previous post next post  

H&I Fires* 05 Sep 2007

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

***********************************

Alan of GenX@40, one of our leftish Denizens, has a request:

Hi John,

I wonder if you might spread the news to the Denizens and through the miliblogs about this fundraising event coming up in Vancouver for my undergrad friend Capt. Trevor Green who you will recall was seriously injured in Afghanistan when he was attacked with an ax suffering serious head injuries:

On September 26 lets gather together at ThOn September 26 lets gather together at The Yale Hotel for a fundraiser to assist Trevor, Debbie and Grace on their miraculous healing journey. Captain Greene was attacked from behind and struck with a taliban axe on March 4, 2006 while sitting in a peaceful Shura discussing how to bring clean drinking water and basic medical care and education to the women and children of Afghanistan. His survival has been called a miracle in the medical profession as he presently undergoes extensive rehabilitation to speak and to reconnect his brain and muscles in order to regain function over his entire body. Hosted by Master of Ceremonies and CTV West Coast News Reporter Todd Battis, the entertainment line up will feature the infectious sounds of the SoTight Band ( www.thesotightband.com) and Brickhouse ( www.brickhousetheband.com). Tickets to No Turning Back � A Fundraiser for Captain Trevor Greene are $20 in advance or at the door. Doors open at 8pm. Show time begins at 9pm. Price of admission includes a silent auction, 50/50 draws and raffle items. Proceeds from this fundraiser will go to the Captain Trevor Greene Trust Fund.

There is a Facebook group set up through which people can buy tickets for 20 bucks (click here). I am sure anyone buying a tickets but not attending would be quite welcome if you know what I mean.

Hope all is well,

Alan

Before anyone says anything about "Let the Canadians take care of their own!" I'll just throw out two things.

1. If you think like that - you'd be *very* surprised at how much Canadian money has flowed into Project Valour-IT. To include Alan's money, which gives him every right to make this request.

2. Yer a poopy-head.

Just sayin'.

The Armorer even broke down and registered on Facebook so that I could buy a ticket. Now, if a Denizen/ne in the PNW were to be interested in going to the event, I might be motivated to send 'em a Cluebat of Argghhh!® to deliver to Captain Green...

If the whole saga of Captain Green is new to you - read about it (or refresh your memory) by clicking here. -the Armorer

**********************************

Chuck Simmins, of America's Northshore Journal, just scored his first paid gig, an Op-Ed on Examiner.com Good on ya, Chuck! Heh. If I could do that, I'd fully retire from the day-to-day show-up-at-the-office grind... -the Armorer

**********************************
I don't know why this made me think of The Chief.........Maggie

*********************************

Over at Small Dead Animals... a dark view into a seemingly incomprehensible situation in Britain. Any Brit who can shed light into this (linkage, explanation, etc) is welcome, and encouraged, to do so! -the Armorer

*********************************

A fascinating debate on the DC Gun Ban case and the 2nd Amendment, over at the Federalist Society. -the Armorer

********************************

Something fun for servicemembers and their families hanging about in NYC on November 12th ... the 75th Celebration of the Radio City Christmas Spectacular.

On November 12th, 2007 Microsoft Federal is partnering with the USO and Madison Square Garden Entertainment to honor and thank our military community this holiday season by creating a unique experience for our troops and their families by bringing them the 75th Celebration of the Radio City Christmas Spectacular.

And for those folks who can't make it in person, catch the re-broadcast on AFN at Christmas time...

In addition to creating this special in-person experience, Microsoft and the USO are partnering with the Armed Forces Network to broadcast this show to viewers in 177 countries starting on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. This will provide all of our troops and their families currently overseas with the opportunity to join in the fun and celebration.

- Barb

********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"

11 Comments

You are very kind and this is true that it is a call to mutual aid from a maple syrup drinker. Any help I am sure would be greatly appreciated by the family. And if you do buy a ticket you can declare in that old Canadian way "Je Ne Suis Pas Un Poopy-Head!"
 
*Before anyone says anything about "Let the Canadians take care of their own!".......* I would be very disappointed in anyone who is smart enough to hang here, saying something that dumb. Also, excellent preemptive comeback.
 
I second Maggie's thoughts. I'm embarrassed you even had to put that in, John. My comeback would be a bit more pungent than "poopy-head." Which would be just before I hit the buffoon with a clue bat (which you owe me, by the way).
 
I will most certainly buy tickets, and I would love the honor of showing Captain Green just how much we appreciate his service in person. However, going to Vancouver in midweek may not be do-able. Let me investigate options, and let you know about the Cluebat delivery potential.
 
Hmmmm. Busted, I think. Send me yer terrestrial permanent address, plz.
 
Castle Argghhh! - number 2 (how apt) in Google for... "Yer a poopy-head." Right after Chris Clarke, who holds pride of place... Well, actually, it's commenter *Rana* down at the bottom of the page who made the score for Chris.
 
Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head Yer a poopy-head There. That ought to help propel you to #1.
 
Gee, thanks... I think.
 
re "a dark view into a seemingly incomprehensible situation in Britain." Social Security has been told that there is a risk that this young woman could harm her child. Their lawyers will have examined the case and decided that they could convince a judge that there is "reasonable cause to believe the child is likely to suffer significant harm and that he/she will be in danger unless he/she is removed to a place of safety" They have applied for an Emergency Protection Order (EPO) An EPO ALLOWS (not REQUIRES) Social workers to remove the child from home for up to 8 days OR KEEP IT IN A SAFE PLACE (like a hospital, for instance). Therefore social security could ensure that the mother is not allowed to take the baby away from the hospital - the baby must remain in a "safe place" (and hopefully both mum and daughter will be closely monitored). Perhaps most importantly, in this case, an EPO gives responsibility for medical decisions to the social workers AS WELL AS the mother (in other words she won't be the only person allowed to make medical decisions for her daughter). An EPO is the only mechanism - that I know of - that would produce this additional responsibility. BTW - you'll notice that the article does not refer to Ms Lyon's family, spouse/partner, or anyone else who might be in a position to help this potentially-ill mother look after the baby. This is probably a factor in the decision to apply for an EPO. Despite the implication in the article, it is unlikely that the child will be handed over by a doctor to a social worker before the EPO has been granted by a court (if the mother doesn't agree, this is kidnapping). There is no guarantee that the court will agree to the request for an Emergency Protection Order. If it is granted, there is no guarantee that it will be renewed after the 8 day period (even then, it would only be for 7 days). If Ms Lyons can get several Doctors to testify on her behalf, the court will take this into account. The Emergency Protection Order does NOT preclude parental contact. The Emergency Protection Order does NOT mean that the child will be put up for adoption. That's another implication introduced by the article see this link for an EPO explanation http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/index.cfm?request=c1147423
 
Oh, on the Federalist Society thing: I've always thought that the Founders got it right the first time; that is, only volunteers allowed for foreign wars, and you don't get to vote unless you show up for militia muster and drill with the standard weapon, good boots, rucksack, etc.
   
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.