<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-</id>
  <updated>2012-03-24T15:34:40Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Information War: The Best Defense is an Information Offense</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=8409" title="Information War: The Best Defense is an Information Offense" />
    <published>2007-11-27T08:59:19Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T16:53:29Z</updated>
    <title>Information War: The Best Defense is an Information Offense</title>
    <summary>[Denizen Commentary - Kat] Cannoneer No 4 Issued a request for thoughts on reconstituting the USIA (United States Information Agency) and received several responses. My own response revolved around the major stumbling block to the establishment and effective use of this agency: the great divide over the position of terrorism and non-state actors (ie, terrorists) on the scale of national security imperatives. Until we can come to a consensus as to its status and degree of threat, reconstituting the USIA would be an act of futility. Somebody high up must read the Cannoneer&apos;s site because Gates quotes the Cannoneer in...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Denizens</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="<![CDATA[<s>GWOT</s> Whatever it is...]]>" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>[Denizen Commentary - Kat]</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/the-regulars-rfi-on-usia/">Cannoneer No 4 Issued a request for thoughts on reconstituting the USIA</a></strong> (United States Information Agency) and received several responses.  My own response revolved around the major stumbling block to the establishment and effective use of this agency: the great divide over the position of terrorism and non-state actors (ie, terrorists) on the scale of national security imperatives.  Until we can come to a consensus as to its status and degree of threat, reconstituting the USIA would be an act of futility.</p>

<p>Somebody high up must read the Cannoneer's site because <strong><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/26/AR2007112601985.html">Gates quotes the Cannoneer in the Landon Lecture yesterday at Kansas State University </a></strong> regarding beefing up spending on diplomatic efforts.  He laments the demise of the USIA due to the "peace dividend" and suggests that it be reconstituted, obviously ignoring the problem of the great divide I outlined.  However, he does address my pet peeve:</p>

<blockquote>"We are miserable at communicating to the rest of the world what we are about as a society and culture," Gates said. "It is just plain embarrassing that al-Qaeda is better at communicating its message on the Internet than America."</blockquote>

<p>And all that without even half the server space, computer power or fancy digital software of even one low rent television station in BFE, Idaho.  </p>

<p>(continued in flash traffic)</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Speaking of which, <strong><a href="http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20071126&fname=raman&sid=1">a long a thoughtful dissection of Bin Laden's latest rants</a></strong>.  Very interesting that he appears to be giving out pre-winter quarters directives in ordering "mujihadeen" to get a move on before the bad weather keeps them from getting to the designated fronts.  <br />
<blockquote><br />
Osama bin Laden and his No.2, Ayman al-Zawahiri use periodic video and audio messages (pre-recorded) for motivating their followers, for giving their perception of the state of the world and the global jihad and for carrying on PSYWAR against their perceived adversaries. These messages are recorded in the tribal areas of Pakistan and then got disseminated through Al Jazeera TV channel of Qatar and through the Internet. Al Qaeda has established a separate propaganda wing called As-Sahab, under the supervision of an American convert to Islam, for having these messages recorded and disseminated. In addition to recording and disseminating the messages of Al Qaeda leaders, As Sahab has also started recording and disseminating the messages of the commanders of the Neo Taliban since the beginning of 2007. During 2007, As Sahab disseminated about 90 video messages.</blockquote></p>

<p>But, it's not only the message that is dangerous, it is actual <strong><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/top_stories/story/320631.html">cyber attacks that continues to be perpetrated against US defense and commercial servers</a></strong>.  The danger is outlined in a few key paragraphs:</p>

<blockquote>While U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan engage the enemy with guns, tanks, airplanes and missiles, the American military is quietly fighting a much different kind of war on a new front -- cyberspace.

<p>Military officials say that a cyber-attack by foreign enemies or terrorist groups would result in ''an electronic Pearl Harbor'' that would shut down electricity, banking systems, cellphones and other tools of day-to-day life.</blockquote></p>

<p>The article indicates thousands of attacks per day that have to be defended against and possibly countered.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67126</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67126" />
    <title>Comment from Consul-At-Arms on 2007-11-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Consul-At-Arms</name>
        <uri>http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/">
        IIRC, USIA had a foreign service cadre wholly separate from the State Dept.&apos;s FSOs.  Since USIA was consolidated into DoS, those officers were rebranded as the public diplomacy &quot;cone&quot; of the U.S. Foreign Service.

USDA and, I think, USAID also have their own distinct foreign service components which are not the same as State Dept.&apos;s.
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-28T15:12:07Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-28T15:12:07Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67116</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67116" />
    <title>Comment from Cannoneer No. 4 on 2007-11-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cannoneer No. 4</name>
        <uri>http://cannoneerno4@wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cannoneerno4@wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[As I understand it, USIA was independent of State.  I think they both had Foreign Service Officers in their organizations.  

It did OK against the Soviets by keeping its distance from the American adminstration and putting out products and programs which generated warm and fuzzies about America. USIA was not perceived as a shill for the Adminstration. It was more like a window on America for external audiences to observe and make their own evaluation.  Mostly USIA was <em>conditioning</em> foreign TA's to have generally positive feelings about America even if they opposed specific US actions. Residual goodwill which got America benefit of the doubt it doesn't get anymore.

Even if we could reconstitute it, and keep it nonpartisan, it would take longer than one Adminstration's first term to pay off in higher approval ratings overseas. 
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-28T06:36:34Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-28T06:36:34Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67108</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67108" />
    <title>Comment from Consul-At-Arms on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Consul-At-Arms</name>
        <uri>http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[I've quoted you and <a href="http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/11/re-information-war-best-defense-is.html" rel="nofollow">linked to you here</a>.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-28T03:18:25Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-28T03:18:25Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67102</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67102" />
    <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>kat-missouri</name>
        <uri>http://themiddleground.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://themiddleground.blogspot.com">
        State got much of USIA.  And haven&apos;t done anything any more convincingly good as far as I can tell.

Then again, we haven&apos;t been attacked by any Rhodesians or Tibetans, so I guess that&apos;s all good.
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-28T00:00:05Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-28T00:00:05Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67100</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67100" />
    <title>Comment from subadei on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>subadei</name>
        <uri>http://soobdujour.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://soobdujour.blogspot.com">
        Wasn&apos;t the USIA integrated into another (not sure which) government collective?
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-27T23:29:22Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-27T23:29:22Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67085</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67085" />
    <title>Comment from StarCMC on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>StarCMC</name>
        <uri>http://www.starcmc.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.starcmc.wordpress.com">
        Hat tip for an excellent post.  I added you to my blogroll!

Keep up the good fight!
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-27T17:38:02Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-27T17:38:02Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67084</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67084" />
    <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>kat-missouri</name>
        <uri>http://themiddleground.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://themiddleground.blogspot.com">
        Well, I think that the politics will keep it from happening.  I think that the congress might consider bumping states budget, but that the historical idea of the USIA, its relationship to cold war activities and the general view of all such activities as tantamount to the Soviet Pravda, people (congress) will be unwilling to invest in its reconstitution.
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-27T17:25:32Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-27T17:25:32Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409-comment:67070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8409" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/information_war_1.html#comment-67070" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        I disagree on the issue of USIA, Kat.  We can reconstitute the function, putting out our side of the story, without too much foofaraw on the specificity of the targeting.

So there&apos;s utility in resurrecting the capability.

The politics of it, that&apos;s a different issue, fought in a different arena.
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-27T14:11:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-27T14:11:45Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


