<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348-</id>
  <updated>2012-01-06T18:31:59Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for We need some Gunner Zen.</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=8348" title="We need some Gunner Zen." />
    <published>2007-11-15T15:39:49Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T16:53:30Z</updated>
    <title>We need some Gunner Zen.</title>
    <summary>A friend of mine in Australia owns this (and several others, as well) 5.5 inch gun. And numerous other guns, too. Wouldn&apos;t that just look spiffy out by the flagpoles of Argghhh!!!? Oh, yeah. It would....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Artillery" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine in Australia owns this (and several others, as well) 5.5 inch gun.  And numerous other guns, too.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.fototime.com/D975A8AD4D69E00/orig.jpg" border=0 alt="5.5 inch howitzer"></p>

<p>Wouldn't that just look spiffy out by the flagpoles of Argghhh!!!?</p>

<p>Oh, yeah.</p>

<p>It would.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348-comment:66750</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html#comment-66750" />
    <title>Comment from USMCPOP on 2007-11-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>USMCPOP</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[Can you identify the arsenal shop that made these big cannons?  See <a href="http://www.practicalmachinist.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/4505.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.practicalmachinist.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/4505.html</a>
for a great photo of the cannon lathes.  So far, it doesn't seem to be Bethlehem No. 2 machine shop, Watervliet, the main Navy shop in D.C. or Watertown, based on the steel building construction seen in various photographs.

- Thanks]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-17T22:16:26Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-17T22:16:26Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348-comment:66738</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html#comment-66738" />
    <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-11-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Justthisguy</name>
        <uri>http://enemiesofthelibrary.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://enemiesofthelibrary.blogspot.com">
        I dunno; those two funny-looking equilibrators, or whatever they are, sticking up there kind of ruin the visual experience for me. I think a bronze 12-pounder would be much purtier, and if you wanted something more modern, a French 75 would do.

And then there&apos;s my favorite, the US 75mm Pack Howitzer, breakable-down into individual mule loads.

That&apos;s what I want in *my* back yard, though it cost me a $200 Destructive Device tax every time I shoot it.
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-17T09:27:52Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-17T09:27:52Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348-comment:66676</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8348" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/we_need_some_gu.html#comment-66676" />
    <title>Comment from Barb on 2007-11-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Barb</name>
        <uri>http://barbette.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://barbette.blogspot.com">
        Yep.  It would.  
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-15T21:24:33Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-15T21:24:33Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


