<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Doctrine For Dummies.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/01/doctrine_for_du_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:28:52 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Doctrine For Dummies.</title>
            <description> FM 3-0 for SAMS Students. Given the post below this one - I&apos;m thinking Ralph Peters would approve this version. Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………2 Text……………………………………………………………………..3 Glossary………………………………………………………………...5 Introduction You are students. This means you are supposed to learn things. Read this and learn it. There will be a test. There are only two grades…”win”, or “lose”. Come back with your shield, or on it. I.M. Mean General Soldier in Chief The rest is in the Flash Traffic/Extended Entry - including a link to a .pdf version you can send to all your friends [Wait! Don&apos;t do that! Send them a...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:16:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rambo was Really a Marine on 2008-01-03</title>
            <description>
                The inevitable end:
O.K. lets all agree to just disagree and stop this frivilous blue on blue fire-fight.  Lets rack it up as follows:  The rules:

1.  1st come, 1st served to whack bad guys.
2.  Whacking Bad Guys is always 1st.
3.  1st whack a bad guy, 
    then whack his buddy bad guy #2.
4.  Whack #2&apos;s Bad Guys Dog.
5.  One whack, One kill.
6.  One good whack deserves another. see rule #3.
7.  Whack 1st, and Whack hard.
8.  Whacks make loud noises, be prepared to   
    receive incoming return whacks.
9.  Keep your finger straight and off the trigger
    until you are ready to whack.
10. Whether its Marines, Army, AirForce, Navy,   
    Coastguard, Cladenstine services Whacking see   
    Rule #1.

Got it? you to old timers we might need you someday to help follow through on rules 1-10, and get back to whacking like you came through before  during your time (Thanks by the way!!!)  I just want everyone ready to whack!  We don&apos;t need verbal firefights here, mean looks never whacked anyone.

---The Gunny---
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68224</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68224</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:35:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Julie on 2008-01-02</title>
            <description>
                (Note: Substitute following in Marine edition of manual)

Army: Soldiers who are not part of the Corps. Whack the same bad people in the same way as the Marines.

The difference between Army soldiers and Marines: Army soldiers don&apos;t know the right terminology as delivered to Good Marines in boot camp and beyond by the Corps. Things you were punished for saying they will say in ignorance. Some of them will try hard, but they did not have the loving tutelage of the Corps and will say it wrong. Be patient with them. Whoever is on the scene, Marines or Army, gets first dibs on whacking the bad people. Whacking bad people is good, and makes Army soldiers less cranky.

Hooah: What Army soldiers say instead of Semper Fi.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68211</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68211</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:06:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from julie on 2008-01-02</title>
            <description>
                Marines: Soldiers who are part of the Navy. Whack the same bad people in the same way as Army soldiers. 

The difference between Marines and Army soldiers: Marines speak a different language from Army soldiers. They get upset if you don&apos;t use their language speaking to them or about them. Whatever you say, however you say it, will be wrong. Don&apos;t worry about this. Whoever is on the scene, Marines or Army, gets first dibs on whacking the bad people. Whacking bad people is good, and makes Marines less cranky.

Semper Fi: Marine for &quot;Hooah&quot;


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68205</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68205</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:19:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from M. Simon on 2007-12-31</title>
            <description>
                The Marines were included. Aren&apos;t they part of the Navy? I mean the Navy is really cool. It has ships. Its own air force and its own ground pounders. Plus submarines. One stop shopping.

Semper Fi.

From an old Navy Rod Yanker - Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club &apos;66.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68101</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68101</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:01:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from USMC ol&apos; timer on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Great post &quot;Rambo was really was a Marine&quot;, or should I say &quot;The Gunny&quot;.

The only reason I got over-exuberant, I&apos;ve had a friend for a few years now bragging up the Army and putting down the Marines.  For the most part I blew him off, but the other day it rubbed me the wrong way on something he said.  He got an ear full, and so did y&apos;all.  For that I apologize.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68099</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68099</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:42:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rambo was Really a Marine on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Fabulous FM! when common sense has had its perimeter breached by acronyms so some desk jocky in D.C. or Fobbit in Iraq gets his medal for being on the forward edge on the Global War on Terrorism by word mixing, this is an added relief!  As far as whether the FM using soldier or Marine, sailor, or Fly boy, its all symantics to me.  One team, One fight.  I pulled trigger next to a Soldier and Navy corpsman in Iraq and it didn&apos;t matter as long as it was an American next to me making the enemy deader, and i got home to eat moms&apos; apple-pie.  Besides in the end, your bugler standing over your grave playing TAPS is going to sound like my bugler standing over mine playing TAPS.  

Good read! keep up the sanity check men!

---The Gunny---


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68096</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68096</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:07:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Samir - I need to change the comment template - the only person who gets email data is me, the site owner.  

But it doesn&apos;t say that.  My bad.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68076</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68076</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:12:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MunDane on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                You forgot the principle of &quot;Boot, don&apos;t spatter!&quot;


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68075</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68075</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:12:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Michael on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Harry Truman was ok, but he wasn&apos;t always correct.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68074</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68074</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:05:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Jonn Lilyea on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s real obvious to me that the folks at Benning&apos;s Building One weren&apos;t consulted on this.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68072</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68072</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:54:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Major John on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                I believe the Marines were mentioned - they are part of the Navy, yes?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68070</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68070</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:27:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Outlaw 13 on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                How can a post about a comic version of an FM (Field Manual)degrade into discussion about how great my service (that is not the ARMY) is?

Believe me the USMC gets enough face time without someone whining because a fake FM doesn&apos;t mention them...good grief get over yourself.

Whoever did that PUB did an outstanding job...funny stuff.  THANKS FOR THE LINK TO THE PDF!

Now to stir the pot, President Harry S. Truman said this about the USMC; &quot;The Marine Corps is the Navy&apos;s police force and as long as I am President that is what it will remain. They have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin&apos;s.&quot; 

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68069</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68069</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:15:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Subsunk on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Well Done.  Approved for promulgation.  Now us dumb ole Navy types can actually understand what all that fuss is about.

Back to my casualty drills. Gotta spend my time practicing fires and floodings. You Army guys get all the credit for winning. We&apos;ll take all the dames.

Good post, John. I loved it.

Subsunk
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68068</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68068</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:13:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from USMC ol&apos; time on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Here's the link for casualty rates:  
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/interactive/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/interactive/</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68067</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68067</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:07:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from USMC ol&apos; timer on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                Hey, I like the Army.  We&apos;re on the same side.
The USMC just had their 232 birthday, not the 231st.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68066</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68066</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from USMC ol&apos; timer on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                The Marines are elite.  Army&apos;s lead? LOL
Then tell me &quot;why&quot; Ft. Knox, an Army fort, is guarded by Marines?
I think you&apos;d better re-think the arrogant statement of the Army leading the way.
Marines are &quot;first to fight&quot;, not the Army.  Right now in Iraq, the Marines have had the hardest fighting, but yet the least casualties.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68065</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68065</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:45:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from overkill on 2007-12-30</title>
            <description>
                As with all good humor, it has more than a little bit of truth behind it.

The reason that Marines are not explicitly mentioned, is because they always adopt whatever they like from the Army, so they are mentioned by default.

&quot;The Marines are all right, been following the Army&apos;s lead for 231 years now.&quot; (Quoting myself)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68064</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68064</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:59:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MarineWife on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                You forgot a group of awesome men and women that whack major bad dude butt.  Civies know them as Marines.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68059</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68059</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:45:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Samir on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                John of Argghhh,

I don&apos;t usually leave contact info because I might be seen as unpatriotic by leaving anti-government comments and I used to get a lot of hate mail for speaking my mind.

Peace!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68058</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68058</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:23:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from baldilocks on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                From the Air Force, with love.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68054</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68054</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:23:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Faith on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Love you and Blackfive - excellent post/fm edition. Vet from the &apos;80&apos;s - no combat.  Love you guys and support you all!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68053</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68053</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:57:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Sgt. Grumpy, Please tell me, are you suggesting that this is something remotely like &quot;common sense?&quot; If ro, I fully agree. You might want to contact JAG, we would to make sure this is UCMJ compliant. I fully agree with ALL of the commenters.

I am not you. I am just a &quot;Grumpy old disabled Vet&quot;

Grumpy
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68050</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68050</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:18:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from old guy on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Effing hilarious!  I sent it to my friend a sergeant major in Iraq.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68047</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68047</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:02:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from @thepointyend on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                CI Guy -  Don&apos;t remember Dave the FA Guy, but if you&apos;re thinking of Travis Patriquin&apos;s &quot;How to Win In Al Anbar&quot;, he of course was killed just over a year ago, God rest his soul.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68046</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68046</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:47:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from bomdfuzr on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Excellent, but doesn&apos;t mention the Marines. I guess that means if all else fails, break glass only in case of emergency. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68045</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68045</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:25:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                JarJar, I&apos;m guessing you don&apos;t hang out much with 1st Responder types, either, if you don&apos;t get the ironic humor here.

Hint: You won&apos;t like them, either.

And how come people who comment like that almost *never* leave valid contact info?

8^ )
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68043</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68043</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:03:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sergeant Grumpy on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                ROFLMAO! Every Army FM should be written like this - then the Generals could spend more time running the war, and the rest of us would know what the hell the FM was trying to say!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68042</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68042</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:45:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from American on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Sherlock-
Media Relations:  lying with a smile as well as a patsy lined up to take the heat.
Thank you.  I loved the post.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68041</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68041</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:33:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from sherlock on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Challenge: Include a definition of &quot;Media Relations&quot; without employing the term &quot;Scumsucking&quot;.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68039</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68039</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:19:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JoanofArgghh! on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                The best of good whacking: Manuals for dummies including apologizing, missionary positions, and jedi knights.  I&apos;m assuming the story about the military dogs&apos; service in operations will be covered in an appendaged version entitled Pepper Squad.  Believe me when I say, I love it AS IS!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68038</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68038</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:14:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from CI Guy on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Did Dave the FA Guy write or illistrate this?  It looks like the drawings from the famous SSO slide show...

Thanks

MM
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68036</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68036</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:12:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JarJar on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Wow, you can kill people, you are so cool!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68035</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68035</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:10:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Patrick S Lasswell on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                I sent the link on to my good friend who is opposed to the war but serves on the state Draft Board.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68034</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68034</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:31:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chuckie B. on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                I agree: Colonel Peters would definitely approve. And as a U.S. Army combat veteran of Vietnam, I approve!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68029</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68029</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:40:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Herr Morgenholz on 2007-12-29</title>
            <description>
                Sometimes, not so bad people accidentally get whacked.  More often, some not so bad people claim their cousin got whacked, or their goats got whacked.  So we give them a lot of money.  This is called &quot;Civil Affairs&quot;.

Also, sometimes people in suits don&apos;t give us money to give to not so bad people who got whacked or claim their cousin got whacked or whose goat stepped on one of Saddam&apos;s old landmines. These people are called &quot;Democrats&quot;.  They need whacked. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68028</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-68028</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:31:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2007-12-28</title>
            <description>
                Well researched work you have here, John. Just two suggestions.

1.Where and when do the officers go for their &quot;cranial-rectal extractions?&quot;

2. When picking an op-tempo choose either fast or slow, but under no circumstances choose &quot;half-fast!&quot;

Grumpy
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67996</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67996</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:55:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-12-28</title>
            <description>
                This is the reader&apos;s digest condensed version for SAMS students, John.  Jedi Knights don&apos;t need that stuff.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67994</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67994</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:51:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-12-28</title>
            <description>
                Where are the pictures? Powerpoint slides?

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67993</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67993</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:36:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-12-28</title>
            <description>
                nihil obstat.

publish &quot;as is&quot;

(looks like HR McMaster had some input on the final draft)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67992</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/doctrine_for_du.html#comment-67992</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:09:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

