previous post next post  

H&I Fires* May 29, 2007

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
********************************
Short on time, but I do have this link to a story about Cindy Sheehan quitting the ‘anti-war business’. Laters.
--ry
*******************************
This was the weekend of looking at acreages. The two that currently top the list are a 77-acre plot far enough out of town to be safe from development for a good while, and a 65-acre heavily wooded plot up north of here, near Saint Joseph, just in the bluffs east of Atchison, in Missouri. Both are *well suited* to hosting a blog-shoot, where you could safely take 400m shots, and putting up the horses. I just have to get over sticker shock. The homes on both would need some re-working/reconfiguring as we would like them. But plenty of privacy. Nekkid partying on the deck! Eeeee. Scary thought.

What's up from the email over the weekend... lessee, Tommy S. was really impressed with this display of courage, and striking a blow for freedom, up in Orcas Island, Washington! Not. Pathetic. C'mon kids, that's the best you've got? Real social consciences there!

Bloodspite teases the Armorer. That said, he has the good sense to link to frequent commenter and capital "G" Grognard, John S, of Oldguns.net - I would note that John is sometimes disqualified from playing in our Whatziss posts - because he was the provider of the Whatziss... That said, the Armorer doesn't yet feel rich enough to spend that kind of geld on an addition to the Arsenal, when that kind of geld would fund so many *more* additions to the Arsenal!

Further expanding on the theme of the Cyborg post - Kevin provides a link to this video... mebbe FCS should consider this for some of their RPVs...

And just in case you missed it over the weekend - the Whatziss was answered here. -the Armorer

*********************************

Okay, I know it's a sample of one. Still, there's a new piece in the Middle East Quarterly, written by David Patten. Subject: Is Iraq in a Civil War?

Is Iraq in a Civil War? by David A. Patten Middle East Quarterly Summer 2007

Many politicians have determined Iraq to be in a civil war. "We're not fighting terrorism in Iraq," Rep. John Murtha (Democrat-Penn.) said on January 27, 2006, "We're fighting a civil war in Iraq."[1] He is not alone. On November 27, 2006, NBC sparked media and political debate when it announced it would henceforth label the violence in Iraq a civil war. Such a designation is significant. Major-General William Nash (ret.) explains failure to acknowledge that a civil war exists "means that our counter-measures are inadequate and, therefore, dangerous to our long-term interests."[2] A March 2007 Pentagon report augmented the debate. "Some elements of the situation in Iraq are properly descriptive of a ‘civil war,' including the hardening of ethno-sectarian identities and mobilization, the changing character of the violence and population displacements," it said.[3] However, the debate should not be political. Precision matters. If Iraq is not in a civil war, using the term for U.S. domestic political reasons might undercut efforts to restore stability.

Aside from the content of the article, what's the other bit that caught my eye?

David A. Patten is a sergeant with the 3rd Infantry Division in Baghdad. He holds a doctorate in philosophy from Stony Brook University. His views do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Army.

Emphasis mine. I don't know what that might say about the utility of a Doctorate in Philosophy... but I know what it says about that Sergeant. I'll take two, please. -the Armorer

*********************************

Heh. I forgot that I didn't *do* an H&I yesterday. The one so marked was meant to be todays. Snerk! -the Armorer

*********************************
Update to the Orcas Island vandalism of veteran's graves - Dan of Riehl World View has a person of interest for law enforcement to consider. Of course, sometimes coincidences are just that - coincidences. But LE can see if there are any dots to connect, assuming their workload allows them to devote sufficient time. As to whether or not it's worth the time - well, the locals know better than I do if it's a 'broken windows' kind of thing, or something to go after only if it falls in your lap. -the Armorer

**********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

*Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs (oops, can't call 'em UAVs anymore - they're now Unmanned Aerial Systems... some Colonel got his Legion of Merit for that change...), er, um UAS's we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".

8 Comments

I figured you'd enjoy that one. Researching them on the Internet is actually pretty hard. There isn't much to be found. I literally had finished rereading the book yesterday morning and thought "Y'know I don't think I ever heard of this particular model gun before...I'll google it" Which led me to exactly 2 sources with good solid information. The Julian auction site, and your friend and Old Guns.net. Still a 12 shot revolver in 1859? Pretty interesting in my book! :)
 
where you could safely take 400m shots If it's me shooting at 400m the *target* is certainly safe...
 
Maybe you should refer John Edwards to Sgt. Patten. Maybe my fellow NCO (who holds a degree higher than mine) would be able to explain to NC's favorite ambulance chaser about how the unwashed masses are in the civilian sector, not in our armed forces... Yeah, I know that Edwards doesn't really believe what he says, but it wouldn't hurt to confront him with his absurdities. BTW, Sgt. Patten is not some extreme out-liar on the standard distribution curve, a significant number of NCOs have advanced degrees, yet they choose to serve. Another BTW, the word “Sergeant” comes from old French and means to serve voluntarily. It has the same meaning as the word Deacon does in classic Greek.
 
Neffi - oh, I dunno, we park a junk car down there... I wasn't talking about NRA 25 foot pistol targets. Admittedly, I haven't taken those shots in some years, but back when I was, man-sized sillouhettes with the No.4Mk1(T) and Mosin sniper were doable. Scopes. Not open sights. Unless we buy the property in Missouri, where I can own *shootable* machineguns. Heh. Then you could come visit with your toy! Not that an MP-40 is a 400m weapon...
 
I know the area you are describing in MO. The Engineer and I were looking up thataway about eight years ago. Cindy has quit the peace bidness because she is disillusioned? She needs the hide of Hillary Clinton. Come to think of it, could this be the beginning of a trend? Dare we hope?
 
400m with 9mm Para? Think plunging fire!!
 
Did he write "shootable"? Oh, if it were legally possible to REWAT a DEWAT! Though, I must say, if you pay, what the realtors say, you might not have much left over for the full-auto fun, considering their cyclic rate translated to dollars per minute.
 
JTG - it *is* legal to REWAT a DEWAT. The only requirement is that the weapon be a WAT, so to speak - i.e., on the NFA Register. The difference between the two types is $195 worth of tax. To REWAT one has only to submit the appropriate paperwork, pay the $200 tax, and find a competent machinegunsmith to do the work.