previous post next post  

Okay - let's have a Whatzis today.

I've received a complaint that there has been too much toothsome chewy faux-intellectual discourse (or maudlin self-pity) 'round here of late, so here's a Whatzis for you today.

whatzis%201.jpg


You may begin.

35 Comments

It's the end of a gun. Probably an Army gun. Big one, too.
 
Panzer IV muzzle brake. Darn pilots.
 
Fur sur, a WWII german muzzle brake.
 
Heh. Whattaya all doon up this late? Waiting to see if the MS patch for daylight savings works? [it did]
 
Hey, I wasn't *objecting* to the other stuff; sometimes I actually like a serious moping-and-brooding political piece, and please don't cease, to remind us about people who die for us, it's just nice to have something lighthearted from time to time, which engages the intellect in a fun way. And, yep, that's a purty pitcher of a purty muzzle brake, but I have no idea what piece it's attached to.
 
Heh. Things are getting outta sequence here. Snerk.
 
I've been looking at the muzzle break in the WIkipedia pics for the Panzer IV, and that doesn't look like the same thing. The outside of this one is very straight, while the P-IV is flared near the base. Dusty - I was all set to make a remark just like yours, then I got sucked into trying to find the right match. ;-) Phooey ... I'm going to bed now!
 
Hmmm.... Yes a muzzle brake, even I can tell that much. Yes a land-based gun, probably a mobile one on an armored vehicle, a tank or tank destroyer. But a Panzer IV? I agree that it's most likely German, but it doesn't look quite right for the Panzer IV. It looks closer to the Panzer VI (Tiger II). Still doesn't seem exactly right, but that's the closest match I can find.
 
Muzzle Break from self propelled Arty 155mm
 
That is the muzzle brake for a self propelled 152mm or 155mm Howitzer It is not a M109 series though
 
The active element of the M32A1 combat potato peeler... MC
 
Yep. I'm with Dusty- end of a BIG gun. HEY! Us Zoomies have to stick together, you know.
 
Heh. Bathing takes care of that stickiness, AFSis. Gee, I wonder why no one thinks it's the cage to a cross-wind sensor or something. Hmmmmm. Context matters, pesky thing. You all are falling for the trap that crucifies girls and math. Something about why they don't do math and measurements well. Or not. I'm not giving out hints or clues or anything. Nope. Not me.
 
*phew* You said: "You all are falling for the trap that crucifies girls and math." But what I initially read was "You all are falling for the trap that crucifies GIRTH and math." I personally prefer girth and geometry when it comes to girls and boys.
 
OK, I'm off to "bathe". "soak" in that thought for a while. heh.
 
If that's a muzzle brake, then somebody's been standing that gun on its nose. Besides which, there's daylight behind the thing, down in the corner, where the rest of the barrel should be. I don't have a clue what it is, but I'm pretty sure what it's not.
 
Hey John, the new PnZ2000 in AFG - first time Dutch arty guys have fired a shot in anger since the 1950s-and the first use of the PnZ2000 in combat. Good write up in Janes if you have access to such. Still wish they worked out the salt-water problem and kept that gun on ship. Sniffle.
 
Thanks for the video link, 'Phibian. We *did* blog about it when they pulled the lanyard. We also blogged it when the USAF delivered the guns to Afstan. But I don't think we've had the video.
 
I can see we're going to need some help. New pic tomorrow.
 
What if we're not blessed with patience? What if we can't wait until tomorrow??? Dangit, man. Help a girl out, would you?? I don't think it's a muzzle brake of any kind (based on the cursory research I've done over the past few hours) because of the wear and such on the tip of it. All of the pictures I've seen don't show that kind of wear and tear on them. And, as Ernie says, the locations of daylight in the picture don't make sense. After that, I'm stuck. And your "hints" (or lack thereof) aren't penetrating my thick skull either. I don't deal well with frustration either. Can you tell??
 
Muzzle brake, wha for? Naval gunner never needed a muzzle brake.
 
HFS - The hints refer to issues of scale. You're falling into the "this is eight inches" trap that we males have used for millenia to keep you gurls out of math, the sciences, and engineering in school. 8^ ) Sky color - the muzzle brake isn't painted. It's natural metal, with a matte finish. That *itself* is a major hint. *I'm* having fun anyway! HFS - I'm shamelessly shilling for the traffic tomorrow... ;^)
 
Old Sailor Who-Casts-A-Large-Shadow (your Indian name) you know I couldn't let an assertion like that stand unchallenged. Admittedly, it's German, but it's naval, and there's a muzzle brake there...
 
OK, so bigger or smaller? The "Whatzis" for goodness sake! Sheesh.
 
It's not radially symmetrical. Flash suppressor/compensator. Or a new weird variation on the Hilsch Vortex Tube.
 
"It's naval" Well, in THAT case.. must be the flux capacitor for an aircraft carrier.
 
Ah, AFSis - you're suffering from failure to follow the thread. The Whatzis isn't naval - the link I provided to OFS is of a naval system with a muzzle brake. JTG - it's not? You sure about that?
   
Ok, if I understand it right, it's not what we think, but it is a muzzle brake. Uhh, don't we have rules about going DeSade all over the place?
 
Hmmm, could be a big whistle, I suppose.
 
Snorkal without the ball
 
I think this boomstick end is much smaller than supposed. It's just a closeup. That looks dirty and while I have no doubt big boomsticks get dirty like any other that is not the place i'd expect to find it. Now this photo looks kinda modern and no self respecting collector would sully their toys or their reps with dirt would they? So perhaps this boomstick is more modern? Perhaps even in use? The other thing is the rounding seems so smooth, did ww2 era really have that?
 
Rod - Yes. No. Possibly, but not really likely, and again, possible, but not really likely.
 
Thanks!! I really, truly, without reservation, and with absolutely no attempt to lessen, ameliorate, or in any other way express any form, basis, or expression of sarcasm, doubt or smirminess want to truly and sincerely, thank your very much (read A Fish Called Wanda) for your support in this!!! Once again, without any coercion or implied force, thanks very, very much. Regards Rod (multiple grins)
 
Trias - you have to remember this collector's quirks. He prefers items that are *used* not pristine. He's in it for the history, the connection to the people who used the artifacts for their intended purpose - not to have something that came off final assembly, was put in a crate, stored for 50 years, then sold off as surplus. Nope. He wants stuff that crossed the beach, climbed the mountain, hunkered in bunkers, etc. So beat up is preferable to unmarred. Cheaper, too, which doesn't hurt.