<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Okay, let&apos;s get back to basics.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:04:37 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Okay, let&apos;s get back to basics.</title>
            <description>First - the answer to the cockpit whatzis was... Yak 3. Congrats to Gwedd and HomeFrontSix(!). Turn yourselves loose on this one....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:12:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Steve P on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                Methinks it&apos;s a telescope sight for an A/Ik gun, maybe post wwII. It looks very similar to a No 43 Mk 3 Firefly scope.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55874</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55874</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:18:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Or maybe I should collect myself and think about it for, oh, another 58 minutes or so...


I think I need some sleep....
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55852</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55852</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:14:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Hmmm... thinking with my fingers here: If it&apos;s not a barrel off some kind of gun (which it looks like it could be, can&apos;t tell what those dark spots are on the thicker shaft, greasy fingerprints?), then it looks like it&apos;s designed to be an axle.  If it&apos;s spring loaded, maybe that nub on top is how you take it apart, in which case it&apos;s got to be something that is held in place by compression, Unless a bolt comes in through the seating bearing, but even then it couldn&apos;t take much torque without breaking or bending the bolt, so it&apos;s got to be something relatively lightweght and I would guess used as oriented, like an antenna base for a wind sensor or some such or a rotating wheel of some kind, but being here, I am going to gusss it&apos;s a barrel for some kind of heavy gun...  And since BillT knows what it is, maybe it&apos;s some aviation kind of gun--from the civl war.

Or it&apos;s just some old machined piece of crap put up here to me crazy again...

See, that&apos;s how my mind works (or doesnt)...

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55851</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55851</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:07:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Well, in my defense, Bill essentially *works* with one...   it would hardly have been fair.

And, um, for 95% of you, that is *really* a huge red herring.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55849</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55849</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:54:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh. *I* know what it is, but I had to recuse myself. Actually, John had me recuse myself.

Didn't Fontella Bass sing <a href="http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/rescueme.htm" rel="nofollow"><strong>something along those lines</strong></a>?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55848</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55848</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:28:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Pat on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                The CDN version of the LAV-25 uses a pneumatic cylinder to raise and lower the driver&apos;s seat. My official guess is this is out of a USMC LAV-25.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55846</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55846</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:19:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Sanger is good on scale - and the seating portion.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55840</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55840</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:56:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Looks about 1.5-2&apos; feet long, maybe longer.  

Bottom clearly seats into something, like a chair base

- seat pipe for some kind of armor vehicle

- pedestal mount of some kind for a gun

- If I&apos;ve got the scale wrong, then it could be charging handle or a firing pin for a really big gun...

- Tank track pin remover (a punch of some kind).

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55839</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55839</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:38:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Armorer, have you been digging around in the OSS&apos;s toybox again?  :-)  This looks rather like the Spring Cosh that OSS spooks used in WW2.  Press the button on the butt-end, and it telescopes out to double its length.  A handy concealed club.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55835</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55835</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:58:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Nope.

Nope.

Nope.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55833</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55833</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:34:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                shock absorber?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55828</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55828</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:32:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Eric on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                Cut down M2HB barrel
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55826</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55826</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:32:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Old Fat Sailor on 2007-01-27</title>
            <description>
                subcalaber device?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55825</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/okay_lets_get_back_to_basics.html#comment-55825</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:42:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

