<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for H&amp;I* Fires, 06 MAY 2007</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:28:51 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>H&amp;I* Fires, 06 MAY 2007</title>
            <description>Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That&apos;s only polite. You&apos;re advertising here, we should get an ad at your place... ****************************************************************** Woot! Made the Washington Post today. Nikki did a pretty good job (and spelled the name right - you&apos;d be surprised how hard that&apos;s been for reporters over the years!) - but the quote of mine she used, bereft of the context, makes it look like I&apos;m a touch more concerned that I am, but...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 23:18:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2007-05-07</title>
            <description>
                True, and the Youtube experiment is kinda sorta leaning to that(kinda).  There&apos;s still the fingerprints of &apos;officialdom&apos; over it, which is giving those who don&apos;t want to like it more than enough ammo to complain and belittle what&apos;s there.  

As has been said on these pages many, many times the Institution is risk averse.  They&apos;re also very formulaic.  Figure out what happened before you say anything definitive---very unlike the media news cycle.  

My biggest critique of your criticism, Kat, is it&apos;s pushing only one side.  I know wanting responsible journalism is something of a forlorn hope, but there has to be movement on other fronts too.  Just speeding up your cycle has problems associated with it---as we&apos;re seeing in weaknesses of network centric Big War.  

I really think the solution is for media jackalopes and DoD bigwigs to headshed with each other instead of treating each other as a hostile camp.  Since Vietnam the military has been outright hostile to the media and that&apos;s looking like a real shortsighted decision right now. The media has to get over their innate and irrational fear of the military.  Just having the military push their message and images faster isn&apos;t a winning strategy.  Fast isn&apos;t a strategy in and of itself.  

I do think the institution has been moving glacially slow to date.  They can do better.  But moving to be first isn&apos;t a winning strategy.  YOu have to do the whole OODA loop, not just decide and act.  They need to get faster, but faster with a purpose and reason instead of just being faster than the Jihadi jackalopes.  Faster isn&apos;t always better, imo.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59776</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59776</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:06:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-07</title>
            <description>
                I think the USMC are the only media-savvy branch of the service, and have been so for a long time. I believe Harry Truman complained about that. There is excellent color film of horrendously desperate fights in the Pacific islands, taken by official Marine cameramen.

I do not think this is a bad thing; I mind the guys in the Army of the Tennessee telling my ancestors, &quot;We&apos;re Bill Sherman&apos;s raiders, you&apos;d better run!&quot;

Possession of a reputation for being ferocious badasses can be helpful in a fight.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59747</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59747</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:29:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-05-07</title>
            <description>
                Ry, it&apos;s about driving it down to the lowest levels and empowering people, not about trying to force news out before its accurate and ready.

But, if you are in a fire fight with 50 al qaida guys and drive them off of your fob or convoy, why don&apos;t we say that?  In video if they have it (and yes, there are somethings the jihadists do that we should do more - give video cameras to every active unit, whether combat or cap, have them up load it every night to a central com and have a bunch of geeks like me sitting there editing it for the next morning.  Why do they have to wait to send some official military reporter or have an embed to do it?

Video doesn&apos;t necessarily lie, though it can be twisted.

video and AAR with an inclusive statement that says some details were not confirmed yet.  Then let the public decide for themselves what was going on.  Push it down.

and, its not just the approval process, it is complete lack of resources because the military has not had to fight a real media campaign for eternity, our media is skeptical skeptics and, lets face it, how many journalist wannabes in college are planning a career in the military?

Do we have appropriate scholorships and other programs to attract these people?  Probably not because the big dollars go for doctors and such (arguably necessary, just noting at what level one has to consider the information war if you aren&apos;t willing to invest).
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59746</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59746</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:15:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-07</title>
            <description>
                If y&apos;all are fans of John Varley&apos;s writing, you&apos;ll love the DUKW escapades in &quot;Red Lightning.&quot;  It has all kindsa cool stuff in it, like an ex-drunkard ex-astronaut Major General, a genius Louisiana Coon-Aspie, weird Florida people, evil behind-the-scenes badasses, young love, and etc. and so forth.

The good guys win, of course. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59745</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59745</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:09:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-05-07</title>
            <description>
                Hope y&apos;all had fun on the DUKW ride. There was a guy here who tried to do that. The Rich Republican Silly Bimbos got attacks of the vapors about that, so he painted them turquoise, with pretty decorations. Still no-go. Last I heard, his facility has been taken over by really ruthless bad-arse developers.

Let me tell you about some of the wimmin we have around here: When we were going to get new bridges over the main waterways around here, some aged Midwestern XX busybody complained that it was already bad enough that people in boats went along the canal behind her house, but that people in slightly taller boats could use said canal if the bridge were built too high.

People like her prevailed.

Sucks to have a sailboat around here
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59744</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59744</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:42:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2007-05-06</title>
            <description>
                Kat, like you I&apos;m torn on the OODA loop in the information meta-conflict.

But can the US really risk getting caught out in a half truth?  I don&apos;t think so.  20+ reasons got boiled down to one, afterall.  A quick fix isn&apos;t really at hand is it?  A better and long standing relationship with media seems to be the answer(you know, so they aren&apos;t reflexively afraid of the military and gov&apos;t).  In that environment a faster response should be possible.  But now?  I think we need to cut them a little slack.  At least they aren&apos;t actively shooting themselves in the foot with things like the 5 o&apos;Clock Follies(the last active and responsive to time PR effort I can think of) chock full of mistruths.  That&apos;s SOMETHING.  


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59740</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59740</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:45:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2007-05-06</title>
            <description>
                I dunno about Schatman, KAt and John.  He&apos;s doing a kind of reporting I don&apos;t like.  He doesn&apos;t strike me as an honest broker of criticism, but a dove intent on &apos;chaning the system from the inside&apos;.  Or as inside as he can stand to be.  There&apos;s a difference between, say Lord &apos;Phibian criticizing the newest L ship or the LCS and someone who chits on everything going on at DARPA or Navy Labs(some of which is pie in sky garbage but a lot of it is core science needed for innovation 50 years later(and without Bell Labs...)).  He&apos;s first on stuff, but he&apos;s also nasty much of the time too.  

That&apos;s my read.  Maybe I&apos;m the jerk and misreading him.  But I&apos;m only calling it like I see it.  He&apos;s a got a stick up ______ about military spending and working on futuristic ideas that we don&apos;t know what&apos;ll come out of(but past experience, Bell Labs, shows we often get something amazing out of because we&apos;re doing core science instead of &apos;applicable&apos; science.).   
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59738</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59738</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 20:56:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John S. on 2007-05-06</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Cat pee thread was very interesting- especially the link to hunting feral cats with a coehorn mortar (and of course details on how to build the mortar with which to hunt such felines, as well as handy tips for the bloodthirsty hunter...)  
I think John will have mixed feelings about this one....
<a href="http://www.buckstix.com/CoehornMortarHunt.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.buckstix.com/CoehornMortarHunt.htm</a>
The same guy has a great story on building a mountain howitzer, and proof that they can be handy for deer hunting.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59723</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59723</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 11:27:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2007-05-06</title>
            <description>
                Mama Hilton is right.  It was a misuse of taxpayer dollars when the onus of responsibility was on her precious child.  Had Paris been accountable and jumped through the hoops as mandated by CA law, her sorry but expensive butt
would not be anticipating a jail sentence.

I got my first of two speeding tickets in CA.
I was 16, and the judge lectured me, and mandated traffic school to beat the ticket.  I was on probation for one year and could not add any more points to my license.  Had I not enrolled, I would have had my license suspended
for six months.

And that was in 1975.  

Boo freakin&apos; hoo, Paris.  You will be in a cell all to your lonesome and maybe you can reflect on the total waste your life has been and maybe you can do something about it.

Mama, you are a loser too and I am keeping track of the Hilton establishments to ensure that I NEVER add one d*mn dime to darling Paris&apos; trust fund.

I can only say this; she hasn&apos;t added to the gene pool.  Yet.  For that I am grateful.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59721</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/05/hi_fires_06_may.html#comment-59721</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 08:24:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

