October 6, 2007
Looks like, sounds like...
...everybody's sleeping in.
Soooo, just to see if your neurons are still triggering, here's a little quiz: passing grade is 40%.
Well, it's a *surprise* quiz, right?
1) How long did the Hundred Years War last?
2) Which country makes Panama hats?
3) From which animal do we get catgut?
4) In which month did the Soviets celebrate the October Revolution?
5) What is a camel's hair brush made of?
6) The Canary Islands are named after what animal?
7) What was King George VI's first name?
8) What color is a purple finch?
9) Where do Chinese gooseberries come from?
10) What is the color of the black box in a commercial airplane?
All done? Check your answers in Flash Traffic (I gotta set the example for kat and ry, after all...).
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
1) How long did the Hundred Years War last?
116 years
2) Which country makes Panama hats?
Ecuador
3) From which animal do we get catgut?
Sheep and Horses
4) In which month do Russians celebrate the October Revolution?
November
5) What is a camel's hair brush made of?
Squirrel fur
6) The Canary Islands are named after what animal?
A dog
7) What was King George VI's first name?
Albert
8) What color is a purple finch?
Crimson
9) Where do Chinese gooseberries come from?
New Zealand
10) What is the color of the black box in a commercial airplane?
Orange, naturally.
Sooooooo, how'd ya do?
Yeah, I know this one's a chestnut -- don't change the subject.
Sooooooo, how'd ya do?
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
This reminded me of my Electrical Engineering exams at USAFA...I got one (#10) right...and since this will probably be graded on the curve, I'll get, um, a C.
Hey, my 28/100 got a B in a second-year EE course.
Maybe that's why my BS was in Psychology.
posted by
Instapilot on October 6, 2007 1:50 PM
I got 2 of 'em ... #3 and #10. Guess I'm not as trivial as I thought I was.
Heh.
posted by
Barb on October 6, 2007 2:17 PM
I didn't have a clue about #3.
I dropped the ball on #4 because I totally forgot the Russians used the Julian Calendar until 1918.
Dang. Wish I'd been born rich instead of witty, intelligent and good-lookin'.
Now watch BCR chime in with an ace...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 3:27 PM
I'm surprised that you forgot about that Julian calendar thing too. I remember you telling me how when that happened, you were messed up for months!
posted by
Maggie on October 6, 2007 5:05 PM
Yeah, but that was during the *original* change, back in 1752.
Ummmm, anything I goofed up *after* that comes under the heading of Short-Term Memory Loss...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 5:29 PM
1) not a hundred years, I remembered that much. Silly Europeans never read the spec.
2)Don't know/Don't care/stupid hats
3)Not cats, I remembered that much. Otherwise there would be a lot more maimed violinists.
4)My first guess was Thermidor. I get these revolutions mixed up.
5)Not camel, I'm pretty sure about this.
6)I thought it was Canary wine which isn't usually classified as an animal although I admit I haven't sampled any of the older years.
7) "Hey You".
8) There are PURPLE FINCHES????
9) There are CHINESE GOOSEBERRIES???
10) Orange.
See, Bill? Yet another thing you can do better than me. Besides hypnotize a bucket of bolts into flying in formation, that is.
posted by
bad cat robot on October 6, 2007 5:30 PM
6) The Canary Islands are named after what animal?
Okay was the dog named Canary, or did he just sing well?
posted by
jim b on October 6, 2007 5:45 PM
The Canaries are named after the canines found there by the Romans. Age helps me remember things like this, but not by personal experience of Roman canines, though.
posted by Martin Morehouse on October 6, 2007 7:49 PM
Only one I got was #4(amazing what you can remember from HS world history class). Knew catgut wasn't made of feline intestines, but not what it actually was made of.
Yeah, I suck this week. So sue me.
posted by ry on October 6, 2007 9:11 PM
I got 2, 3, 4, and 10. I do threaten my kitty with being a tennis racket after death if he's not a good kitty, though. He just yawns. Dammit.
posted by
Justthisguy on October 6, 2007 9:18 PM
There are PURPLE FINCHES????
Yup. Got about ten of 'em that visit the feeder -- I thought they were fox sparrows 'til one of 'em decided to make a nest in the hanging geranium on the porch.
Okay was the dog named Canary, or did he just sing well?
Heh. The Canaries were named after the dogs (Insulae Canaris) and now the dogs are named after the Islands (Presa Canario).
(amazing what you can remember from HS world history class).
So you remembered something from last year. Big whoop...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 11:14 PM
Missed #1, 4, 5, and 7.
My kids will surely mock me now.
posted by steveH on October 7, 2007 1:01 AM
First: Maybe that's why my BS was in Psychology.
[rimshot]
And the Instapilot provides the comedy!
I got 'em all. But only because I'd seen this thing before, on the innernuts, about 10 times. I think my original score was about 4.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 7, 2007 6:49 AM
I got four.
*preens*
Actually, very frustrating... I knew some of those weren't obvious but couldn't remember the answers. :P
posted by
FbL on October 7, 2007 8:41 AM
After living 15+ years in the Canary Islands, #6 is a question that comes up frequently. Actually, the dog is the accepted version, but it's not necessarily that straightforward: How Did That Canary Get Its Name?
posted by Pamela on October 7, 2007 8:49 AM
Seems like both Ancient Dawggies and a branch of my family both came from the Canaries. My ancestors came to The Island during the early 19th Century to pursue business opportunities in the sugar cane industry. They ended up co-owning a plantation on the grounds of what is now a Petroleum Refinery
And though when speaking my natal tongue, I may sound like a Canarian, at least I don't bark like a Plinian Pooch
posted by Boquisucio on October 7, 2007 10:23 AM
Let's see...I answered correctly (or close enough for government work) on 1,3,4,6,8, and 10. What do I win?????
posted by
HomefrontSix on October 7, 2007 6:37 PM
BEEEHHHBBB Point of order Mr Speaker.
"Chinese gooseberries" in fact came from China, as did a lot of gold prospectors and they now all own fruit and veg shops so it all worked out. Once here they were renamed "kiwifruit" (the Chinese gooseberries, NOT the gold prospectors) by the apple and pear marketing board and are exported as such. You call them kiwi because you are a. victims of marketing & b. Wrong.
Hence "Chinese gooseberries" come from China & what comes from New Zealand is "kiwifruit".
Don't act all suprised, you knew I'd be jumping in.
posted by Murray on October 7, 2007 7:08 PM
Once here they were renamed "kiwifruit"...by the apple and pear marketing board...
So, we've got a Kiwi goosing the Chinese and the Apple and Pear Marketing Board giving everybody else the berries? And why does the Apple and Pear Marketing Board have naming rights over berries? Can they market honey under the name "Trebuchet treacle"?
Besides, the question was, "Where do Chinese gooseberries come from?" They may have *originated* in China, but they *come* here from New Zealand. Which is okay, because now the grocers don't have to worry about 'em being recalled for too much lead in the seeds or insufficient tread in the rind or whatever...
posted by
BillT on October 7, 2007 11:15 PM
I got a couple. IOW, I went down in flames.
posted by Cricket on October 8, 2007 8:53 AM
Nup, you're on a hiding to nothing there Bill. For a start no one buys Chinese gooseberries from New Zealand, they buy kiwifruit.
The A&P Marketing board have naming rights because they're the guys who market our fruit. By the they renamed them again because frankly it pisses us off that they've allowed people to thing kiwi are fruit but the damage is done and no one knows they're suposed to be calling them something else now.
If only we could get them to sell some of the fruits in our parliament they'd be of some use to us.
Chinese gooseberries come from China and still do. Just that no one buys them. Lead content or formaldehyde or something.
Just because you choose to purchase something from one place rather than the source that doesn't make its point of origin. We're just the middle man in this fruit salad.
Interestingly France doesn't buy any. Apparently they can't stand the green piece in the middle.
posted by Murray on October 8, 2007 4:03 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
October 5, 2007
H&I Fires October 5, 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
*********************************
Someday, John is going to regret giving me the keys to his blog....but, today....
I got the power! (yeah, C+C Music Factory reference...don't worry if you don't get it)
Starting off this morning with something particularly salient to this blog: A Liberal's Lament: The NRA might be right.
Kind of goes along with all that "free speech" stuff I'm talking about in a separate post. I think the guys if finally figuring out there are no half measures and no one right that should be defended while the others are crushed, no matter the reason, nor matter the cause.
Speaking of being "crushed", US says it kills 25 Insurgents (read "Mahdi Army) in Iraq while simultaneously busting up an AQI meeting where (gasp) an Iraqi MP was found attending (sounds like it was a "martyrs" funeral, but we'll see what turns out since the MP was a member of the largest opposition Sunni Block - who is also known to have ties with the Ba'athists, et al; might have been a set up - stand by for updates).
AQI Financier goes down in a blaze of glory and the list of AQI members noted yesterday includes Britons, Belgians, French, etc, etc, etc who will probably never be able to return to their adopted country. Yeah, we're sad for them, can't you tell? Speaking of that, wonder if that's how we snooped out the Iraqi MP? How many of those guys are running around ready to make a deal?
Well, there are 22 groups (ooh, scary) who decided to form yet another (yes, one more) giant organization (since the others keep falling apart) to "fight the occupiers", but also leave the door open for negotiations and, kind of, sort of, denounce Al Qaida.
They better hurry up and decide, because AQI is stepping up attacks on the Anti-AQI in their last bastion in Arab Joubour (also known as Saleh al din, Tikrit, etc north of Baghdad). Sometimes, those who come late to the party don't get any cake. However, don't confuse internal Shi'ite politics with AQI assassinations. The mayor of Iskandariyah was likely targeted by crazy Shi'ites trying to jockey for the position of "ye who gets to kill the women and enforce Shi'ite extremist Islamic Shariah on the unsuspecting citizens".
Sometimes people get the democracy they deserve when they do things out of fear like vote in Shi'ite extremists for "security". There are always 300 Tyrants waiting with out stretched, bloody palms. After all the hoopla about the missing 180k weapons from 2004-2005, we are in an all fired hurry to hand over millions of dollars more. Makes you go, mmmm....particularly while Ahmadinejad keeps on about Iranian dominance and acquiring "nuclear technology". You know what they say, "The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away."
Stand by for updates.
-Kat
*********************************
Let me get this straight:
1) The Chinese military probes our cyber-defenses by attempting to hack into The Pentagon’s computer systems.
2) Thanks to the firewalls that 3-COM (the contractor in charge of DOD’s cyber infrastructure) has put in place, the cyber-attacks are largely unsuccessful.
3) The Chinese military orders its networking and telecommunications equipment supply company, Huawei Technologies (a CHICOM subsidiary), to purchase 3-COM.
4) The Chinese military through Huanwei and its water carrier Bain Capital Partners investment firm, submits a request for approval of the deal to the Department of Treasury's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) .
And that’s where we stand. Are the Chinese doing an end run play, to do by subterfuge what they could not do by brute force? - Pescem Primum ad Caput Foet.
BOQ
**********************
Heh, now I've got Denizens *dueling* to get an H&I started. Both Boq and Kat had one going.
Jules Crittenden asks: Got Kids?
Why is that important? Why should you click that link?
The paranoia over parents is so strong that the AAP encourages doctors to ignore “legal barriers and deference to parental involvement” and shake the children down for all the inside information they can get.
And that information doesn’t stay with the doctor, either.
Debbie is a mom from Uxbridge who was in the examination room when the pediatrician asked her 5-year-old, “Does Daddy own a gun?”
When the little girl said yes, the doctor began grilling her and her mom about the number and type of guns, how they are stored, etc.
If the incident had ended there, it would have merely been annoying.
But when a friend in law enforcement let Debbie know that her doctor had filed a report with the police about her family’s (entirely legal) gun ownership, she got mad.
She also got a new doctor.
I'm guessing the AAP wouldn't approve of the Arms Room of Argghhh!!! - which gets cabinetry and the door installed today... whee! Busy day for me - I've got that, plus I'm laying out the route for the American Heart Association Heart Walk (which takes place tomorrow) and then there's that whole, oh, work thing, too. -the Armorer
*********************************
Wow! There's a lot of serious stuff today. You know it's Friday, right? Since nonsense is my specialty I think I'll point you toward a YouTube vid sent to me by Anthony. It is nonsense, but it's fun in a history geek kinda way......Maggie
************************
Maggie says "humor" we comply or else the princess might ask for our heads...
PIKEVILLE, Ky. - Kentucky officials on Thursday sued the manufacturer of OxyContin, the prescription painkiller dubbed "hillbilly heroin," because of widespread abuse in Appalachia.
Okay, drug abuse not funny, but "hillbilly heroin" is. And, six counties are joining in the suit. Talk about "pain". Nothing like telling drug companies not to create new and improved drugs because, you know, we just can't hack it, we'll become addicted, AND IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT!
(In which case, can I sue Typad, blogger, the first amendment, stupid congress critters, and the maker of my computer for blog addiction?...never mind...moving on....)
Here's some unintentional humor: When the CIA got it right.
This in the "eww..that is just sick" column. (you know you're going to click it - SFW)
-Kat
*******************************
Geez, Kat, if yer gonna stomp me, quit wearing the stillettos, eh?
Code Pink strikes a blow for FREEEEEEEEEEEEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!! /sarcasm. -the Armorer
*********************************
Well, it was the stilletos or the steel toed boots. Men are never happy. -Kat
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
I had the "got kids" on the list of "non-military", mmmm...things to post.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:11 AM
As well as holding up the Chinese posts. They also grabbed info from France, Germany and Britain I believe.
Everyone is busy pretending its a regular ol' hacker or four and not the Chinese military.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:34 AM
Sorry K-MO. The Admiral of the Moat Fleet didn't want to elbow anyone from her rightful place.
posted by Boquisucio on October 5, 2007 9:36 AM
NO apologies necessary. ACtually kind of takes the heat off...the moat being full of post eating monsters some times. ;)
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 10:13 AM
Just like you guys posting takes the heat off of me, especially know, when my access is spotty.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 5, 2007 10:23 AM
Well, hopefully we are driving the visit meter down to much. ;)
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 10:34 AM
that would be "we aren't" driving the site meter down.
oi
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 10:46 AM
Re: Hillbilly Heroin. That's sorta/kinda old news as the Oxycontin "problem" has been reported and editorialized in the local papers for the past few years here in eastern KY. I don't recall the specifics but it seems there was some strong evidence that the drug company used some questionable marketing practices when they first began hawking the product to doctors in this region. Still, you have to wonder what happened to personal responsibility?
I can remember when cannabis was the choice of the dopeheads here. You always knew it was harvest time by the appearance of State Police helicopters flying over the ridges and remote hollows. We haven't seen too many of those the past few years - a sign of times, I guess.
posted by Appalachian Gun Trash on October 5, 2007 2:58 PM
This is a test; from my iPod touch.
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on October 5, 2007 3:57 PM
ooohh...cool.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 4:36 PM
You can listen to over 40 of Americas top Talk Shows [yadda-yadda-yadda spam].
http://nutsyshort-wavenutwork.com
[Hi-ho, Steverino -- saved yer addy and IP for John's accountant. Expect a bill. If you're still tracking this --Bill]
posted by
Steve on October 6, 2007 9:28 AM
Hey, Boq, this is just the ChiCom trying to do it the legal(kindasorta) way. Look at the laundry list of ethnic Chinese who've gotten busted for passing US secrets to the PRC. Their intel branch doesn't work like our's does. This is them playing clean, when they play dirty you wind up with the kid who passed on the power systems and other data on the Navy to the PRC last year.
Wen Ho Lee is a classic example. yes, the guy was not convicted. But that's because info that would've convicted him couldn't be revealed in civil court. So he walks around free---but the hole was, hopefully, plugged at Los Alamos.
posted by ry on October 6, 2007 10:51 AM
I am an American Parent and I fully approve of this blog as being child friendly and totally safe because of the weapons, not in spite of them.
We had a pediatrician at Fort Wood who knew us really really well. He told us he was going to ask our children if we had guns at home (this was about 5 plus years ago) and told us by shaking his head that we were to answer it.
So we said 'No.' He said 'That is good.' Later on at Scouts (he was also the scoutmaster) he said that they were told they had to start asking because of the statistics regarding gun-related child deaths. You know, where the weapons are loaded, no safety locks, etc. 'Cause if we had answered 'yes,' he would have had to annotate our records as to whether or not the weapons were safe as in stored in a locked cabinet or safe, with the safety on and a trigger lock, with the ammunition being somewhere else.
Doctors are mandated reporters and if you have a good doctor, (we have been very blessed with our pediatricians and family docs) who KNOWS your family, keep him or her.
posted by Cricket on October 8, 2007 9:06 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh...
Finally.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Did you leave the combination on the other side?
Just asking. !;-})
posted by
Marvin on October 5, 2007 4:04 PM
Pretty nice! Looking forward to pictures of the collection in their new home :-)
posted by
Barb on October 5, 2007 4:08 PM
Ooo i gotta get one of those to make sure kids do homework.
posted by
Trias on October 5, 2007 8:04 PM
I do hope and trust, that that's not just two thicknesses of sheetrock for walls on either side?
(Poured concrete with granite aggregate and lotsa steel in it would be my choice.)
posted by
Justthisguy on October 6, 2007 8:08 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Another thread in the warp of the fabric of the Greatest Generation parts...

The flags will go to half-staff at the Castle later next week, for there has been a death in the family of Castle Argghhh! Not my direct family, nor SWWBO's, but my boon companion Mike Lehnherr, a dedicated reader, occasional content provider, grammar consultant and commenter, his father passed yesterday.
I don't know a lot about Mike's Dad and Mom - but I know Mike, and I know that even though his Dad was not his biological father... there is no doubt as to whom his Dad was.
And by knowing Mike, I know his Mom and Dad did at least one thing right in their lives.
So bow your head for the passage of yet another of the "Greatest Generation" and give thanks for what they passed on - in spirit, and in flesh.
Make a hole down there, inbound to the Stammtisch at Fiddler's Green!
Sergeant (made it three times, he did!) Elden D. Lehnherr, U.S. Army, arriving.
Now is the time at Castle Argghhh! when we dance: In Memoriam.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Prayers incoming. Rest in peace, Sgt.
posted by AFSister on October 5, 2007 8:44 AM
a toast to him, and his family!
posted by MajMike on October 5, 2007 8:50 AM
a toast!
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:51 AM
Mike,
I'm so sorry to hear about your father. Please let us know if there is anything we can do.
Most sincerely,
Margaret McLaurin
posted by Margaret McLaurin on October 5, 2007 10:18 AM
Mike,
I'm sorry to learn of the death of your father.
I hope that you and the members of your family that gather to honor his life and love are able to come together in a meaningful sense and strengthen the family and all that means, in his memory.
We will be thinking of you - safe travels.
Warmest Regards,
Tim
posted by Tim Daniel on October 5, 2007 10:32 AM
Mike,
My deepest sympathy on the loss of your Dad. Another "old soldier" passes in review to the parade ground "on high". You and your family will be in our prayers. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help you or your family.
Matt & Judy DeMaria
posted by Matt DeMaria on October 5, 2007 10:41 AM
Mike,
No need for SGT Lehnherr to set up an NDP anymore. He made it to the cantonment area and can get fresh uniforms and a shower any time he wants.
Sergeant may be the absolute best rank in the Army (still with troops, lots of authority and respect, not as much administrative hooey, and still young and fit enough to do the fun stuff). Your dad was a wise man to go for it three times!
Hope that he enjoys his new assignment, the camaraderie with his new unit, and the cushy duty of just getting the area ready for you and the rest of your family.
Here's to a soldier who won't fade away.
Jack
posted by Jack Hammell on October 5, 2007 10:42 AM
My condolences to Mike and all of the Lehnherr family. Rest in Peace, Sgt. Lehnherr.
posted by
Barb on October 5, 2007 11:06 AM
I'm very sorry to hear about the loss of your father Mike. We all know we'll have to say goodbye some day, but we're never prepared. His spirit will be there with you as the bugler blows Taps.
posted by Eric Franzen on October 5, 2007 2:34 PM
Okay - now my eyeballs are REALLY sweating. I never could figure out how a lump, the size of a watermelon, can fit in our throats. Thanks so much to everyone - raise one with me to a comrade, fallen. Kyrie Eleison. ML
posted by
Mike Lehnherr on October 5, 2007 6:17 PM
We salute an old soldier who answered "boots and saddles" for the last time, and we honor him with a famous samurai death poem:
Foe unvanquished
I won't perish in the field
I'll be born again
to take up the halberd seven more times.
posted by Chris & June Foley on October 5, 2007 7:32 PM
May light perpetual shine upon him, Mike.
I'm so sorry.
posted by
Cassandra on October 6, 2007 5:40 AM
Mike,
Our prayers are with you and your family during this time. We are very sorry for the loss of your father. Please let us know if there is anything at all that we can do.
Your friends,
Doug & April Rollison
posted by April Rollison on October 6, 2007 7:48 AM
Qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere eis. Omnibus in Christo quiescentibus locum refrigerii, lucis et pacis...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 11:14 AM
What Bill said. Light and Peace...
posted by
Justthisguy on October 6, 2007 8:17 PM
Mike, our deepest sympathies to you and yours. You know you are in our prayers here at home, let us know if there is anything we can do. Mel & Donna
posted by Mel Cape on October 8, 2007 6:26 AM
Mike and Family,
As I watch this happen to our Booz family of friends, I cannot imagine this loss, nor how one deals with it, save for the support of others. As I read the messages left you here, I know it must help you because it even touches me to be a part of this group who grieve with you for a man whom they do not even know except as a fellow vet. My thoughts are with you as well and I too will honor your father's passing. Take care.
posted by Lona on October 11, 2007 3:44 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Note to Congress:
MoveOn made a dumb ad, that played to their base. Rush Limbaugh made a clumsy elocution, which when taken out of context, looks dumb. Okay. This is a note from the Heartland to BOTH parties.
COULD WE PASS A FEW FARGING APPROPRIATION BILLS, PLEASE?
Ya wanna make a statement supportive of the troops?
PASS THE DAMN VA FUNDING BILL. How 'bout that? Not to mention the rest of 'em. Good golly gee, people. And ya wonder why the nation thinks you're a collection of buffoons? Just watch C-Span.
The bills are what's important, ladies and gents. Not the posturing that mostly only interests those who already agree with you. ARGGHHH!!!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
I've barely got time to sleep let alone blog and comment, but you sum up my feelings in 1.
Next they'll be passing a Brittney bill.
posted by
BloodSpite on October 5, 2007 8:59 AM
Well smote, sir. If it makes you feel any better (and I'm almost positive it won't), we're just as bad up here north of you folks. It's like these pols live in a freakin' bubble, where everything's about the sizzle and nobody cares about the steak.
Frustrating.
posted by
Damian on October 5, 2007 9:19 AM
Well, except for not passing any salient bills, sometimes non-working buffoonery is good...for the American people that is. At least they can't make it worse than it is.
But, money would be good for these two items. They can wrestle over their little squealing pork projects some other time.
and people wonder why I absolutely detest the possibility of government directed health care.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:42 AM
Hmmm. I did kinda break my own rulez, didn't I?
Sigh. Anger, it's such an ugly thing.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 5, 2007 10:13 AM
Hmmm. I did kinda break my own rulez, didn't I?
Not really. The messengers have self-identified with the message in this instance, ergo, a slap at the messenger is a slap at the message is a slap at the messenger.
Think of it as a political Moebius strip...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 11:25 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Admiral Mullen's command guidance.
The Chairman of the Joint Chief's laid out his agenda for his staff.
You can download it here.
Pages 1, 2, and 6 are the pretty standard boilerplate for command philosophy. The heart lies in pages 3-5. Emphasis in the original.
To wit:
Priorities and Strategic Objectives
1) Develop a strategy to defend our National interests in the Middle East. Our immediate concern remains the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But we cannot dismiss the efforts by other state and non-state actors to foment instability in the Middle East. The increasingly hostile role being played by Iran; the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; Sunni-Shia rivalries; the rise of radical jihadists, and the resurgence of A1 Qaeda all threaten to tear at fragile seams and all bear directly on the security of the United States. We need a strategy to manage U.S. military presence in the Middle East that adversaries must take seriously and which reassures our friends, allies and partners.
Therefore, we will:
1). Develop a comprehensive Middle East security strategy, tied to a larger global view, but focused on our vital national interests. This effort will address long-term security in Iraq and Afghanistan, potential threats from Iran, and movement toward reducing major sources of conflict, with a goal of ultimately achieving regional stability.
> Ensure that our strategic plans are sustainable over time and provide flexibility for escalation, de-escalation, and a wide range of options.
> Integrate our capabilities within the interagency process to develop and execute this longterm strategy, while leading in the interagency wherever appropriate.
> Improve international cooperation in the region.
2) Reset. Reconstitute and Revitalize our Armed Forces . . . particularly the ground forces. Though recruiting and retention figures remain good and morale is still high, we cannot take for granted the service of our people or their families. We must rapidly mitigate the toll our current pace of operations is taking on them, our equipment, and our ability to respond to other crises and contingencies. We must recognize that new asymmetrical threats call for different kinds of warfighters, mission systems and strategies. We need to be smarter, lighter, more agile, and more lethal. Only by applying our own asymmetric advantages -- our people, intellect and technology -- and by maintaining a force correctly shaped, sized, trained and equipped can we adequately defend the nation.
Therefore, we will:
> Determine the true health of our ground forces in terms of people, training, equipment, and family support to ensure these forces are ready to serve effectively over the long term and across the full spectrum of operations.
> Provide clear estimates of resetting our units in each Service and Defense agency. Assess how long it will take and what resources will be necessary to regain full spectrum capabilities across all our forces. We must make this issue a priority in our Program and Budget process and prepare to execute it in the long term without substantial support from supplemental funding.
> Improve the capabilities of our Reserve Component as it continues to become a more relevant contributor to the operational joint force. We must also ensure it preserves a significant "strategic reserve" capability and capacity.
> With an understanding of its unique domestic responsibilities, support National Guard Bureau efforts to improve readiness, leverage existing forces, streamline organizations, and make units leaner, smaller, and more effective. We must likewise ensure the National Guard preserves its own "strategic reserve" capability and capacity. Improve requirements, acquisition, and technology development efforts to ensure rapid, predictable delivery of needed combat capabilities to our warfighters.
> Develop and help integrate realistic, complementary, jointly interdependent, prioritized Service modernization plans.
> Develop implementation plans to ensure effective execution of pending BRAC and joint basing initiatives.
> Engage in the development of a broad-based, flexible, effective, and affordable joint military health care system that provides superb care for combat wounded (to include PTSDITBI patients), and improves wellness initiatives, military care, family care, and retiree care.
> Prepare plans, to include strategy-driven prioritization, to sustain and modernize our joint forces during a time of civilian administration transition and potential fiscal constraints.
3) Properly Balance Global Strategic Risk.
We must stay mindful of our many global security commitments and of the core warfighting capabilities, resources and partnerships required to conduct operations across the full spectrum of peace and conflict. A larger, longer view of risk assessment that helps us maintain a position of global leadership and preserves our freedom of action remains critical. I want the Joint Staff focused on rebalancing strategic risk.
The demands of current operations -- however great -- should not dominate our training exercises, education curricula and readiness programs. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan will one day end. We must be ready for who -- and what -- comes after.
What "comes after" is hard to predict. Conflict in the future will most likely -- but not exclusively -- demand increased precision, speed and agility. We may face state as well as nonstate enemies, including some who may only appear in cyberspace. The target could be America's infrastructure and the new weapon could be a computer-generated attack on critical networks and systems. It could just as likely be a chemical, biological or nuclear weapon of mass destruction.
Future war may therefore be borderless, or it could exist completely within the confines of small, urban areas. It may require of our people skills they do not yet possess and capabilities we do not yet field. In some conflicts, information and non-kinetic means may prevail, while in other places at other times only "boots on the ground" and precisely delivered fires will carry the day.
The American people expect their Armed Forces to maintain sufficient capability and capacity to deter and, failing that, defeat all such military threats to their security and the security of our vital national interests: a homeland secure from attack; sustained global influence, leadership and freedom of action; sustained strategic endurance and military superiority; flourishing global and national economies; assured access to strategic resources; and regional stability in the Middle East.
Where conflict threatens these interests, U.S. forces must be able to rapidly respond, providing political leadership with a range of options for deterrence, escalation and de-escalation, in coordination with other elements of national and multi-national power.
Therefore, we will:
> Develop -- through the Combatant Commanders and in cooperation with our partners -- integrated theater engagement plans that strengthen relationships with enduring allies, improve ties to emerging partners, and engage and better understand potential competitors.
> Build and reinvigorate relationships through Theater Security Cooperation with a focus on capacity-building, humanitarian assistance, regional frameworks for improving governance, and cooperation in enforcing the rule of law.
> Rapidly develop an enduring cultural, historical, and linguistic expertise in our total force to ensure effective interaction with diverse international partners.
> Establish and quickly achieve reasonable goals and expectations for deployment rotations of our Active, Reserve and National Guard Bureau components. For our Active Forces, this deployment to dwell ratio should be no greater than 1 : 1 in the near term with a view towards an equilibrium level of 1 :2 while at war.
> The vast majority of focus in people and capability resides in the Central Command AOR, and rightly so. We must work to rapidly rebalance this capability when conditions permit.
> Pursue a comprehensive approach to deterrence. Put in place a new concept of strategic deterrence for the 2 lSt Century in terms of training, equipping, theory and practice appropriate to a range of state and non-traditional threats in both nuclear and conventional realms.
> Develop an effective military strategy for cyberspace to protect and defend against infrastructure attacks, reduce our vulnerabilities and ensure our capability to operate in this vital realm.
Methinks the Navy and Air Force aren't going to like the budgetary implications of the "Reset, Reconstitute and Revitalize" the ground forces... He hits all the major hot buttons that I can see - now to see if he'll have a President and Congress that will allow it and fund it.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
How come "rename the war-whose-name-can't-be-mentioned" isn't on the list?
posted by AFSister on October 5, 2007 8:45 AM
Heh...sis, i think you missed the "renaming"
strategic deterrence for the 2 lSt Century
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:13 AM
Of course, these are politically incorrect, but I would prefer in lieu of GWOT:
1. Southwest Asia Punitive Expeditions (hey, it worked in Mexico…)
2. The Jihadistan War (with Iraq and Afghanistan recognized as 2 campaigns in the same war)
3. The Last Crusade...
posted by Oldloadr on October 5, 2007 4:18 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Flagging Patriotism and Manufactured Controversies
[Denizen Opinion - Kat - yes, another one. In a general disclaimer, this post is mine and does not represent the views of the owner of this blog or any other commenter unless otherwise specified]
Sometimes I think that life must be too boring for people. Not enough controversy, so somebody has to make it up. It is interesting to see people trying to manufacture controversy out of nothing. Especially during an upcoming election season. Pretty much tells you how vapid and empty the entire political process is going to be.
Now that Iraq seems to be slipping off the radar, we don't seem to have anything important to twist ourselves around. So, we're back to "first principles".
(continued in flash traffic)
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
For instance, the Rush thing goes on because now he had the gall to patronize (yes, that's what he did) Brian McGough on the VoteVet ad that was slamming him.
Look, I don't care for VoteVet.org. They aren't just a democrat associated veterans organization. They are barely this side of the IVAW. These folks were supporting Olberman's claims of Tillman's alleged murder and cover up. John Soltz actually tried to claim that his combat experience made him a forensic scientist and he could verify the wounds on Tillman came from a specific weapon, fired from a specific distance. In fact, he did so by doing exactly what they are doing now: taking a part of a report, interpreting incomplete information and insisting that one sentence from a medical examiner nullified all the other evidence.
There was no conspiracy to murder Pat Tillman. Some officers doing CYA after they didn't handle the release of information right was the only "conspiracy" that occurred. That was bad enough and certainly gave the military a black eye. No need for manufactured conspiracies here.
Political murder, no.
Military service does not equate to perfect people. It doesn't make them Sacred Relics, immune to criticism nor, apparently, to supporting idiotic conspiracy theories for political gain. John Soltz representing VoteVets on Olberman's show, supporting a conspiracy theory, pretty much ended any ideas on my part about listening to their ideas and told me what I needed to know about the organization.
Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.
For Rush, my advice comes straight from my grandmother: when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
Best thing to do is to stop talking about it personally. I would have brought some real veterans on to talk about their service and their incredible sacrifices in defense of the nation. Turn off the "fakes" like Jesse MacBeth (who are just getting their jollies off of being talked about; the whole reason they faked their service records in the first place) and turn off the conspiracy theorists like VoteVet. Or, if you just can't resist, get some vets who follow actual "phoney" claims of service, like Matt from Blackfive, to talk about actual people that continue to be outed as not having served. Particularly, people like Chester Stiles who the media, without checking, reported was once a Navy Seal (he isn't by the way; but who pays attention after the fact?). Talk about how much harm that does to the credibility and honor of the people that really serve.
But, don't patronize these VoteVet guys and suggest some service member with a political axe to grind is "manipulated". That's just playing the same game that the Democrats and other "anti-war" people like to play when they suggest military people are deluded or brainwashed or otherwise unable to rationally contemplate their commitment to serve or their commitment to the mission.
I imagine this VoteVet guy knows exactly what he is doing. I'll say it plainly, he's a political hack. Anyone that disagrees with me, leave your comments below, but remember, this is written by "Kat" not "the Armorer".
On to the second subject of "Sacred Relics":
Over at Blackfive, the vet who cut down the flags because the United States Flag was being flown under the Mexican flag is getting a lot of play. Mostly the applause and support of a bunch of people who are concerned that Patriotism is failing in the United States. That may be so and I would even agree, but I disagree with John Broussard's actions and those that applaud him. I certainly won't be contributing to his "defense fund".
I have not seen any interview with this owner. Allegedly, he said it was "in support of the local populace" (the illegal Mexican immigrants that are being rounded up?). I don't know. I can't seem to find this alleged interview. I don't think it makes a difference in my opinion. But, for all the applause being thrown towards Mr. Broussard, I think his actions were actually misguided, illegal (petty larceny, damage to private property) and maybe even remotely racist. Yes, I said the "R" word.
When Mr. Broussard said "These people want to fight us." Who was he speaking about? He was tearing down the Mexican flag. Was that all Mexicans? Because, that is what he implied. And people are cheering him on. Does anyone know anything about this man besides he's a white vet that was angry about the flag? Any affiliations? Past history?
I'm not trying to throw suspicion on him, but, per my comment on VoteVet: lay down with dogs, get up with fleas. I think anyone supporting him should have something more than the scripted release of information.
Then, when some commenter at one of my favorite blogs puts "Mexican" in scare quotes, that is the equivalent of sneering that word in writing and something we regularly lambaste the media for doing when they want to describe something the military says happened and they disagree with. What do we call them? Anti-military?
My point here is that, regardless of the intent, when we act this way, we turn off people who might otherwise have agreed that border security is important, but who want to steer clear of any overtly, intended or perceived racially motivated organizations and actions.
That may not be the intent, but perception is everything and if I can perceive it as such, others can, too. I believe this kind of thing harms the conservative base and will drive supporters and voters away eventually. Plenty of folks want to dump the "amnesty" republicans, but I wonder if they are prepared for a Hillary who would do more and possibly worse?
I know, people feel provoked by "La Rassa" and similar organizations. I know that people feel provoked by people who desecrate the flag, fly it upside down and any number of other things. Shockingly, I happen to agree with the ACLU: Free Speech.
Please, don't assume you know what I believe about what the flag means or how it should be respected.
I can hold both ideas without going into apoplectic fits. I am also not provoked to do something illegal by such acts of disrespect or political speech. Free speech means we can counter it with more free speech, not break the law. Protesters who break windows at recruiting offices and vandalize war monuments are breaking the law. So did Mr. Broussard.
People could have protested outside of the establishment. They could have set up flags and handed out flyers talking about proper flag etiquette. They could have went down and given an interview to the news organization about what they believe. They could have used this event for something positive that not only reflected our patriotism, but also provided an opportunity to educate people about the issues from illegal immigration to appropriate flag etiquette.
they could have done a lot of things that are explicitly allowed under the first amendment and equally protected as this shop owner. Instead, the new hero of the right is making the right look a little like the fringe left: crazy, angry, scary people.
Yeeeaaaarrrggghhh! Did not get Dean elected. Remember that.
What informs my opinions on free speech are things like Wes Clark calling for "rated" speech; the attempts to re-instate the unfair "fairness doctrine", the backhanded attempts to have radio talk show hosts tossed off of AFN because the reigning party can't stand the idea that they don't get "equal time" to propagandize the troops with their defeatist rhetoric; Hillary's "media smatters" propaganda attacks in support of these attempts to limit the speech of others; Burmese dissenters being chopped up and tossed in the jungle, perfectly good democracies throwing their freedom away for 21st Century Chavismo Communism that institutes "re-education" in state funded schools and "nationalism" where non-state news stations are closed down because they resist the "revolution"; Hollywood activism with their giant, overpaid, undereducated megaphone; Chinese and North Korean dissidents in secret prisons; and, historically (breaking Godwin's law) a rather infamous picture of Hitler "consecrating" Nazi SS flags with the "sacred" bloody flag of the Munich Putsch.
All of these things I keep in mind, remembering that most of these things happen under the guise of "law". I don't believe we need any law that inhibits free speech. I don't believe we need penalties, fines or jail time for it. I don't want to give any would be dictator any little legal powers to imprison me because someday I might feel like this country has gone to hades in a hand basket and desire to show it by hanging the flag upside down or even burning it.
I have a last thing to say about the News Station involved: I think they went down there to film the flag for the exact thing that happened - manufactured controversy. News must have been awful slow that day. Then again, its what I've come to expect from the media. If they don't have anything good to write about, they create it. Journalist hacks.
Finally, Barak Obama gave some lame excuse for not wearing the United States Flag on his lapel. It was an obvious play to his constituency. The folks who most fear "ultra-patriotism", who most often desecrate the flag or decry it because it is flying over causes they disagree with.
His answer, though, was a weaseling cop out. A cop out that seems to go with his "embrace the world" point of view.
Not that his weaseling changed my mind. Wasn't intending to vote for him anyway. Not because of his lack of flag or his weaseling cop out. But, because I don't intend to be a citizen of the United Continents of the World or embrace dictators like Fidel Castro singing Kumbaya, roasting marshmallows over "Camp Happy World" fire pit filled with the bodies of people who want just what we do: freedom.
Another political hack.
If you want your kids to know about patriotism, honoring the flag and real heroes, don't look for the state or schools to do it, do it yourself. Do it for their future. But don't teach them to infringe on other people's rights because they think they are right.
Don't show them a video of an angry white guys with a K-Bar. Show them the proper way to hang a flag, salute the flag, pledge to the flag and put it away.
Someday, they may teach that to their kids, too.
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Kat has almost officially taken over. There's only room for TINS, gun pr0n, and Kat. Dang, I'd hate to see what your volume would be if actually got serious.;)
I do wish though, we'd simply forget this whole Rush Limbaugh thing. Who bleedin' cares? I was just annoyed when I posted about it that Congress was wasting time on this(come on, there's nothing more pressing then a photo-op/sound byte op to show you support the troops but the other side doesn't bs?). Let the big mouths fight amoungst themselves, they live for this tearing of each other down activity. Rushbo(or whatever he's called now) simply isn't worth our 'trons.
posted by ry on October 5, 2007 8:16 AM
No one is stopping you from competing with Kat, Ry...
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 5, 2007 8:25 AM
Oh - and at least she's burying the long stuff in the extended entry!
I'm the only one who gets to bloviate all over the front page, with posts so long your finger cramps from the scrolling...
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 5, 2007 8:31 AM
Kat, just one quibble with a great post. Free speech wasn't an issue at all with the incorrect flag flying, neither party represented the government. I am in agreement with you that there shouldn't be laws against it, with the exception of the upside down, that is a distress signal and should be treated as such with regards to false alarms.
posted by Geo on October 5, 2007 8:48 AM
yeah...you're making me carry the load around here, ry.
And, I wouldn't have noted it except it was all of the piece on flags and free speech.
though, that might have been too subtle I suppose.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 8:48 AM
kat: i had to read the whole thing twice, and still couldn't figure out what you thought would be the objectionable part. i came to the comments, saw Geo's note regarding the minor quibble, and concur with him.
from my perspective, nothing you said should raise any hackles.
posted by MajMike on October 5, 2007 9:02 AM
Actually, the free speech part came because people were insisting that there was or should be a law that had the tavern owner thrown in jail or otherwise penalized for not flying the flag right.
At which point, a law that did so would indeed endanger free speech. It's why I opposed the "burning flag" bill last year. that's why I framed my reply on the subject as "free speech".
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:05 AM
Well, I didn't want the Armorer to take any flack for my "political hack" comment.
Or the "crazies" on both sides of the fence.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 5, 2007 9:19 AM
WELL, I DISAGREE!!!
And calling VoteVetGuy a political hack is simply noting he's a horse of a different colour. Not that horses of colour are un-horseylike. Unless he's a donkey. Then he'd be an ass.
Even if the Armourer is irresponsible, he can still be blamed. On principle.
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on October 5, 2007 12:42 PM
Also:
Two Kinds of Patriotism.
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on October 5, 2007 1:51 PM
Kat – I agree that the Vet handled the situation wrong. If I had seen that, I would have gone into the establishment and explained the rules to the proprietor. If he had not adjusted the situation, then I would have hauled the flags down (without cutting the lanyards), treating both with due respect and taken them into the establishment and handed them to the proprietor. That would have made the point without breaking the law. If the shop-keeper persisted in his disrespect then, as has been pointed out, he could have organized demonstrations…
posted by Oldloadr on October 5, 2007 5:05 PM
Even if the Armourer is irresponsible, he can still be blamed. On principle.
But only if you keep it in context.
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 11:38 AM
Talk about how much harm that does to the credibility and honor of the people that really serve.
All politics is local. F'r instance, there are only about 40,000 folks in my town, but there are at least 1.200 who did some form of military service (mostly WWII and Korea -- there's about thirty Viet and OIF/OEF vets). If there were a sufficient number of genuine vets in each community, the mannabes wouldn't have any credibility.
As an example, the now-former -- and now-on-the-lam -- mayor of Atlantic City claimed he'd been a Green Beanie. A real one called him on it, which started a curious prosecutor wondering what else he'd lied about.
Heh. One fake VietVet down, about 12 million to go...
posted by
BillT on October 6, 2007 11:51 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
October 4, 2007
H&I Fires October 4, 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
*********************************
Running a tad bit late...but off to a good start this morning.
How many people know that North Korea just took home a deal for approval from the six party talks to close down all three nuclear reactors by Dec 31 in exchange for food and oil? According to the details, the US will lead the way in dismantling them and provide the funding. Basically its a hand shake deal, but the Chinese pretty much told Kim Jong Il to take it.
Besides heating oil and food I'm not sure what was promised although the food and heating oil probably topped the list since even Kim's elites were probably going to have to eat a lot more vegetarian(sole of shoe) soup this winter.
Oh, yeah, obligatory: Bush is worst president ever!
And here is a little speculation about the possibility part of the "I swear I am not cheating this time" deal from North Korea was ratting out some of its client states? You know..things go "boom" in Syria and nobody is talking?
In other news, a 1,200 pound Marine retires after 12 years showing the new recruits what being a marine is all about.
Cost to outfit GI going into field during WWII $170 (2007 adjusted rate); today $17,000; next decade $28,000 to $60,000 depending on specialty. It's called, "force protection", but we'll call it "CRA" Civilian Risk Aversion.
This in the "about time" column: Army to offer college credits with training.
A museum that honors Black WWII Vets opened 2 months ago is barely making it. Maybe they'll incorporate it into the WWII Museum the are building in Witchita. You'd think some folks (Danny and Whoopi) might remember that they are doing their thing in Hollywood as black actors because black vets showed the world they could shed their blood for freedom and democracy as well as the white man could. They placed the flag of equality on the mountain top. Even Martin Luther King, Jr was only following the path they had carved out.
NATO launches new Afghan offensive. Looks like we're not going to let the cave dwellers sneak home for Christmas and come back to war in the spring.
Small break from things warlike: Astronomers find second earth forming 424 light years away. Followed closely on the heels by the US and Russia signing a new space deal. You wonder if anybody else knows the world is going to explode someday soon and we need to get off of it as soon as possible? Or maybe we're all just a bunch of imperialist expansionist who want to be the first to put a flag on some other piece of property?
Speaking of Russia and things not military: Unusual Hostage Situation - Kidnapper demands Cranberries.
Back to things ugly and violent: Chavez claims US stoking military rebellion. Now, would we do that? I mean one of our ex-presidents did confirm old Chavez as dictator for life...er...duly elected president.
-Kat
***************
A series of unfortunate events for AQI. That includes, after Al Tunisi was vaporized, discovering a list of 500 takfiri including their pictures and personal data. I picture many roaches running from the light. (H/T Mudville Gazette and somebody else who I can't find the original link from but you know who you are)
Also from Mudville, please read Jim Spiri on returning home from Iraq. He and his family have given much in this war.
-Kat
******************
Bill Roggio provides an actual picture of the problems AQI is having staying alive.
More on the North Korea Deal...it looks a lot better than any before and we will have actual techs on the ground to perform "disablement" by next week. (H/T Instapundit) - Kat
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Does anyone else wonder about AQ? Here's a secret organization committed to terrorism world-wide, but they have applications, and they keep personnel files. Just not the way I always pictured terrorists operating.
BTW, we do thank them for all the help.
posted by
Chuck Simmins on October 4, 2007 7:43 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
The Prince of Darkness.
[Note - Dusty put this in the H&I late yesterday, and it clearly deserves it's own post, so I did that. -the Armorer]
Jason puts the crosshairs on my favorite retired 4-star.
Thoughts:
Having seen Wes' conduct of the war in Kosovo (as the senior USAF officer attached to V Corps in Albania) up close, the Shelton characterization didn't surprise me.
For the blue suiters, especially the planners in the CAOC at Vicenza, there seemed to be great deal of pressure to introduce an Army aviation unit into the conflict when the latter clearly wasn't ready and their contribution would have had little effect on the fight. The same thing was happening, sort of, with the Corps' MLRS batteries.
That's not to say the Apaches and their crews weren't capable...it just didn't make sense to roll them into the equation given the ROE limitations, the targets, the intel available and the AH-64's capabilities and vulnerabilities. Again, the 11 AVN Rgmt is chock full of great Americans, with balls the size of pickle jars, flying awesome aircraft but sometimes you gotta square peg and a round hole and it doesn't pay to needlessly pound away--it wastes assets and can really screw things up.
Personal opinion: The pressure from Wes to do so was palpable...and the Army staff resisted, and resented, it. Clark's demanor/attitude, and what seemed to be a nakedly partisan and opportunistic attempt to showcase the Army in an ongoing air battle got him in trouble. My gut tells me Clinton rightfully saw the hazards in that and responded. Trying his damnedest to inject Army combat units into what was a pure air war (for good or bad--different discussion), Wes made himself a pain in the ass, exceeded Bill's personal and political pain threshold and the rest is history.
All that said, the shortcomings we saw in capabilities less than a decade ago have been extensively addressed in today's ops. Say what you will about the political dimensions of the Iraq campaign, the corporate memory being built there across all three services, and the associated improvements in all services' equipment, tactics, techniques and procedures, will stand us in good stead for a long time to come.
[As someone who was involved in this from a different perspective - let me just echo the Instapilot's view here. But I admit, I've not been a fan of he POD since I first worked with him at the National Training Center, back in the '80s. Now to see if this post will pull in the one guy who pops in to support the POD when we bash him in these pages! 8^ ) -the Armorer]
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Wesley Clark and Bill Clinton make my skin crawl so much that I'm tempted to believe whackjob David Icke's contention that the Rhodes Scholar program is a "front" operation run by reptile aliens to develop evil world leaders. LOL
posted by fdcol63 on October 4, 2007 7:57 AM
From the PuffH link:
"Last week, Rush Limbaugh labeled any American soldier who supports an end to the war in Iraq as "phony.""
I think Gen Clark thus places Gen Clark in the group of "phonies", which I think suits him well.
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on October 4, 2007 3:20 PM
...a great deal of pressure to introduce an Army aviation unit into the conflict when the latter clearly wasn't ready and their contribution would have had little effect on the fight.
Nail. Head.
Every Attack Helicopter outfit in the Army was wondering *why* send Apaches someplace they won't be able to use Hellfires?
Hint: without breaking OPSEC, it has to do with terrain and weather, and anybody who's got a Balkan rotation under his (or her) belt is One Who Knows.
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 7:24 PM
From the Tom Delay site, remember when Wes was running for president cause he wanted adulation?
MSNBC, Chris Matthews, Hardball, Dec 9, 2003...
MATTHEWS: Did Bill Clinton agree in your policy?
CLARK: Absolutely.
MATTHEWS: Why did he relieve you?
CLARK: First of all, I wasn’t relieved.
MATTHEWS: You weren’t?
CLARK: No. Uh-uh.
MATTHEWS: You weren’t relieved as supreme commander as NATO.
CLARK: No, I wasn’t. No. I was asked to retire three months early.
MATTHEWS: How is that different?
CLARK: Because, the way it works...
MATTHEWS: But you weren’t fired?
CLARK: No.
MATTHEWS: Well, it sounds like it. You were told to leave.
GEN. NORMAN SCHWARZKOPF, U.S. ARMY (RET.): He was fired because of matters of character and integrity. That is a very, very damning statement which says if that’s the case he’s not the right man for president as far as I’m concerned.
posted by
jim b on October 4, 2007 8:17 PM
Now to see if this post will pull in the one guy who pops in to support the POD when we bash him in these pages!
Nope. Looks like he's too busy doing damage control -- anonymously -- over at Jason's house.
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 8:26 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
TINS! Numbah Ten!
I smacked Real Life on the snoot and it hasn't come to -- yet.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Số mười, GI. And this one was definitely a Number 10 for the ground participants:
As you recall, the mission was a combat assault.

And if you don't recall, well, it was *still* a combat assault.
The Plan called for a five-ship insertion into the southeastern green quadrangle after the morning monsoon ended and, after the troops began moving westward into this neck of the U Minh, a second five-ship insertion would make an insertion into the quadrangle just west of the WR0 line. Those troops would move into the U Minh and take up blocking positions along the trail bordering the Rach Xen Bau canal -- when they were in position, the troops from the first insertion would re-orient and sweep towards them through the jungle, driving any VC they'd flushed toward the blockers. A heavy fire team of Copperheads would be patrolling between the shoreline and the trees on left flank security detail. After the action was over, everybody was supposed to procede to the western quadrangle for extraction. Sounds like a plan, right? But did I mention the jungle was the U Minh Forest?
Nasty place.
The morning monsoon ceased right on time (you could set your watch by the rainshowers if you didn't mind being maybe ten minutes off every couple of days) and there were still some broken clouds layered at about 2,500 and 7,000 feet. I was flying C&C, enroute at two grand to scope out the LZs; the Copperheads would do the close-in recon, and they were trailing me at about a mile, staying on the treetops. If there was anybody home to hear the noise, they'd associate it with me until the guns appeared. We'd left the flight at Ca Mau, about ten minutes away; they'd crank in another five minutes and bring in the first lift, because I'd have a decent LZ brief by then. We figured that if it took you more than five minutes to formulate the approach path, approach type, enemy situation and obstacle warning, touchdown point, egress route and suppression instructions, you were snoozing -- these days, they spend *hours* on "The Mission Plan: Actions Approaching the LZ" "...Actions In the LZ" et cetera -- usually with the same results that we got in five minutes.
*shrug*
The aircraft are six times as expensive, so I guess you've gotta spend six times longer on The Plan.
Visibility beneath and between cloud decks was great -- I identified the LZs when I was still a good seven miles to the southeast (the lower right corner of the map, ry) and, when I got closer, I could see something else.
Four guys un-camouflaging something.
"Hey, Three-One, One-Five on Uniform -- I've got people on our side of the north-south blue just short of--"
A 12.7mm Soviet heavy anti-aircraft machinegun. Aka, a .51 cal. See the red circle on the map?
"Owwww! Fifty-one! Fifty-one! Fifty-one! Break south -- One-five is going for the clouds!"
When concealment is closer than cover, opt for concealment. I'd already figured if I turned to run or dove, they had an excellent chance at nailing me, but I could climb 500 feet and be inside the scud before they could get a shot off. I yanked the cyclic back and the collective up, and went from straight-and-level at 100 knots to climbing in bat-outta-hell mode with zero knots forward airspeed.
Yours Truly to pilot: "Keep your eyes on that .51 -- lemme know when they start elevating it."
Pilot to YT: "Like they're doing now?"
*jink left, right pedal turn 90 degrees, keep climbing -- they don't have radar, and the jink 'n' pedal turn will skew his lead angle -- I hope*
Into the clouds. Six seconds later, out of the clouds.
"Hey, One-Five, Three-One, Uniform -- you sure you don't want company up there?"
"No, you'll just -- waitaminnit. Head south for three more minutes, then frag off one of the guns to Ca Mau for fuel -- have him tell the flight to hang loose and monitor Victor. Then you and your wingman head west to the Gulf, then turn north along the shore until you're over the PZ. Fly a long orbit and make noise, but keep the trees between you and the .51."
"Roger that. I sent Three-Three back. Don't get a nosebleed way up there."
YT: "Okay, how do you figure we're gonna get those guys?"
Pilot: "By that, I take it that we're not going to do something sensible, like go away from something designed to shoot down friggin' Messerschmitts?"
YT: "What's sensible got to do with it? I didn't get up at 0430 just to enjoy cold C-rats at Ca Mau at sunrise. Think."
Pilot: "Well, using the guns would be stupid -- they'd get killed before they got the first rocket off. Ummm -- you planning on dropping stuff on them?"
YT: "In a manner of speaking. Where were we yesterday?"
Pilot: "At that Marine Tiger Team fort. The one with the -- ooooh, artillery!"
Continued in Flash Traffic, so I don't blow all kat's Monday/Tuesday stuff through the bottom of the blog...
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
YT: "Yup. That .51 is right on the canal junction -- I can send a ten-digit grid. And the Marines are right on the north-south canal, so that's our gun-target line (if you haven't memorized the map yet, look for the magenta line. What, you thought I'd use *red*?). They've got one-seven-fives, and they fire a shell heavier than *I* am with a hundred-meter bursting radius -- and even if we only get close, the concussion will flatten them and the mud from the burst will bury 'em."
Yep. A 100-meter bursting radius and, at the range we were going to adjust, a normal dispersion of about a grid square (that's an old artillery joke)...
Long-story-short.
The clouds were drifting east and broken enough to give me a decent view of the target area from about 3,000 feet up while I was flying along the blue ellipsoid on the map. The first few rounds were on line and within 500 meters of the target, then they started to wander so far to the right (using the GT line) that they were hitting in the U Minh Swamp. Between exploding thirty feet deep in the the muck and the smoke dispersing through the foliage, I couldn't adjust for squat.
And, to make life even more exciting, whenever I strayed too far from the clouds, the VC gun crew would scramble to put a quick burst in my direction. Because I was being sneaky by flying out-of-trim, they'd miss by a mile. Copperhead 31 also had me in sight and razzed me every time he heard me make another adjustment, which just added to my determination to kill something before the day was over. Snarky UH-1C pilots included.
Back to square One.
YT to USMCFA: "Change adjustment. Mark Center of Sector, one round, Willie Pete, over."
Gyrene Guns: "Roj-oh, mark Center of Sector with one round of Willie Peter, out."
*pop into the clouds*
GG: "Shot, over."
YT: "Shot, out."
*pop out of the clouds to observe the burst*
GG: "Splash, over."
YT: "Splash, out."
...four, three, two -- looking out along the canal line for the football-field-sized white phosphorus--
!!! AIRBURST RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME !!!
Into the cloud. Six seconds later, out of the cloud. However, due to the aerodynamic peculiarities of the UH-1H, we'd already sucked a Huey-sized gulp of white phosphorus smoke into the cockpit and cabin, which, also due to the aerodynamic peculiarities of the UH-1H, proceded to leach out into the slipstream in as pretty a smoke trail as a stunt plane's at an airshow. Three-One hadn't seen the burst, but he *did* see me pop from behind a cloud.
Trailing a *lot* of white smoke.
Whereupon he keyed the mike and said, "Hey, One-Five -- uhh, ya do know yer on fire, don't ya?"
My reply was not suitable for your tender sensibilities, dear readers.
And, needless to say, I do not adhere to the old aviation dictum about ignoring ground fire -- "Big sky, little bullet."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Epilogue: After I decided Somebody didn't want me to verbally abuse the Marines any more, a Black Pony popped up on Guard (243.0 UHF, for the grognards) and asked if he could play with us. Oh, yessss!
I gave the artillery End Of Mission, AA Gun Crew Terrified, gave the OV-10 driver the location of the .51 and told him to have at it. He climbed up to 6,000 feet, did a wingover and came straight. down. at. the. gun. About 3,000 feet ( I was 'way off to the southeast, watching from behind a cloud), he launched a pair of 5-inch Zuni rockets, peeled left, and climbed back above me.
One of the rockets hit the canal junction and the other hit the .51. We felt the double *thwumpk* before we heard it -- my crewchief swore he watched the tripod fly a hundred feet across the canal before it disappeared into a paddy.
"Three-One, One-Five on Uniform -- tell Three-Three to follow the flight out here." *click* "All Vultures, One-Five on Victor -- go ahead and launch, give me a call when you're five minutes from the LZ."
YT: "Whoever's been watching from the woodline is gonna have a heart attack in about fifteen minutes."
Pilot: "Good. I had one when the Willie Pete went off, so that'll even things out..."
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
*fiddle-fiddle* Hah! Enable Comments
*doink!*
Serves me right for staying up 'til 0200...
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 9:49 AM
Snerk - trying to hit a point target with a 175. Geez, Bill, no wonder they let you go fly helos...
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 4, 2007 10:17 AM
Oooh, didn't see that coming... at least it wasn't an HE airburst.
posted by
Pogue on October 4, 2007 10:24 AM
I was waiting for him to run out of fuel after all that time messing with the little gun.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 4, 2007 10:36 AM
Wow, between the WP and the smoke from it in the cockpit, I'm surprised you could see at all!
posted by NinjaFluff on October 4, 2007 10:43 AM
Snerk - trying to hit a point target with a 175.
You don't *have* to hit it with a 175 -- you just have to get close enough for the crap-nel to scare the gunners off.
Then you nip down and steal their friggin' gun.
...didn't see that coming...
We didn't either. Saw it after it got there, though.
I was waiting for him to run out of fuel...
Oh, thanks. Next time I won't give you a free ad.
I could've screwed around for two hours and still made it to Ca Mau or Rach Gia.
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 11:02 AM
Notice how he doesn't mention me hanging on the skids and backflapping for all I'm worth so the WP was a near miss rather than a direct hit. And some of that "cloud of white smoke" was a chunk of my starboard pinions. Not the first time and it certainly wasn't the last either.
posted by carborundum on October 4, 2007 11:43 AM
No...I wasn't "hoping" you'd run out of fuel...just "anticipating" the next hair raising part of the story. LOL
posted by
kat-missouri on October 4, 2007 11:51 AM
Well, good news is that you weren't actually On Fire, bad news is breathing WP isn't good for your health. Then again, yer still around, so ol' Carborundum's backflip musta worked pretty well ;-)
posted by
Barb on October 4, 2007 12:32 PM
You guys should have stayed above 25,000 feet.
posted by
lex on October 4, 2007 1:02 PM
Well John they nearly hit the point target rotoring around the clouds that's high precision isn't it? Even if low accuracy.
posted by
Trias on October 4, 2007 4:00 PM
So that was the noise we heard over on the Song Ong Doc?????
posted by Old Fat Sailor on October 4, 2007 6:08 PM
...between the WP and the smoke from it in the cockpit, I'm surprised you could see at all!
Well, considering we all slammed our eyes shut just before we punched in, seeing was kinda out of the loop for a few seconds. But if you lean forward far enough, you've got the altimeter, the airspeed indicator and the VSI right in front of you. You don't have to look outside to be able to keep it upright. Of course, keeping it upright and not bumping into something are two different things...
Heh -- kat, if I'd been dumb enough to run out of fuel, they would've grounded me and stuck me back in the artillery. Probably on the staff...
...bad news is breathing WP isn't good for your health.
Stinks a little, but as long as *koff* you don't *koff* inhale the burning *hack* stuff, it's no big *koff* *wheeze* deal.
You guys should have stayed above 25,000 feet.
Nah -- nosebleeds. Besides, you can't see the "uh-oh, shooting at him was a bad idea" expression on their faces from that high...
So that was the noise we heard over on the Song Ong Doc?????
I doubt it -- we were at least 50 klicks north of you and a 175 doesn't make *that* big a noise. But it might have been the 5-ton bomb a C-123 dropped east of Sea Float to make us an instant LZ in July, or it could have been an Arc Light (the Air Farce was always trying to catch us unawares), or maybe it was...
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 8:03 PM
Well John they nearly hit the point target rotoring around the clouds
A 175 round would always hit *something* -- even if it was only Planet Earth...
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 8:07 PM
Besides, you can't see the "uh-oh, shooting at him was a bad idea" expression on their faces from that high...
That's our SugarButtons--always a "people" person ...
posted by
bad cat robot on October 4, 2007 9:22 PM
Yeah, making eye contact always gives these things that personal touch -- it tells 'em, "Hey, I *feel* your pain. Just not quite as much..."
posted by
BillT on October 5, 2007 6:23 AM
Bill shows his inner infantryman, or lunatic. Rational people kill their enemies at a far enough distance that they can avoid looking them in the eye, unless they're really mad at them.
Uh, wait...
posted by
Justthisguy on October 6, 2007 10:36 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Senator Clinton in Kodak Moments.
She who will raise our taxes for the greater good (hey, at least she's open about it)...
Senator Clinton with a fund-raising con artist:

Senator Clinton with a man she would command:

And, in a blast from the past, Senator Clinton with a constituent:

For the record - even if I thought she was the best choice, I wouldn't vote for her. For the same reason I wouldn't vote for Jeb Bush, were he running. Political dynasties in the House and Senate are one thing - in the White House, quite another.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton ..... scary, indeed.
You'd think a country with over 300 million citizens could produce better political leadership without this kind of incestuous nepotism.
posted by fdcol63 on October 4, 2007 8:24 AM
The country can produce decent pols -- it can even produce statesmen. All they have to do is compromise their principles long enough to get elected...
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 9:41 AM
I've always opposed the idea of term limits because I believed that we already had them (called elections) and that the American public should have the right to vote for whomever they feel is the best candidate for office. I believed that we benefitted from those good politicians who gained expertise and wisdom over the years in countless committees and crises, and who had learned to use their staffs and the Federal bureaucracy for the common good.
Now, however, I've changed my mind. Whatever good I thought might be gained by "career" politicians is far outweighed by the negative consequences of extreme partisanship, incompetent and corrupt leadership, and their inflated sense of elite entitlement and megalomania.
Wiser people than I had obviously already come to that conclusion. LOL
posted by fdcol63 on October 4, 2007 10:04 AM
Frank - I prefer to think of it like the military's "up or out" policy...
If you think about it - we were term-limited...
Why should it apply only to the Executive Branch?
I understand the logic on the Judicial Branch, though I'm beginning think a little "churn" in there wouldn't be bad, either - but the terms should be long enough to carry them through several administrations.
If only because of how long it takes the Senate to do judges anymore...
Which shows how skewed the balance has become in the government - because, in a very real sense, the Judiciary has evolved into a much more powerful, yet unaccountable, branch of the government than the Founders intended (and I agree with the Founders on this issue).
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 4, 2007 10:10 AM
...even if I thought she was the best choice...
That event would be forecast by the Arsenal getting posted on e-Bay and followed by yours truly signing up as Bellows Technician at Murray's forge...
posted by
BillT on October 4, 2007 10:23 AM
It'd have to be on Gunbroker or Auction Arms, eBay doesn't allow bangsticks.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 4, 2007 10:39 AM
Yes. And I don't think she is.
You know, part of me thinks, "now here is someone that would be a good power player, making deals, pushing necessary legislation" and then that comes to a screeching halt because, yes, she would be cutting deals, but they would be less open and less honest than any other person in history and possibly leave us owing people things we should not be owing them.
then there is that whole "greater good" socialism thing.
And, every once in awhile, I picture her with Chavez talking about "presidency for life".
But, yeah, the fear of a presidential dynasty scares the beejeesus out of me.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 4, 2007 10:43 AM
John, I agree.
I'm even at a point where I'd almost like us to adopt a French idea: a single 6-year term for POTUS.
Let's face it .... we probably get less than that out of a 2-term POTUS under our current system, considering at least 1 year spent campaigning for re-election, and almost 2 years as a lame duck at the end of the 2nd term.
Unfortunately, you're right about the Judiciary. It's definitely more powerful than intended, and basically unchecked with lifetime appointments. I'm not sure what the answer there is, given the ideological issues involved and the need for some kind of jurisprudential "independence".
However, I definitely prefer jurists who are more prone to be "constructionists" who base their opinions on the US Constitution, American common law precedents, and basic common sense - and not those who prefer to base their opinions on "international" law to enact domestic legislation that they can't get passed through popular support in the other 2 branches.
posted by fdcol63 on October 4, 2007 10:49 AM
Give your new CinC a hug :)
posted by
Trias on October 4, 2007 4:14 PM
You know "lame duck" is not what I would call this president. He is possibly wrapping up a deal to squash NK's nuclear proliferation, winding down Iraq and moving us into strengthening this hemisphere with free trade acts to minimize the effects of 21st century communism in South America.
Nothing lame duck about that unless you buy the media pap.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 4, 2007 4:35 PM
"For the record - even if I thought she was the best choice, I wouldn't vote for her. For the same reason I wouldn't vote for Jeb Bush, were he running. Political dynasties in the House and Senate are one thing - in the White House, quite another."
Did the "dynasty" concern keep you from voting for GWB?
posted by Mark In Irvine on October 4, 2007 10:23 PM
John,
WOW, I, of course, know the name Bush is radioactive in todays politics, yet, Jeb's positions as Governor of FL would make him my # 1 candidate for President!
Dream ticket? McCain for Prez, Jeb VP! McCaine dies 2009 & Jeb is President!
Cold but realistic!
Mike
posted by Mike on October 4, 2007 10:23 PM
Irvine, dude...you don't even know who John voted for. That was just lame.
For that matter, you don't know who I voted for either.
A-ss u-me
posted by
kat-missouri on October 4, 2007 10:57 PM
Frank, I know exactly what you mean. The Hubster and I had many discussions over the past few years on the topic of term limits. I started off as you did, and now I am right there with him (and I think, you). Single term for all of 'em. Maybe (a slim maybe) two terms for Congress, since that limits their damage to 4 years. The industry of getting people elected and re-elected won't change without it.
posted by
Barb on October 5, 2007 12:20 AM
Mark - I voted for GWB both times. The second time with much less enthusiasm when I did it.
But I'm an adult, and my ideas and ideals are not fixed in stone, and can change over time with changed circumstances and experience.
Unlike a politician, I can admit it. The "flip-flop" charge holds when you try to be all things to all people, and deny you're doing it.
In this case, I've come to the conclusion that I am very uncomfortable with dynastic politics in the Executive. If Jeb were to run today, I wouldn't vote for him, because frankly, even if he might be (and since he's not running, I dunno) the best candidate, he's not the only candidate who can do the job.
It's kind of like the pool of Colonels available to be Generals. We only pick about, oh, maybe 1/8th of them to be Generals, but 1/2 of them are easily capable of the job.
Same thing is true of Presidents.
Certainly, it's easier for one of my political persuasion to say this now regarding Clinton than it would have been for me to say it of Bush in 2004. I wasn't happy then, but I still hadn't worked my way through the political dynasty aspect. And now that we're facing the possibility again, well, it's crystallized for me.
I'm a grown-up, I can change my mind and explain why. Or, in this case, actually, make up my mind - because I hadn't made a choice on the subject before.
And just because I did vote for Bush, doesn't make me inconsistent in that context.
If another Bush were to run, and I voted for them, *then* I'd have some 'splainin' to do.
Will that suffice?
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 5, 2007 9:20 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
October 3, 2007
H&I Fires October 3, 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
Rush Limbaugh, kind of amusing, sometimes annoying, occasionally funny, but, honestly, not an appropriate debate topic for 24 hours or more in congress. These people literally must have nothing to do. They have certainly accomplished little over the last two years. Of course, they're after Limbaugh, not just because of the MoveOn mess, but because they can't quell talk radio through competition, they can't make it give up its market share by the "fairness doctrine" and now they are doing some lame "Mom, he hit me, too" dance in congress. This is so lame I can't believe I'm blogging on it, but wanted to say:
People...the world is going to heck in a hand basket and you're debating Limbaugh. We're doomed.
Except in Iraq where the surge is going so well that the Shia now asked for our specific assistance backing up the IP during a Shia holiday instead of relying on the segregated police and private security. They are too worried it will come out like last time with multiple people wounded and killed.
Hey, some more leaking of the secret plan to conduct a secret test of some not so secret places.
Now, for something completely different from NRO: Why right wing economics beat left wing social causes in elections. (referencing "the Problem with Kansas")
I'll give you a hint: people don't like people that mess with their money, especially when they have no say in how its spent (no taxation without representation). For the most part, Democrat social schemes like Health Care for all and $5,000 savings bonds for Children involve something like taking more of my money, giving it to a crooked pyramid scheme con artist (the government) and then passing what's left around to people I don't know and have no idea whether they deserved it, got it or cared about it like I do.
That would be reason #2 why I won't be voting for Hillary. Scariest thing she ever said in 2004 was "We're going to raise your taxes for the greater good."
Oh, and sometimes, these social schemes remind me of our friendly new dictator down south who calls his movement "21st Century Socialism", but looks a lot like 21st Century Totalitarian Communism complete with "politburos" who will make the "will of the people known" to the executive and legislative branches. Of course, how that will happen since elections are now gone is a mystery unless, of course, the politburos are full of fine upstanding folks with ESP.
Thank you Jimmy Caw-taw for over seeing the destruction of democracy. I always knew you had it in you.
-Kat
********************
On the Lebanon Fires: Seems they are under control. Details.
And, from SWJ: Kilcullen's Power Point on Counter-insurgency. For the most part, this was a very informative presentation on counter-insurgency. I did find one or two points interesting regarding "strategic communications". More on that later.
-Kat
*********************************
Frank - this one's for you! Battery Adjust! -the Armorer
********************************
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Did the Congress pass any meaningful legislation in the last session? Have they passed the upcoming years Defense Budget? They surely have better things to do with their time than "condemn, Rush Limbaugh" All that did was commit the known opinion from some on the left into the history books and the official record of Congress. As a tax payer that pisses me off!
I pity the FOOLS!!
Suckas are just trying to lay the ground work for next year to neutralize the right side of the governments certain political add/commercials over Move On... won't work but hey if Sen Reid and Boxer want to waste time on this fine, it means they are not earmarking... right...
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 7:21 AM
Yeah, Limbaugh can be annoying, and it's unbelievably absurd that Congressional "leaders" have wasted time and effort both condemning and lauding him on the floors of their respective chambers.
But the incident is more disturbing for the serious political and cultural conflict it's a part of. It exposes a serious attempt by some on the Left to squelch commentary from the Right that exposes their hypocrasy and weaknesses on national security and support of the military, and their desire to suppress freedom of speech through the use of manufactured McCarthyite scandals.
Absurd, but serious ..... and very dangerous.
posted by fdcol63 on October 3, 2007 7:22 AM
Best part is they unleashed the attack dogs from Vote Vets. I will not question their patriotism, but I will question their sanity. These dufuses were supporting Oberman's "George Bush had Tillman murdered for his political beliefs" conspiracy.
Before that, I just thought they were a bunch of guys who wanted us to go kick some but in Afghanistan and get out of Iraq, which I could debate. After that sterling moment on MSNBC, I realized they were bat sh^t crazy.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 7:37 AM
Yesterday I watched/listened to the Blackwater hearings from my desk in work. Rep. Diane Watson (D)-CA, used nearly the entirity of her time to discuss Rush "Limbo" (I don't think her mispronunciation was intentional). Not that she would have had anything intelligent to say to or ask Mr. Prince, but it was silly.
posted by
Maggie on October 3, 2007 7:48 AM
The whole Limbaugh brew-ha-ha is a text-book example of Reid & Co. attempting cognitive dissonance on a grand scale. The scary part is: I think they will succeed because they have laid the groundwork with their previous forays into the realm of social psychology (e.g. the war is already lost). The sad thing is instead of counter-attacking, the administration has played perfectly into their hands by refusing to engage in the info/propaganda war. I wonder what Ronnie would say about a White House that is so communicatively challenged…
posted by Oldloadr on October 3, 2007 7:49 AM
I don't think Bush should say anything at all. I'm not sure they hit any sort of psychology with the folks at home.
Here, among the moonbats I know, they were like "whose Rush?". It got tuned out ASAP. So, we'll see.
It was pretty obvious who he was talking about, but since most of the outside world does not know who Jesse macbeth was and a few other phonies, it is easy to misconstrue.
Still, it's a good way for them to waste time, quietly pass spending bills, pass non-binding resolutions and do nothing that really changes the status quo. They don't get blamed for anything bad happening and people will forget soon enough that they were talking about "losing Iraq" since they stopped talking about it and the press has stopped talking about it.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 7:56 AM
I don't think the administration should say anything on the Rush thing, either. However, the point that I was trying to make (and obviously missed making) is: because the moon-bats have been constantly on the offensive in the propaganda sphere, it would only stand to reason that their attacks would become more visceral and less connected to logic as time goes on since there is seldom a counter-attack from the conservative establishment, including the White House.
posted by Oldloadr on October 3, 2007 1:08 PM
Wow, that hydraulic rammer is a real pita when it's broken, isn't it.
posted by
Pogue on October 3, 2007 1:22 PM
I recall the 2005 "secret" test of the "secret" plan.
First, NJ EmerOpCen issued a press release the week prior so people wouldn't panic, with followups on the day prior and the day of. On the day of, ERs from Newark to Cape May were jammed with people demanding "pneumonia shots" because the press releases only appeared in three newspapers -- two of which were in Trenton. The local Talk Radio stations kept reminding people it was only an exercise, but the station managers decided to do that as a public service after the first hundred panicky calls about "the germ bombs."
Second, after a week of promising aviation support to augment the State Police and making phone calls to Fort Dix, Lakehurst, West Trenton and Picatinny Arsenal, the EOC discovered that they couldn't get any medevac support because
1. the 1159th AeroMed had been disbanded in January 2002,
2. the last UH-1V in the state had been sent to Ft. Drum in April 2003, and
3. the only UH-60 helicopters -- and crews -- in the NJARNG had been deployed to Iraq in November 2004.
Iceberg, tip of the.
On the positive side, the tranny folks who had been mobilized performed Above and Beyond -- until the fuel allocated for the exercise ran out...
Lessons Learned: Sorry -- FOUO.
posted by
BillT on October 3, 2007 2:37 PM
Rule 1. No one is allowed to disagree with Dingy Harry and Move on.
Rule 2. If Move on screws up with an ad .. scream about anything else.
Rule 3. I enjoy the screaching.
PS Denny Moore has not responded to either of the two letters I sent him asking if he condemned the Move on ad concerning the general. The term hiding under a rock comes to mind.
posted by
jim b on October 3, 2007 3:32 PM
Well, I think congress should have stayed off of MoveOn add, too, believe it or not. The only reason it got traction and hurt the Dems is that it came out on the same day as the testimony and the little speeches the Dems were giving.
Which made it seem like it was coordinated and that is why they got cornered into making a comment on it.
Otherwise, I think that these messages should remain off the congressional floor. as if they didn't have anything better to do.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 6:24 PM
The term hiding under a rock comes to mind.
Ah-HA! The ol' "I can ignore you until you grow tired of pestering me" tactic!
posted by
BillT on October 3, 2007 6:29 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
The Arsenal in Motion.
Construction proceeds apace, with painting finished yesterday, carpeting going in today, satellite TV going in today, and Internet access next week (when I'll be gone on the road, anyway), hence why blogging by me is sporadic, despite all the stuff going on.
If the schedule holds, the cabinets will go in tomorrow, and the seals will be in place on Friday.
Accordingly, the Arsenal is in motion, changing from one site to the other, via different routes and at different times, natch. Not for nothing did I take those counter-terrorism classes with the driving lessons!

For those who want to figure out what's in there - click here.
Notice Sergeant Barnacle keeping a [glowing] eye on things. Or izzat a BCR Labs Special Patrol 'Bot? You'll never know... until it's too late!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
There's a cat with shiney eyes. does that count?
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 8:01 AM
via different routes and at different times, natch. Not for nothing did I take those counter-terrorism classes
....and Twinkles only smiled!!
posted by
Mike Lehnherr on October 3, 2007 8:26 AM
I can spy with my little eye, several SKS's both pre and post ban. Looks like a Romanian or Yugo SKS?
I spy a Mauser or two.
Oh and is that Enfield?
But a question? Where are the Black Rifles? (is this a time specific collection?)
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 8:32 AM
There are *no* post-ban SKS's, only post-84 with the marking requirement.
And there is a clean one, a Vietnam battlefield capture.
The only "black rifle" in the Arsenal of Castle Argghhh! is a Brit L1A1 (pre-ban). There is a ROMAK in the Arsenal.
I got into collecting for the historical connection.
I do intend to get at least an M4-clone, but that hasn't been a priority.
There's a Korean War capture M38 Nagant, an M44, several flavors of Mauser, including Siamese, several flavors of Enfield (including Siamese), there's a Tower 3 Band musket in there, a repro Remington Zouave (had it since I was 18), several flavors of Gew 88 and a MAS 35 in there, too.
Oh, and a Springfield '03, I don't remember which one off the top of my head.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 3, 2007 9:23 AM
Oh, I meant to ask, how is the Interior Guard handling the move? I imagine y'all are a bit leery granting extraliminal privileges, 'specially after P.P. Houdini went missing, or deserted, or got waylaid or whatever.
posted by
Justthisguy on October 3, 2007 4:35 PM
Most of the Interior Guard did just fine with it.
The one who didn't, the one named after the famous family member who was an explorer... Meriwether, *he* had a two-day hissy.
Some have ventured out onto the deck, and the Empress, she of 16 years, has ventured into the backyard to sample the greenery.
Rest Stop bolted out the front door this morning, only to realize, "Man, the world is freaking HUGE!" and scrambled back in.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 3, 2007 4:44 PM
Good move, Rest Stop - it's a big nasty world which doesn't care about kitties getting chomped or run over.
Glad to hear that the Castle is getting outfitted properly, John :-)
posted by
Barb on October 3, 2007 6:23 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Victory in Iraq: 300 Tyrants
[Denizen Opinion - Kat]
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. - Declaration of Independence
I am writing this piece as a follow up to "Winning in Iraq: Disconnecting From the Matrix". Mainly because, while I was making a point about media coverage and the difficulty in understanding what was really going on, I did not want anyone to be fooled or to fool myself about reality in Iraq.
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
As I read the blogs of men and women who are there in uniform, those who are Iraqis and those who are reporters, I am reminded of that section of the Declaration of Independence and a phrase from "the Patriot" with Mel Gibson. In the scene, the Virginia House of Commons is discussing joining the revolution and the benefits. Gibson's character asked a salient question, "Why should I trade a single tyrant 3000 miles away for 300 tyrants a mile away?"
In Iraq, this question remains ever present in the current political and security situation. Even as Al Qaida is rooted out and some of the worst of the Mahdi death squads with them, the reality of daily living in Iraq is the reality of "300 tyrants". Iraq is broken politically and socially. Every neighborhood now has a "petty tyrant". The tyrant is no longer in a palace in Baghdad or the provincial capital, but may live on the same street as the people they say they protect.
Some, of course, may have the vested interest of their community in their minds and work towards that. However, the power of weapons and money, the absolute power, as history shows, is an absolutely corrupting power. In a nation where corruption has been the overweening political and governing power for centuries, it is little wonder that it would continue so today.
The difference is, once upon a time, that corruption was institutionalized. They knew what to expect from the corrupt. They knew who the corrupt were. As our forefathers once wrote, people are more likely to suffer it than to change it because it is known and they find ways to work around it. It is why the lament is so often heard from Iraqis that they preferred the security under Saddam. Democracy and freedom is actually one of the least "secure" methods of governing. It is easier to know the mind of and react to a single tyrant than to know the minds of hundreds or thousands. It is a wonder it is so sought after and hard to manage.
The reason it has been difficult to define "victory" in Iraq is because we can win the shooting war, but the war to create a real democracy is just beginning. Those who were the oppressed are now the oppressors. Learning the difference between real freedom, democracy and sharing power and the freedom to become tyrants, to become what they beheld for so long, will be much more difficult. Learning to govern in the name of the people instead of the name of one tyrant or another will take years if not decades. It is this that will decide the "other victory" in Iraq: democracy and freedom over tyranny.
That is something that we can help along and have by working to set up local governance, guide council meetings, work towards local and provincial elections, etc. The central government can help this along by working towards equitable economic and power sharing with the provinces as well as finalizing any De-ba'athification. But, real reconciliation will not happen at the parliamentary level until the citizens on the street are reconciled to the fact that they must live in a country and share all things, including power, with millions of others.
Right now, the citizenry is broken into armed enclaves that have been "purged" of any of the "others". It was largely a defense mechanism due to the horrific effects of internal guerrilla war. We should not be shocked that it occurred. Here in the United States, after 9/11, it was the thing that we most feared would happen. People talked about WWII and the internment of the Japanese. People openly discussed the "question" of our "Muslim population".
In some respects, we are not all that different. We were only lucky enough to have an historical example to remind us of the cost of segregation, a long history of living in the "melting pot", a government that was strong enough to remind us of what we are and powerful enough to enforce it. A government that reflected our people and our ideas. Of course, it did not act without our consent nor without a true understanding of our minds. We may have feared the possibilities of more attacks, but we feared what segregation of our population would make us more. We feared becoming what the enemy wanted us to be to strengthen their claims. So, we rejected it and rather quickly.
In Iraq, the government does reflect its polity. It is segregated, sectarian and weak. Not because the government is, but because the people are. Had we suffered the same, we cannot say we would not have become the same. Our own reconciliations after the Revolution and Civil War were not so easy to come by either. We even impeached a president over it.
Whether Maliki remains in power is yet to be seen. Whether Iraq is partitioned is not up to us, but to the Iraqis. Both of these will depend on the people of Iraq to make that decision. That is democracy and that is the real hope of Iraq.
Maliki losing power may not be the worst thing that happens. Parliament collapsing and requiring new elections is not the worst thing that could happen. Even new elections at the point of the gun with petty tyrants winning elections is not the worst thing that could happen. The worst thing that could happen is that Iraqis could reject reconciliation and fall into an all out civil war, more horrific than that which we have witnessed. The worst thing that could happen is that they could reject democracy all together.
Against the fears of this unknown is the real work of both US forces and Iraqis who are in little towns and big cities like Ramadi, working together and learning what government "for the people and by the people" really means. It is the bulwark that shores up the final victory. US, Coalition and many more Iraqis have shed their blood to make that happen. Something that is paid for so dearly is not so easily given up.
There in may be contained the hope of the final victory.
As the events on the ground have overtaken our own politics, so do the events on the ground in Iraq overtake their own politicians. Some day in the future, the "petty tyrants" will be subsumed by the masses. Parliament will act on the will of the people. It will remember that its people are armed and able to change it at any time. That fear is not entirely a bad thing.
It is unlikely that the United States will be viewed as a "liberating hero" by the mass of Iraqis. Particularly as it seems that most do not want to take responsibility for their own actions. Before the United States came, they say they lived in peace and harmony as Iraqis, not as "others". That is true, but also a delusion because they were not held together by common understanding and respect, but by a common fear. That which brought the war already existed behind the tyranny of the one.
We will not change that. It may not even be necessary or desirable. A common complaint can join people just as well as a common enemy. However, for some, regardless of the view of our government, a US Army Sergeant or a Marine Lieutenant will be remembered because he shed his blood, sweat and tears with them; because she tended their wounds; because she or he taught them about democracy. The individuals will be the heroes. They will be the inoculation against decades of petty tyrannies.
It is not the United States government nor President Bush nor Gen. Petraeus who wins the final war. It will be the people from Canton, Ohio and Wellsville, Kansas or upstate New York, Prague, and Sydney with the people from Ramadi, Husbayeh, Samawah, Irbil and Suleiman.
That is who wins the wars in a democracy.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
October 2, 2007
H&I Fires October 2, 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
**********************************
Bumped Up For Important Update
Beirut is Burning! You should be reading the Tank. J. Thomas Smith has been keeping abreast of the situation there and reporting that Hezbollah was up to something. I was overtaken by events because I was going to publish something about Iran and Syria using Hezbollah in Lebanon as a proxy sometime soon. Also, an unreliable source of Debka was reporting Russian's had left the Bushehr nuclear plant and Putin was quoted as saying that Russia had not left but had contingency plans for evacuation in case of a war. That was the second report of the same that just came out this morning (yesterday actually).
Buckle Up Boys and Girls, it's going to be a bumpy ride. -Kat
Update: Beirut Spring is covering the fires, which are not yet formally tied to terrorist events. -the Armorer
**********************************
Not that I'm fond of Al Jazeera Terrorist Network, but, in the pursuit of some information, I saw one or two items.
First, as promised, if you didn't see it anywhere else already, this is Al Tunisi's letter to AQ in Iraq: Help! I've fallen and I can't get up!
Meanwhile, somewhere in Arab Jubour, last bastion of AQI and the most vile Ba'athist hold outs, a few of the remaining "fighters" are insisting that no group is talking to the US, there are no agreements and they are simply waiting for the US to pull out, the Maliki government to fail so they can take over the government. Picture shows them armed to the teeth, in front of their homes, looking defiant. Until an Apache flies, over at least.
Someone else notices the slow disappearance of Iraq from the news.
-kat
********************************
CAPT H thought we should get ourselves some Classical Values... -the Armorer
********************************
Speaking of InfoOps, as we do around here, Bob Owens of Confederate Yankee points out a *huge* InfoOp and the long-time-in-coming CounterInfoOp, which highlights the problems that people inclined to generally follow the rulez have when confronting people with no such compunction - or at least shared concept of the rulez. That's the utility of the Geneva Conventions and associated compacts - they establish what are supposed to be a generally-accepted basic premise for belligerents to follow. Significantly, on a different level, most conflict post-WWII has taken place between opponents who are *not* signatories of the Conventions, which is a source of some of the pain in our Current Operating Environment - while there are in fact rules under the Conventions and LoLW that cover illegal combatants, politics prevents them from being applied, in many cases, for venal political purposes - because no one anticipated it being an issue when the Conventions were first drafted. -the Armorer
***********************************
Jules Crittenden on a little hypocrisy regarding looting... -the Armorer
***********************************
Bloodspite, on remodeling, and a little lesson about Mother Nature. -the Armorer
***********************************
And now it's my turn to suffer the fates of post stomping. LOL -Kat
*********************************
And you unpublished it, too! -the Armorer
********************************
Yep...somethings are just too hideous to hide in the comments section.- Kat
Now to our Afghanistan watch:
Violence up 25% in Afghanistan this year. Right now it's way up. It's the post summer, pre-harvest, everyone had time during Ramadan to go jihad-ing. Not to mention, fighters unable to go through Syria due to the crackdown have to go get their jihad on somewhere else.
Something a little more local: In Ft Riley, Afghanis and Americans train together. Goes along nicely with this piece over at SWJ: how to create non-linear thinkers.
Back in Afghanistan, suicide bombings are up and so is the infamous practice of booby trapping toys to kill children. Something that they claimed the Russians did in the Afghan/Russo war. Makes you wonder.
A hero of Afghanistan who received a bronze star for pulling two men from a burning vehicle in April, was killed in Afghanistan on patrol this week. Read. He was severely burned, but after rescuing the men, jumped in the turret and returned fire. He went back to Afghanistan because he wanted to serve his country.
And, CNN asks you to vote for their CNN Everyday Hero. Somebody is missing from the list. Go figure.
In other parts of the world, Putin says he is the Czar! and no way he is stepping down. Look into his eyes.
Democracy gets a big boost in the Ukraine and a woman is the leader.
While down south, Democracy is being eroded under the guise of "21st Century Socialism" (ie, Communist Tyranny by any other name; Fukyama, history is calling).
Our good friend, I'm A Jerk, was making his rounds through Venezuela, Bolivia and probably soon Ecuador. One must wonder how deluded and horrifically "oppressed" one has to feel to "elect" tyrants and then give away all of your freedoms. More like Democracy was "too hard". Take all my freedoms so I don't have to make a choice!
Which reminds me of why I totally do not want Hillary for President. The fact that we are apparently on some dynastic roll (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton) in this country is top on my list of reasons not to vote for her. There is a major malfunction in our democracy when people are too lazy to vote and too lazy to look beyond the "known" for a president when we are about to go 20 years with the same families in charge. Is there any chance one of these Republican guys is going to step up and make a case? (Yes, I am discounting the rest of the Democrat candidates because they are a bunch of idiots. So, Republicans, where are you?)
-Kat
*******************************
What Kat said. Moving on - email from my buddy Kevin:
1) Win lottery
2) Get pilots license
3) Get Class 3 license
4) Get ammo, lots and lots of ammo
5) Buy this.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yEqslC2h3T0
6) Find strafing range in NE Kansas......
Neffi, Bill, Dusty - look! Bright! Shiny! Ooooo! -the Armorer
*********************************
Apropo Kat's link above - Peter Hegseth on Iraq slipping out of the news... -the Armorer
********************************
You knew it wouldn't last. Marmosets of the world... be vewy afwaid... the Princess of Snark is back, over at Milblogs (scroll down to "winning the information war one acronym at a time). Hussy. I gave her the keys to this place a long time ago. Does she hang out? Hardly. -the Armorer
*********************************
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Well, then there's no reason for the Marmoset to bunk with me then, is there? Good, he's hogging the cheetos and was sniffing around the emergency stash of M&Ms we keep on hand in case Princess Crabby needs to be distracted.
Hitting Iran.
It isn't going to happen. Face it, we're not going to do it. We've had the resources available for 2 years(AF and USN aviation are by and large untapped). Sure, Sarkozy being the new Man in Paris changes things a little, but not enough to make it doable(how many divisions is Sarkozy going to be able to devote the endeavour?). A once off raid doesn't give us what we want, doesn't secure a better peace, and is therefore a bad move. Ergo, it ain't happening. In my mind this is the same thing as whenever another carrier group arrives on station every 6-9 months. People get exited, the rhetoric on blogs ratchets up, but there's no beef in the sandwich. It isn't happening.
posted by ry on October 2, 2007 1:49 PM
Ah, but it keeps Sy Hersh flush with talk-show invites, doesn't it?
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 2, 2007 1:51 PM
mmmmmm... P-26! I was reaching for my cheque* book until I read "without armament". Wutsa funna that?!
*missed out on Canadian Day last week, eh?
posted by Neffi on October 2, 2007 1:59 PM
Yeah...actually, I don't think we were planning to, just noting that it seemed interesting that Russia made such an announcement, again, a day before the Iranian proxies in Lebanon started burning things.
Get the picture?
posted by
kat-missouri on October 2, 2007 2:34 PM
I know..it is not official yet that the fires are "terrorist" related.
If they are not, they are going to be one heck of a coincidence with mother nature lending quite a hand.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 2, 2007 2:54 PM
Sounds like something's about to happen in Lebanon, doesn't it?
Too many separate fires to be accidental, combined with reports of Hezbollah preparing positions .... all mixed in with the other stuff happening with Syria.
posted by fdcol63 on October 2, 2007 8:57 PM
Bright! Shiny! Ooooo!
WTF? Robin's egg blue with the Escadrille Lafayette insignia is just a bit too precious for me.
"Without armament" put the cap on it...
posted by
BillT on October 2, 2007 10:16 PM
"Without armament" Bosh... check point one, was 'win the lottery'. Heck, if I could afford this lil' beauty, I could afford the modifications, interrupter gear included. Coupla .30s and let the strafing begin! Don't think this airframe could handle .50, otherwise, that would be my period MG of choice. But hey, it's a fantasy eh? Always loved the P-26! Now, where is King Kong? Nevermind Faye Wraye and her satin drapped frame.... as it clung to her thigh..
posted by Kevin on October 2, 2007 10:28 PM
I'm not into old stuff (one exception: the P51...prettiest airplane ever built). Also, I'd prefer not to slip the surlies in something called "The Peashooter."
Assuming I win a lottery, it'd have to be a big one 'cause I'd get a civilianized F-22, paint it midnight blue and commute to work with it.
Hey, it's a fantasy conversation, right?
posted by
Instapilot on October 3, 2007 12:33 AM
...I'd get a civilianized F-22...
With luggage hatches?
posted by
BillT on October 3, 2007 6:05 AM
25% increase of violence in Afghanistan! That is disconcerting! Fools better be done with the tantrum by the time I get there!
Suckas!
posted by MR T' s Haircut on October 3, 2007 8:20 AM
"... the P51...prettiest airplane ever built ..."
No doubt, sweet. But I've always had a soft spot for the F4U Corsair. I liked "Black Sheep Squadron" until I tired of Robert Conrad's ego, and the show started getting hokey.
posted by fdcol63 on October 3, 2007 8:34 AM
...and the show started getting hokey.
Which happened right around the middle of the first season...
posted by
BillT on October 3, 2007 6:50 PM
Well, I am not exactly hanging out there, either Big Guy.
And it was your post that moved me to say something. I don't imagine I will have a whole lot to say. But my brain will probably explode every now and then.
posted by
Cassandra on October 4, 2007 2:29 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Iran And Syria: Heavy Handed Chess
Pushed up and incomplete for relational purposes to current events in Lebanon. I've been working on this for three days, trying to read all the reports on Iran and Syria, including the reports from J. Thomas Smith in Lebanon. Last night after the rumor of the Russians leaving Bushehr Nuclear Facility, it seemed that the below analysis was correct and I was not going to have time to finish it before it happened. That turns out to be correct. Still, here is some background information on the situation and why Syria and Iran would be moving now to push Hezbollah, their proxies in Lebanon, to begin their attacks in Lebanon and attempt a coup (UPDATE: uncomfirmed rumor as to the start of the fires; however, Hezbollah has been moving up operations - read). .
Previous Post: Iran and Syria - Brinkmanship in the Middle East
There is much maneuvering around Syria and Iran that points to a barely concealed game of chess over the potential survival of either regime and stability in the region. Last week's report indicated that Syria was believed to be involved in the assassination of yet another anti-Syrian Lebanese Parliament member in the hopes of reducing the majority ruling party and force a new election or at least provide room for a deadlock with pro-Syrian forces inside the government that would be favorable to Syrian economic overtures and military protection. The Lebanese parliament has yet to elect a president.
J. Thomas Smith reports that the Lebanese Anti-Syrian PMs are now "under siege, literally" in a hotel in Beirut. They are currently being protected by Lebanese military and special forces. He has also been reporting for several days that approximately 2,000 to 3,000 Iranian Quds and IRGC are in Lebanon training Hezbollah fighters in advanced guerrilla tactics. While Hezbollah fighters took up positions in largely Christian enclaves, blocking roads and manning checkpoints. In Thomas' words, they are planning something big (dated 10/1/07: big is happening Lebanon is burning)
At the same time Israeli planes continue to fly into Lebanon's air space on a daily basis.
(continued in flash traffic)
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
The United States and Saudi Arabia are working behind the scenes to try to take pressure off of the Lebanese government and allow them the opportunity to choose their president. This may be one of the reasons that Syria was invited to the latest round of Middle East Peace talks. Syria is using Hezbollah as a battering ram, not only to force control issues within Lebanon for economic security, but also as its proxy force against continued incursions by Israel against potential weapons sites.
Last weeks report indicated that Israel had struck a potential nuclear site, though details have not been verified. Around the same time, a Sarin filled missile had exploded during loading, killing 200. It's clear that Israel believes it may be in direct confrontation with Hezbollah in the near future and has decided to either neutralize Syrian capabilities to support Hezbollah or was sending them a warning about their continued support.
Syria is playing it as if the Israeli AF struck nothing but desert and is attempting to pull Damascus into a broader fight. This report continues to play Syria as a victim who is seeking peace with Israel, but continuously rebuffed, "forcing" Syria into an "uncomfortable embrace" with Iran. In two sentences, however, the report also notes that Syria was at a recent arms show in Moscow purchasing air defense missiles and anti-tank weapons allegedly responsible for Hezbollah checking Israel's ground invasion of Lebanon. This weapons build up has been taking place along the Lebanon and Israeli border prompting Israeli forces to beef up security in the Golan Heights.
Despite Israel's attack on an as yet verified target, Israel's defense minister says that Israel is not planning to go to war with Syria.
A major problem with Syrian politics is that it continues to be extremely heavy handed. On one hand, obviously being a conduit for arms to Iran and Hezbollah, outright assassinations of Lebanese politicians to bizarre heavy handed overtures to the US by assassinating known Al Qaida facilitators in Syria or the hand over of the leader of the Al Qaida affiliate Fatah al-Islam in Lebanon by Hezbollah to the Lebanese army.
Of course, Syria does nothing that is not also in its own interests. While the Ba'athist party controls Damascus, it is run by a largely Alawite tribe of Shia. The Sunni tribes in Syria have routinely attempted to rise against the Ba'athist Socialist government and been brutally put down.
The death of the cleric known as Abu Al Qaqa may have other connotations. Al Qaqa is widely believed to have co-founded Jihad and Tawheed in Iraq (later Al Qaida in Iraq) with Zarqawi and may have not only facilitated fighters into Iraq, but Zarqawi agents into Syria. Al Qaqa had given many speeches in support of the Islamists in Iraq. However, as far back as 2004, an Islamist website had claimed that Al Qaqa was, in fact, a spy that gave Syrian intelligence forces information on the "mujihadeen" going into Iraq resulting in their capture or death.
Reports on Al Qaqa indicate that he had "moderated" his speeches after being gone for a year to places unknown (his followers were told he went to Chechnya and Afghanistan) and was given a job as a teacher at a state run Islamic school. His killer was detained shortly after the shooting. He is identified as a mujihadeen who had been recently released from a US prison in Iraq. He claims he shot Al Qaqa because he was a traitor. Either way, it works well for Syria. Possible Islamic extremist threat is eliminated and blamed on "Zionist-Americans" as either the reaping of a traitor or the possibility that the recently released assassin was brain washed in American prison or repaying his debt for release. Thus, keeping the internal unrest at a minimum while the US is given a "goat" to prove Syria's sincerity in assisting with minimizing insurgent transit to Iraq.
Syria has other concerns outside of its physical security and not totally related to its relationship with Iran. This is what prompts it to play at schizophrenic politics. On one hand, responding to overtures to curb Al Qaida transition to Iraq while pushing the accelerator on Hezbollah in Lebanon.
In the previous post on Iran and Syria, Syria's need for Lebanon to open its economy to Syrian exports and its ports to Syrian oil pipelines is taking on a new urgency as it attempts some economic reforms, such as decreasing subsidies on olive oil, tea and gasoline, to improve its situation. However, foreign investment has decreased since US sanctions put in place in 2003 and a myriad of other woes continue to inflict economic pain.
Syria's economy has relied heavily on oil and agricultural exports. In recent months, Syria's wheat production has fallen significantly due to a shortage in rain fall. This coupled with the rise in consumption due to an influx of approximately 1 million Iraqi refugees caused Syria to cancel all exports of wheat. Oil production has decreased from a high of 560k bpd to 360k bpd. Syria has sought multiple avenues to exploit the rise in oil prices to maintain its viability while simultaneously decreasing gasoline subsidies to citizens and planning "smart card" rationing that Iran has been using for nearly six months.
Both Iran and Syria are net importers of gasoline and both have gasoline subsidies in place. Both nations are attempting to reduce consumption with the ration cards in order to reduce the drain on the dwindling public coffers.
Another problem for Syria is that its private sector is considered highly corrupt. With the additional problem that socialist economies have: the rich appear to be getting very rich while the rest of the country is poor as church mice. They are alternately squeezed by Palestinian refugees and Iraqi refugees. That can sometimes lead to serious rumblings at the ground level.
Iran has also recently invested 270 million in building projects in Syria. This is either an attempt to continue to buy Syrian compliance for Hezbollah and Iranian weapons transit or an attempt to prop up a collapsing ally. Or, both.
It's important to remember that Hezbollah is not the sole creature of Syria. It is an Iranian creature, as reported by Smith. Iran has a vested interest in turning up the Hezbollah pain in Lebanon as well. Aside from the possibility of an Iranian oil pipeline through Iraq, Syria and into the Lebanese ports, the potential for a Hezbollah attack in Israel or actually overthrowing the Lebanese government, is one of Iran's own very heavy handed attempts to reduce pressure on their own country.
The United States, France and Britain had agreed on sanctions against Iran and was pressuring Germany to join more fully. In last weeks report, Germany was attempting to discern how to join the sanctions and deal with the loss of revenue that was likely to follow. China and Russia were refusing to join the sanctions but signaled their concerns to Iran on questions over the nuclear situation.. Iran was given two more months to respond before other sanctions were in place.
Recent reports indicate, however, that sanctions were continuing to have even more devastating impact on the Iranian economy, even as Ahmadinejad was shaking hands with Chavez in Venezuela and loaning money for construction projects, even loaning money to Syria for the same, the internal situation in Iran is getting serious. Main food export and import companies were starting to shut down or slowing imports because they have to work with cash. They are literally carrying around hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash because no bank will give them credit outside of Iran.
As noted in the previous post on Brinkmanship, Iran has been moving its ministers around and placing hardliners in strategic political positions to stop any potential opposition from delaying their plans.
It's clear that sanctions are, indeed, having the desired effect on the Iranian economy. But, Iran has long considered Hezbollah in Lebanon it's best pawn in offsetting criticisms and demands from outside. Iran and Syria have vested interests in Hezbollah take over of Lebanon or at least in making the situation so terrible that they can win concessions.
Iran believes that the ME and the West are so concerned over the potential for regional instability after the Iraq situation that it can rock the Hezbollah boat and blackmail their way into a decrease in sanctions and an acceptance of their nuclear future. Syria, of course, wants to return as Lebanon's "protector" with all the benefits that entails.
Hezbollah does nothing without orders from Syria and Iran. That is a fact. Without the money, protection and arms from these two countries, Hezbollah does not exist.
Update: Edited for sake of reducing speculation of the known fires. However, original comment stangs: Hezbollah is an Iranian and Syrian proxy. It is doubtful either of these nations would risk an outright attack on the US or Israel. They would use their proxies first. The Palestinians have the "ultimate moral authority" and that protects Iran and Syria until the world decides it is no longer a sham worth carrying on.
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Interesting Analysis...
A wise Admiral once told the crew, "Those that don't know are talking and those that do know are silent"
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 5:16 AM
mmmm...is this saying to be quiet? Not sure what you're saying there Mr. T.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 5:59 AM
No Kat,
I am not saying for you to be quiet!
I am saying sometimes the lack of information or chatter is just as telling as the glut of it. Meaning the lack of references to the entire affair by our military, the Iranians, the Syrians and the MSM etc.. is telling IMO... I predict this matter will come to a head sooner than later...
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 6:46 AM
oh...sorry...tired this morning. Did not have "blog comment" interpretation skills fully functioning. I actually edited out the sentence at the end:
ahmadinejad is suddenly silent after a week of rhetoric: rattle snakes are at their most dangerous when you don't hear their rattle anymore.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 3, 2007 7:25 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Rather than risk the H&I again today...
...I'll just make what got blown away twice yesterday a post!
First up... neener neener neener to most of you (though there are some who no doubt have views just as kewl or kewler...)
This is the view from the bedroom doors in the morning, out here at the Castle.

For those so inclined, a larger pic can be had here.
This last weekend was spent mostly in the barn, though there was some outside work, with SWWBO pulling fenceposts and learning to use the tractor.
The reason for all this is that the Destriers of Argghhh!, who have lived the last 10 years in the old Quartermaster Stables at Fort Leavenworth, were due at the new demesne on Sunday, lest we have to pay for another month... Good trade for them. They're going into larger stalls, and instead of getting to go to a 3 acre pasture with 30 other horses every other day... they have 40 acres of wood and pasture, which they will eventually share with about 20 horses, as we allow friends to pasture their horses out at the Castle.
So, SWWBO has been working on her stalls, with me as muscle when needed, and the two young men, Major and Andrew, who are helping out at the Castle in exchange for pasturage, helped us get the post holes dug for the stalls. The poles are set, and SWWBO will finish out the stalls this week. All of this labor has been supervised by the Barn Cat of Argghhh!, Sergeant S'mudge.
The Destriers of Argghhh! are in their temporary lodging, the Round Pen, seen here with dawn starting to brighten the eastern horizon yesterday morning. If you look close - you can see Willy and Petey in there.
The Gun Vault of Argghhh! is coming along - but that will be a different post.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Lotsa work - but good progress, too. Lookin' good, you two! That last pic is a beauty, John :-)
posted by
Barb on October 2, 2007 8:48 AM
That's the view from your bedroom? I'm envious... I like city life, but I sure do miss the country life something terrible!
posted by NinjaFluff on October 2, 2007 9:17 AM
Looks really peaceful and serene, until .....
BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! B-O-O-M!
LOL
posted by fdcol63 on October 2, 2007 9:28 AM
Frank, yeah, well, mebbe... sometimes. Now and again.
Okay, a lot.
What's yer point?
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 2, 2007 9:32 AM
yeah..kind of reminds me of that movie Shrek where the princess is singing all pretty to the birds and then hits a note she couldn't possibly carry off. Shriek!!!
and all the birdies fly away.
I imagine something like that will be happening at the Castle soon.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 2, 2007 10:52 AM
You gotta love the smell of an auger in the morning. You've seen my fence - just dig one hole at a time and eventually you get there.
posted by leavenworth centurion on October 2, 2007 10:53 AM
Great place! I bet you could build a gun range and no one will complain! (Maybe a good place for Hannibal, Face and the rest of us to hang out.)
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 5:13 AM
Snerk! The Haircut hasn't been reading around here for a long time, clearly.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 3, 2007 6:55 AM
You are correct. I retract the earlier comment!
Beautiful!
Good work!
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 8:25 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
TINS! You Picked It (Again)
Well, the voting was close, in keeping with the spirit of the TINS!, in which *all* the calls are close. And at least nobody said, "Hey, all that stuff happened while you were still in Flight School!"
Nooooo, they *didn't*, and I have the best witnesses a quart of muscatel can buy.
Unfortunately, Real World reared it's misbegotten multiple heads so often I didn't get the chance to write anything for the past two days. *But* -- because I like ya, and you've waited so patiently to see me get my ass shot off yet again something tangible, here's a preview of what Numbah 10 was all about:

Yup, all those pretty colored kindergarten shapes actually *mean* something. I won't tell you exactly what, of course, until I figure out how to keep from getting my ass shot off actually type up the story. I'll give you a couple of hints, though.
The Plan.
Me.
Them.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Off to Bollimer. With any luck, I'll be there before any of you can wake up, read this, and ask me to retrieve a certain stuffed marmoset...
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Be warned, some of us read on the midwatch.
Now about that stuffed critter...
posted by bc on October 2, 2007 12:05 AM
Hmmmm, a .51, theres gonna be pucker factor in this story....
posted by Old Fat Sailor on October 2, 2007 12:42 AM
OFS ~ there's an understatement for ya. Yikes.
posted by
HomefrontSix on October 2, 2007 1:21 AM
There is not enough room nor enough stale cheetos for the Marmoset(stuffed or not) here in Castle Argghhh!'s Purgatory. Sorry. If Cassie were willing to subsidize upkeep of said Marmoset with comic books and choco-pudding(not slated for the choco-gun, which isn't looking so good since it hasn't been used in a while and Sgt. B hasn't been by to service it), well, then something could be arranged.
posted by ry on October 2, 2007 4:54 AM
Eeeeewwww - Just the thought of Sgt. B servicing a stale Marmoset, is enough to ruin anyone's day.
posted by Boquisucio on October 2, 2007 7:51 AM
Boq - that's baa-a-ad. And I'm peeved that you got to post it before I did! Hehehe.
It's the return of Twitchy Bill! Yeeha!
posted by
Barb on October 2, 2007 8:51 AM
I'm wondering why rusmilitary.com is a banned site at work...
No. Actually, I should have known anything with "military" in the name would be a banned site for a company headquarted in Portland, OR.
frggin libs.
i'm testy today... and thinking about B servicing a stale marmoset put a big smile on my face! Thanks Boq!
posted by AFSister on October 2, 2007 9:47 AM
AFSis - try this link.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 2, 2007 3:13 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
October 1, 2007
H&I* Fires 1 Oct 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
**********************************
Heh. A new fiscal year... and we're working from last year's budget. That was usually annoying from a soldier perspective - as a blood-sucking contractor, it really bites, because all those shiny new contracts written on '08 dollars can't go into effect until the actual budget is passed. Which hampers us, but also hampers the government client - one, I might note, At War. A pox on both the Executive and Congress!
Dusty sent us this WSJ article on the "Broadband Taxman Cometh." Oddly enough, not having any service at all, it's academic for the moment. Depending on how the states approach this, there's going to be a potentially huge crunch throughout the system.
Silly debate news, via Stop the ACLU.
John Hawkins of Right Wing News sends:
Hello
Right Wing News polled the right side of the blogosphere on their favorite people on the right.
Here's are a few hints/questions about the results:
* A very prominent bloggers tied for 2nd place. Can you guess who it is?
* Can guess the top 4 Republican candidates for President and the order they were selected?
* Can you guess who finished higher: George Bush or Dick Cheney?
Click here for the results. The Armorer did not participate in this one, on purpose, because my conservative heroes tend to wear boots and carry rifles, or command those who do. That was gonna get lost in what all those polibloggers chose, and I was right. -the Armorer
**********************************
Two diametric views on PMCs in Iraq.
--
Sy Hersch is at it again. You know, this guy’s been saying we’re going to war Iran, imminently, since, oh, 2004?
--ry
*********************************
It's official, Admiral Gary Roughead is the Navy's newest CNO and I (along with the Ogre, SJS and several others) have won the CNO Pool. Nearly as sweet, I bested the favorite Naval Consort and I will crow until I am silenced, lol.......Maggie
************************
Well, since we're all Seymour Hersch today, I'll give you this: Hersch's interview with Der Spiegel. He's continuing to beat the "US is planning to go to war with Iran" drum and talking about the "real Hitler". It's a laugh a minute. My favorite "go on and laugh, you know you want to" line was something about "if" Iran would get the bomb (best estimate he says is five years) it would be under the control of the IRGC, not Ahmadinejad. Uhhh...I might be confused, but Ahmadinejad IS the IRGC. You know, former leader, giving all the cool jobs, contracts and money to the IRGC to build up its power?
Oh...and, you know, there is only one Hitler even if the US has been quick to call everyone they disagree with "Hitleresque". Of course, it could be because the regimes he lists, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, etc are some of the most repressive, genocidal regimes in history. Some of them may even have surpassed Hitler in their genocidal murder. But, you know, I'm not a lefty, apologizer for mass murdering totalitarians so my reading of history may be way off.
Not to spoil my update on the Iran-Syria situation, but Strategy Page gives an interesting point of view about all the "war or not to war" rhetoric going on with Iran. The long and short of it is, Iran is experiencing a "Mr. Gorbechav, tear down that wall" moment. You know "Reaganitis": Spending all your hard earned dough on weapons and people you will probably never use while your economy goes to the dogs. The "kaboom" you hear in Tehran may not be an actual war head.
In other news, we continue "mop up" operations in Iraq. The things you won't see put together on your favorite news channel or in your favorite paper: US Military deaths down and Iraqi Civilian Deaths down at the same time. All the while, there has been the usual uptick in Ramadan attacks (Al Qaida's favorite time of the year) that is no where near the last couple of years.
How bad is it? I can't find the link right this second, but a report indicates that documents found on al-Tunis, the most recent "2nd in command" of Al Qaida in Iraq recently killed, included a letter he never got to send. Basically it said, "Send help. We're surrounded and cut off with no escape."
Ya' think?
Oh..and the infamous Abu Al Qaqa, the late Zarqawi's mentor and facilitator in Syria, was assassinated on Sept 29. Depending on whose press you read, he was either assassinated by "Zionist-American" collusion with the Syrian government or a disenchanted, recently released, "Zionist-American" brain washed mujihadeen for being a traitor to Al Qaida and sending many a young wannabe jihadist to their death. I'll have more on that later.
Mmmm...and I can't get to it because it's behind the WJS wall for paying subscribers only, but some other folks are starting to jump on the "Iraq is a Win" bandwagon. The Australian says, "If it Quacks like a duck..."
Now that their losing, AQI is going into the "death spiral" of purging and blaming everyone but their stupid leaders for causing the faithful mujihadeen to be defeated.
Let's see, freedom, democracy, capitalism v. 7th century, isolationist, totalitarian, head chopping, murderous, raping, child slaughtering, "pray like we do, or else", real torture, fanatics? Touch and go for a bit there, but your average Iraqi probably doesn't "love death" more than they "love life".
Uh-Oh...AQI in Iraq may have finally figured out that Iran has been playing them like a $50 Chinese Violin. The fictitious Omar Baghdadi threatens Iran with attacks if they don't stop arming those pesky Shia death squads
More to follow on the "pesky Shia death squads", the Blackwater incident and a more recent attack on some hostile forces that are now miraculously innocent Shia civilians who were just playing a Ramadan game of "find the ring". You know, no Mahdi would be attacking US forces. Sayyid al Sadr said not to. Yes, another "go on and laugh, you know you want to" moment.
-Kat
********************************
[Is it safe?]
Murray feels the need to share a TINS, after reading Bill's post. F-bomb warning!
Update: Heh, I've covered similar ground here... -the Armorer
**********************************
Okay, this has gone beyond lame into a whole new realm of stupid. Really, doesn’t the House of Representatives have something better to do than play this silly game? *Sigh.*
What ever happened to "Don't get stuck on stupid?'
--ry
********************************
Can't resist posting this...it's nice to see a judge not taking himself too seriously. H/T to Mona Charen at NR's Corner
Eggsactly
Courtesy of Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld of The National Synagogue in Washington, DC I have learned of the following opinion filed by Judge James R. Muirhead of the US District Court in New Hampshire. A prisoner had filed a complaint about the kosher food he was being fed in the prison. As part of his request for a preliminary injuction, the prisoner filed a hard-boiled egg.
Judge Muirhead issued the following ruling:
No fan I am
Of the egg at hand.
Just like no ham
On the kosher plan.
This egg will rot
I kid you not.
And stink it can
This egg at hand.
There will be no eggs at court
To prove a clog in your aort.
There will be no eggs accepted.
Objections all will be rejected.
From this day forth
This court will ban
hard-boiled eggs of any brand.
And if you should not understand
The meaning of the ban at hand
Then you should contact either Dan,
the Deputy Clerk, or my clerk Jan.
I do not like eggs in the file.
I do not like them in any style.
I will not take them fried or boiled.
I will not take them poached or broiled.
I will not take them soft or scrambled
Despite an argument well-rambled.
No fan I am
Of the egg at hand.
Destroy that egg!
Today! Today!
Today I say! Without delay!
SO ORDERED (with apologies to Dr. Seuss).
**********************************
BTW...
Reference this post yesterday, I apologize for not providing a much shorter summary for those who don't have the time or inclination to watch Professor Pausch's entire lecture (almost 1.5 hours long but worth every %*#@! minute, IMHO, but still...).
Here's the WSJ article that piqued my interest.
**********************************
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
I *knew* I shouldn't have published when I did.
First Ry, then Maggie, stomped on my addition.
Fooey! Now you'll never know what it was!
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 9:10 AM
My apologies.
You know everytime I post, I worry about that. I get all spooled up and I think it actually ends up taking me longer. That's why I don't do it often, but I just really had to put something here today. I am insufferable when I best the favorite Naval Consort.
posted by
Maggie on October 1, 2007 9:18 AM
Ah, don't sweat it Maggie. I knew it was going to be a problem when I set it up that way.
It's just funny.
I refreshed to see if anyone had put anything in, I published, then Ry published over it. So, I go back in, do it all again... and you published over it.
The *real* lesson is: Don't publish the thing until I'm done! No way for you to know - don't worry, I'm just whinin'.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 9:37 AM
hah...and I came down probably stomping it to bits...again. mucho apologies.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 9:53 AM
No, I dodged your bullet. By a few minutes.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 10:07 AM
Yeah...I actually refreshed the live blog twice before I jumped in just in case I was jumping on somebody's post. that is how Maggie's post escaped scrubbing.
At least it was somebody else's fault this time.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 10:16 AM
now imagine being taxed for all those aborted transactions....
this broadband tax cuts into my real life bread and butter. this thing must be defeated.
posted by MajMike on October 1, 2007 12:25 PM
Uh, the site you linked to in /to_borrow_from_blackfive" (questingcat.com) is dead and for sale.
posted by DoesNotMatter on October 1, 2007 1:05 PM
DNM - Can't help that, that post of mine I linked to is from 2004, and Questing Cat shut down. The purpose of the link was about the ubiquity of the F-bomb in the vocaulary of Anglospheric soldiers under stress...
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 1:18 PM
F bomb?
Down here thats just punctuation.
Can't wait to see what Peter Jackson does with the Dam Busters.
posted by
Murray on October 1, 2007 3:50 PM
Rush Limbaugh???? damn, what have I gotten myself into.....
posted by 1sg Keith on October 1, 2007 4:41 PM
Why the Army has Problems. Some ominous images here.
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on October 1, 2007 6:31 PM
Umm, Murray, and Bill, and The Armorer; just what is the M113 good for?
I mean, aside from avoiding having to walk, and stopping pistol bullets and low-velocity fragments, and all?
Surely, when they first built the thing, somebody shot at it with various weapons to see what would penetrate.
Just curious, I was always WTF about aluminum armor.
posted by
Justthisguy on October 1, 2007 9:41 PM
Oh, Murray, I believe that Tom Wolfe (in "The Right Stuff") described the use of the F-word as speaking in "Army Creole".
You know what I mean, interpolating it between syllables, etc,
posted by
Justthisguy on October 1, 2007 9:49 PM
...pledges to debate any supplemental funding request or any policy decisions regarding the war in Iraq with the solemn respect and the commitment to integrity...
*Always* disregard the body of any congressional resolution until you've checked the bottom line. And the bottom line in this instance -- in keeping with the line of the thread -- translates as, "To everyone we mentioned in the preceding paragraphs: F**k you."
* * * * * * * * * * * *
I was always WTF about aluminum armor.
The Royal Navy had that same thought during the Falklands Exocet-Catching Exercise...
posted by
BillT on October 1, 2007 10:34 PM
An interesting lecture it was, I watched a bit of it expecting little of it but it turned out worthwhile. To hold an audience's attention for that long is an achievement in itself and he's good at inspiration too.
What is with this resolution? I don't really get it.
posted by
Trias on October 1, 2007 10:38 PM
Ask the Aussies who were at Long Tan how they feel about 113's.
Last I heard a few of them were ready to marry one.
Might be what you do with it rather than what it can do that matters.
posted by Murray on October 1, 2007 10:43 PM
Murray, I was just askin', in a technical kind of way, about what kind of objects, approaching at whatever speed, could be counted upon to make a hole, or not, in an M113.
Yah, obviously on many occasions people protected by nothing more than thin shirts have won violent deadly fights,by being smart and maneuvering, etc.
And survived, even.
posted by
Justthisguy on October 1, 2007 11:16 PM
Grunts bounce off real good.
posted by Murray on October 2, 2007 3:49 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
The Chairman is Dead! Long Live the Chairman!
As long as you don't use the term... GWOT.
We now stop the /snarking and bring you President Bush.
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT ARMED FORCES FAREWELL TRIBUTE
IN HONOR OF GENERAL PETER PACE
AND ARMED FORCES HAIL IN HONOR OF
ADMIRAL MICHAEL MULLEN
Fort Myer, Virginia
11:47 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Vice President, Mrs. Cheney, Secretary Gates, members of the Cabinet, members of Congress, members of the Diplomatic Corps, members of the finest military ever, that United States military, Secretary Rumsfeld, General Myers, members of the Pace and Mullen family and distinguished guests. Today we pay tribute to an outstanding Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and we welcome his distinguished successor.
Ceremonies like this are a storied military tradition. It is a time when families, friends and comrades honor those who have fulfilled great duties to their nation. It is a time when we show admiration to those who step forward to assume new obligations. It's a time when we make generous use of words like "honor" and "character." Sometimes those words are used too often. In the case of the two men we celebrate today, those words cannot be used too much.
Admiral Mike Mullen comes to this post with a broad and unique range of talents and experience. Some of you may not know that his parents were highly-regarded members of the Hollywood community, who worked for some of the greatest entertainers of the day. Many people are surprised when told about the Admiral's show business roots. After all, he's humble, well-grounded, and filled with common sense. (Laughter.) Not exactly what one thinks about when they think of Hollywood values. (Laughter.)
Admiral Mullen left California to attend the United States Naval Academy to pursue a career in military service. He soon found himself stationed on a destroyer on the gun line off the coast of Vietnam. During that tour, Admiral Mullen was part of operations so intense that the gun barrels on his ship glowed red. That was the beginning of a distinguished career.
The Admiral has commanded three ships, an aircraft carrier battle group, and the U.S. Second Fleet. He served as the commander of all U.S. naval forces in Europe and the NATO Joint Force Command. And later, as Chief of Naval Operations, he championed the construction of new types of vessels needed to deal with the threats of the 21st century.
Admiral Mike Mullen understands what's at stake in the war on terror. He was on duty at the Pentagon when Flight 77 made its doomed plunge. He felt the plane slam into the building. He saw the carnage and devastation. And like all who worked there that terrible day, he still carries the pain and the loss. Admiral Mullen was there when war reached America's shore -- and he brings the talent, vision and judgment needed to help us fight and win that war.
As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mullen will follow his strong belief that every member of our Armed Forces is, as he put it, part of "one team and one fight." He will continue to set a sterling example to our men and women in uniform. He will bring judgment and candor to decisions that may mean the difference between life and death for young Americans who are serving our nation. He will demonstrate the same love of country and dedication to duty that inspired his sons to follow him into military service.
Admiral Mike Mullen is a man of decency and honor, and I congratulate you on your new assignment. And I know your parents would be proud. And I thank you and Deborah and Jack and Michael for your service to our nation. (Applause.)
As Admiral Mullen begins his service as Chairman, he is fortunate to have as an example the man we honor today. General Pete Pace is one of the most respected and accomplished military leaders I have ever known. He helped craft America's response to an unprecedented assault on our homeland. He helped liberate two nations from brutal tyrannies and helped bring freedom to millions of people. He began the process of transforming our military into a more efficient and effective force.
Yet these accomplishments do not begin to tell the full story of this remarkable man. That story begins in Teaneck, New Jersey, where General Pace grew up the proud son of an Italian immigrant. His dad worked two and sometimes three jobs to provide for his family. His mom attended church service every Sunday, and, according to the good General, still lights candles to pray that her children are happy, healthy and safe.
General Pace was a good student and a good athlete. His mom said the General has been good at everything he's ever done. Some of you may think mothers are required to say only admiring things about their sons. Well, take it from me, it's not always the case. (Laughter.)
General Pace's dad died before he could see his son reach the height of his career -- yet he always knew that his son would be a success. His family believed in his potential -- and they weren't the only ones. There is something about General Pete Pace that makes believers out of nearly everyone. That includes the men who served with him in Vietnam and whom he led during some of the most vicious urban combat in American military history. It includes the troops he led in Somalia who looked to him for resolve and guidance during difficult times. It includes Marines who look with pride on the first of their ranks to lead the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It includes two Secretaries of Defense who relied on the General during tough and trying times. And it includes a President who has counted on General Pace's candor and sound judgment during some of the most difficult times in our country's history.
During his service at the Pentagon, General Pete Pace has shown us many talents. He's shown an intellect sharpened by post-graduate studies at George Washington and Harvard. He's shown us great oratorical skills -- this is a man who frequently speaks without notes -- I really don't recommend this to everyone. (Laughter.) He's shown a sharp wit. When a Naval commander once made an edgy joke in front of the Secretary of Defense, the General stepped right in and gave the young officer some advice. He said, "Never let a promising career stand in the way of a good joke." (Laughter.)
The most important attribute General Pete Pace has shown us is a quiet strength. It is a strength that has won the admiration of friends and peers. It is a strength built on the love and support of a strong and devoted wife, Lynne, and their family, Peter, Lynsey and Tiffany. It is a strength that gave Pete solace in the tough, and sometimes bitter, world of Washington, D.C. It helped him bring selflessness to a city filled with egos, and a dignity to a political process that might have worn down lesser men. He now leaves active service with a distinguished team in place and a talented successor. And yet I also have the sense that General Pace is not going to end it all here. He's a man who has always put country first and he will find new ways to serve.
General Pete Pace always understood what's important. It wasn't titles received, or honors bestowed -- and it certainly was not the good graces of official Washington. What mattered most were the young men and women who serve our country and risk their lives for its honored cause. He kept a picture on his desk of the first Marine who died under his command in Vietnam. He can still recite the names of all other Marines who died under that first command -- and because this is a man with a tender heart, sometimes it's hard for him to get through all the names without choking up a little bit.
Pete has devoted his life to those who wear our country's uniform. And they are devoted to General Pace. They're among the hundreds who've received his advice and friendship. They're among the thousands who lined up at military bases during his final tour to shake his hand and wish him well and say goodbye. They're among the millions whose names he will never know but who will always remember him. And they include that single soldier who came up to the General on his last visit to the war zone. He looked at General Pace with gratitude, respect and pride, and said, "Thanks for your service. We'll take it from here."
General Pace, throughout your life, you have led those troops to honorable achievements and into the pages of history. Because of your example, you can know that with courage, valor and confidence, they will take it from here.
And so Godspeed to my friend, General Pete Pace. Thanks for your courage. Thanks for your leadership. And thanks for your service to a country we love.
Thank you, sir.
Snark=Yes
Godspeed General Pace - and Admiral Mullen - what're we going to rename those medals? Welcome to the Snarkpit, Chairman...
8^ )
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
I'm glad you put this up. Pace is a good guy. Also, I forgot to post congrats to Mullen as he becomes CJCS (as part of the Navy's plan for world domination). I guess I was a little too caught up in the whole I-Won-and-SB-lost-on-the-CNO-Pool thing
posted by
Maggie on October 1, 2007 5:42 PM
General Pace deserves all the thanks in the world. The man is first class from the top of his head to his toes. Thank you General, you are the best.
posted by Rita on October 2, 2007 10:42 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
A naming contest!
Okay, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Admiral Mullen, has slain the Global War On Terror, much like King Canute tamed the tide.
So - let's have a naming contest.
If it ain' the GWOT, what is it? Mel sent me one suggestion already:
I recommend SCAPEGOAT: Synchronized Combined Arms Police Enforcement on Globally Ominous Agents of Terrorism.
Okay - that'll get you started.
Suggest away!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
"IIWII"... it is what it is.
posted by MajMike on October 1, 2007 10:33 AM
'Global War On Really Bad, Bad Men'
posted by Patrick Chester on October 1, 2007 10:36 AM
MEEMO - Middle East Extreme Make Over
WARRE - War Against Revisionist Regressive Extremism
WASTE - War Against Salafist Terrorist Extremists
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 11:08 AM
how about...
It's not a GWOT, it's Appropriately Reasoned Goals Given [for] Horrendous [and] Hellacious.....
ARGGHHH!! Never mind! (sorry, couldn't resist!)
It's a "Glass the Desert" campaign, or how about Operation LAST - "Let Allah Sort Them"?
posted by NinjaFluff on October 1, 2007 11:56 AM
How about "Fluffy Bunny Love"? It doesn't stand for anything, I'd just really like to hear the Chairman JCOS prattle on about his success in fighting Fluffy Bunny Love!
Or how about the side-campaign HUA - the Hammering of Unacceptable Acronyms? (aka "Head Up Ass")
posted by Q_Mech on October 1, 2007 12:21 PM
Q-Mech - I like your line of thought here...
Man, if I was Frank J at IMAO, I bet I could really nail it. Ah well.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 12:35 PM
DOA - Defense of America
posted by fdcol63 on October 1, 2007 1:32 PM
PSALMS
Perpetual Struggle Against Loony MindSets
posted by fdcol63 on October 1, 2007 1:36 PM
Hello Fellow Americans.
I'm coming to you tonight from the Rose Garden to introduce to you the new name of the-war-whose-name-shall-not-be-mentioned.
VOLDEMORT.
From now on, the-war-whose-name-shall-not-be-mentioned will be referred to as VOLDEMORT. I am in the process of re-titling my closest advisors as well.
Condi- you shall now be known as Hermoine.
Dick- As my closest advisor and friend, you get stuck with "Ron".
My beloved wife, I've officially changed your SS codename to "Jenny", but in private, I will still call you "my hoochy-mama".
And finally, Dad, my mentor throughout the years... I hope you don't mind me naming you after a dead guy. *slight chuckle* From now on, I'll be calling you "Dumbledore."
And last, but not least, I think it's only fair to name the Dark Lord's right-hand man, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad... "Professor Snape."
Thank you for your attention, but I must now return to Hogwarts for the "house cup" award ceremony. It's a really big deal, you know.
Be steadfast, my friends... and avoid the Dark Forest. It's off-limits, you know.
Good night.
posted by AFSister on October 1, 2007 1:39 PM
How about "War of Capitalist Aggression Under Guise of Combating Terror"?
posted by don on October 1, 2007 1:46 PM
Why, no, don. WCAUGCT? That acronym just doesn't make any sense at all. You must be using some other language.
Instead, how about War to Protect Humanity, Except for Don Briefed's Sorry Ass Who We're Gonna Hand Over to bin Laden For Kicks?
I like that better. It may be a mouthful, but its nice and chewy.
posted by Q_Mech on October 1, 2007 1:56 PM
Sigh. Just Sigh. First they came for the Long War.
How about, "War Against Dhimmitude?"
posted by
CDR Salamander on October 1, 2007 2:02 PM
Frank - DOA? Dead On Arrival, man. Not a good mix.
Don! A contrarian voice arriveth!
What else ya got? Make it clever, now!
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 2:41 PM
"Dead On Arrival"
John, depends on who's dead on arrival, doesn't it? LOL
posted by fdcol63 on October 1, 2007 3:56 PM
How about the Death to America Tour?
Everyone who chants "death to america" has to die.
Oh...wait...we'd have to wipe out Don and a third of our own population.
I'll try again.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 4:46 PM
Now let's not pick on Don - he merely offered an opinion, however much it may not be popular with you peasants. Leave your pitchforks in the rack by the door, plz.
8^ )
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 4:53 PM
War on Islam. Because let's just face it, that's precisely what it is. Even the soft cuddly Islam that gives the President a warm fuzzy still wants to tell us how to live in our own country. And that alone, is reason enough to open up a can of jihad juice.
There should be a statute of limitations on crazy death cult movements. We fight you inconclusively for longer than five years and we start hauling out the A bombs again until someone somewhere cries uncle.
Operation Sucks To Be You
posted by
Buck Sargent on October 1, 2007 5:21 PM
Middle East Security Situation....MESS
South West Asia Military Project...SWAMP
posted by Soldier's Dad on October 1, 2007 5:22 PM
Acronym for the
Offending
Acronym
AOA
Short, sweet, palindromatic.
posted by agip on October 1, 2007 8:04 PM
How about DROPOBAT...or however it works out...
Defeating the Religion Of Peaceniks One Bullet/Bomb ata Time
Let's not forget that this is all about the "religion of peace"!!!!!
posted by Swino on October 1, 2007 9:53 PM
How about the War for Oil
And we take some darn oil while we're at it. Start with Iraq and Iran's oil and then take Saudi Arabia's. Pump them dry and cut them loose. We could bank it in some dry West Texas oil wells until we need it here.
Or Global Counterjihad, to put a real name on it. The dangerous enemy is the Jihad. The problem is that this doesn't pull the NoKors into the name. NK is a terrorist state but not a Jihad state.
I could be convinced to vote for Fluffy Bunny Love.
Or Invading their Countries, Killing their Leaders, and Converting them to Christianity?
posted by
Wolf Pangloss on October 1, 2007 10:00 PM
The Mother of All BLT Fights,
where BLT stands for Bin Laden Types.
posted by
Vigilis on October 1, 2007 10:32 PM
TWIT. Totally Whipping International Terrorists.
Also matches the apparent 'utility' of changing names.
posted by Blackhawk on October 1, 2007 10:47 PM
I suggest "Bob".
Like Q_Mech's suggestion, it doesn't stand for anything. But anything can be called "Bob".
There's a bridge in Colorado named Bob. Remember the old TV show, Twin Peaks, and who killed Laura Palmer? It was the demon, Bob.
posted by malclave on October 1, 2007 11:28 PM
Strategic Harmonizing of Intelligence and Tactics.
posted by
BloodSpite on October 2, 2007 12:39 AM
Like I said over on Cass' piece:
Official Homonym We Think Fits, OHWTF, for short. Gives them the future latitude to nickname it anything that fits the meme du joir without all the messy moral implications of taking a stand.
posted by Sly2017 on October 2, 2007 12:34 PM
The Big Fight.
I've got to fit this thing on personnel evaluations, and Operation IRAQI FREEDOM or The Global War on Terror just take up too much room in a one-line bullet.
posted by greyhawk on October 2, 2007 12:52 PM
How 'bout:
"That Groovy Thing We Do?"
posted by Cassandra on October 2, 2007 4:05 PM
DOCATWFGP
Deciding Our Children's And The World's Future Gene Pool
I like wafugap part. I sounds like mumbling, like bumbling.
posted by AMC on October 2, 2007 4:46 PM
Changed my mind, it should be TWOB: The War on Birthdays. On my last tour I was 29 when I left and 31 when I got back. Felt like a time warp.
Luckily, I only missed a single year of the wi-fi's. Two in a row with a couple anniversaries thrown in for good measure, I'd still be paying for it.
You people with kids, I don't know how you do it. I guess I'll have to find out the hard way.
posted by
Buck Sargent on October 2, 2007 5:16 PM
Yeah, 'Fluffy Bunny Love,' so far I go with that.
posted by agip on October 2, 2007 10:22 PM
I think it is more like the War against the Infidels. (note" we are the Infidels. We are just very slow to pick it up.)
We should ask Al and Tali what they call the war against us and we can all get on the same page for the MSM....
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 4:57 AM
How about "War Against Child Killers And Militants Organized as Loose Entities"?
It pulls on the emotions, describes a networked and disparate enemy, and the acronym is descriptive of our strategy: WACK-A-MOLE.
posted by
MountainRunner on October 3, 2007 10:49 AM
A bit out of left field, but how about:
The Tenth Crusade
posted by bathandwells on October 3, 2007 11:52 AM
I would pick War on Oil aka "World Oil Takeover" W.O.T. or "Money Making for Weapons Makers" MMWM.
C.K. for Countries Killers is good too...
WWIII World War III (soon to be, to stop the new dictatorial regime that Bush has brought)...
Making War for Peace = F**king for Virginity
[Naughty naughty! We don't allow the F-bomb in here. It excites the Net-nanny software and only rarely truly advances the conversation. -the Armorer]
posted by me on October 3, 2007 12:55 PM
Me - "War on Oil?" that's really Greenpeace and Al Gore, donchathink?
World Oil Takeover... yeah, that's working real well for us, but yeah, okay, every war is a war for oil. That's a little tired, all things considered. Now, if you'd said "War To Try To Stabilize Oil Markets" you could at least perhaps have signed Mr. Greenspan up.
Money Making For Weapons Makers... again, if we'd *actually* mobilized the industrial base, that one might make sense, but given that the Congress(!) has had to bully the Administration into spending money on armaments and accoutrements, I'm thinking this one isn't working so well for ya, either. Oh, sure, people are making money, but that would have been true regardless. Again, not really appealing.
Country Killers. Yeah, right. See "Dresden" "Stalingrad" "Leningrad" "Berlin" "Tokyo" "Nagasaki" Hiroshima" etc, if you want to talk country killing. Scale and perspective can be useful here. And recall, when we showed up, Iraq was pretty much a shell, as Saddam had kept all that Oil For Food money Kofi's son et.al., were providing.
WWIII... Well, we could stumble into that as Europe did in 1914, true enough. Dictatorial regime Bush has brought... hmmmmmmm. If Bush is a Dictator, what's, oh, Chavez, et.al.?
I see the NYT's has been shuttered, and Senator Reid clapped in irons, and Speaker Pelosi is being held under house arrest while the monks/students are being slaughtered and the tanks are rolling into Prague/San Francisco.
I'm thinking - you've never really lived in or under a *real* dictatorship, or you wouldn't be quite so quick to toss the word around. It makes your arguments unserious, too.
I could be wrong - you look to be visiting from the Northeast, if you're in Massachusetts you do live in the land of the Oligarchs.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 3, 2007 1:38 PM
GEORGE - Global Effects Of Religious Garbage Everywhere
:)
posted by Idiot on October 5, 2007 3:04 PM
How about we name it by what it is, who created it and what he will get hit by when the fan finally gets turned on!!!
What u say?........BUllSHit
posted by
Blade on October 6, 2007 12:00 PM
Blade - what happens if Hillary or Obama continues the fight? Because the Admiral's terminology concern *includes* Afstan, Horn of Africa, etc.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 6, 2007 1:14 PM
I think Hillary has been chosen and she will continue the eternal battle because we will have attacked Iran before she takes office, unless a very strong military leader can stop it all!! I can always hope, huh???
posted by
Blade on October 6, 2007 2:42 PM
Blade, coupla things.
1. What do you mean by "chosen"?
2. Are you essentially suggesting a revolt of the Generals?
3. If the answer to 2 is "yes" are you prepared for the consequences of that?
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 7, 2007 6:51 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
This just in: War Over! Back to Status Quo Ante for naming anyway...
Sanitized to protect the innocent.
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:10 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: *****REMOVE ANY REFERENCE TO GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR" OR "WAR ON TERROR" FROM ALL CORRESPONDENCE*****
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
J-X,
Today, we have received clear direction from Adm Mullen (incoming CJCS) regarding the phrase "Global War on Terror". He does not like this reference and we are not to use this in any future correspondence. Review your letters, orders, JSAPs, and presentations to ensure this reference is removed.
Ensure strict compliance.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
R/S,
LtCol X.
We eagerly await the Chairman's new naming guidance. Still, can't help but think... walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck...
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
I wonder just what the new CJCS, Adm. Mullen, is going to do with all those pesky GWOT service and expeditionary medals so many are wearing.
posted by
Consul-At-Arms on October 1, 2007 9:45 AM
I was thinking, "a little late for that", heh, grand-poobah?
Kind of all over the lexicon military to civilian.
You think he'll make me change my title on the grand communications strategy I'm cooking up?
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 9:49 AM
great, so now i'll have to re-rack my tinsel and get rid of that pretty little GWOT-E?
posted by MajMike on October 1, 2007 10:36 AM
I was unaware that the CJCS had any direct command authority over anything, except maybe the Joint Staff.
His principle duty is to serve as the primary military advisor to the President and SecDef. He's not actually in charge of anything. So how can he say "Don't use that phrase."
Besides which, I was under the impression that we'd already begun the transition to the term "Long War."
posted by
Heartless Libertarian on October 1, 2007 12:38 PM
So when do we get to start calling it what it really is then?
GAOIA
Global Annihilation Of Insurgent A$$h@les.
posted by AFSister on October 1, 2007 1:17 PM
HEY!
That reminds me of a song.
There was a Prez who had a war, and Gay-Yo was it's name-oh.
GAIAO
GAIAO
GAIAO
And Gay-Yo was it's name-oh!
Then again, I don't know if the military would appreciate fighting for anything with the word "gay" in it.
*sigh*
Back to the drawing board....
posted by AFSister on October 1, 2007 1:22 PM
AFSis, 'specially since yer refrain didn't match yer acronym...
Heartless - good call, and note, the email was to J-Staff personnel.
I was just showing everybody how it works, when a new guy shows up and feels the need to have an impact, fast.
Changing the vocabulary actually can do that - as long as you don't mind the snark.
Given the size of his paycheck, I'm doubting Admiral Mullen is worrying too much about what I think.
But this might have bollixed my invitation to "The Tank" (the real one, vice the NRO one) to spend an hour with the Chiefs...
;^ )
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 1:27 PM
I was unaware that the CJCS had any direct command authority over anything, except maybe the Joint Staff.
CJCS doesn't even command his own driver. His function is to serve as the conduit between the focus group (the JCS) and POTUS.
There's an excellent chapter on the origins and functions of the JCS in Arthur Hadley's The Straw Giant.
posted by
BillT on October 1, 2007 1:33 PM
Yeah, but it sounded good, eh?
posted by AFSister on October 1, 2007 1:48 PM
The Focus Group. Snerk.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 2:42 PM
Why does this remind me of the decision to make the black beret the Army's standard issue head gear?
posted by fdcol63 on October 1, 2007 2:52 PM
Admiral Mullen signaled this change some time ago. He thinks the terminology gets in the way of doing business with other nations (I mean that in terms of diplo-military relations, not commerce) and so he wants it to go away.
Depends on how it plays out whether or not this was a good decision or not. Unlike the beret issue, where the significant number of heads *not* designed for berets still cause me to wince.
That, and all the time lost fiddling with them to get them to set right, for those who bother.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 2:57 PM
Instead of spending time/resources finding the right name for the current conflicts, how about the nice folks at the Pentagon re-invest their time in fighting the actual conflicts?
Most wars are known as "The War" when they are being fought. After a few years, with some historical perspective, they naturally assume a name. "The War" 90 years ago, later became "The Great War" and then "World War I."
We don't know yet what this may or may not become. So let's just call it "The War."
posted by
Adeodatus on October 1, 2007 3:49 PM
Vaguely recall this "Drop GWOT" thing a few years ago (from same author). Now that he's "Big C", vice just a seat on the JCS, I guess I can see it...IF and only if we refer to IZ and AF as "The Battle of Iraq and The Battle of Afghanistan" to properly place them in the overall "Long War".
Otherwise...screw it.
posted by Desert Sailor on October 1, 2007 5:14 PM
I suggest a replacement name that also hints at our strategy: War Against Child Killers And Militants Organized as Loose Entities, or WACK-A-MOLE
posted by
MountainRunner on October 1, 2007 5:21 PM
Whatever..........I'm not giving up my coin even if a Sailor tells me to.
posted by
Maggie on October 1, 2007 5:48 PM
DS-Actually, I think the correct terms would be "Iraq Front" and "Afghan Front"
posted by
Heartless Libertarian on October 2, 2007 11:32 AM
I think the whole notion to this as a "WAR" is really over-complicating it. It fits the description of violent combat, it cetrtainly could be classified as a battle or series of battles, but the strategic term of "War" is difficult to grasp for most.
During WWII, the term "War" was pretty easy to envision. Two opposing sides, with clear division of Geo's. Geography and Geo-politics. Easy to see the "War" when set on those terms.
War against Nazi Tyranny
War against Fascism
War against Germany
War against Japan
Always though, WWII. The allies didnt even have a coined phrase back in the days of WW2, only calling it the European Theater or the Pacific Theater of Operations.
I will start believing it is a "real war" when the Will, the Sacrifice and the motivation is present in our nation.
Until then, this is business as usual for me, it is a deployment and series of defensive operations conducted offensively against a fanatical insane enemy that house no boundries geographically speaking, yet has a lot of allies geo-politically speaking.
In WWII we had the strategic vision to conduct "Warfare" on a global scale, yet we have difficulty in the current state of "Warfare" against the Taliban and Al Queda. IMO this may be due to creating a bigger boogie man... I think all we lack to really end this is the political will. Period.
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 4:51 AM
Hey AFSister:
Global Annihilation Of Insurgent A$$h@les
if you drop the "O" from "GAOIA", which you really should for an acronym, it becomes "GAIA", which is perfect, since it will send the moonbats into a frenzy.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis
redc1c4,
here to help? %-)
posted by redc1c4 on October 4, 2007 10:36 PM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
“Follow on orders.”
Hello all.
I want to congratulate Joe on his safe conclusion of his tour in the Stan’. Thanks Joe, you are a great American.
Well, as I complete my tour here at my current overseas duty station and ready my family and myself for the next PCS and IA deployment to Afghanistan, it occurred to me that some folks may not know the details of how the process works for a Sailor up for reassignment. In my particular case this will be my 12th Permanent Change of Station (PCS). The process begins as they all do, an email or phone call to the “Detailer” (a mythical creature who lives in a far off place, who is supposed to represent the Sailor and the Navy). This process is very similar to the mating ritual of the right whale. After a series of non-conclusive, non-binding “maybe’s”, I was able to pin the Detailer down to “Penciling” me in for a set of orders. I eagerly told Mrs. Haircut the news and we celebrated the return to the States and to our adopted hometown of Pensacola. The inevitable question from my wife was, “when will we see hard copy orders”. Now “hard copy” orders are about as binding as a U.N. Resolution, but it is enough to authorize shipment of household goods, auto, dog and more importantly complete the mortgage application for breaking ground on the house construction.
Well I called the detailer and asked when I could expect to receive the hard copy and he gave the same non committal “6-9 months out”. Then a few days later came the email: “I have an IA you might be interested in”. Whoa Nelly! Now, at first I was anxious then I was excited. I have never been the guy who has to be “voluntold” and I earlier volunteered to go IA to a PRT battalion but big Navy said “no”, something about the Army (lead on Civil Affairs and PRT’s) not having a billet for a Navy Warrant Officer. So I resigned myself to heading back to the States and wrapping up the career.
The Navy reviewed the policy of how they assign Individual Augmentee Sailors and have decided to fill the IA billets with personnel up for orders or PCS’ing. The Service has always been about timing and my timing was lousy or good depending on how you see it.
My wife was not very happy that the Navy decided to spring the new policy change at this particular point in our career. You see this is not her first tea party, and she has been with me for Desert Storm and the cruises and deployments after that and of course when I was deployed on USS Enterprise on Sep 11th. It was “just like the Navy” she said. From my point of view, since I was there at the beginning, it is very exciting to go back again. This time Boots on the Ground (BOG) I wonder what has really changed in the last 6 years.
Oh since volunteering for this IA, I received hard copy orders for the IA tour in 5 DAYS!!! Got to love the commitment! Still waiting for my Pensacola orders!
- MTH -
[Ya'd think a Senior Guy like this would know better than to admit to volunteering where his wife could see it... - the Armorer]
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
So... MTH.. will your orders have to be re-written to ensure that they no longer refer to anything even closely related to the term "Global War On Terror?"
*KIDDING*
Glad to have you aboard!
posted by AFSister on October 1, 2007 1:56 PM
AFsister,
They better not! They better just 'ordmod" em!
posted by MR T's Haircut on October 3, 2007 4:30 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Cox and Forkum.
Coda.
Why is this important? For all the reasons others will tell, but for the Armorer, here at the Castle it's...
...because they were early and powerful supporters of Project Valour-IT.
Just ask Fuzzybear Lioness, the Heart of Project Valour-IT.
Sadly, that hoser Rall still publishes.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Wow. This is a loss, and I'll miss their cartoons very much. Hopefully, someone else will seize the opportunity to provide some balance.
posted by fdcol63 on October 1, 2007 8:01 AM
You beat me to it. I had it up as one of my "H&I" links. (like I didn't have enough).
I have another cartoon though that they did not long ago which I plan to link to for my upcoming Iran-Syria report.
I am saddened. Kind of like the family you never visited enough just to find out they were moving to higher ground, if you know what I mean.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 10:25 AM
Of course rall still gets published. He's got his lips tightly attached to the dangling lower anatomy of the msm/dnc.
C&F unfortunately had the audacity to do cartoons that skewered those same people and their "ideas". Not a chance in hell that they would ever get picked up and published regularly.
posted by emdfl on October 1, 2007 11:13 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
September 30, 2007
H&I* Fires 30 SEP 2007
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
**********************************
Grandma Guavin’s rosary is getting a real workout thanks to the Taiwanese senate vote. Maybe all that idle talk we had not too long ago won’t turn out to be so idle? Gawd, I hope it remains absolutely idle. Please.
--
Supporting the Troops starts long before they step on the field, and it doesn’t end when they step off either. I may not be on the same page as Phil Carter over at Intel Dump, but we’re at least in the same chapter of the same book.
--
I wonder what the feeling on this one will be around here? Not really, I know, it just pisses me off someone would say that and I’m looking to share the outrage on it.
--
ry to Labo(u)r MPs: Don’t.
--ry
*****************************************
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... �
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone"
� Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
All one can say about the jerk who wrote the Oakland Airport story is that he is beneath contempt. Unfortunately the entire San Francisco Bay Area seems to be infected with the anti-military virus. As a young Marine said recently, America hasn't gone to war, America has gone to the mall.
posted by Marine6 on September 30, 2007 10:23 AM
Ry,
Don't let the China situation upset you. I can practically guarantee the mainland won't do anything until at least 2009. Why? The Olympics. Red China won't do a single thing to jeapordize their chance to host the games; they would lose too much face otherwise.
posted by
Casey Tompkins on September 30, 2007 12:43 PM
Heh. Chuckie's kind of a dolt, isn't he? He stepped on it in his post, got a message from the Hive Mind that he's supposed to *support the troops but not the mission*, did an update and decided it was fabricated (should've done a fact-check, Chuck -- it's not), then proved he didn't even comprehend what he was reading (nooooo, the chaplain didn't write the e-mail, he merely confirmed the incident happened), and finally suggested that the airport build an additional terminal for military passengers to preclude a recurrence of the incident he thinks is a fake.
But the best line in the whole post is "Anyone else remember Vietnam?" According to his personal info, he's 35-years of age. The war was over before he was a year old, and he *remembers* Vietnam?!?
Wotta rectal chapeau...
posted by
BillT on September 30, 2007 2:47 PM
Chuckie's really in trouble if any Marines find out he's been calling them... soldiers. They hate that worse than someone referring to their widdle feelings.
One wonders if Chuck would be so, um, dismissive face to face.
8^ )
That said - did anyone go read the "About Me" section, and try to square that with the post?
posted by
John of Argghhh! on September 30, 2007 3:19 PM
That said - did anyone go read the "About Me" section, and try to square that with the post?
Yeah -- that's how I bumped into his age. He doesn't like chaplains, that's for sure, and his views on the troops have evidently changed as often as the name of the blog. Interesting that he claims to be right of center -- his blogging background info and the language in his posts screeches "moonbat"...
posted by
BillT on September 30, 2007 4:41 PM
1. He's lived in SW Detroit all his life.
2. From the entry on Lincoln Park: "The School district has also failed to pass the meap(?) in most categories." Chuck must be a proud exemplar.
3. A SH-Prac shell has more explosive power than his literariness.
4. But he's not witless: "Life’s a bummer, then you get married." But it may be a quote, vice one of his major life lessons.
Cheers
Cheers
posted by J.M. Heinrichs on September 30, 2007 7:47 PM
Yes, I also read the about me right after the post. He's got more baggage than an airport and isn't really worth reading.
posted by
Trias on September 30, 2007 8:25 PM
He's got more baggage than an airport and isn't really worth reading.
LOL! You completely nailed it, Trias. He's just a wannabe ... something.
I didn't read the About Me until you guys discussed it (because I wasn't that interested). One corn-fuzed guy.
posted by
Barb on September 30, 2007 11:22 PM
I've been watching the CHina thing for a few years now, and one thing I can say is don't think they're real predictable. The Olympics is huge for them, they've spent a busload of money on preparations for it. But, the nationalism plank is the tent pole about which the legitimacy of the regime is built. If it fails, the CCP has a real problem. Letting Taiwan go is a threat to the central tent pole regardless of whether losing international face and money over the games due to military action. It is, as usual, a bit complicated.
It may become something, and it may not. I'm hoping not. There's a lot more to go than a senate vote---there's been a few of these over the years---before they really go independent and therefore require more than a stiffly worded diplo-note from Beijing. But I bet the threatcon boards are getting updates hourly in a couple headquarters for the next week or so. I wouldn't want to be an intel guy in PACCOM right now, ulcercity.
M6, damnit. I keep hating that phrase(because it carries more than a little truth). I hope this place reminds you that not all of us are at the Mall. Not all of us Normals are at the Mall.
posted by ry on October 1, 2007 2:47 AM
Actually, I think the most interesting thing that's been going on with China is its cyber attacks on western countries.
buckle up boys, its going to be a bumpy ride.
posted by
kat-missouri on October 1, 2007 2:50 AM
Actually, I think the most interesting thing that's been going on with China is its cyber attacks on western countries.
but they've been doing that for *years* and intensively. It is far from a new thing. So too have they had people infiltrate to do industrial espionage, for years.
Yeah, it's going to be bumpy. But bumpy is all I hope it ever is, and not truly raucous or interesting.
posted by ry on October 1, 2007 5:48 AM
But bumpy is all I hope it ever is, and not truly raucous or interesting.
"May you live in interesting times." --one of the more scrutable Chinese curses.
posted by
BillT on October 1, 2007 6:46 AM
Kat - the cyber-attacks have been going on with serious intensity, and for long enough, there are unclas books written about it.
The good thing about them is - they're practicing on us, we're learning from them.
There's some downsides, too, but the unclas books haven't been written about those yet.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 7:21 AM
"There's some downsides, too, but the unclas books haven't been written about those yet."
You mean like them moving to Linux as a result of seeing how porous Windows based stuff is?
I know, I know. YOu see no evil, you hear no evil, you sure as hell aren't going to tell me. ;)
posted by ry on October 1, 2007 7:30 AM
8^ )
Ry, you assume I have something to tell.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on October 1, 2007 7:50 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!
Go Watch this now...
Sometimes, it's easier to just point to something when trying to explain to people why we serve.
In war, you do it for your buddy/shipmates/wingmen. But when you have time to get philosophical, the reasons broaden.
This is why I was proud to serve and contribute to the preservation of a country, society and culture that can produce such people. Click on the link to watch the video.
God bless you Randy; you help make the 26 years I gave VERY worthwhile. -Instapilot
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Sundry Sunday
An old farmer in Georgia had owned his farm for several years. He had a *huge* pond in the back, fixed up real nice; picnic tables, volleyball net, a horseshoe pitch -- like I said, real nice. And he'd properly shaped and graded the pond for swimming when he built it. One evening, the old farmer decided to go down to the pond, as he hadn't been there for a while, and look it over.
As he neared the pond, he heard voices shouting and laughing with glee.
As he came still closer, he saw the noise originated from a bunch of young ladies skinny-dipping in his pond. He coughed to make the ladies aware of his presence and they immediately swam to the deep end of the pond. One of them shouted to him, "We're not coming out until you leave!"
The old man replied, "Calm down, now, hon -- I didn't come down here to watch you ladies swim or make you get out of the pond nekkid--
"--I'm just here to feed the alligator..."
V-29 swears he *didn't* make that up.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
So far, the Kill Bill Match the TINS! to the Radio Call Contest has produced some enlightening results: Brab and NinjaFluff (with Pogue flying CAS) want to see me crisped, the starch-wing contingent wants me to go trolling for flak, Sis wants to see me ventilated, ry's opting for a Blue-on-Blue and Two Who Shall Remain Nameless want me to go up for a rematch with the heat-seeker. At least Cassie hasn't shown up to fling the trivet. Or engage in rampant foot-tapping, followed by a faire la moue et la flounce.
However, if the trend holds, *most* of you will be able to -- ahem -- brag about your prescience...
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! �
Wow, slow day. They're not even bitin' on 'yer jokes, Unka Bill.
posted by ry on September 30, 2007 9:29 AM
Oh, that joke is so old it should have moss growing on it. I used to tell it as a Cajun joke...
MC
posted by
mostly cajun on September 30, 2007 10:15 AM
Mostly Caje did.
Looks like V-29 was right -- he *didn't* make it up!
posted by
BillT on September 30, 2007 2:13 PM
hahahahaha
posted by AFSister on September 30, 2007 7:38 PM
hahahahaha
Uh-oh. I recognize *that* laugh...
posted by
BillT on October 1, 2007 6:48 AM
It's too early on a Monday... but at least this is a decent start to the day. I don't care if it is old, it's still funny!
posted by NinjaFluff on October 1, 2007 11:36 AM
� Dismissed, Soldier!