<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The Whatziss... answered.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:42:32 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The Whatziss... answered.</title>
            <description>...Not! I don&apos;t know what it is either - though I agree with those of you who saw it as an azimuth measuring instrument, that might somehow use the sun. All I do know about it is that it&apos;s WWII, Soviet, and it dovetailed on to something else, probably an azimuth base of some sort. This next one, however, I *do* know what it is. Here&apos;s another picture for you people who get so wrapped around scale... One hint - it&apos;s a component of something, not a stand-alone....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:45:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Old Fat Sailor on 2007-03-10</title>
            <description>
                Does look like a screw in fuze, not sure if a delay element went in the center or the powder train went around the helical groove, if the latter then its a delay element itself and not the holder for same. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57676</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57676</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:22:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-03-09</title>
            <description>
                ..ya know, like a vent-piece...

{scrolling thru Gibbon&apos;s to find the correct terminology}
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57654</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57654</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:57:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-03-09</title>
            <description>
                screw in replacement insert for the hole where the friction fuze what the lanyard pulls out.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57652</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57652</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:52:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from WereKitten on 2007-03-09</title>
            <description>
                Welp....it would appear that I&apos;m screwed on this one.

Of course, that looks like a pretty nice sized screw, so I&apos;m not in such a bad position afterall.

*runs from pg17c*
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57636</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57636</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:07:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John S. on 2007-03-09</title>
            <description>
                Looks very much like the internal portion of a WW1 or earlier era artillery time fuze which used a powder train instead of clockwork.  Not sure of the mechanics of how they worked, but the various time increments are marked on a cover that fit over a piece like this and were punched or something at the appropriate point to determine the setting.  Just a guess.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57629</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57629</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:30:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-03-09</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>All I do know about it is that it's WWII, Soviet, and it dovetailed on to something else, probably an azimuth base of some sort.</i>

Hmmm...  The USSR in the Great Patriotic War had something of a reputation for makeshift ways of aiming guns.  Some of their fighter aircraft had "gunsights" that were no more than hand-painted circles on the windshields.  They also had a problem with poorly educated and trained troops.  Could this mysterious whatzit have been a dual-mode sight for light artillery: a mirrored and telescoped eyepiece for a gunner who knew what he was doing, and the string thing for someone who didn't?  It takes training to read an azimuth; it takes none to line up the string on the target and pray.  

Now, as to this one: threaded cone shape, concavity on the narrow end... Breech-block off a really early breechloader cannon, before they figured out the interrupted-screw design?
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57624</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/03/the_whatziss_an.html#comment-57624</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:08:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


