<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Empiric Proof of the Answer to the Question.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:34:38 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Empiric Proof of the Answer to the Question.</title>
            <description>And the Answer is &quot;Yes.&quot; Proof of the Answer is in the Flash Traffic/Extended Entry....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:05:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from HomefrontSix on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                The bunny he&apos;ll use to wipe himself is hiding behind the tree. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67225</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67225</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:32:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s a good thing my Photoshop computer is currently unavailable, JTG, or I would risk the excommunication...

Oh, wait, I&apos;m not Catholic.  So they can&apos;t!  I&apos;d be anathematized, instead.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67220</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67220</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:02:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                I see no vestments, nor other Papal regalia. Are you sh*ttin&apos; me?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67217</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67217</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:50:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                Geez, Bill, you and Jack Holt.  Hey, it&apos;s a logging road at the entrance to the woods... or something.

Talk about overthinking!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67209</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67209</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:34:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                That ain&apos;t woods. Copse or margin, maybe -- but it ain&apos;t *woods*...

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67206</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67206</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:49:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                yeah, but where&apos;s the squirrel with the non-stick fur?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67199</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67199</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:01:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                Nah.  Wouldn&apos;t that be cool though... 

Alright, prolly not.

*Neighbor&apos;s woods!*  Yeah, that&apos;s it!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67198</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67198</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:00:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Barb on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                So question two is... Are those YOUR woods?  heh.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67196</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67196</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:52:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Beth Donovan on 2007-11-30</title>
            <description>
                HAHAHAHA!!!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67195</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/empiric_proof_o.html#comment-67195</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:35:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


