previous post next post  

H&I Fires* 9 JAN 2008

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

Time to add a new caveat, because from email it's not clear to some folks (mind you, if you don't read this it won't matter...) Being an open post, people (collectively, the Denizens) other than I post in the H&I. They sign their work (most of the time) - keep that in mind when you want to flame someone in email please - if it doesn't say "The Armorer" or "John" then I didn't write it! And honestly - if you don't like something said or posted... leave a comment, and hash it out (within the context of The Rulez which are clearly posted on the comment form, I would add).

*********************************

Hillary and McCain - New Hampshire goes for same ol' same ol'. The big losers in the primary yesterday? The pollsters. I admit, I just refuse to talk to them. They don't call much any more, thank heavens.

**********************************

In the comments on the 7 January H&I Fires, FuzzyBee and Mike D. had this exchange:

...Unfortunately*, for both the dog and the soldier, it is US military policy in Iraq to kill the dog! "Prohibited activities for service members under General Order 1-A include adopting as pets or mascots, caring for or feeding any type of domestic or wild animal" To help these soldiers and there "adoptees" Bonnie Buckley is working hard at http://www.militarymascots.org/ Mike

[*In the original version of this post, I inadvertently left off the "Un" from "unfortunately" which rather changed the meaning of what I was attributing to Mike. Mike is *not* a meany when it comes to dogs, I'm an incompetent when it comes to block-selecting test. I really really regret the error. -the Armorer]

Fuzzy responded:

Yes, I'm aware the order. It is also my understanding that regulations are being unofficially loosened in many, many cases (though I'v also heard stories of camps where dogs on base are shot at sight). But I know of at least half a dozen cases of Iraqi dogs being brought to the U.S. either by returning personnel or on behalf of the family of someone who was KIA. In fact, Blackfive has been following a case of the latter type.

This is my contribution to the discussion: Where's *my* chow?

Where's *MY* chow?

Photo by Spc. Shawn M. Cassatt January 04, 2008 A unit pet eyes Soldiers' food at Combat Outpost Zagania in Muqdadiyah, Iraq. The Soldiers are from 2nd Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division.

Speaking of dawgs - SWWBO has a video of one just having the time of his life!
-the Armorer

********************************

General Honore of "stuck on stupid" fame goes out in style. It sounds like retirement is not going to be the end of his service to the country. Congratulations and thank you, General. - FbL

********************************
Video of Sunday morning's fracas from the USS Hopper......Maggie

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone."

11 Comments

Love the pic, John! It has been a joy to watch the rigidity of the "No dogs!" order soften. These dogs are a huge boost to morale, and the physical and psychological benefits of interaction with friendly dogs are surely even more powerful amid the strains of a war zone. Just awesome. :)
 
The original orders were driven by a concern about bio-hazard vectors, deliberate or otherwise, as well as concerns about anti-tank dogs, so to speak. It's just hard to keep 'Murican soldiers from puppies.
 
Yes, I understand the concerns/needs. But here on the sidelines I'm tending to think that lower-level leadership can be trusted to address those issues satisfactorily according to each situation.
 
Honore needs to head FEMA. Or Red Cross.
   
Neat dog video. All the time I was watching him running blind through the snow I wondered if he remembered the locations of all the trees.
 
Congress would eat him up- all those liberal anti-military freaks would over-shadow anything he tried to do. He needs a more public leadership position before anyone in Congress will take him seriously instead of just another Soldier-politician-wanna-be
 
John, For the edifice of all those without time to follow all links, I sure wish you'd used the "un" part of the opening word of the post. Really looks horrible; "fortunately" in this context looks likes its been ignored by your very well informed commenters. Mike
 
John, Your quote of what I wrote begins "...fortunately for both the soldier and dog, it is US military policy to kill the dog". It was just that I'd have prefered for you to have used the "unfortunately" as I wrote in the comments. Probably should have just left well enough alone.
 
Ooops. Sorry Mike. It's fixed now.
 
During Gulf One, Desert Shield/Storm, the brigage commander ended up with one of the desert dogs that the engineers had collected. The Colonel took the dog back to the states. I am reasonably sure that if the Colonel is still serving, he did not have a darn thing to do with this reg except to decline. 5th Engineers, 2nd Bde, 24th Infantry
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.