<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Wrapping up that 38cm German gun.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:43:36 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Wrapping up that 38cm German gun.</title>
            <description> Bill said it was a railway gun. I said it wasn&apos;t. We&apos;re both right. It was moved by rail (how else, especially back in the day?) but was assembled into a purpose-built emplacement. The emplacement was concrete, and took weeks to construct. They were substantial enough that they still exist. [Interesting article on several large german guns here.] There was a central pintle for the gun (which answers Trias&apos; question about training the gun for direction) and, as can be seen in the picture above, used little railcars to move the projectiles and powder from the preparation site to...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:18:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-02-13</title>
            <description>
                Note the Germans had the little guys shoving the rounds -- must&apos;ve been militarily practical because we followed that example in WWII, Korea and the opening days of Vietnam by assigning the smallest guys in the squad to carry the BAR.

Never had that opportunity myself (&apos;wayyyy too tall), but I *did* get to hump the baseplate and tube of an 81mm all over the impact area at Indiantown Gap in the summer of 1967...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56638</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56638</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:27:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from KCSteve on 2007-02-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Ah, but I'll bet they were <strong>glorious</strong> rounds!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56616</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56616</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:28:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Trias on 2007-02-13</title>
            <description>
                Nice images.  I guess WW1 was so slow that WW2&apos;s incredible mobility caught everyone by surprise.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56603</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/wrapping_up_tha.html#comment-56603</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:13:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


