previous post next post  

More politics... who said this was a milblog?

In the Evans/Novak political report that gets emailed to me every week, Robert Novak makes this observation:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is painted by Republicans as a left-wing extremist, but the truth is that the left wing of House Democrats complain privately that she is far too cautious. They grumble that nothing is being accomplished in Congress because Pelosi is far too attentive to 20 or so moderates in the Democratic caucus -- especially those who overturned Republicans last year in marginal districts.

Interesting juxtaposition and timing. I happen to live in the District of one of thoes 20 or so moderates - who thus far has been exactly that, pretty moderate overall, especially given what we expect from a Democrat - and in Kansas our pet Democrat has been Dennis Moore, who generally fits the schema, where thus far Nancy Boyda has not.

In a sense, Ms. Boyda proved the point yesterday, as she published, for all to see, her list of earmarks for the upcoming budget battle.

Here's the letter that accompanied the list:

List of FY 2008 Appropriations Requests

In the coming weeks, the U.S. House of Representatives will begin to debate the yearly appropriations bills to fund the federal government for fiscal year 2008. As part of that process, Members of Congress often submit appropriations requests, or earmarks, to set aside funds for particular projects. These earmarks do not add funds to the federal budget; instead they set aside funds for particular projects among the dollars allocated to federal agencies.

This process makes sense. Instead of someone sitting on the 4th floor in an office building in DC deciding where federal funds go, Members of Congress set aside a portion of funds for projects especially important to their districts. The result is - or can be - a more responsive, efficient federal government.

The earmark process has been abused in the past. Members of Congress have set aside funds for programs that turned out to personally benefit them. This Congress has worked hard to clean this up, and now all Members of Congress have to submit formal statements that they have no personal financial interest in their earmark requests.

Since January, I have been meeting with constituents to talk about the programs in their communities they feel need federal funds. The list below represents those programs that can be funded under the mandates of a federal agency.

There are many pressures on the federal budget, and with the passage of the new “pay as you go” rules instituted by the Democrats in Congress, it will be harder and harder to pay for new programs without finding the corresponding savings from other programs. Therefore, it is likely that only a few of these projects will ultimately receive earmarked funding. Still, I consider each one important to people in the Second District of Kansas, and I am proud to support these programs in Congress.

It is important to me that this process is as transparent as possible. After all, this is taxpayer money. This is why I am taking the unusual step of publicly releasing this list of my appropriations requests.

Regards,

Nancy Boyda

Member of Congress

Emphasis in the original.

Below the fold, in the Flash Traffic/Extended Entry, is the list of Ms. Boyda's earmarks for the district. Interesting list. Have at it, plus or minus.


Title: The Children's Identification and Location Database (CHILD) Project
Requesting Entity: Miami County Sheriff's Office

Amount: $25,000

Title: The Children's Identification and Location Database (CHILD) Project
Requesting Entity: Atchison County Sheriff's Office

Amount: $25,000

Title: National Fred Harvey Museum Restoration
Requesting Entity: National Fred Harvey Museum

Amount: $100,000

Title: Army Corps of Engineers Manhattan, Kansas Levee Study
Requesting Entity: City of Manhattan, Kansas

Amount: $200,000

Title: Topeka, Kansas Flood Damage Reduction
Requesting Entity: City of Topeka, Kansas

Amount: $200,000

Title: Iola Public Library
Requesting Entity: City of Iola, Kansas

Amount: $250,000

Title: EMEDS Center of Excellence
Requesting Entity: 190th Air Refueling Wing

Amount: $250,000

Title: John Redmond Reservoir Feasibility Study
Requesting Entity: Kansas Water Office

Amount: $250,000

Title: Army Corps of Engineers Flood Damage Reduction Project, City of Rossville
Requesting Entity: City of Rossville, Kansas

Amount: $300,000

Title: Pre-harvest Food Safety and Security
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $400,000

Title: Renovations to Constitution Hall, Topeka, Kansas
Requesting Entity: City of Topeka, Kansas

Amount: $500,000

Title: Great Plains Joint Regional Training Center Radios to Support Joint Operations
Requesting Entity: Joint Force Headquarters, Kansas National Guard

Amount: $500,000

Title: Infrastructure Development of Ottawa Industrial Park
Requesting Entity: City of Ottawa, Kansas

Amount: $520,625

Title: Broadway Streetscape Phase II
Requesting Entity: City of Pittsburg, Kansas

Amount: $680,000

Title: Development of Overland Station and surrounding park lands
Requesting Entity: City of Topeka, Kansas

Amount: $695,000

Title: Persistent Outcomes of War
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $700,000

Title: Center for Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gases in Agriculture
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $750,000

Title: Riverside Park Community Building Renovation
Requesting Entity: City of Iola, Kansas

Amount: $750,000

Title: Mobile Data Terminals with Automated Vehicle Locator Integration System
Requesting Entity: Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority

Amount: $800,000

Title: Renovation of K-10 and Bob Billings Parkway Intersection
Requesting Entity: City of Lawrence, Kansas

Amount: $800,000

Title: Clinton Lake - Bloomington Park Road Improvements
Requesting Entity: Kansas City District, US Army Corps of Engineers

Amount: $850,000

Title: The American Soldier Project
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $1,000,000

Title: Interstate 70 Viaduct Realignment
Requesting Entity: City of Topeka, Kansas

Amount: $1,000,000

Title: Leadership for Leaders at CGSC/CAL and KSU
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $1,000,000

Title: Kansas Regional Prisons Museum
Requesting Entity: City of Lansing, Kansas

Amount: $1,180,000

Title: Clinton Lake - Dam Toe Road Access and Dam Road Repair
Requesting Entity: Kansas City District, US Army Corps of Engineers

Amount: $1,200,000

Title: 20th Street Extension & US 73 Improvements
Requesting Entity: City of Leavenworth, Kansas

Amount: $1,262,000

Title: Kansas Technology Center
Requesting Entity: Pittsburg State University

Amount: $1,292,000

Title: Wheat Genetic and Genomic Resources Center
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $1,300,000

Title: Iola, Kansas Wastewater System Improvements
Requesting Entity: City of Iola, Kansas

Amount: $1,500,000

Title: Streetscape improvements to the central business district
Requesting Entity: City of Fredonia, Kansas

Amount: $1,500,000

Title: The City of Ottawa Community Recreation Center
Requesting Entity: City of Ottawa, Kansas

Amount: $1,500,000

Title: Joint Light Tactical Vehicle - Second Source Tires
Requesting Entity: JLTV Program Office and Goodyear Tire

Amount: $1,500,000

Title: National Agricultural Biosecurity Center
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $1,600,000

Title: Military Working Dog Facility
Requesting Entity: Governor's Military Council, State of Kansas

Amount: $1,900,000

Title: Treece, Kansas Buyout
Requesting Entity: Kansas Department of Health and Environment

Amount: $2,000,000

Title: Great Plains Joint Regional Training Center Safety Equipment
Requesting Entity: Joint Force Headquarters, Kansas National Guard

Amount: $2,000,000

Title: Our Military Kids, Inc. Expansion Program
Requesting Entity: National Guard Bureau

Amount: $2,000,000

Title: Combined Arms Center/Ft. Leavenworth Faculty and Officer Development Program
Requesting Entity: University of Kansas

Amount: $2,000,000

Title: Kansas Virtual Transportation Operations Center
Requesting Entity: State of Kansas Department of Transportation

Amount: $2,000,000

Title: PC-AFIS Fingerprint Identification Technology, Global Initiatives Unit, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, FBI, Clarksburg, West Virginia
Requesting Entity: AFIX Technologies, Pittsburg, Kansas

Amount: $2,300,000

Title: South Topeka Sewer & Water Infrastructure
Requesting Entity: City of Topeka, Kansas

Amount: $2,500,000

Title: Great Plains Sorghum Improvement and Utilization Center
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $2,500,000

Title: K-State GIScience Commons
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $2,570,000

Title: M871 Series Trailer Refurbishment Program
Requesting Entity: Army National Guard Readiness Center

Amount: $2,900,000

Title: Midwest Institute for Comparative Stem Cell Biology
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University

Amount: $3,000,000

Title: Bus Fleet Replacement, Topeka Metropolitan Transit
Requesting Entity: Topeka Metropolitan Transit

Amount: $3,000,000

Title: Parents as Teachers Military Pilot
Requesting Entity: Parents as Teachers National Center

Amount: $3,000,000

Title: Castings for Improved Defense Readiness
Requesting Entity: Defense Logistics Agency and American Metalcasting Consortium

Amount: $3,200,000

Title: US Highway 69, Crawford County Section
Requesting Entity: City of Pittsburg, Kansas

Amount: $3,500,000

Title: Kansas Polymer Research Center
Requesting Entity: Pittsburg State University

Amount: $4,000,000

Title: University of Kansas High Throughput Screening Upgrade
Requesting Entity: University of Kansas Center for Research

Amount: $5,000,000

Title: National Center for Strategic Applications of Nuclear Sensors
Requesting Entity: Kansas State University
Amount: $5,000,000

Title: Improvement to Runway Safety at Manhattan, Airport
Requesting Entity: City of Manhattan, Kansas
Amount: $5,000,000

Title: Advanced Extended Range Attack Missile
Requesting Entity: AERAM PM at AMRDEC
Amount: $5,000,000

Title: National Eisenhower Memorial Design Phase I and Associated Operational Costs
Requesting Entity: The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission

Amount: $5,100,000

Title: Green Valley Road Improvements, Pottawatomie County Kansas
Requesting Entity: Pottawatomie County, Kansas

Amount: $5,900,000

Title: Reconstruction of K20 between US 75 and Horton, Kansas
Requesting Entity: Kansas Department of Transportation

Amount: $6,500,000

Title: Coming Together Around Military Families
Requesting Entity: OSD Office of Family Programs

Amount: $6,500,000

Title: Defense Command Integration Center
Requesting Entity: Joint Forces Headquarters, Kansas National Guard

Amount: $6,600,000

Title: Sensor Interoperability Networking, $10,000,000
Requesting Entity: Office of Naval Research

Amount: $10,000,000

Title: GL-1800 AP Truck Mounted Deicer
Requesting Entity: 542nd Combat Sustainment Wing

Amount: $8,100,000

Title: Construction on K18, Riley County Kansas
Requesting Entity: Kansas Department of Transportation

Amount: $11,000,000

Title: Rehabilitation of the Amelia Earhart Bridge - US 59
Requesting Entity: Kansas Department of Transportation

Amount: $47,200,000

12 Comments

My b.s. alarm is in full clangor over the description of "earmarks" as being mere redirection of "available" funds within the budget. The budget process is fairly straight forward. The departments and agencies solicit all of their components for input on their needs. Starting at the working level, and moving up toward Washington, that input is aggregated and decisions are made concerning the priorities within the department or agency. Eventually all of the input from the departments and agencies is massaged within OMB to establish the final priorities in the budget that the president submits to Congress. Since the requests are ALWAYS far more than will actually be available the President's budget represents a series of compromises, and in many cases, a bare bones budget to accomplish critical tasks. The critical point is that everything in that budget that goes to Congress has had to compete against many other meritorious requests, and in that review process has been found to be more meritorious than the competition. Once the budget is forwarded to Capitol Hill the Congress Critters jump in and say "You don't understand - I need a new post office, or a new over pass, or this or that." What they are really saying is "I want to get REELECTED and I think that bringing home the pork will do it!" They claim that earmarks don't add additional money but let me give you an example. At Fort Leavenworth they have a list of military construction projects that are all considered critical to meet immediate needs. But when that list goes forward to the Pentagon it has already been trimmed in competition with other Department of the Army requests, then it's trimmed again in the DoD competition, then again at OMB. When it finally gets to Capitol Hill some Congress Critter decides to raid the MilCon budget by inserting language that says "...of which $X million may only be used to construct the Center of Peace Research to be located at Fort Leavenworth." Now that doesn't add any additional money to the budget, but it just screwed every man and woman at Leavenworth because that money is coming out of the really essential projects that had to compete in the budget process. And, oh by the way, it's the gift that keeps on giving, because now the Army is going to be stuck, in perpituity for the operations and maintenance costs of something they didn't want in the first place. And would you like to guess exactly who the Congress is going to pass a law to name the thing after? And the way the Congress Critters see it they have another choice. They can be magnanimous, and decide not to screw the Army by "earmarking" funds as in the above example. In the alternative they can just add money specifically for their Center for Peace Research. That has two problems. The first is mentioned above, and that is the long term tail of having to pay operations and maintenance costs for the life of an unwanted facility, which comes out of the Army hide. The other is that just adding money increases the deficit, and that increases your taxes and also drives inflation up. And that means that everyone gets hit in the wallet. You can ALWAYS tell when a politician is lying about "earmarks" --- their lips move. Marine6 Sends
 
I like that she actually published the list. Universities sure aren't bashful about asking for money, are they?
 
Have some fun. Pick out a bunch of pork barrel projects earmarks, things like the "Bus Fleet Replacement, Topeka Metropolitan Transit" and ask her office to explain what Article, Section, and paragraph/line of the Constitution authorizes Congress to spend money on such things. Since they'll probably respond with either the Interstate Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause, follow up with asking what relation the Topeka Metro Bus fleet has to interstate commerce, or what function of the federal government makes it 'necessary and proper' to buy busses for Topeka. [Heh. Heartless - Ms. Boyda's office reads the blog - consider your questions asked. As for answers, I'll probably have to ping them]
 
I presume the funds for the "Combined Arms Center/Ft. Leavenworth Faculty and Officer Development Program" will be courtesy the Department of Health and Human Sevices. Cheers
 
Dammit, I thought that the US Constitution means exactly what it says in plain English as understood by a person of average understanding at the time it was written. Where is Grover Cleveland now that we need him? (He was famous for using the veto on a bill because he could see no authority for said bill in the Constitution.)
 
P.s. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, and again, and ...n: I'm a *real* Democrat. I am in favor of encouraging Small government, Small farms, Small business,and Small arms.
 
P.p.s. I really don't care what's most economically efficient, if it hampers individual liberty and gets crossways with producing lotsa cranky freedom-loving individualists. (As long as they can co-operate together long enough to defeat an exterior threat)
 
Heh. JTG, I'll soon qualify on two of the four!
 
That's an impressive list but I see very little on it that could be justified as a proper federal government responsibility. But, what the heck. Congress Critters look at it as FREE money that will help them get reelected. As Everett McKindley Dirkson used to say "A million here, a million there, pretty soon you're talking real money." And it's all free. All they have to do is find another sneaky way to raise your taxes. Like I said, watch their lips. Marine6 Sends
 
Frankly this list is appalling. And she will be on the low side compared to most of the rest of the Congress. Most of the stuff on this list is not federal business. But her constituents would never understand that. Many of the dollar amounts seem excessive. A bridge rehab $47mil and change -- gimme a break. Iola can't take care of its library so the rest of the country should? Our form of government is the worst except for all the others.
 
OK, other than the Army Corps of Engineers thing none of those should not be locally funded. Also, that PM from RSA better not be personally requesting earmarks. When I worked at the Head USAF budget office if a PM was found to be going to the hill directly there was hell to pay. It should be big Army requesting those kind of funds. Of course your good Congresswomen is being pretty cautious, some of our fine Represenatives and Senators would be requesting Tens of Millions in earmarks.
 
What the heck - Topeka needs to be funding our own darn bus service! Ditto Iola's library and Manhattan's airport! I would argue that a few of the bridge and highway projects are part of the interstate and therefore should get partial federal funding. The university stuff MIGHT get some, but not those kinds of $! And shouldn't the National Guard and US Army stuff be coming out of the DoD budget??? No wonder the federal budget won't balance *sigh* - and you're right, she's one of the more or less good guys on this.