<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The &quot;miscegenation of military awards&quot; week continues...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:41:35 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The &quot;miscegenation of military awards&quot; week continues...</title>
            <description>First it&apos;s Kiwis getting US medals. Now it&apos;s an American getting a Brit medal. BZ, Major Chesarek! Marine Receives Distinguished Flying Cross at Buckingham Palace From DefenseLink By Gunnery Sgt. Donald E. Preston, USMC Special to American Forces Press Service LONDON, March 23, 2007 – A U.S. Marine appeared before Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace March 21 to receive the United Kingdom&apos;s Distinguished Flying Cross for saving lives and in recognition for his bravery during combat operations in Iraq. Marine Maj. William D. Chesarek Jr., is the first U.S. servicemember to be so honored since World War II. Assigned...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:19:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2007-04-05</title>
            <description>
                THAT is awesome.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58611</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58611</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:43:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-04-05</title>
            <description>
                If he&apos;d done that in anything but a Lynx or an MD500, it would have been a posthumous award. Westland builds some *nice* fling-wings...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58605</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58605</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:22:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-04-05</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Chuck - for the Army, <a href="http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r600_8_22.pdf" rel="nofollow"><strong>AR 6-800-22, 11 December 2006</strong> </a>is the governing regulation.  Whatever the Marine equivalent is will be broadly similar.

The Major does not require the permission of Congress, but did require approval from a General Officer (or an )6 with General Courts Martial convening authority)  Since this is a significant award for valor, and was in fact awarded by the Queen, no doubt this actually staffed through DoD and State, and was probably pushed through (as required) by the Brit MoD, not pulled through by Major Chesarek or the USMC.

The relevant text from the AR is:

<blockquote>
Section V
Application for Authority to Accept and Wear Foreign Decorations and Badges to U.S. Army
Personnel

9–25. Foreign decorations
a. Eligibility requirements. Individual foreign decorations may be accepted if awarded in recognition of meeting the criteria, as established by the foreign government concerned, for the specific award. Only those decorations that are awarded in recognition of military activities and by the military department of the host country are authorized for acceptance and permanent wear. Individual decorations that do not meet these criteria may be authorized for acceptance but not for wear and will not be entered in the official military records of the recipient. Of particular importance are the criteria established by the military department of the host country; for example, if a particular decoration is authorized for award only to enlisted personnel of host country then badge may be accepted and worn by U.S. Army enlisted personnel.

b. Awarding authority. Commanders (overseas and CONUS) serving in the rank of brigadier general or higher and colonel level commanders who exercise general court-martial authority are delegated authority to approve the acceptance,
retention, and permanent wear of foreign badges listed in appendix D. This authority may be further delegated to commanders charged with custody of military personnel record files. The burden of proof rests on the individual Soldier to produce valid justification, that is, orders, citations, or other original copies of the foreign elements that awarded them the badge. Any individual foreign decoration not listed in Appendix E will be forwarded to USA HRC,
ATTN: AHRC–PDO–PA, Alexandria, VA 22332–0471, for approval.

c. Other awards. Individual foreign decorations presented to Army personnel that do not fall under the category 128 AR 600–8–22 • 11 December 2006 discussed in a above (for example, honorary) will be reported in accordance with AR 1–100, paragraph 6. Awards in these categories are considered gifts. They will not be authorized for wear nor entered in official military personnel
records.

d. Wear. AR 670–1 governs the manner of wear of foreign individual decorations.
</blockquote>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58591</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58591</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:46:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chuck Simmins on 2007-04-05</title>
            <description>
                My one thought, when I blogged this, was if the Major needed the permission of Congress to accept a foreign medal?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58589</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_miscegenati.html#comment-58589</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:25:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


