<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for H&amp;I* Fires, 19 MAY 2007</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:31:36 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>H&amp;I* Fires, 19 MAY 2007</title>
            <description>Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That&apos;s only polite. You&apos;re advertising here, we should get an ad at your place... *********************************************** Yet more contrary views: Project on Defense Alternatives says There’s No Good Reason to Grow The Army and Marine Corps, since it’s only Iraq that’s pinching deployable troop numbers. -- Shloky says Tigerhawk doesn’t know war. That also extends to a lot of the rest of us too. The Hyper-empowered individual and 4GW makes mass...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 23:39:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2007-05-22</title>
            <description>
                Shlok, that&apos;s the bit of Robbism I can&apos;t buy.  Sorry, just can&apos;t.  I&apos;m seeing a different trend.  A return to things like Christendom and Islamdom.  The battles are fought by hyper-empowered but the goal is mass system. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60265</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60265</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 07:29:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-22</title>
            <description>
                P.s. I mentioned in a comment to another post, that I try to act like a rational grownup and control my violent passions.

Some of the people we&apos;re fighting seem to get great joy from exulting and *wallowing* in their violent, and yes animal, passions.

In public.

On Youtube, and bragging about it, even.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60261</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60261</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:22:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-21</title>
            <description>
                And they ARE bullies. I mean, isn&apos;t cutting somebody&apos;s head off with a dull knife the act of a bully? If that ain&apos;t, I don&apos;t know what is.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60260</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60260</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:59:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cassandra on 2007-05-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[My comment that Shlok 'made very little sense' was made in reference to his very short post, which several of us read and had a tough time making heads or tails of. That happens, sometimes. But his comment here is far easier to understand, and I agree with it, so far as it goes. But even then I have a bone to pick.

Sure, it's harder to convince people in a culture where nationalism is viewed as socially acceptable. But human nature hasn't changed. I think the nature of mass media has changed the equation somewhat. I've written about this several times - government doesn't control the news cycle: they are forced to combat a highly distributed information network with a centralized one.

It's that whole bullied pulpit thing: unless you can gain numerous allies in the free media, you are essentially <em>vox clamantis in deserto</em>. You'll be shouted down; it won't matter how good a job you do at propaganda, even assuming you do an excellent job at getting the word out. You'll be drowned out. Plus there is the whole 'mean-spirited poopy head/intolerance' aspect that conservatives have always had to contend with - in America anyone who tries to say anything bad against a Person of Cholor is not only Wrong but unbearably Wrong/Bad. As we all know, the only acceptable pariahs in American culture are upper class white males.

But this does prove that it is possible to mock, deride, and dehumanize an entire class of people. We do it all the time. You just have to choose your victyms carefully, and you have to portray them as bullies so no one is tempted to feel sorry for them :p

What the media have done with our enemies by hiding the evidence of their atrocities is prevent anyone from viewing them as bullies. And so no one can say a bad word about them. It always helps to have a friend on the inside. 

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60245</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60245</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-20</title>
            <description>
                Ah, Ry! Finally somebody else who understands the Combined Action Platoons! Didn&apos;t have a chance, even though it worked right well. A real militia is anathema to all big government types, be they communist or corporate-statist. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60222</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60222</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 03:45:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2007-05-20</title>
            <description>
                You liked the PDA one John?  I came away thinking &quot;Well, sure, that makes sense, if we don&apos;t actually go anywhere or do anything.&quot;  What&apos;d I miss then?  Given:  civilian side of reconstruction is well short of what it should be.  But, we&apos;re deploying more than 1/3 of total force, including Reserve component, in 1.25 wars(same general theatre)?  I dunno.  That&apos;s not sounding like being able to fight 1.5 wars in two theatres to me.  What&apos;s my stoooped butt missing there then?  (Oh, and isn&apos;t that what I linked to yesterday?  Okay, it&apos;s the expanded FbL story, but I linked to that yesterday.  First you edit and then you copy?  Baggins!)

TH, sorry.  I wasn&apos;t looking to pick on you.  I just do the Castle Contrarian Corps thing.  I only get stale cheetos if I do stuff to prevent echochamber creep around here.  I think Shloky is talking past you.  I get what he&apos;s saying(you don&apos;t call up the state&apos;s national guard to combat the mafia or hackers---you bring in old sheepdogs who know how to work the underground for intel), but you&apos;ve also got a point---in kinetic situations we can&apos;t be overly squimish.  Obey the LoLW and GC in constructionist interpretations but no more.  A little more rare steak and less tofu, neh?

Cass.  Oh, I know I&apos;m going to wind up like Brendan Fraser in the movie Monkeybone when he get&apos;s sent back to Earth by Whoopie Goldberg where she kicks him like a football and instructs him to position himself properly for the kick(lift your butt a little higher, a little higher, hold it.(wham!)), but Shloky isn&apos;t talking total trash.  He&apos;s in Bill Lind and TX Hammes theoretical land.  Shlok&apos;s actually looking at things in a way to not put your Marine in a no win sol&apos;n where he&apos;s only a target since he&apos;s an improperly used tool---you don&apos;t send the Marines to handle the mafia(poor analogy, but it&apos;s the best one I can come up with right now).  That&apos;s what John&apos;s talking about when he&apos;s talking about Emperial watchstanders.  You need the right tool for the right job.  THere&apos;s some things the Marines(particularly with their history of small wars, and being the first service to get it right in &apos;Nam wrt the indigenous people) are the best tool for and others they aren&apos;t.  That&apos;s what Shloky, John Robb, Barnett, and the others are looking at.  What&apos;s the best tool so we don&apos;t use your Marine stupidly, like using a quaryman&apos;s chisel to repair eyeglasses or a pocket watch. Has little to do with OODA, but much with selecting the proper tool to wage battle in the moral sphere of war(since we&apos;re using Boyd).   (A little higher?  Okay.  I&apos;ve got my hockey helmet on.  (cringe and whimper)). 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60221</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60221</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 02:57:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Shlok on 2007-05-20</title>
            <description>
                For what it is worth, my argument is pretty simple:

Dehumanization of the enemy has worked in the past because of nationalism, designed to bring multiple decision cycles (250 million+ ) into a more manageable size - as close to 1 as possible.

But, given the relatively recent developments that drive technological empowerment of humans, de-humanizing the enemy won&apos;t work because it is basically self-delusion. 

As people become more empowered, their individual decision cycles matter more, which leads to less imperative for collective action. To make that happen, with a large scale, you have to force it - through mechanisms commonly used by police states. 

But thats a backwards step. Obviously, the better plan is to move forward.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60220</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60220</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 02:39:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Miss Ladybug on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                I guess I&apos;m a bit of a motard because I can&apos;t make the trackback work...


[No, it&apos;s an MT problem, probably. We&apos;re still (very slowly) tinkering in the back-office of the blog. -the Armorer]
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60219</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60219</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 23:54:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[So here I sit fat and happy. 
And then the Commandant writes to me.

Time to get off my ass and execute. Once a Marine, Always a Marine.

<a href="http://cookiecrumbexpress.com/blog/2007/05/19/commandants-letter-to-retirees/#respond" rel="nofollow">http://cookiecrumbexpress.com/blog/2007/05/19/commandants-letter-to-retirees/#respond</a>

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60218</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60218</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 22:20:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Miss Ladybug on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've got a Memorial Day related post/book review that might be of interest to anyone with young children in their lives:

<a href="http://miss-ladybug.blogspot.com/2007/05/americas-white-table.html" rel="nofollow"><i>America's White Table</i></a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60217</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60217</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 20:59:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cassandra on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I took from TH's post was that the fact that we lack the will to fight this type of war is <em>precisely a function</em> of our evolution into a modern 'enlightened' democracy. This indicates to me that he understands the problem very well. We are getting bogged down in our relatively greater 'number of decision cycles', whereas the enemy we face has far fewer layers to contend with. 

Shloky, on the otter heiny, made very little sense.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60212</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60212</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 13:28:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                Thanks for the link John, but in the interests of The Children(tm) might want to toss a language warning up there :)

I&apos;d hate for folks to come away shocked from my usually more restrained self ;)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60206</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60206</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 09:06:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                The PDA, Tigerhawk, and Shloky things (well, really not so much Shloky as Robb) are all very interesting - well done, Ry.

I actually find myself agreeing with much that is in the PDA piece, though I think the author has some glaring gaps/assumptions - such as the level of participation from civilian agencies in nation-building operations.

If we think we&apos;re going to play the New Model British Empire this century, we need to do some serious expansion in those civilian agencies and put them to work *now* doing things before the military gets sent in, but that requires a level of patience and across-adminstrations continuity that isn&apos;t likely in this polity.

I&apos;ve been working a post similar to Tigerhawk&apos;s - I may not bother with it now.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60205</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60205</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 08:03:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from TigerHawk on 2007-05-19</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;m fairly sure I don&apos;t understand war.  I am blessed that my only contact with it has been through books.  But I don&apos;t understand Shloky, either, so maybe it&apos;s just me.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60201</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_19_may.html#comment-60201</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 06:17:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

