<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A guest post in response to Kevin&apos;s post on Dr. Ron Paul.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:06:38 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A guest post in response to Kevin&apos;s post on Dr. Ron Paul.</title>
            <description>This continues a discussion from a previous post. If you need to catch up - click here. Kevin, I have decided to answer you point by point where appropriate. I am actually very sympathetic to your cause. I tilted at windmills myself supporting Howard Phillips and the Constitution Party every time out since they started as the Taxpayer’s Party. H*ll I was even chairman of my county’s Republican Party for a very short period. After the back stabbing by the faction I defeated and the actions of my homie Bob Dole announcing the National Republican Party’s platform was “their platform...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Kevin on 2007-12-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Using your reasoning, then Ralph Nader gave us Prez Bush...

I'll also point out that Dr. Paul would be running as a Republican, NOT as an independent, so your analogy is inaccurate.

And, after studying the other offerings, both Democratic and Republican....

The <em>real</em> difference between them is?

None, won't matter if they have a D or an R next to their name on the ballot.

They all promise the same things; more Constitution busting, more oath breaking, more taxes, more war, more government, more laws, regulations, restrictions etc. etc. etc.

Thank you, but mine will be an emphatic <strong>'no'</strong> for any of the other candidates.

I would prefer to actually cast a vote <strong>FOR</strong> a candidate, rather than hold my nose and waste my vote by pulling the lever for the lesser of two evils.

Been there, done that.  No more.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html#comment-67839</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html#comment-67839</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:42:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-12-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I consider Ron Paul to be today's Ross Perot.

And we got 8 years of Bubba because of Ross.

Not again, <strong><em>please</em></strong>.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html#comment-67833</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/12/a_guest_post_in.html#comment-67833</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:20:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

