<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for More on the NICS bill.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:39:07 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>More on the NICS bill.</title>
            <description>I know many of you are strong supporters of the GOA (Gun Owners of America), and I seem to be in a minority on the new NICS bill. But I&apos;m still with the NRA on this one - the devil is always in the details, and the anti&apos;s will have to be watched carefully in the Senate, and I&apos;m sure, in the Conference Committee, as I doubt the Senate will pass the bill without some attempt to stuff something in it that will be unpalatable. The NRA&apos;s official position. On June 13, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H.R....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:08:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-06-18</title>
            <description>
                Concerns like yours, JTG, were actually central to some of the hardests discussions during the negotiations on the bill.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61260</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61260</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:21:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-06-18</title>
            <description>
                As someone who&apos;s pretty sure he&apos;s a bit neurally divergent, I look at these kinds of laws with some suspicion and fear.  This one _seems_ Ok, as they describe it, but I&apos;d rather not have the unconstitutional (IMHO) NICS thing at all.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61257</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61257</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:05:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-06-17</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;ve some discussions with Boyda about that...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61252</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61252</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:31:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2007-06-17</title>
            <description>
                Given that Sen. Mikulski is working to strip the Tiahrt Amendment (which, for some idiotic reason, must be renewed annually) from legislation in the Senate Appropriations committee, I&apos;d love to see it attached-permanently-to HR 2640.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61246</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/06/more_on_the_nic.html#comment-61246</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:37:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


