<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Thinking outside the box.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:45:12 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Thinking outside the box.</title>
            <description>The Russians have always been a fan of artillery. And they&apos;ve been pretty competent users of it, as well. They also think differently from us, and take novel approaches to things. There&apos;s some pictures of a putative new Russian artillery piece making the rounds, and it&apos;s shown up in my email box a couple of times. It looks to be a derivative of this SP artillery piece, the 2S19 &quot;Mstas&quot;. Artillery by Beretta... this thing, called &apos;Koalitcia-SV&apos;, or Coalition, hit the web over at the Cannon, Machine Guns and Ammunition website (which is a treasure trove of stuff, btw). Murdoc...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:47:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Troy Z on 2007-01-10</title>
            <description>
                Mmmm...Tankerporn...

For the sake of decorum, I wisely decided to edit out the obligatory lascivious slappity sounds to accompany that.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54912</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54912</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:08:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-01-08</title>
            <description>
                such lovely beasties.  each and every one of them is beautiful in its own way.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54831</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54831</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:54:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-01-08</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Object 279 looks like a JS3 that's been through a Hoboken body shop.

<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:IS3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:IS3.jpg</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54822</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54822</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:48:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                A WWI modeling site called &quot;Land Ships&quot; has quite a bit of good info the &quot;Tsar Tank&quot;, in english too.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54820</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54820</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:38:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                Minor spelling note: Msta-S.

I noted some of the to/froing about the sights and such. It appears  me that at best, the photos show the new guns as mounted in a standard 2S19 turret. This is not necessarily actual prototype.

Also, the 2S19 turret is mounted on a T-80 chassis, and powered by a T-72 engine. Other combinations are not correct.

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54817</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54817</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:41:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I tried using Babelfish, but it was a pretty rough translation!

<a href="http://babelfish.altavista.com/" rel="nofollow">Click here and try yourself.</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54806</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54806</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:26:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Dan Brock on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Re the giant Rusky tricycle:  If you can read Russian, there's info here:
<a href="http://www.mk.ru/numbers/2289/article79754.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mk.ru/numbers/2289/article79754.htm</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54805</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54805</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:19:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Murdoc on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                Doh!  What was I thinking?

&quot;If it&apos;s over .50 cal, alert Donovan.  If it&apos;s over .50 cal, alert Donovan. If it&apos;s over .50 cal, alert Donovan.&quot;

Forgot it this time.  I&apos;ll try to do better in the future.

Thanks for the link!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54799</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54799</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:38:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2007-01-07</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;ve often found it mildly humorous that folks attribute &quot;More is Better&quot; to we Americans.

Russian designs have almost always been overloaded with so much &quot;More more more&quot; More guns, more engines, more wheels, more armor, more weight, than almost any design I can think

Not to say we design perfection everytime...we don&apos;t. But on a 1 to 10 scale I give the Russkies a 9 for creativity and about a 3 for actual use compared to the amount of things they have scrapped over the years because &quot;Hell it looked good on paper! Lets add some more to it!&quot;

A close friend once made the remark &quot;The Russians are the Alabama Redneck Inventors of the World&quot;

Heh.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54795</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/thinking_outsid.html#comment-54795</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:14:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


