<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A Twin Whatzis</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:43:58 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A Twin Whatzis</title>
            <description>I tried out a bunch of whatzis candidates on the expert first, and both of these went unidentified, at least as far as I know, so here you go... Whatzis #1: Whatzis #2 Enjoy, SangerM [Armorer&apos;s note - just because Sanger put this up doesn&apos;t excuse you hosers from the *other* Whatzis still working. Slackers.]...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 20:50:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-06</title>
            <description>
                T15E1 75 mm cannon for the Beechcraft XA-38 Grizzly.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56295</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56295</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:14:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-06</title>
            <description>
                OFS,  Nope.  The big gun on an AC130 is a 105mm.  Of course, I imagine twin 40s, and a couple of 30s feel like big guns too, when you&apos;re looking back at em...

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56287</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56287</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:34:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Old Fat Sailor on 2007-02-06</title>
            <description>
                #1 not a clue

#2 Main gun for an AC130?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56280</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56280</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:37:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-06</title>
            <description>
                BillT... Ha.  I grew up in Philly.  Camden.  Ha.


JMH, nope.  Close, but not the B25 or B26...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56279</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56279</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:28:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                Then it&apos;s the 75mm mounting for the B-25?

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56277</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56277</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:42:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #1. Tank transporter.

#2. What&apos;s left of the tank after the transporter stalled out on Admiral Wilson Boulevard in Camden.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56272</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56272</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:28:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                Up for maintenance?  Few choices, (taking into account museum stuff) if US.  M-48, M-60, or Panther (I think thats the name of the M-1 based bridge layer).  Of course, I also thought this was a jail cell.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56269</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56269</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:08:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #1 MajMike got the ramp, not &quot;open&quot; as much as just UP, though that&apos;s just semantics at this point.  And not stuck, just parked that way for maintenance, etc.  Made it easier to climb around on top of.  (I&apos;ll post another shortly, hopefully with an animated GIF --I need to make it) 

Now can you tell which launcher version?  (I couldn&apos;t from that pic, but hey who knows with you&apos;se guys?)

#2. MM Nope, and JMH nope (think bigger x 3.75)

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56267</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56267</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:47:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #1 AVLB ramp section stuck in the open position.

#2  the hydraulics what caused situation #1 to happen.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56263</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56263</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:36:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #2
20mm (Oerlikon?) cannon in gun pod mounting (Mk 11 gun pod?)

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56261</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56261</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:12:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                Heh.  Dang conference.  I can&apos;t waste my employers time googling away.

Fardle.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56260</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56260</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:55:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Time Lord on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                That&apos;s &quot;Doctor&quot; to you.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56258</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56258</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:16:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                The Who?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56251</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56251</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:24:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Harvey on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #1 - Early prototype of the TARDIS? :-)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56247</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56247</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:11:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                Greetings All:  

Umm... The Armorer got #1 right, #2 wrong. :-)

   Close, but not...


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56246</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56246</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:11:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                And I just twigged to #1!  Context *is* everything!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56244</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56244</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:37:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                Hah!  I just figgered out *which* one it is, too.  I sent that in a note to Sanger. Y&apos;all keep looking.

It *is* on the web.

I&apos;m still clueless on #1.  But I&apos;ll get there.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56243</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56243</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:35:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                This is Sanger&apos;s Whatzis - so all your usual habits regarding my stuff... are wrong.

#1 Sanger was surprised I didn&apos;t get immediately (and still haven&apos;t gotten).

#2 I know *what* it is, but I ain&apos;t figgered out *which* it is.  Yet.

Just goes to show, you seem brilliant when you control the message (think self-important college profs here) but when you gotta play by the rulez everybody else does... well, dem feets made of clay.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56242</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56242</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:13:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #2  Model of one of the navel guns intended for the defense of the Atlantic Wall.  Never went past the paper stage, but the plan was for two of these to hide in a (semi)mobile barn-like building driven by 3 tiger chassis.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56241</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56241</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:55:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from chris on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                1) Prison cell sounded good
2) Drive shaft and shifter gimbals of a manual automotive transmission
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56240</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56240</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:22:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Trias on 2007-02-05</title>
            <description>
                #1?  hmm it&apos;s filthy it&apos;s metal it&apos;s riveted.  Some abandoned industrial dodad.

#2 a jackhammer?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56237</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56237</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:10:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-02-04</title>
            <description>
                #1 Leavenworth Cell block.
#2 No idea.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56228</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/02/a_twin_whatzis.html#comment-56228</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:26:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


