previous post next post  

H&I* Fires 1 Oct 2007

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

**********************************

Heh. A new fiscal year... and we're working from last year's budget. That was usually annoying from a soldier perspective - as a blood-sucking contractor, it really bites, because all those shiny new contracts written on '08 dollars can't go into effect until the actual budget is passed. Which hampers us, but also hampers the government client - one, I might note, At War. A pox on both the Executive and Congress!

Dusty sent us this WSJ article on the "Broadband Taxman Cometh." Oddly enough, not having any service at all, it's academic for the moment. Depending on how the states approach this, there's going to be a potentially huge crunch throughout the system.

Silly debate news, via Stop the ACLU.

John Hawkins of Right Wing News sends:

Hello

Right Wing News polled the right side of the blogosphere on their favorite people on the right.

Here's are a few hints/questions about the results:

* A very prominent bloggers tied for 2nd place. Can you guess who it is?

* Can guess the top 4 Republican candidates for President and the order they were selected?

* Can you guess who finished higher: George Bush or Dick Cheney?

Click here for the results. The Armorer did not participate in this one, on purpose, because my conservative heroes tend to wear boots and carry rifles, or command those who do. That was gonna get lost in what all those polibloggers chose, and I was right. -the Armorer

**********************************
Two diametric views on PMCs in Iraq.
--
Sy Hersch is at it again. You know, this guy’s been saying we’re going to war Iran, imminently, since, oh, 2004?
--ry
*********************************
It's official, Admiral Gary Roughead is the Navy's newest CNO and I (along with the Ogre, SJS and several others) have won the CNO Pool. Nearly as sweet, I bested the favorite Naval Consort and I will crow until I am silenced, lol.......Maggie
************************

Well, since we're all Seymour Hersch today, I'll give you this: Hersch's interview with Der Spiegel. He's continuing to beat the "US is planning to go to war with Iran" drum and talking about the "real Hitler". It's a laugh a minute. My favorite "go on and laugh, you know you want to" line was something about "if" Iran would get the bomb (best estimate he says is five years) it would be under the control of the IRGC, not Ahmadinejad. Uhhh...I might be confused, but Ahmadinejad IS the IRGC. You know, former leader, giving all the cool jobs, contracts and money to the IRGC to build up its power?

Oh...and, you know, there is only one Hitler even if the US has been quick to call everyone they disagree with "Hitleresque". Of course, it could be because the regimes he lists, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, etc are some of the most repressive, genocidal regimes in history. Some of them may even have surpassed Hitler in their genocidal murder. But, you know, I'm not a lefty, apologizer for mass murdering totalitarians so my reading of history may be way off.

Not to spoil my update on the Iran-Syria situation, but Strategy Page gives an interesting point of view about all the "war or not to war" rhetoric going on with Iran. The long and short of it is, Iran is experiencing a "Mr. Gorbechav, tear down that wall" moment. You know "Reaganitis": Spending all your hard earned dough on weapons and people you will probably never use while your economy goes to the dogs. The "kaboom" you hear in Tehran may not be an actual war head.

In other news, we continue "mop up" operations in Iraq. The things you won't see put together on your favorite news channel or in your favorite paper: US Military deaths down and Iraqi Civilian Deaths down at the same time. All the while, there has been the usual uptick in Ramadan attacks (Al Qaida's favorite time of the year) that is no where near the last couple of years.

How bad is it? I can't find the link right this second, but a report indicates that documents found on al-Tunis, the most recent "2nd in command" of Al Qaida in Iraq recently killed, included a letter he never got to send. Basically it said, "Send help. We're surrounded and cut off with no escape."

Ya' think?

Oh..and the infamous Abu Al Qaqa, the late Zarqawi's mentor and facilitator in Syria, was assassinated on Sept 29. Depending on whose press you read, he was either assassinated by "Zionist-American" collusion with the Syrian government or a disenchanted, recently released, "Zionist-American" brain washed mujihadeen for being a traitor to Al Qaida and sending many a young wannabe jihadist to their death. I'll have more on that later.

Mmmm...and I can't get to it because it's behind the WJS wall for paying subscribers only, but some other folks are starting to jump on the "Iraq is a Win" bandwagon. The Australian says, "If it Quacks like a duck..."

Now that their losing, AQI is going into the "death spiral" of purging and blaming everyone but their stupid leaders for causing the faithful mujihadeen to be defeated.

Let's see, freedom, democracy, capitalism v. 7th century, isolationist, totalitarian, head chopping, murderous, raping, child slaughtering, "pray like we do, or else", real torture, fanatics? Touch and go for a bit there, but your average Iraqi probably doesn't "love death" more than they "love life".

Uh-Oh...AQI in Iraq may have finally figured out that Iran has been playing them like a $50 Chinese Violin. The fictitious Omar Baghdadi threatens Iran with attacks if they don't stop arming those pesky Shia death squads

More to follow on the "pesky Shia death squads", the Blackwater incident and a more recent attack on some hostile forces that are now miraculously innocent Shia civilians who were just playing a Ramadan game of "find the ring". You know, no Mahdi would be attacking US forces. Sayyid al Sadr said not to. Yes, another "go on and laugh, you know you want to" moment.
-Kat

********************************

[Is it safe?]

Murray feels the need to share a TINS, after reading Bill's post. F-bomb warning!

Update: Heh, I've covered similar ground here... -the Armorer

**********************************
Okay, this has gone beyond lame into a whole new realm of stupid. Really, doesn’t the House of Representatives have something better to do than play this silly game? *Sigh.*

What ever happened to "Don't get stuck on stupid?'
--ry
********************************

Can't resist posting this...it's nice to see a judge not taking himself too seriously. H/T to Mona Charen at NR's Corner

Eggsactly

Courtesy of Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld of The National Synagogue in Washington, DC I have learned of the following opinion filed by Judge James R. Muirhead of the US District Court in New Hampshire. A prisoner had filed a complaint about the kosher food he was being fed in the prison. As part of his request for a preliminary injuction, the prisoner filed a hard-boiled egg.

Judge Muirhead issued the following ruling:

No fan I am
Of the egg at hand.
Just like no ham
On the kosher plan.
This egg will rot
I kid you not.
And stink it can
This egg at hand.
There will be no eggs at court
To prove a clog in your aort.
There will be no eggs accepted.
Objections all will be rejected.
From this day forth
This court will ban
hard-boiled eggs of any brand.
And if you should not understand
The meaning of the ban at hand
Then you should contact either Dan,
the Deputy Clerk, or my clerk Jan.
I do not like eggs in the file.
I do not like them in any style.
I will not take them fried or boiled.
I will not take them poached or broiled.
I will not take them soft or scrambled
Despite an argument well-rambled.
No fan I am
Of the egg at hand.
Destroy that egg!
Today! Today!
Today I say! Without delay!
SO ORDERED (with apologies to Dr. Seuss).

**********************************

BTW...

Reference this post yesterday, I apologize for not providing a much shorter summary for those who don't have the time or inclination to watch Professor Pausch's entire lecture (almost 1.5 hours long but worth every %*#@! minute, IMHO, but still...).

Here's the WSJ article that piqued my interest.

**********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"

19 Comments

I *knew* I shouldn't have published when I did. First Ry, then Maggie, stomped on my addition. Fooey! Now you'll never know what it was!
 
My apologies. You know everytime I post, I worry about that. I get all spooled up and I think it actually ends up taking me longer. That's why I don't do it often, but I just really had to put something here today. I am insufferable when I best the favorite Naval Consort.
 
Ah, don't sweat it Maggie. I knew it was going to be a problem when I set it up that way. It's just funny. I refreshed to see if anyone had put anything in, I published, then Ry published over it. So, I go back in, do it all again... and you published over it. The *real* lesson is: Don't publish the thing until I'm done! No way for you to know - don't worry, I'm just whinin'.
 
hah...and I came down probably stomping it to bits...again. mucho apologies.
 
No, I dodged your bullet. By a few minutes.
 
Yeah...I actually refreshed the live blog twice before I jumped in just in case I was jumping on somebody's post. that is how Maggie's post escaped scrubbing. At least it was somebody else's fault this time.
 
now imagine being taxed for all those aborted transactions.... this broadband tax cuts into my real life bread and butter. this thing must be defeated.
 
Uh, the site you linked to in /to_borrow_from_blackfive" (questingcat.com) is dead and for sale.
 
DNM - Can't help that, that post of mine I linked to is from 2004, and Questing Cat shut down. The purpose of the link was about the ubiquity of the F-bomb in the vocaulary of Anglospheric soldiers under stress...
 
F bomb? Down here thats just punctuation. Can't wait to see what Peter Jackson does with the Dam Busters.
 
Rush Limbaugh???? damn, what have I gotten myself into.....
 
Why the Army has Problems. Some ominous images here. Cheers
 
Umm, Murray, and Bill, and The Armorer; just what is the M113 good for? I mean, aside from avoiding having to walk, and stopping pistol bullets and low-velocity fragments, and all? Surely, when they first built the thing, somebody shot at it with various weapons to see what would penetrate. Just curious, I was always WTF about aluminum armor.
 
Oh, Murray, I believe that Tom Wolfe (in "The Right Stuff") described the use of the F-word as speaking in "Army Creole". You know what I mean, interpolating it between syllables, etc,
 
...pledges to debate any supplemental funding request or any policy decisions regarding the war in Iraq with the solemn respect and the commitment to integrity... *Always* disregard the body of any congressional resolution until you've checked the bottom line. And the bottom line in this instance -- in keeping with the line of the thread -- translates as, "To everyone we mentioned in the preceding paragraphs: F**k you." * * * * * * * * * * * * I was always WTF about aluminum armor. The Royal Navy had that same thought during the Falklands Exocet-Catching Exercise...
 
An interesting lecture it was, I watched a bit of it expecting little of it but it turned out worthwhile. To hold an audience's attention for that long is an achievement in itself and he's good at inspiration too. What is with this resolution? I don't really get it.
 
Ask the Aussies who were at Long Tan how they feel about 113's. Last I heard a few of them were ready to marry one. Might be what you do with it rather than what it can do that matters.
 
Murray, I was just askin', in a technical kind of way, about what kind of objects, approaching at whatever speed, could be counted upon to make a hole, or not, in an M113. Yah, obviously on many occasions people protected by nothing more than thin shirts have won violent deadly fights,by being smart and maneuvering, etc. And survived, even.
 
Grunts bounce off real good.