H&I* FIRES 15 JAN 2008

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

Time to add a new caveat, because from email it's not clear to some folks (mind you, if you don't read this it won't matter...) Being an open post, people (collectively, the Denizens) other than I post in the H&I. They sign their work (most of the time) - keep that in mind when you want to flame someone in email please - if it doesn't say "The Armorer" or "John" then I didn't write it! And honestly - if you don't like something said or posted... leave a comment, and hash it out (within the context of The Rulez which are clearly posted on the comment form, I would add).

********************************

General McKiernan to assume command of the NATO forces in Afghanistan. Among his many qualifications for the job - may fave is the first one:

General McKiernan was never a favorite of former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, and after the invasion he was made the deputy head of the Army’s Forces Command, which oversees the training of American troops in the United States. In 2005, he was awarded a fourth star and made the head of American Army troops in Europe.

His European experience will be a plus in dealing with NATO’s disparate forces in Afghanistan. During the 1990s, he was a senior officer with allied forces in Bosnia and later was deputy chief of staff of American Army operations in Europe.

Among his other posts, he has been commander of the First Cavalry Division and the Army’s chief of operations.

Petty of me, I know.

Read the rest here, in the NYT.

Of course, I'm guessing it won't be easy, and this Washington Post story via MSNBC lays out:

The U.S. plan to send an additional 3,200 Marines to troubled southern Afghanistan this spring reflects the Pentagon's belief that if it can't bully its recalcitrant NATO allies into sending more troops to the Afghan front, perhaps it can shame them into doing so, U.S. officials said. But the immediate reaction to the proposed deployment from NATO partners fighting alongside U.S. forces was that it was about time the United States stepped up its own effort.

After more than six years of coalition warfare in Afghanistan, NATO is a bundle of frayed nerves and tension over nearly every aspect of the conflict, including troop levels and missions, reconstruction, anti-narcotics efforts, and even counterinsurgency strategy. Stress has grown along with casualties, domestic pressures and a sense that the war is not improving, according to a wide range of senior U.S. and NATO-member officials who agreed to discuss sensitive alliance issues on the condition of anonymity.

Moving over to Iraq - here's some understatment, methinks:

Mr. Qadir’s comments are likely to become a factor in political debate over the war. All of the Democratic presidential candidates have promised a swift American withdrawal, while the leading Republican candidates have generally supported President Bush’s plan. Now that rough dates have been attached to his formula, they will certainly come under scrutiny from both sides.

In what context? This one:

FORT MONROE, Va. — The Iraqi defense minister said Monday that his nation would not be able to take full responsibility for its internal security until 2012, nor be able on its own to defend Iraq’s borders from external threat until at least 2018.

Those comments from the minister, Abdul Qadir, were among the most specific public projections of a timeline for the American commitment in Iraq by officials in either Washington or Baghdad. And they suggested a longer commitment than either government had previously indicated.

Pentagon officials expressed no surprise at Mr. Qadir’s projections, which were even less optimistic than those he made last year.

President Bush has never given a date for a military withdrawal from Iraq but has repeatedly said that American forces would stand down as Iraqi forces stand up. Given Mr. Qadir’s assessment of Iraq’s military capabilities on Monday, such a withdrawal appeared to be quite distant, and further away than any American officials have previously stated in public.

You can read the rest of that here in the NYT. As ever, the devil is in the details. -the Armorer

********************************************

The model for the Mona Lisa has been definitively identified. - FbL

********************************************

In their ever-accelerating attempt to make Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi furious, the Iraqis have finally passed their "de-Baathification Remediation Reconciliation" bill. From the Christian Science Monitor:

Signs of political reconciliation are emerging in Iraq, raising US hopes that a logjam has broken.

By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is counting on Saturday's passage of a key piece of legislation in Iraq, easing measures against former Baathists, to act as a break in a logjam that has held up national reconciliation.

With violence down, insurgent groups quieted, and many of the forces affiliated with Al Qaeda in Iraq routed, the United States is hoping passage of the new law means the "surge" of 30,000 additional troops is succeeding. In announcing the surge a year ago, President Bush said its aim was to provide the conditions for Iraq's warring power blocs to find common ground on important political issues.

Not that all is sweetness and light in Iraq - the a**holes still vex us:

WASHINGTON — When the two Army Rangers slipped inside the house of suspected assassins in the dark on Christmas morning in Mosul, they expected a fight. They got one.

Two gunmen, using an 11-year-old boy as a shield, confronted the soldiers. One of the Rangers, a staff sergeant, shot the suspects dead with his rifle. The boy was unharmed, according to an Army document about the assault. [Emphasis mine. -the Armorer]

That clash — recounted to USA TODAY by four of the Rangers involved and confirmed by the military command in Baghdad — kicked off what U.S. military officials say was a 17-hour firefight that resulted in the deaths of 10 al-Qaeda in Iraq insurgents, including the head of an assassination cell, a financier and a military leader. At least one fighter was from Saudi Arabia, according to the military account of the raid. Intelligence gleaned from the fight led to 10 follow-up operations, the Rangers' commander said.

The Dec. 25 raid occurred in what military officials say has become the most dangerous part of Iraq — Mosul and surrounding areas, about 200 miles north of Baghdad. The assault was a preview of a U.S.-led campaign to root out insurgents in Mosul and Diyala province who have targeted those who cooperate with Americans. It was part of a broader operation that led to the combat deaths of nine U.S. soldiers last week in Diyala.

You can catch the rest of that in USA Today. -the Armorer

*********************************

Now, for a little change of pace... want to have your guns, and eat them, too?

Snerk!

My sister, who is not a fan of guns, but who has come to terms with the fact that reasonable people can have reasonable reasons for owning a lot of them (because of the blog) was determined that her children would not play with guns.

So, no toy guns, not even squirt guns.

She recognized the fallacy when her eldest took a slice of bread, bit off a corner, and proceeded to say "Bang! Bang!"

So, of course, I sent her the link.

H/t, the Flea! -the Armorer

*********************************

J.R. and Josie Salzman have been known on these pages as "a wounded warrior and courageous spouse." But today I wanted to share something far more universal--a vignette of typical domestic life, from her point of view: Cooks and those who love them, but not their cooking. - FbL

********************************

Update: You simply *must* read that post that Fuzzybee linked. Jo, you are a gift from G-d. Lookit the line she handed us... " watching the officer arrest the cross dresser with a warrant"

The truth is out there, Chief WARRANT Officer 4 BillT(ret'd)... Let us not quibble about context. Today I'm pretending I'm an MSM reporter...! -the Armorer

*********************************
How come my spam filters are full of "Colon Cleanse" ads? What's wrong with my punctuation? I've got an apostrophe problem, sure, but my colons are fine! :::: See? Or izzis a public health campaign in Panama and they're just soliciting help from the world? -the Armorer

*********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone."

20 Comments

She recognized the fallacy when her eldest took a slice of bread, bit off a corner, and proceeded to say "Bang! Bang!" LMAO! Just don't tell her what they're doing outside with sticks when she's not looking. :D
 
Well, her youngest son is in his early 20's, and neither of her boys joined the Army, got interested in hunting, or became a cop, so I think she's safe these days. And from what I know of her daughter, the youngest of them all - she's still safe. They're taking more after their father and mother than they are their Grandfather or Uncle...
 
Perhaps a plate of cookies for your sister's next visit? Recent reports from Boots (who were) on the ground in Afghanistan indicate that good things are happening there, with some changed attitudes, beginning at the very top of the Afghan government.
 
Hmmmm. Those look vaguely familiar, Master Jewell. And, we solicit guest lectures from formerly muddy boots, btw.
 
Ok, John, I admit it, it was stoopid. I should have known that boys can, will, and do make guns out of anything. The ban was lifted immediately following the bread incident, a fact you neglected to include in your report. I do not think it was necessary to reveal this bit of silliness to your vast audience, however. Especially when you consider that I have known you your entire life and have an immense wealth of dirt I could reveal about your misbegotten youth. Even though you control the content here, I'm sure some of your blogging friends would be happy to help me. Hmmmm, which story shall I drop first?
 
So are you saying Nancy & Dingy Harry are PO'd because the Iraqis actually got some legislation passed (unlike them) or because of the specific bill?
 
Looks like it's time to pop some popcorn, eh John? hee hee Gotta love sibling rivalry!
 
Oooo. Threats! I did say you recognized the fallacy... which is more than I can say of many politicians regarding their pet projects and "good" ideas!
 
Mostly P.O.'d because they keep forcing Reilosi to have to go out and move the goalposts again. I actually hadn't looked at it from the other perspective!
 
HFS - she used to beat me up mercilessly when I was but a tyke. Until the day (about 3 years after it actually happened) that I realized I could beat *her* up. Then she turned to psychology. It's been downhill ever since.
 
Now you are placing me one step above a POLITICIAN? GAK!!!! I am so wounded I shall have to slink off and apply some psychotherapy to myself while I simultaneously plot my revenge.
 
Hey, I never put a metric to how far above a bottom-feeder you are... Anyone who sees armored columns moving down the road and it makes them feel *safe* can't be all bad!
 
I also sleep really, really well during thunderstorms because the firing range at Ft. Sill was my lullaby. Military brats have all sorts of bizarre quirks.
 
So, a certain Warrant Officer dons a dress whenever he becomes cranky? Cheers
 
Ha! Kathy, reminds me of the CIA's attempt to blackmail Sukarno. When they showed him the films, he immediately demanded a hundred prints, to show in every theatre in the country, to prove how cool and manly he was! Well, that's the version I did read.
 
I'm making the popcorn and taking requests for snacks. Bedtime stories from the book of sibling blackmail. Heh. I am up for one along the lines of the appetizers a la Chein Biscotti.
 
" watching the officer arrest the cross dresser with a warrant" The lower case doubleyou indicates that the RLO was accompanied by a *junior* Warrant Officer, WO1. Or, as we in the aviation trade say, "Wobbly One"...
 
My 4-year old son has been using a green & yellow potato chip bag clip as a gun, and insisted on wearing a belt everyday just so he could wear it as a side arm. The day-care administrators just sent it home in a large manila envelope, and told us it was "inappropriate". LOL
 
And please, John, no snerks about my use of the word "gun" above. I know it's not a HOWITZER! LOL
 
The model for the Mona Lisa has been definitively identified. *Not* news to anybody who's taken an Art History course any time within, say, the last four centuries...