<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-23T17:29:56Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Yesterday&apos;s Whatziss... explained.*</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7439" title="Yesterday's Whatziss... explained.*" />
    <published>2007-04-22T13:35:09Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-27T12:17:08Z</updated>
    <title>Yesterday&apos;s Whatziss... explained.*</title>
    <summary>Okay, the Usual Suspects® weighed in with several answers, in keeping with their métier, with the discussion revolving around bomb fuzes. Those with a more modern heritage being a little sceptical of the whole tail fuze thing, which was strongly put forth by others with a more historical bent or who&apos;s knowledge of the subject is more from books than experience - what I alluded to in my post. Heh. The pic with this post should get Oldloadr all full of misty-eyed remembrance. Dusty, too. Bill and Casey opened the bidding at tail fuze, WWII or earlier. The Instapilot weighed...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Gun Pr0n - A Naughty Expose&apos; of the fiddly bits" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Okay, the Usual Suspects® weighed in with several answers, in keeping with their métier, with the discussion revolving around bomb fuzes.  Those with a more modern heritage being a little sceptical of the whole tail fuze thing, which was strongly put forth by others with a more historical bent or who's knowledge of the subject is more from books than experience - what I alluded to in my post. </p>

<p>Heh.  The pic with this post should get Oldloadr all full of misty-eyed remembrance.  Dusty, too.</p>

<p>Bill and Casey opened the bidding at tail fuze, WWII or earlier.  The Instapilot weighed in with geekoid corrections (my kinda guy!) and discussed modern fuzes.</p>

<p>Heh.  Funny you should mention that.  Sitting on a shelf, among other avian products, a visitor to the Arsenal would find this:</p>

<p><img src="http://www.fototime.com/CC2AAD834E7D081/orig.jpg" border=0 alt="Fuze, Bomb, Nose, M904E2, in hte holdings of the Arsenal of Argghhh!"></p>

<p>A Fuze, Bomb, Nose, M904E2.  Note all the integrated arming/fuzing stuff as Dusty pointed out.</p>

<p>Others were more into the historical bombs (this *is* the Arsenal, after all, we like auld stuff (hence why Bill and Dusty have posting privileges, both being older than the Armorer)!</p>

<p>With the Instapilot providing geekoid corrections, Casey chimed in to make his point and reclaim some geek status.  He was all after pointing out that, technical nomenclature aside, he was talking about arming vanes, like you would find in bombs like this <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/BAF4773FDF98642/standard.jpg">Brit one</a></strong>, a 250 pounder from WWII, or this <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/22050459BEC9CA7/standard.jpg">fuze, percussion, aircraft, bomb, tail, No. 30 Mark III</a></strong>, which I would note is integrated in ways that the Instapilot was suggesting wasn't the case for older fuzes that he was familiar with.</p>

<p>Though, in fact, Casey was really talking about something more like the <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/AFB975AB77C457E/orig.jpg">AN-M64 500lb General Purpose bomb</a></strong>, a standard piece of ordnance of the USAAF/USAF for many years, with <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/C1A7DE959879450/orig.jpg">these two options for tail fuzing</a></strong>.</p>

<p>Oh, and why does the Armorer have a modern inert bomb fuze in the Arsenal?  <strong><a href="http://www.fototime.com/98DB0C8C0C2D998/standard.jpg">It was fate</a></strong>.</p>

<p>Okay, we went through all that for a reason - the big reveal!</p>

<p>Remember this line from yesterday's post?</p>

<blockquote>Let's see whose experience leads them where on this one.</blockquote>

<p>It took you exactly where I expected, given those that chose to play (including MajMike's contribution).</p>

<p>And...  yer wrong.</p>

<p>Keep trying, boys and girls.</p>

<p>Well, you're not completely wrong.</p>

<p>You've got function nailed in fact.</p>

<p>But you're way off on application.</p>

<p><br />
*Not really.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59335</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59335" />
    <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-04-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Justthisguy</name>
        <uri>http://enemiesofthelibrary.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://enemiesofthelibrary.blogspot.com">
        No clue on the Whatzis beyond the obvious posted by all the other folks, but thanks for the bomb drawings. With trunnions! You&apos;ve revived my little-kid SBD-pilot fantasies! 


Oh, BillT? That&apos;s yer punishment for your unlikely survival of all those things you&apos;ve told us about. The Lord God does exist, and He has a very low, nasty sense of humor.
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-23T08:52:13Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-23T08:52:13Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59330</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59330" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-04-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Um, no.  I hit the lotto with SWWBO.

Yer describing Wife V2.0.
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-23T05:02:13Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-23T05:02:13Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59329</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59329" />
    <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>BillT</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Slug yer own se&apos;f. Ever try to get anything done around the yard with a Luddite hollering out the window to &quot;get in here and take this %$#@! dog outside!&quot; every 55 minutes?
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-23T04:25:34Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-23T04:25:34Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59327</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59327" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Geez, you guys are *slugs* today!
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-23T03:22:40Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-23T03:22:40Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59321</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59321" />
    <title>Comment from Oldloadr on 2007-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Oldloadr</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        You&apos;re right, that particular fuze does make me misty-eyed with nostalgia...  For all of those talking about tail fuzes, the M904 nose fuze was usually used along with the M905 tail fuze (except in snake-eyes).
I did chores all day yesterday and didn&apos;t see this until you posted today (darn).
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-22T18:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-22T18:45:00Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439-comment:59312</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7439" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/yesterdays_what_1.html#comment-59312" />
    <title>Comment from Gwedd on 2007-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gwedd</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Well,

   How &apos;bout a tail fuze for a japanese .5kg bomb? Looke like it to me, although I may well be mistaken. Part of an assembly called an &quot;anti-aircraft&quot; bomb, dropped in a black cannister of 33 bomblets.

   Respects,
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-22T15:02:27Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-22T15:02:27Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

