<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-23T18:02:37Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Blog to the Chief, probably the final post.</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7152" title="Blog to the Chief, probably the final post." />
    <published>2007-02-17T14:45:58Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-08T14:39:49Z</updated>
    <title>Blog to the Chief, probably the final post.</title>
    <summary>Yesterday, CAPT H sent me a note about that &quot;Kansas blog thingy&quot; which contained a link to Joan McCarter&apos;s post on the event (she&apos;s the Kossack who blogs as McJoan). CAPT H said, quoting McJoan: &quot;...the right blogosphere is dominated by professional political types ...&quot; ...and then he added: ... and no mention of the Castle! I&apos;m terribly saddened at that. Broken-hearted. After all, Joan and I had a &quot;moment&quot; down in the archives when we discovered we actually had something in common regarding the Long War - that a nuke-armed Iran is probably bad. This occurred as we bloggers...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Politics" />
    
    <category term="Shameless Pandering to Big Bloggers" />
    
    <category term="Shameless Self-Promotion" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, CAPT H sent me a note about that "<strong><a href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/liveblogging_bl.html">Kansas blog thingy</a></strong>" which <strong><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/16/03153/1082">contained a link</a></strong> to Joan McCarter's post on the event (she's the Kossack who blogs as McJoan).   </p>

<p>CAPT H said, quoting McJoan:</p>

<blockquote>
"...the right blogosphere is dominated by professional political types ..."
</blockquote>

<p>...and then he added:</p>

<blockquote>
... and no mention of the Castle!
</blockquote>

<p>I'm terribly saddened at that.  Broken-hearted.  After all,  Joan and I had a "moment" down in the archives when we discovered we actually had something in common regarding the Long War - that a nuke-armed Iran is probably bad.  This occurred as we bloggers were getting a tour of the archives.  They had turned us loose to wander the shelves full of the interesting mundania of Senator Dole's career when I noticed that the three rightys were moving down one aisle together, and the two lefties (with a very nice student lefty-blogger-groupie) were moving down a different aisle.  Throughout the evening watching the comfort groups form was amusing.</p>

<p>Joan being my first live Kossack, I picked up something else...  when I hear those of us on the right refer to the Kossacks in speech, we do so in the form of Russian Cossacks.  When Joan uses the term, she pronounces it Ko-sack.  And Daily Kos is pronounced with the "ko" sound, not the "ka" sound I've always used.  And, since it's Markos Zuniga, it makes sense - it was just odd to my ears, living in the great benighted hole that is Kansas. (Hey, *I* like it here - I want all you others to think it sucks and stay away...)  Go live in Missouri or something.</p>

<p>Anyway - if you haven't yet, go read Joan's post, she expands on the one thing that was actually the major difference between the two camps - because they all pretty much agreed that politicians need to figure out this internet thingy and adapt to it - because we "netizens" aren't going to adapt to them very well, despite Senators McCain and Feingold's attempts to indirectly force us to - because I don't care that they cloaked it in campaign finance rhetoric, the purpose of that bill was to stifle dissent and criticism.  Not to make it somewhat accountable in terms of truth in advertising, but to just shut it off.  Which is why it was bi-partisan.  It could just as correctly been titled the "McCain-Feingold Incumbency Protection Act" as campaign finance reform.  And in that regard, the left and right of the 'sphere have some common ground.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-comment:56811</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html#comment-56811" />
    <title>Comment from ry on 2007-02-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>ry</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        (giant tuna) Smack.

I guess I deserved that.  Being obtuse and all.  Ooops.  And what is it with me getting into your nose this weekend?  You or I wake up on the wrong side of the planet?  I think I&apos;m just gonna watch cartoons.  I don&apos;t want to be Big Booted.  
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-18T03:01:18Z</published>
    <updated>2007-02-18T03:01:18Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-comment:56806</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html#comment-56806" />
    <title>Comment from Kat-missouri on 2007-02-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kat-missouri</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        LOL...oh, the irony.

Or something like that.


    </content>
    <published>2007-02-18T00:00:02Z</published>
    <updated>2007-02-18T00:00:02Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-comment:56803</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html#comment-56803" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Sometimes, Ry, sarcasm and irony are just *wasted* around here...
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-17T23:16:39Z</published>
    <updated>2007-02-17T23:16:39Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-comment:56800</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html#comment-56800" />
    <title>Comment from ry on 2007-02-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>ry</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        What did you expect, Hoss?  Their internal narrative is the noble and romantic revolutionary schtick. Why do you think they come up with things like &quot;Suburban Guerilla&quot; for the name of their blogs?  

Par for the course.  

Poor John, him being the squish(who they&apos;ll call arch right wing or extreme right wing or something to that effect).  Thought he had a real moment where the progressive didn&apos;t see the rest of us, or at least him, as &apos;Other&apos;.  A real coming together deal.  Sorry you&apos;re disappointed man, but what did you expect?  

Turn the other cheek, homes.  
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-17T21:55:46Z</published>
    <updated>2007-02-17T21:55:46Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152-comment:56792</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2007://1.7152" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/blog_to_the_chi.html#comment-56792" />
    <title>Comment from FbL on 2007-02-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>FbL</name>
        <uri>http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<i>...the right blogosphere is dominated by professional political types.</i>

Yeah, right.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-17T16:58:55Z</published>
    <updated>2007-02-17T16:58:55Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

