<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-</id>
  <updated>2012-03-24T15:36:37Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for This would look good on the ramparts...</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=8027" title="This would look good on the ramparts..." />
    <published>2007-09-07T12:48:09Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-11T12:24:01Z</updated>
    <title>This would look good on the ramparts...</title>
    <summary>A Saxon wall-gun, circa 1680. It&apos;s a volley gun, i.e., all barrels fired simultaneously. For a closeup of the muzzles, click here. This sucker was rifled....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Rifles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>A Saxon wall-gun, circa 1680.  It's a volley gun, i.e., all barrels fired simultaneously.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.fototime.com/8220D49EF4162AF/orig.jpg" border=0 alt="Saxon Wall gun, circa 1680"></p>

<p>For a closeup of the muzzles, <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/40525F7C5E8A319/orig.jpg">click here</a></strong>.  This sucker was rifled.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64113</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64113" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-09-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Been to the JM Davis, Rusty, back when I was stationed at Fort Sill.  They have a tank, too, and an interesting collection of hangman&apos;s knots.

Used ones.


    </content>
    <published>2007-09-08T19:45:24Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-08T19:45:24Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64107</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64107" />
    <title>Comment from The Bookman on 2007-09-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Bookman</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[IIRC, there's a certain association with this site, and the KC area.  

That being said, I thought I'd mention the J.M. Davis Arms & Historical Museum in Claremore OK.  
(That's about 4.5 hours from KC, give or take.) 

<a href="http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html</a></a></a> 

I went there several years back, and the collection of firearms is nothing short of staggering, IMO.  Everything (IIRC) from matchlocks to Maw Deuce, bur just wandering around sent me into stimulous saturation, so I can't provide particulars by memory.  Well worth the price of admission, IMO.  

Claremore is also the home of the Will Rogers museum, FWIW.  Another interesting place, but i have a taste for museums.  

Feel free to contact me, if you'd like.

Regards, 

Rusty the Bookman
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-08T05:10:51Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-08T05:10:51Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64105</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64105" />
    <title>Comment from The Bookman on 2007-09-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Bookman</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[IIRC, there's a certain association with this site, and the KC area.  

That being said, I thought I'd mention the J.M. Davis Arms & Historical Museum in Claremore OK.  

<a href="http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.state.ok.us/~jmdavis/arms.html</a> 

I went there several years back, and the collection of firearms is nothing short of staggering, IMO.  Everything (IIRC) from matchlocks to Maw Deuce, bur just wandering around sent me into stimulous saturation, so I can't provide particulars by memory.  Well worth the price of admission, IMO.  

Claremore is also the home of the Will Rogers museum, FWIW.  Another interesting place, but i have a taste for museums.  

Feel free to contact me, if you'd like.

Regards, 

Rusty the Bookman
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-08T05:08:22Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-08T05:08:22Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64088</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64088" />
    <title>Comment from Ride Fast on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ride Fast</name>
        <uri>http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com">
        It would make sense to have rifled barrels so you could shoot down the length of the wall. Then any shot that didn&apos;t hit a someone coming over the wall would continue downrange more accurately and get some more invaders.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T21:20:51Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T21:20:51Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64081</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64081" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com.</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com.">
        Well, yes and no.

As for *why* it was rifled, I dunno, the designer didn&apos;t consult with me.  I suppose you could have used it against artillery crews advancing in a siege.

As for a punt gun, that depends on the fortification you are defending.  Since all the punt guns I&apos;ve seen are essentially duckbills in that the barrels aren&apos;t parallel, you might prefer concentrated carnage alone the merlons vice spreading shot and potentially hitting your own troops.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T18:53:09Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T18:53:09Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64080" />
    <title>Comment from guy on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>guy</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        &quot;This sucker was rifled&quot;

Why?  Wouldn&apos;t a punt gun work better for its intended purpose?
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T18:39:14Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T18:39:14Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64077" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com.</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com.">
        The Sassenach, Chuck?

BTW - in response to a question on the post that was actually posed in meatworld... caliber of that monster is 13mm.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T18:19:19Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T18:19:19Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64069</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64069" />
    <title>Comment from Chuck Simmins on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chuck Simmins</name>
        <uri>http://northshorejournal.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://northshorejournal.org">
        It took a moment for me to realize that the name of the gun did NOT imply it was used to shoot at... well, you know.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T15:39:48Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T15:39:48Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64068</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64068" />
    <title>Comment from hdw on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>hdw</name>
        <uri>http://highdesertwanderer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://highdesertwanderer.com">
        I don&apos;t think I&apos;d want to be anywhere on the wall when that was fired.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T15:35:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T15:35:00Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64062</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64062" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com.</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com.">
        Jeff - there was a channel full of powder under the socket the barrels fit into.

And... you didn&apos;t.

Hence, they weren&apos;t all that popular, but they were really intended as one shot weapons to clear the top of the wall while reinforcements arrived.
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T14:04:20Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T14:04:20Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027-comment:64061</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.8027" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/09/this_would_look.html#comment-64061" />
    <title>Comment from Parrothead Jeff on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Parrothead Jeff</name>
        <uri>http://www.parrotheadjeff.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.parrotheadjeff.com">
        John,

Very cool piece of history!  Having used percussion lock weapons and posessing a working knowledge of the method of operation of the flint lock mechanism&apos;s principles of operation I still can&apos;t figure out how the flame was to travel to all the touch holes.  Also, I wonder how you would know that one of the barrels did not fire and might go off due to a &quot;hang fire&quot; ?
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T13:32:44Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-07T13:32:44Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


