previous post next post  

H&I* Fires 09 OCT 2007

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

*********************************
Some philosophical questions for today:
a) Is it alright for the DoD to hire anthropologists? There’s some pretty strong opinions on the matter.
b) Predicting the outcome of the Iraq theater of operations, and therefore the exercise of JWT. Mark Danziger the Armed Liberal in this corner and in other corner Matthew Yglesias.
--
There’s things afoot other than giving a beating to wackado defilers of the faith of Islam, like the struggle for control of the gov’t of India and the fate of the nuclear deal we made with them. Next we move to some analysis of what Russia has going on(note: Denizen ry thinks this author is full of Shiite and is waaay superficial, but that’s me.).
--
Because the bringing beat downs to wackado defilers of the Islmaic faith is something near and dear to our hearts, mostly because of the people we know doing it, here’s a story about the complication that War on Drugs creates for War on Terrorism. What to do with the poppy crops is an old topic here at The Castle.
--ry

*********************************

Via the good offices of the "Thunder Chickens" (Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263) the Osprey arrives in the combat zone. Well, 90% of 'em made it in first try. Hey, that matches Army standards on wheel vehicle availablity.

My kinda school.

Students on the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard aren't allowed to leave their village without a shotgun and ammunition.

Hey - speaking of kids and guns - some advice for pediatricians who are annotating gun presence and storage practices in child medical records... Just click here for some advice. And parents - there's a form in there for you to ask your Doctor to sign *and* put in the records, too! H/t, Jim C. -the Amorer

***********************************

Snerk! Nothing like keeping an open mind while on a "fact-finding" trip...

No matter what he learns on his "fact-finding mission" to Afghanistan, Liberal defense critic Denis Coderre said Monday that he and his party remained convinced that Canada must end its combat mission here when the current mandate expires.

Yeah, that *is* nothing like keeping an open mind. Heh. How 'bout the Strategic Corporal?

A corporal who was ordering a pizza shook Coderre's hand. Moments later he told a journalist he knew that Coderre wanted to end the combat mission, which is strongly supported by the troops.

Asked what he thought of Coderre's position, the corporal paused before finally saying, "Well, he's entitled to his opinion."

Indeed, Corporal, indeed. H/t, CAPT H. -the Armorer

**********************************
No offense intended to Chief Bill, Dusty, and many others who laid it on the line in Kosovo, but one wonders if going there did anything useful when instances like this, indicative of tensions bubbling just below the surface about to burst out into homicidal rages again, keep happening. Yet, we send them, continue to send them, and continue finding places to send them to(like Darfur).

But it's okay. The body count is small enough and out of the media eye enough that we can pat ourselves on the back about it and call it a 'good war' (Unlike Vietnam, Iraq,....) regardless of what the reality on the ground is.
--ry
**********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"

8 Comments

I LOVE the firearm counseling disclaimer form.. can we use it for ADHD/ADD advocating Teachers? According to the latest (and defeated) proposal by congress on gun control and background checking regarding the medical diagnosis and firearms... Every Child diagnosed or ever treated for supposed ADD/ADHD would be inelgible to EVER own a firearm. Same thing for a Soldier returning from Iraq or Afgahnistan who is diagnosed with PTSD. Never mind the qualification of the Doctor making the diagnosis... Scary stuff huh? Another attempt to disarm...
 
Screw anthropological ethics. Anthropologists are not a self-governing body with a separate ethical structure distinct from the aims of their clients or employers. They should be delighted that anthropology is being put to a good use...or even just a use.
 
I've had a pretty extensive briefing on the Human Terrain Teams (labeled such that I can't put it up here.). Suffice it to say that I think they are a *great* idea, and the sort of thinking we're going to have to do if this sort of warfighting/peace enforcing/keeping is *ever* going to work. The whole purpose of these teams is to reduce the need for violence, and when it's applied (a decision *not* made by the teams) it's done so in very specific ways - you would think this is *exactly* the sort of innovation that even people opposed to *this war* would want the military to be making. Of course, if your only goal is to have a US military that fails, or, to succeed can only use sledgehammers, then, fine, you'll hate this concept. But even if your support of war is purely partisan, i.e., you hated Somalia because it was Bush Elder, liked Bosnia and Kosovo because they were Clinton, and hate Iraq because it's Bush Younger (and are just terribly conflicted about Iraq) then you should want the US military to develop this kind of tool. Otherwise, you're in terrible danger of just being an unserious dilettante. And that's a reinforcing verbal construct, not a Department of Redundancy Department violation.
 
Being in the politically incorrect business that I am (tobacco, wine, spirits etc), I always get a case of the jollies when customers come in and tell me that they've cleaned out Grandpas attic and found some old pipes. More often than not, they mention that they found an odd pipe, with a tiny ivory or ceramic bowl with a long churchwarden type stem. I then ask them if their grandpa was in the military. "Yes" is the invariable response. Was he in Asia or the Pacific during WWII? "Why, yes." Comes their surprised response. Well, then, Grandpa brought back an Opium pipe... Then the fun begins as their eyes widen, jaws drop and the "I didn't know that about Grandpa" comes out. Ah well, gotta find fun where you can.
 
Antropologists and others of similar lines of work are an excellent idea which will empower the military in non traditonal areas like that it fights in today, and really is part of the concept of making the peace rather than waging war. Sure there are ethical considerations but as I see it anthropolists are individualist in their ethics and thus must decide for themselves if a particular project offends their ethical beliefs, including a military assignment. If their involvement is unethical then simply don't get involved. If anthropologists become a permanent military role, which is quite possible i suppose, then the military will have their ethical 'umbrella' practices probably not unlike medics or chaplains. At the end of the day it's about Choice. As long as the military involved makes the information about how it works open and honest and a free Choice is made then I don't care who works for the military in whatever role regarding ethics. That's not so say there won't be ethical wrangling, there always is. Which is not really a bad thing.
 
Oh, man, Mr.T's H., you have no idea! This kind of thing gets discussed in the autiesphere *all* the time, and most 'specially after things like the William Freund murders, and the Cho murders &cetera, not to mention the annoying propensity of some people (like a certain Captain Nowak) to let their lawyers use AS as a defense when it obviously isn't, even if she R 1. (M'self, I think the good captain suffered from plain old erotomania, as suggested by a woman on an Aspie community I lurk at.) Play Misty for her. I have more gossip about Captain Nowak, but Cricket's kids are reading
 
P.s. If Captain Nowak were a *real* aspie, with the same psychosexual issues, she'd have brought a *real* pistol,and wouldn't have gotten caught. We don't do "pretend". You normals plz thank yer lucky stars that most of us are more ethical than you guys. Pppfffgtthph!
 
No offense intended to Chief Bill, Dusty, and many others who laid it on the line in Kosovo... None taken -- I was СФОР/SFOR, not KFOR. *twiddling thumbs, waiting for ry's eyes to glaze over*