previous post next post  

Making Poor Career Choices 101.

I like the assumption inherent in this comment, from the Lawton, Oklahoma (a very Red area, actually) television station:

But, with two similar incidents this week - both justified - will it lead to more homeowners arming themselves to potentially fire upon bad guys who are only trying to steal?

That's the back end of the paragraph. This is the front end:

"I believe I have a right to protect my home and belongings in my home and my family," says Miguez. "You know, this is my property. I'm buying it. I'm paying for it. So I have a right."

Of course, they don't answer the question, they just leave it hanging in the air. You can read the whole thing here. And, as ever, you should, and not rely on my biases on the issue.

The context? Two burglaries where homeowners used a gun to protect occupied property.

This incident is a 17 year-old would-be burglar. The other incident was a fatal shooting of a burglar by a homeowner. I got it. He's a kid. Probably a punk. And his death being shot in a burglary would be hard on his family and friends. Not to mention extract a toll on the homeowner. But this is a perfectly avoidable situation. Not by disarming the homeowners, btw. Um, okay, kiddies, here's how it is: don't break into people's homes. Even if you think they aren't home (as I suspect this kid did from the article). See? Easy. If you hang with people who think it's a *good* idea, you probably need a new circle of friends. Need to get away from them to do that? I hear the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard are all hiring. Then come back home and join the police. Now *there's* a plan.

I'm not the homeowner, I wasn't there - I'm guessing I would have been more likely to use the gun to scare the kid into running and personally - if I id'd the thing in the kid's hand as not being a firearm - would have waited until he advanced on me before I would have shot. But that's me.

The lesson here isn't dangerous homeowners. The lesson is - don't be a burglar. There's a world of difference between this incident and the one in New Orleans where the foreign kid, drunk and confused about which house the party was in, got shot through the door by that homeowner.

Yeah, I would have waited on that one, too.

8 Comments

Umm, I think the incident of which you speak was in a different part of Lousiana, not New Orleans. As I recall, it happened on Hallowe'en, and a Japanese kid knocked on the door and got shot dead.
 
"Only trying to steal?" What kind of a mind produced THAT?
 
potentially fire upon bad guys who are
only
trying to steal? Qualification of a thugs actions Shameful. The poor kid was "ONLY" trying to steal. We have dumbed this act down to show the criminal as the victim... Put me on that jury... First a burgalary next an assault, then a murder... what if the kid stumbled upon a homeowners young daughter or child then what? Defend what is yours. Don't tread on me or my household..
 
Why should criminals in the act of their crime have protections of any kind? 'Only' huh. Granted, at least in Australia, it seems the pettier the crime the more serious the punishment at times but I don't think that covers an 'only' kind of excuse on what is still a serious crime.
 
1. I went and read the whole article and I find I agree with your apraisal. It proves the point that journalism in this country is biased to the left and they are so insulated from the rest of the world, they (the journalists) don't even realize their bias. 2. I checked Brady bunch site and found that OK has a D-. Obviously, the people/politicians of OK are not giving much credence to what their media are muttering.
 
I'm not surprised that the media around here is trying to portray this kid as a victim. But seriously... what do these ninnies expect? Someone breaks into my place, I'm gonna shoot them too! I've worked too hard for what little I've got, I'm not going to let some little wannabe thug take what's mine. If he wants what I've got, get it the same way: work for it. Aside from that... a buddy of mine works at the local shooting range. Sounds like as good a reason as any to send a few more downrange!
 
When you steal my property you're stealing a part of my life. Unless you make arrangements in advance I have no idea how much of my life you're intending to steal so I have to assume you're after all of it and I will defend it.
 
I kinda figured all y'all would react like this. Like I said, *I* in the situation described, might choose to not shoot, if letting the kid look up the muzzle will do the trick, but I don't fault the guy on the ground for shooting. I just found the whole thing... interesting.