<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The nicely obscure whatzis...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:42:40 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The nicely obscure whatzis...</title>
            <description>As I expected, you guys collectively pretty much nailed it, if missing some of the fiddly details. It is in fact an airbrushed photo for an advertising brochure. J. Walter Christie was a pretty talented designer of tanks. But, as happens to many people with talent, he got a little messianic now and again. That photo represented one of those ideas which just couldn&apos;t get out of his head. He was fixated on developing a light tank that could be carried under a plane. You&apos;d spin the tracks up to high speed, then the plane would skim along the ground,...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:24:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ibm on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Possibly the guts of a grenade of some sort but IIRC most light grenades are wrapped in layers of prefragmented (partially) wire not ball bearings.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56196</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56196</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:14:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Just kidding of course.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56194</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56194</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:04:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Ya know JTG might be on to something.  You remember those objects d&apos;art that were real popular back in the 70&apos;s?  You&apos;d press your hand or face into it and a 3-d image would remain.  So armouror, how &apos;bout you slam this into your face and than tell what you see? :^)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56193</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56193</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:38:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Y&apos;all do realize, of course, that JoA may just be funnin&apos; us? 

I mean, that may not be any kind of weapon at all, maybe just an objet d&apos;art his Gramma gave him, which has had some of its shiny thingys fall off, during the passage of the years?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56192</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56192</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:25:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                I think the Soviet Russkis actually did test the freewheeling tracks air-dropped from five feet up tank.

Once.

Ren and Stimpy did an episode in which they joined up with the Armored Parachute Tank Corps, or something like that. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56191</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56191</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:19:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                1/35th, Casey.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56184</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56184</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:32:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Eric, I stand corrected. Yes, it could be for a space bike. :)

wolfwalker raised a point I hadn't thought of, but should. Those spheres <i>are</i> small for anti-personnel. 

Hmmm. Is that a 1/35 scale model next to the whatzit, or is it a 1/6 GI Joe howitzer?
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56180</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56180</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:55:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Eric Wilner on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Waitaminnit...
Could those ball bearings actually be meant to function as ball bearings?
Is this the spherical bearing for some sort of tilty-swivelly joint?  Little hardened steel balls surrounding a big hardened steel ball, magnetized for ease of assembly?
(But then I contemplate how the outside of the thing would be constructed, and I don&apos;t see how you&apos;d keep some subset of the little balls from flying off in the event of impact.)

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56176</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56176</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:53:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-03</title>
            <description>
                Hey, BilltT, that sounds like my Grandmother&apos;s knedlick (Passover chicken soup dumplings)...

Straight to the bottom of the stomach....
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56173</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56173</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:27:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                One of KtLW&apos;s famed armored meatballs.

Don&apos;t ask...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56162</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56162</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:03:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Trias on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                well they are fixed in place so the bearings aren&apos;t actually used to minimise friction.  So i leap to assume this is some kind of bomb which explodes the bearings out to rip people to shreds, much like those nice terrorists in Israel do.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56155</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56155</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:36:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                &gt;Heh. How many people remember what &quot;Tempest Hardened&quot; means...

I lived in that world for a bit...  How about a AT PC (80286) computer in a heavy green box that had about 50 screws in the top cover, and all sorts of steel parts and some stuff that looked like steel wool on the inside...  INSIDE a SCIF.  What nitwits... talk about 400 toilet seat..

On the other hand, the Army bought a toy in the early 80s called TEAMPACK (AN/MSQ-103), a tactical MI track/shelter mtd radar direction finding system.  Supposedly, it was discovered that if you got close enough (within a couple hundred meters, I guess), you could recieve information about the targets it was DFing--emitted from inside the shelter (tempest NOT being installed properly apparently).  Our unit had to stop using them for a bit....

Go figure...



            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56153</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56153</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:42:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                I dunno how small ball bearings can get, but those look kinda small for ball bearings to me.  Maybe it&apos;s some kinda lightweight scattergun round, loaded with birdshot?  No idea why they&apos;d do something like that, but sometimes the military runs the durndest experiments... 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56152</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56152</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:30:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Eric Wilner on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[But, Casey, it's too <em>small</em> to be the sphere for the main engines!  Gotta be for something smaller, like a shuttlecraft or maybe a space bike.
Hmmm... unless that's a <em>full-size</em> howitzer, and those planks are a lot bigger than I'd assumed.
It does have a bit of the "explosive covered with ball bearings" look to it, but isn't the ratio of explosive to ball bearings rather high?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56150</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56150</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:59:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Toluca Nole on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                &quot;It&apos;s all ball bearings these days!  Maybe you need a refresher course.&quot;
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56148</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56148</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:13:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                1. Tempest 1 or 2?
2. Radar cross-section/signature test target.

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56146</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56146</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:02:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from KCSteve on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[(ahem)

With regards to yesterday's Whazzit?, while he seems to have covered how they were supposed to get the tank off the plane (thus allowing them both to land), how did he intend for them to <strong>take off</strong>?

Also, a modern LAPES drop is pretty much what you described.  Way back when they were developing it I happened to work at USAYPG (Yuma Proving Ground) and got to see one.  Cargo plane comes into view flying low with tail doors open.  Plane <strong>dives</strong> at the ground and somehow manages to level off looking like it's lower than it would be with gear down.  Little bitty drag chute appears at tail of plane followed <strong>immediately</strong> by full chute and something very tanklike.  Plane <strong>bounces</strong> up to a more reasonable altitude (tanklike vehicle also bounces, but not as high).  Plane goes into steep climb and exits area.  Basically the unload the cargo plane without bothering to (quite) land - or slow down.

Now, as to today's item:

Looks to be a lump covered in shot.  Since it's egg-shaped and appears to be covered all over I'm guessing it's intended to distribute said shot over the entire area in a grandly egalitarian manner.  Bursting charge out of the Euro version of a Bouncing Betty?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56143</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56143</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:54:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                BB Cheeseball.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56142</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56142</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:51:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Geez, Eric, everybody knows a Beryllium sphere is used in the main engines, not the shuttlecraft!

Some people... ;)

Now I normally stay away from the more abstruse &quot;whatzit&quot; posts, but assuming the ball bearings aren&apos;t a red herring, I&apos;d hazard it&apos;s part of a beehive round or anti-personnel grenade, in the manner of the old Shrapnel rounds.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56141</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56141</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:06:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from WereKitten on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                WEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!

The camera operator SUCKS!

gotta love an operator who sucks.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56139</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56139</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:03:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Will the Sea Scout on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Some sort of scouring shot for cleaning out a really foul rifle barrel?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56138</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56138</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:00:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Bruce Quam on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Warhead submunition for a Roland antiaircraft missle?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56137</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56137</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:00:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Eric Wilner on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Pincushion?

Beryllium sphere for a shuttlecraft?

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56131</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56131</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:27:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                In reverse order... my Canon EOS Rebel camera is just fine.  It&apos;s the operator who sucks.

Component.

Modern.

European.




            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56130</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56130</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:20:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Hints please:

Whole object, or component of something bigger?
Weapon, weapon component, mechanical thingy?  

Oh, and you need a digital camera with a better macro mode. :-) 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56129</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56129</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:17:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Heh.  How many people remember what &quot;Tempest Hardened&quot; means...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56128</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56128</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:17:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                a Tempest hardened pomegranate?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56127</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56127</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:14:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Tiffany egg from the company&apos;s &apos;minimalist&apos; period...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56121</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56121</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:26:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Pogue on 2007-02-02</title>
            <description>
                A nice little model of an M102 next to a magnetic stress ball covered in ball bearings?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56118</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/the_nicely_obsc.html#comment-56118</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

