previous post next post  

I want to take this at face value...

...but it's kind of hard, passing now, in the current environment. It may be well-meant, but it just feels wrong to me, passing this at this time, with the leadership of this House working to "welcome home" a whole new group of vets, as it were. What do the Viet vets among us think?



110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 189
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a `Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day' should be established.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 16, 2007

Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. FILNER, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CARDOZA, Ms. CARSON, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. HOBSON, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, and Mr. WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a `Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day' should be established.

Whereas the Vietnam War was fought in Vietnam from 1961 to 1975, and involved North Vietnam and the Viet Cong in conflict with United States Armed Forces and South Vietnam;

Whereas the United States became involved in Vietnam because policy-makers in the United States believed that if South Vietnam fell to a Communist government then Communism would spread throughout the rest of Southeast Asia;

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces began serving in an advisory role to the South Vietnamese in 1961;

Whereas as a result of the Gulf of Tonkin incidents on August 2 and 4, 1964, Congress overwhelmingly passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (Public Law 88-408), on August 7, 1964, which effectively handed over war-making powers to President Johnson until such time as `peace and security' had returned to Vietnam;

Whereas, in 1965, United States Armed Forces ground combat units arrived in Vietnam;

Whereas, by the end of 1965, there were 80,000 United States troops in Vietnam, and by 1969 a peak of approximately 543,000 troops was reached;

Whereas, on January 27, 1973, the Treaty of Paris was signed, which required the release of all United States prisoners-of-war held in North Vietnam and the withdrawal of all United States Armed Forces from South Vietnam;

Whereas, on March 30, 1973, the United States Armed Forces completed the withdrawal of combat troops from Vietnam;

Whereas more than 58,000 members of the United States Armed Forces lost their lives in Vietnam and more than 300,000 members of the Armed Forces were wounded;

Whereas, in 1982, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial was dedicated in the District of Columbia to commemorate those members of the United States Armed Forces who died or were declared missing-in-action in Vietnam;

Whereas the Vietnam War was an extremely divisive issue among the people of the United States;

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces who served bravely and faithfully for the United States during the Vietnam War were caught upon their return home in the crossfire of public debate about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War;

Whereas the establishment of a `Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day' would be an appropriate way to honor those members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War; and

Whereas March 30 would be an appropriate day to establish as `Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day': Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that there should be established a `Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day' to honor those members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam.

11 Comments

I have a hard time taking anything the Sanchez sisters(Linda and Loretta) do at face value. Liars and hucksters from the ORange County region. I don't trust either of them as far as I can throw them. (now, the HIspanic Mayor of Santa Ana on the other hand, him I'd trust with my bank account info.).
 
Seems dreadfully late, the question is whether people are behind it or not.
 
This is eyewash, pure and simple. It's my opinion that Members of this congress want to be able to say to the People, "See, we really do care about all those veteran voters... er people... er soldiers... you know... those guys who wore uniforms back then... and NOW, of course. Of course now... but To me, it's an insult. Especially coming from this congress, which is doing the exact same thing that the congress back in '72 did... stab an allie (sp) in the back, along with every veteran of that war. I was career Army, so Vietnam was an expected tour of duty. The "Welcome Home" has to come from the people and can't come from any institution. The military community gave me the proper respect rendered to all war tour veterans, so while I did experience the disdain and dismissal of the civilian community, I didn't have to live with it. If this congress wants to really honor veterans then they should beef up the VA and ensure that the services have the proper funding for operation of their varied medical facilities.
 
As a VietNam vet I think that this is 40 years too late. What do they want to do for us? Welcome home??? Is that it? I finally completed my last mile home in 2004 when I went to a reunion for my old unit for the first time. I don't need condesending sympathy. Maybe the liberals have a guilty conscience. These morons need to get a life.
 
Opportunistic Congressional posturing, with all the significance, relevance and national impact of Support Your Local Quince Growers Day. A resolution restoring our GI Bill benefits would be a more appropriate recognition; however, since that would require a fiduciary outlay that *wouldn't* necessarily garner them votes, the chance of that happening is exactly the same as my level of confidence that the current Congress will do right by the current crop of vets. Zero. "It don't mean nothin', it's just a thang..."
 
Being among those who served 'in-country' is honor enough. Instead of trying to assuage their consciences, let Congress honor all veterans with legislation that addresses health, educational and financial issues.
 
Welcome to a boatload of new commenters. My dog in this fight is my father, as I missed out on the SEA War Games. I'm glad to see I'm not alone in my thinking.
 
Cynical person that I am, I don't even think the Congresscritters had in mind the Vietnam vets at all --I think they are trying yet again to connect Vietnam and Iraq in people's minds. Gotta follow the script, ya know.
 
Nice thought. About four decades too late, I have to re-iterate. I was at several cemeteries on Memorial Day to lay flowers at my relatives' graves. One was Leavenworth. There are lines upon lines of stone with the names of Viet Nam vets who should have been welcomed home long before their names were carved there. That includes my uncle. Further, we are at war now. As much as I would like to imagine some grand healing or what not from this gesture, I don't see it. I see it as inappropriate coming from congress while men and women are currently dying, coming home permanently injured and or scarred. Particularly, as I have known and am reminded again about how overwhelmed the VA health system is with discharged vets, both from Viet Nam and our current war, who have PTSD and can't get treated because the programs are full, no one wants to take their tri-care or tri-care offers minimal days of services compared to the effects of PTSD. No, I am not suggesting all our men and women are going to come back crazy rambos, but I am concerned that the acute effects of PTSD, that can be treated to prevent the chronic, are being allowed to manifest while we dither about funding the VA appropriately or do not provide appropriate incentives for the private sector to take Tri-care. And, would like to suggest to the private sector that they might volunteer more time for these programs. That would be a great way to honor our veterans of all eras. How about these congress folks make a proclamation asking for the private sector to step up? I know that these folks are concerned that their remarks have created another era where people are free to insult and disregard our veterans. They should be because this is one area that can have an impact on our veterans in a general sense. It is conjectured that part of the effects of war leading to PTSD is how the soldier perceives his/her actions and results. Were they important? were they worth the cost? Were they defending our nation or "fighting the wrong war in the wrong place"? While we question these things as a political body, we indirectly question these actions and sometimes lead to the questions being re-enforced in those who are already seeking personal answers. Maybe, that is just a cost of our new reality. But, I don't have to like it. Keep your Viet Nam Veterans Day. On the real Veterans day, let us show all veterans that their service has always been and will always be honorable and important to our nation, to our freedom, to our ideas and to our people. God Bless them.
 
I know that these folks are concerned that their remarks have created another era where people are free to insult and disregard our veterans. I don't think that bothers them in the least, kat. If they were concerned, they'd call their leadership to account for its actions.
 
I have a hard time taking anything the Sanchez sisters (Linda and Loretta) do at face value. Liars and hucksters from the ORange County region. I don't trust either of them as far as I can throw them. –ry I have to agree with ry on this one. I do a lot of work in the area. The Sanchez sisters are political opportunists. I don’t trust them. Ever since the Sanchez sisters were elected the OC area has gone down hill. You can usually take what they say and reverse the meaning and it will be correct. They have no stake in Vietnam. I don’t even think they would even remember it (They are too young and very liberal).
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.