<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/apropos_to_the.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/apropos_to_the_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8347-</id>
  <updated>2008-12-03T12:47:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Apropos the two other posts today on the issue of Soldier mental health...</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8347</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/apropos_to_the.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=8347" title="Apropos the two other posts today on the issue of Soldier mental health..." />
    <published>2007-11-15T15:10:58Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T16:53:30Z</updated>
    <title>Apropos the two other posts today on the issue of Soldier mental health...</title>
    <summary>This tidbit from the Army&apos;s morning Stand-To! email: Army Sponsored Study Appears in Journal of the American Medical Association--Study Helps Army Understand Post-Deployment Soldier Health Issues What is it? An Army study about the overall health of redeploying Soldiers was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Nov. 14. All Soldiers undergo two health assessments when they redeploy; once during an initial Post Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) and again three to six months later during a Post Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA). Walter Reed Army Institute of Research studied the health assessments of the first 88,000 post-OIF Soldiers who...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Observations on things Military" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This tidbit from the Army's morning Stand-To! email:</p>

<blockquote>
Army Sponsored Study Appears in Journal of the American Medical Association--Study Helps Army Understand Post-Deployment Soldier Health Issues 

<p>What is it? An Army study about the overall health of redeploying Soldiers was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Nov. 14. All Soldiers undergo two health assessments when they redeploy; once during an initial Post Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) and again three to six months later during a Post Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA). Walter Reed Army Institute of Research studied the health assessments of the first 88,000 post-OIF Soldiers who completed both screenings in order to better understand the mental and physical health impacts of combat and the most effective ways to prevent, recognize and treat health issues related to combat deployments. The intention is to detect mental health problems while they are still small, simple, and temporary. </p>

<p><br />
What did the Army learn? This study looks at the first 88,000 Soldiers who went through both screenings.</p>

<p>Study findings: <br />
• The study shows that if you screen Soldiers a second time, you uncover a second, larger group of Soldiers who were not detected to have health concerns on the first screen.<br />
• Of the Soldiers who identified either depression or PTSD symptoms on the first screening, more than half had improved by the second screening; many of them without treatment.<br />
• The study also indicates that many Soldiers sought care within 30 days of the initial screening even if they were not referred, suggesting that the Army’s three-part process of self-identification, provider interview and Battlemind training promotes seeking out mental health care when needed. <br />
• Although on the initial screening National Guard and Reserve Soldiers reported physical and mental health concerns similar to the rates of active-duty Soldiers, their concerns were significantly higher than active-duty Soldiers at the time of the second screening. Reserve- component Soldiers could be more concerned with their health because they are worried about their Tri-Care benefits expiring, where as active-duty Soldiers know they have time to seek help if it is needed. However, VA’s will always provide help with combat related injuries, although Soldiers should document their symptoms for their files.<br />
• Serious relationship conflicts showed the largest rate of increase between the PDHA to the PDHRA. This highlights the mental health impact on families, a finding also noted in the recent DOD Mental Health Task Force Report.<br />
• Soldiers reported alcohol misuse at rates similar to other problems, although the fact that Soldiers are willing to admit to alcohol misuse could be an indication the stigma of seeking helping is waning.</p>

<p>What is the Army doing? We have put in place a comprehensive screening mechanism to identify Soldiers who may need assistance. All Soldiers are screened for physical and mental health risks upon redeployment and then again three to six months after they return. After completing both the initial assessment and the follow-up reassessment, the Soldiers have the opportunity to speak directly to a health care provider. </p>

<p>Additionally, the Army has also launched the Army Medical Action Plan, which consists of Warrior Transition Units Soldier Family Assistance Centers, providing one-stop support to the Families or wounded and ailing Soldiers.<br />
</blockquote> </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8347-comment:66656</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8347" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/apropos_to_the.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/11/apropos_to_the.html#comment-66656" />
    <title>Comment from fdcol6363 on 2007-11-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>fdcol6363</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[Another thing that those of us who are concerned about veterans' mental health and substance abuse issues can do is to support legislation like this:

<a href="http://nccbh.browsermedia.com/cs/public_policy/action_alerts_veterans" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://nccbh.browsermedia.com/cs/public_policy/action_alerts_veterans" rel="nofollow">http://nccbh.browsermedia.com/cs/public_policy/action_alerts_veterans</a></a>

<em>DISCLAIMER: Although not employed by NCCBH, I do work for a similar trade association of community behavioral health providers.</em>

While we certainly need to support the VA's efforts in confronting these issues, the fact remains that, for various reasons, many veterans and their families rely on and receive services from locally-based providers which are more geographically accessible to them.

These community based providers are chronically under-funded and over-stretched just meeting the needs of their civilian populations, and the current numbers of returning veterans are exacerbating this situation to a breaking point.

I'm no big fan of Obama, but I applaud him for his role in this legislation, and I urge everyone to at least consider supporting this type of legislation and funding.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-15T15:30:20Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-15T15:30:20Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

