<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The Code of Conduct.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:41:11 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The Code of Conduct.</title>
            <description>Regarding the Brits captured by the Iranians. On 13 April, an Air Force Captain named Lance Sijan would have turned 65. He would have, at least, had he not chosen a different path from that chosen by the Brits. The difference in the respective approaches is what underlies the discussion of the behavio(u)r of the Brit sailors and Marines. I&apos;ve been pretty quiet on the issue, actually. Initially, I wanted more information, though from what we had I was appalled at the response of British leadership, military and political. As the debacle continued, I became more appalled with the response...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:36:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from David M on 2007-04-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - <a href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2007/04/web-reconnaissance-for-04172007.html" rel="nofollow">Web Reconnaissance for 04/17/2007</a>
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59031</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59031</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:33:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chadd on 2007-04-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The English have come a long way from this:

<a href="http://www.bartleby.com/246/562.html" rel="nofollow">The Private of the Buffs.</a>

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59028</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59028</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:36:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                Dance... Dance... wherever you may be.... I am the Lord of the Dance said He....

I&apos;d like to think his wounds are healed and he&apos;s dancing a mean jig in the clouds.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59000</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-59000</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:15:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Jon The Mechanic on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Frank, in most of the US, I would have to agree with you that the "gimme, gimme, gimme, forget about you" mentality is alive and well, however, all you need to do is spend time with a platoon that has just returned from Injun country and you will see men and women that have learned that, no matter the cost, there is someone who will stand next to them. One GREAT example of this is <a href="http://www.cmohs.org/recipients/jldunham.htm" rel="nofollow">This young man</a>.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58997</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58997</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:08:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Instapilot on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                All four years I was at USAFA, I lived in Vandenburg Hall, the &quot;old&quot; dorm. The &quot;new&quot; dorm on the opposite side of the Cadet Area didn&apos;t have a name until I was a senior. That year (&apos;75-&apos;76) we dedicated it Sijan Hall. One of the few ceremonies I remember as a Cadet.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58990</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58990</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:25:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                Sorry, I missed the &quot;Teamwork&quot; post. I agree with everything you&apos;ve said there, too, John.

But even that, IMHO, leads to another current social and cultural dynamic. LOL

Wherein, during the same period that our youth have been inculcated with that &quot;moral relativism&quot; and &quot;cultural equivalence&quot; junk, they&apos;ve had their senses of &quot;self-esteem&quot; and egos over-developed to the detriment of the &quot;team&quot; and the community. There&apos;s been so much focus on &quot;uniqueness&quot;, &quot;self-absorption&quot;, and materialistic &quot;what&apos;s in it for ME?&quot;, that I don&apos;t think many people ... especially in Europe ..... place much priority on &quot;teamwork&quot;.

We&apos;ve seen fine exceptions to this in the US military .... despite the &quot;Army of One&quot; double meaning ..... but Europe and Britain are another matter.

LOL
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58988</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58988</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:57:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                Because, Frank  - like in my &apos;teamwork&apos; post - you do it for your buddies.

The rest of the issues be damned.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58978</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58978</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:19:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                I agree that a &quot;failure of leadership&quot; contributed to the behavior of the British detainees in Iran, but I&apos;m afraid a larger  societal and cultural dynamic is also at work here.

We&apos;ve just seen the consequences of years of &quot;progressive&quot; inculcation of &quot;cultural equivalence&quot; and &quot;moral relativism&quot;.

How can we really expect people to endure pain, hardship, suffering, sacrifice, and even death in the name of service to one&apos;s country, when they&apos;ve been &quot;educated&quot; their whole lives to believe there&apos;s nothing instrinsically better or superior about their own countries and cultures that are worth it?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58976</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58976</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:32:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I have to say, I still didn't rant on about the sailors the way I want to simply because I don't think I have to. 

Whatever needs to be rectified in their individual characters will be done through attrition in the ranks.  These folks will not be put back on their ship I don't think.  Particularly Mr. Bean since he will be ridiculed beyond belief or, at the least, cause some serious unit cohesion issues.  

Faye Turney very likely has the same problem.  She broke in less than 24 hours and apparently over a questionable lie regarding the release of the others, being "stripped" and made to put on some other clothes.  It didn't take much.  Probably a good thing she got nearly 200k for her story.  I think she is going to be offered an early discharge due to trauma.  any takers on that bet?

As for the future of captive Brits, while I won't say they won't be taken captive or that they will even fight capture off, I think we will see a different behavior from any in the future after this very public example of what not to do.  Even if the MOD does not issue a memo on the subject or revise any training manuals.

Finally, the person I would like to bring to our attention is a <a href="http://www.liwomen.com/WomenIraq.htm" rel="nofollow">Col. Cornum </a>(previoiusly Maj Cornum) who was shot down over Iraq in Desert Storm, suffered broken arms, bullet wound in the shoulder and smashed knees, was subsequently abused by her captors.

Or even the 7 captured at the beginning of the war.  Those folks had to be scared spitless, yet, when they were forced on TV, they were very careful what they said and neither denied or confirmed what the Iraqis were demanding.  Surely, they had to be quite a bit more afraid of the situation then these British soldiers.

Beyond that, I think that I've said already somebody was obviously very lacadaisical in the SOP for interdiction in allegedly terrorist infested waters close on to so many potential hostiles.  Black mark on the record please.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58975</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58975</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:26:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-04-16</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[In 1985, Readers' Dige did a condensation of his biography, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=ZnMTDj2ryawC&pg=PA193&lpg=PA193&dq=lance+sijan+into+the+jaws+of+the+cat&source=web&ots=VDqDiX6qjU&sig=XAW1l3xtOW2UlgrI47tbXqnX3jE" rel="nofollow"><em>Into the Mouth of the Cat</em></a>. Nice to see it's in reprint -- it's a worthy read..]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58966</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/04/the_code_of_con.html#comment-58966</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:08:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


