iraq and blowing up Americans, et al a very bad idea.  Not that the Iranians aren&apos;t still trying to influence politics by providing material and monetary support to various political parties.  Even those who are nominally &quot;allies&quot; of the Maliki government and the US.  

Just that Ahmedinejad is under siege in Iran, they have some serious political and economic problems, plus the various demonstrations by dissidents and other dissatisfied Iranians.  all things told, they really couldn&apos;t afford to keep messing around in Iraq like they were.

But, don&apos;t worry, somebody in Iran is still running EFPs into AFghanistan on a much smaller scale.  They haven&apos;t given up being a pain in our buttocks yet.
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T09:46:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T09:46:56Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-comment:69086</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html#comment-69086" />
    <title>Comment from FbL on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>FbL</name>
        <uri>http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com">
        Thanks, Ledger.  I probably should&apos;ve followed up on that.  

What I&apos;ve understood from news reports it that there was a gradual reduction last fall and a sudden uptick the first two weeks of January (which has since fallen back off).  News reports say the border with Iran is becoming less porous, so perhaps that is part of the drop.

This up-and-down aspect is why I asked about EFPs.  I was thrown by the &quot;nothing&quot; response, which is probably why I didn&apos;t think to follow up with &quot;Why?&quot;  

And I think it may be notable that I simply asked about incidences of EFPs, but he immediately came back with the statement of seeing no Iranian involvement of any kind in their AO.  According to an interview of MG Lynch I heard, 3ID&apos;s AO includes part of the Iraq-Iran border, so perhaps he mentioned that because they&apos;ve been working hard at shutting down the border to Iranian activity and they&apos;re feeling good about their success rate.
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T07:21:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T07:21:08Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660-comment:69084</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.8660" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/talking_to_3rd.html#comment-69084" />
    <title>Comment from Ledger on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ledger</name>
        <uri>http://www.msn.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.msn.com">
        Good work!

COL McKnight comment about EFPs: &quot;no indication of Iranian involvement&quot; within their AO.

Its good news but why the sudden reduction in Iranian involvement. Have the Iranians suddenly turned all peaceful?

    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T07:05:59Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T07:05:59Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

