<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for More reasons I can&apos;t go to Afstan.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:19:21 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>More reasons I can&apos;t go to Afstan.</title>
            <description>Another picture from the bazaars, sent by Joe, the land-locked sailor. From top to bottom - French Mle 1886 Lebel rifle, what I believe is a British Lee-Enfield Mark I* (vice a Lee-Metford), followed by a Snider conversion of the Tower 3-band Enfield musket, and a Martini-Henry carbine, that has seen some local decoration, or is in fact a &quot;Khyber rifle&quot; of local manufacture. Hard to tell without really giving the weapons a good look. The partial rifle, well, I haven&apos;t taken the time to see if I can figure out what it might be. If you&apos;d like a closer...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:52:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from eskimo curlew on 2007-08-24</title>
            <description>
                And if wussie liberals had their way they would have us face a vicious rapists with a big bunch of pink wussietard flowers LIBERALS ARE SO STRANGE
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63524</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63524</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:23:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-08-23</title>
            <description>
                That would be the *charger-loading* Lee-Metford.

Based on what I *think* I see of the bayonet bar, and the socket - I&apos;m still sticking with the Lee-Enfield.

Who&apos;s booking the flights?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63512</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63512</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:01:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2007-08-23</title>
            <description>
                Yesh, indeed- but IIRC the SMLE Mk1 has a band around the muzzle supporting the front sight. And also has a thumbring-screw at the rear sight for elevating same....
Dangit! Let&apos;s go check &apos;em out, eh?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63511</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63511</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:14:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-08-23</title>
            <description>
                Lookit the socket of the receiver and see if you think those are Metford markings.

Of course, if it&apos;s a Khyber, it could be all of that.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63497</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63497</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:30:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2007-08-23</title>
            <description>
                I think that&apos;s a Lee-Metford MkII*, judging by the sights. A look at the upper receiver would help, though...
Some rare bayonets have been coming out of the &apos;Stan, mostly socket-bladed Imperial German ersatz types but also Martini-Henry sword bayonets and the occasional Baker and Brunswick. Love to go cruise...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63488</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63488</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:01:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-08-23</title>
            <description>
                It did.  ;-)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63472</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/08/more_reasons_i.html#comment-63472</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:29:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

