<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-</id>
  <updated>2008-12-03T13:03:45Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Ready, Fire, Aim!</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7506" title="Ready, Fire, Aim!" />
    <published>2007-05-09T11:47:47Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-14T13:10:57Z</updated>
    <title>Ready, Fire, Aim!</title>
    <summary>As many readers know, the Castle Moat has not required any topping off of late, nature having been doing that for us. The Moat Monster is quite disturbed, as he prefers brackish, stagnant water with sickly, easy to catch fish and stale cheetohs that Ry tosses out the dungeon grate (we do let him have light for 30 minutes a day). The Missouri River right now is just a touch under 6 feet above flood stage, and should crest today. This is well below the 15 foot flood stage in the Great Flood of &apos;93. This being a slow-moving disaster,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>As many readers know, the Castle Moat has not required any topping off of late, nature having been doing that for us.  The Moat Monster is quite disturbed, as he prefers brackish, stagnant water with sickly, easy to catch fish and stale cheetohs that Ry tosses out the dungeon grate (we do let him have light for 30 minutes a day).  The <strong><a href="http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=eax&gage=levk1&view=1,1,1,1">Missouri River right now is just a touch under 6 feet above flood stage</a></strong>, and should crest today.  This is well below the 15 foot flood stage in the Great Flood of '93.  This being a slow-moving disaster, the city and county have had ample time to sandbag the small areas (mostly city-owned, in terms of buildings) likely to be affected.  I will be inconvenienced only in that my Rotary club, which usually meets in the Riverfront Community Center which is closed due to the proximity of the water, so we will move across the street for today's meeting.  (Hand dramatically to forehead) Oh!  The humanity!</p>

<p>Alas, there are some in Kansas who are not so fortunate, such as the residents of Greensburg, the town flattened by the tornado this weekend.</p>

<p>And oh, lucky them, they got drawn into the politics of it, as we, out here in our big old sparsely populated rectangular fly-over got drawn into a mini-reprise of Katrina finger-pointing and the politics of the war.</p>

<p>I'm sure the residents are, well, thrilled.</p>

<p>Governor Sebelius opened the exchange of unaimed fire by asserting that the State was short of gear for the Guard because of the war. "I don't think there is any question if you are missing trucks, Humvees and helicopters that the response is going to be slower," she said in response to a press question yesterday. "The real victims here will be the residents of Greensburg, because the recovery will be at a slower pace."  She asserted that surrounding states, part of the mutual assistance compact, are also missing gear, and that equipment that could have been borrowed is over in Iraq and Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, returned with his own shots, showing that Snow, and perhaps the White House, hadn't learned the lesson of Katrina and adjusted the ROE - instead of addressing the issue of missing equipment with facts and figures (which he may well not have had at his fingertips, certainly) or with statesmen-like words, he asserted that any slowness of response was... Sebelius'/Kansas' fault, and if she simply followed the guidelines of the Federal Response Plan - identify your shortages and request what you need to meet those shortages, well, that's *your* fault, Governor.  "If you don't request it, you're not going to get it." was Snow's response to reporters asking about Governor's Sebelius' comments. "As far as we know, the only thing the governor has requested are FM radios," said Snow.</p>

<p>Both sides, having taken shots at each other, rather than the enemy (the disaster) took a breath and decided a little fire control was in order.</p>

<p>Snow, after having been grabbed by the lapels and shaken like a puppy dog (okay, I made that up) came back later in the day and clarified things a bit.  He noted that in fact the state had requested several items that the federal government had already supplied — the radios, a mobile command center, urban search team, and was coordinating to get helos to Greenburg.  He did stick a small shiv in the Governor's side by detailing a phone conversation yesterday between Sebelius and the Bush's homeland security adviser, Fran Townsend.  During that conversation, the Governor reputedly said she was pleased with the federal response to the tornado and the state had everything we need to deal with it.  But he didn't twist it.  Just pinked her a bit.</p>

<p>For her part, the Governor trotted out her spokesperson to make the "What I really meant" defense. </p>

<p>Spokesperson Nicole Corcoran averred the governor didn't mean to suggest that Kansas was unable to deal with the tornado damage.  Rather, Governor Sebelius' comments about National Guard equipment were meant to be taken as a warning about the state's inability to handle additional disasters, such as another tornado or severe flooding, she said, neatly inoculating Sebelius if the Missouri river flooding gets out of hand. There have been some levee breaches downstream of here in flatter and more densely populated ground - here at Leavenworth we're up on a bluff overlooking the river, except for the narrow area where our  steamboat landing used to be.</p>

<p>"We are doing absolutely fine right now," Corcoran said. "What the governor is talking about is down the road."</p>

<p>Governor Sebelius has been griping for a while about the war and the drain on National Guard manpower and equipment she clearly feels should be home in the state and not out gallivanting about the world and leaving their gear behind.   She's continually griping the Pentagon is not replacing gear, such as the engineer vehicles that are most useful in disasters, quickly enough.</p>

<p>True enough.  The Pentagon is focused on the external threats and fighting the war, though I'm guessing that NORTHCOM, the combatant command charged with the defense of the continental US is fully aware of where the shortages exist and has plans for coping.  At least we did back in the day when I was a Federal disaster response planner.</p>

<p>Both sides were playing for a larger audience, and both sides fired on each other when the effort would have been better expended attacking the common problem.  But that seems too hard for the political class these days.</p>

<p>Since the Adjutant General falls in the congressional district of Nancy Boyda (D, KS 2) who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, perhaps the Governor will push that lever to affect Administration priorities.  The Congress has seen fit in the past to give the Pentagon money for things  and programs it didn't want or felt it needed - and since the majority leadership of the Congress clearly feels the Commander-in-Chief and his executive agents aren't up to the task, perhaps they should seize the reins via the budget and their charge to raise and equip armies... </p>

<p>Just sayin'.  Several print and broadcast media sources were used in feeding this rant.</p>

<p><br />
Update: For a more troubling look at Governor Sebelius' performance in this issue, <strong><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjM3Yzk1OGEwZTA1MWQ1OTE5YTE4MzQyNTlkYmVlZmY=">take a gander at Peter Boyles in NRO.</a></strong></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59900</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59900" />
    <title>Comment from Marine6 on 2007-05-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marine6</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I must admit that I know next to nothing about the funding mechanisms for the guard. If the state really does fund the entire budget, then the state clearly should have first claim on their services. But I somehow doubt that is the case. Seems to me I&apos;ve heard the Congress critters arguing endlessly about all kinds of funding for guard equipment. But I&apos;m sure that we must have a few experts in the crowd who can set me straight.

The only reason I ignited this little brush fire is that we have seen a significant sea change in recent years on how we utilize our guard and reserve forces. For many years they were the ultimate backup for when the Evil Empire came West. But now they are expected to carry a full (some might say disproportionate) share of the load. Mobilizing a unit, training for deployment, and forward deployment invariably take every moment available. How can we reasonably expect guard units to maintain an edge for their combat role, and still devote siginificant time to all these non-combat related duties?

In the days before Bill Clinton took an axe to the Army and cut it nearly in half we didn&apos;t have this problem. We had sufficient combat power in the active forces to meet most contingencies. Of course, even then we would have needed guard and reserve components to meet our logistics and non-combat arms commitments. 

There was a time, not too long ago, when the guard could reasonably be expected to have at least some period of time before being called up as a part of a general mobilization. But now units get called as part of a combat rotation. And, as we have learned the hard way, even the logistics and sustaining units MUST be combat ready in all respects. 

I know that this flies in the face of all that &quot;citizen soldier&quot; and &quot;Minuetnan&quot; mistique, but aren&apos;t we treating reservists and guardsmen (and guardswomen) the same as regular soldiers? We just let them spend some of their time in civilian clothes. So why do we let anything else interfere with valuable training time? 

And before anyone pings on me I KNOW that the best solution would be to right size the Army and the Marine Corps. We should have a significantly larger active force to meet our requirements. But I don&apos;t think anyone really sees that in the cards anytime soon. 

Marine6 Sends


    </content>
    <published>2007-05-10T19:59:59Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-10T19:59:59Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59882</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59882" />
    <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>BloodSpite</name>
        <uri>http://www.techography.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techography.com">
        <![CDATA[Late to the fray as always:

Playing Devils Advocate Warning:

I think one of the biggest complains from state level politicians, such as the Kansas Gov, is the state foots the bill for those National Guard troops. They buy the equipment from the Federal Government, they pay to train the soldiers, and they pay the soldiers themselves.

From their thought perspective, and rightfully so, those National Guard units are a State resource used for state problems, crowd control, sporting events (upon occasion in Georgia we used the National Guard heavily. 1996 Olympics for example...yes the same one made famous by the Richard Jewel bomb scandal)

Now that being said does not totally justify the mud slinging match, as The Armorer so gracefully covered on this blessed pages earlier today :)

But I can easily see how, a Gov, tired, stressed, looking at the damage, and knowing that some of her typical resources were in use elsewhere, could get snippy. Especially when, as those here in Missouri, Arkansas Kansas, Texas and Oklahoma know; tis <i>is</i> the season for Tornado Outbreaks.

But using the National Guard for home crisis is a long time precedence. A few examples that I know or have been involved with from a LEO point or a military point, way back in the day:

Flooding in South Georgia Late 1990's
Idaho Wild Forest Fire's 2000 
Katrina rescue
Hurricane Gloria
Hurricane Hugo (Active Military in this one)
California Quake of ...1998? (I forget the year)
World Trade Centers- 9/11

National Guard unit get suckered.....errr....volunteered for other civic state duties as well on a fairly regular basis.

I imagine it can be fairly irksome to know yer paying for something, thats somewhere else, when you need it.

That being said, it still does *not* excuse the mud match. Just in case I wasn't clear on that :P



]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-10T00:11:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-10T00:11:00Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59881</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59881" />
    <title>Comment from Marine6 on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marine6</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Is it possible that the duality of duties currently given to the guard, military and civil, lead to an organiztion that sometimes has difficulty doing either particularly well?

Having had some experience with training both Marine and Navy Seabee resrvists over the years it has been my experience that it is difficult in twelve weekends and two weeks of active duty for training to teach and maintain necessary military skills. In fact, I suspect that most would agree that maintaining unit skills in the reserves is basically a full time undertaking that is made even more difficult with all the administrative crap that is piled upon all commanding officers.

I am reminded of the experience in Gulf I, in which I recall the Army found for the first time that the decision to place nearly all of the logistics and sustaining capability in the guard and reserve carried a significant price. And, if memory serves, I seem to recall that not a single round-out brigade made it to the fight. 

There was significant discussion at that time that much of the cause for those shortfalls was based on specific guard related problems, many of which appeared to be related to the screwy politics of the National Guard Bureau&apos;s sometimes prickly relationship with the regular Army.

And before you write me off as just another elietist Marine, let me say that I happen to think that the Air Force has done a spectacular job of integrating their reserve and air guard forces into the regular force in a way that, at least most of the time, appears seamless to us ground pounders. They seem to get the &quot;one force&quot; concept, and to integrate it across the Air Force. And if you ask any (well almost any) Marine who was supported by &quot;the boys from Syracuse&quot; in the first round in the sandbox you would find that we would go to war with them in a heartbeat.

I guess that my basic argument would be that the role of the military is the same in both the active and the reserve components. And training for that role, and maintaining readiness, is a full time occupation. Any civil role; disaster relief, law enforcement, support for special events such as the Olympics, are all secondary and should only be undertaken when there is no detriment to the primary role of readiness.

And, John, I agree that some states (I am familiar with the militias  in New York and South Carolina - which, by the way, do undertake some of those secondary roles) have both Guard units and militias. Perhaps that is a model we should examine more closely. Since those secondary roles are mainly state responsibilities, the capability to respond to them should be clearly under the control of state authorities. And the states should bear the funding responsibility as well.

I don&apos;t think my idea is going to take flight anytime soon, but perhaps it should. After all, don&apos;t we all take the same oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies. And don&apos;t you think that it would  make a major difference in the regular Army&apos;s perception of the weekend warriors if everyone was trained to the same standards, and held to the same standards? And, gee, wouldn&apos;t it be nice if resources could actually be allocated to the people who really need them, instead of being allocated on who has clout with the bureau -- or the right Congress critter?

Marine6 Sends
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T23:11:24Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T23:11:24Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59876</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59876" />
    <title>Comment from AFSister on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>AFSister</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        (please note that my characterization of the Guard&apos;s duties are during times of natural disaster.  I am fully aware of their wartime duties as well, and am glad for it.)
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T19:57:18Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T19:57:18Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59869</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59869" />
    <title>Comment from AFSister on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>AFSister</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Is disaster relief a military function?
Sure it is.

If you think about every military operation around the world, it&apos;s a response to a crisis.  Some are political, some are meteorological, some are social- but they are all crisises. 

The National Guard&apos;s job is to protect and promote the safety of each state&apos;s citizenship, no matter what reason is given.  They provide necessary functions such as debris clearing, security details, and general law enforcement.  Red Cross is not a disaster relief clean-up service- our core function is to provide food, clothing and shelter.  We are federally mandated to provide these services during times of national crisis, in addition to aid to military families.  Any other services are secondary to those two missions.

*steps down off of soapbox, putting Red Cross hat away for now*
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T18:15:56Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T18:15:56Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59867" />
    <title>Comment from Barb on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Barb</name>
        <uri>http://barbette.blotspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://barbette.blotspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<i>But, is disaster relief REALLY an appropriate core function of a military organization?</i>
I was thinking this very thought as I listened to the b.s. on the radio while driving home.  The Guard is a military force, not the Red Cross.  Of course there are occasions when we want to use our resources as best we can to help in emergencies - but disaster relief is NOT why we have or need the Guard.
(/rant off)

Playing politics with the survivors of this kind of disaster is simply distasteful.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T17:15:36Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T17:15:36Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59861</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59861" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com.</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com.">
        Marine6 - I do approve of prompt, *accurate* counter-battery.  That&apos;s what the radars are for.

As for the rest - certainly open to discussion, but you&apos;d have to let the currently serving Guard members out of their contracts if they wished.

Some states, Georgia and New York come to mind, do maintain state militias that are not a component of the National Guard, IIRC.
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T15:30:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T15:30:45Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59860</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59860" />
    <title>Comment from Marine6 on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marine6</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I would have thought that an old Redleg would have approved of prompt counterbattery fire. For years we have taught that the appropriate response to an ambush is overwhelming return fire and to assault right through it. Governors should understand that their duty is to their people, and not to their party.

I know that this will also draw a lot of fire, but why not get the Guard out of politics? It seems to me that in this era, when we are actually utilizing the reserves and the guard to regularly supplement the active force, there is an inherant conflict between the bifurcated roles of the guard. If they are mobilized they obviously can&apos;t be available for disaster relief. But, is disaster relief REALLY an appropriate core function of a military organization?

History has many examples of military forces being utilized in a disaster relief capacity, but that has always been as a secondary role. There are some (particularly governors from both parties) who seem to think that the primary duty of the guard is non-military functions within the state. But we fund the guard through the Department of Defense. We equip and train them to military standards. And we justify them by their capacity of reinforcing the active forces.

I totally agree that we need a larger active force, particularly in the Army and the Marine Corps, to reduce the operational tempo on those who are bearing the brunt of the current war. And I would agree with those who say that the current tempo is raising havoc with family lives, training objectives and, in many cases, unit cohesion. 

But wouldn&apos;t it make a lot of sense to remove the question of politics from the equation (as much as possible) by making all guard components reserves? By making them only answerable to the Department of Defense, and not the governors, we would certainly streamline a number of things. And for those who have ever had to deal with the National Guard Bureau within the five sided puzzle palace, we would (hopefully) get rid of one of the most insidious snake&apos;s den of politics in Washington.

Marine6 Sends
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T15:22:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T15:22:45Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59857</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59857" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com.</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com.">
        Frank, you answer your own question.

That said, years after Congress authorized it, the Army is saying &quot;Why yes, we *do* need those extra soldiers, thank you.&quot;
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T14:23:48Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T14:23:48Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59856</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59856" />
    <title>Comment from Damian on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Damian</name>
        <uri>http://www.toyoufromfailinghands.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.toyoufromfailinghands.blogspot.com">
        Not a rant, John, but rather a well-deserved bilateral scolding.  Wouldn&apos;t it be nice if politicians (north or south of the 49th) would show some statemanship instead of making the playground antics at your local primary school look composed and mature in comparison?
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T14:17:57Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T14:17:57Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59854</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59854" />
    <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>fdcol63</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Not to belabor the obvious, but if we had a larger ACTIVE component, we wouldn&apos;t have to rely on state Guard components to confront the external threats.

I know you more senior professionals will tell me why this won&apos;t work, but perhaps to avoid this kind of sniping we ought to do this:

1) Increase the Federal active and reserve components to be able to adequately face the external threats we have, without having to rely at all on state Guard units.

2) Allow the states to fully control, and fund, their own state militias. De-&quot;militarize&quot; Guard units, remove all their Federal obligations, and restructure them so they are more of a &quot;paramilitary&quot; force to be used in their state roles - disaster relief, civil control, and as a check on the powers of the Federal government.

Even I can see issues going to this system, namely: money, personnel, jurisdictional, command &amp; control, equipment, etc. Which is probably why we have the system we now have!  LOL
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T14:05:41Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T14:05:41Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59850</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59850" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Well, fully half of Missouri will have to be underwater before it hits us at the Castle.


    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T13:14:25Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T13:14:25Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506-comment:59849</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7506" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/ready_fire_aim.html#comment-59849" />
    <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2007-05-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>BloodSpite</name>
        <uri>http://www.techography.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techography.com">
        <![CDATA[<i>"How highs the water, momma?"
"Said it's 5 feet high and risin'"
</i>
Makes me glad I live on my lil mountain heh.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-09T13:10:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-09T13:10:37Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

