<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for TINS! Smoke Gets In Your Eyes...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:00:26 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>TINS! Smoke Gets In Your Eyes...</title>
            <description>Well, since John started recycling my war stories under the &quot;everything old is new again&quot; premise, here&apos;s an old one that&apos;s new -- it never appeared in Flightfax because real life intruded before it got published. * * * * * * * * * * * Sometimes I think that every Army aviator old enough to remember reciprocating engines has a little tale about an emergency procedure that didn’t quite address the problem or had an emergency for which there was no written procedure. I met CW5 Roger W [those who know, know] (Flightfax, July 1998, “Crew Commo: UH-1...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:27:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-06-16</title>
            <description>
                Bill, the Lord was obviously exercising his sense of humor, and playing with your head.


And torturing Carborundum.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61234</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61234</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:15:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-06-15</title>
            <description>
                The alternator&apos;s mounted on the right side of the tranny, slightly aft of the mast. Intake for the vents is located about six feet forward on the fuselage, just behind where the pilot&apos;s right arm would rest if the Cobra was a convertible.

Ever known smoke to travel *against* a ninety mile-per-hour wind?   
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61209</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61209</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:13:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-06-14</title>
            <description>
                Ah, but aircraft are designed by engineers, not physicists. The latter think about the Universe as they imagine it to be, the former have to deal with the Universe as it actually is, using messy approximations and empirical equations, sometimes with large fudge factors. 

Physicists, I think, sometimes forget that the Lord has a sense of humor. Engineers know that He does have one, and a low and nasty one it is.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61183</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61183</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:14:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-06-14</title>
            <description>
                You simply reinforce my point, HFS!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61175</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61175</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:01:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from HomefrontSix on 2007-06-14</title>
            <description>
                So are bumblebees, John.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61174</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61174</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:58:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-06-14</title>
            <description>
                That&apos;s not such a stretch, Brab - helicopters are violations of the laws of physics.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61160</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61160</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:56:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Barb on 2007-06-14</title>
            <description>
                &quot;in violation of the laws of physics&quot;
Maybe you were inhaling just a Leetle too much there, Bill!
Just sayin.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61159</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/tins_smoke_gets.html#comment-61159</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:38:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

