<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Here&apos;s a thought...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:44:20 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Here&apos;s a thought...</title>
            <description> Mark Steyn might agree. Building on Fuzzybear Lioness&apos; link in the comments: &quot;It&apos;s not the American people or the U.S. Congress who are emboldening the enemy,&quot; said Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, a White House hopeful in 2008. &quot;It&apos;s the failed policy of this president — going to war without a strategy, going to war prematurely.&quot; So, going to war was still a Good Thing, then Senator? We only opened the campaign &quot;prematurely&quot;? If so - how about the Democrats proposing a plan to *win* it then? Of course, it&apos;s easy to carp. Talking heads (myself included) have that bit...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:42:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-29</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;m looking forward to Biden&apos;s next spate of made up family history...  I&apos;m amazed that he seems to think everyone&apos;s forgotten he was lying about his past to try to get elected.  Well, maybe they have, he keeps getting elected, don&apos;t he....

Screw him too.  I figure it&apos;s gonna be Hilary and Obama (he&apos;s got to be going for the face time or the VP slot, both work for a young guy), but to be honest, I don&apos;t think that combo will work.   I don&apos;t think Hilary has the chance a lot of people think she does &apos;cause she&apos;s not willing to dump her philandering perjured hubby, and lots of folks like me would vote for almost anyone before they&apos;d see him back in the Whitehouse, no matter who the servants work for.

I&apos;d like to see Newt Gingrich and Rice run together, they just need to call it first if they are going to because that would just kill the demo chance of playing that race card...  And man wouldn&apos;t Gingrich and Rice be one tough pair to deal with... I think that would make for some interesting politics...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55895</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55895</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:05:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                Biden&apos;s problem...which also afflicts Hillary, Obama, and McCain...is that they&apos;re trying to look Presidential while still being Senators.

Personally, I think the two objectives cause enough of a conflict of interest that it should be forbidden.

New Amendment:  &quot;No person, while holding any elective office, nor any office of public trust under the United States, shall be allowed to run for the office of President of the United States.&quot;

You want to be President?  Fine and dandy.  But you&apos;ll have to give up your cushy government job to do it.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55868</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55868</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:30:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, that probably wasn&apos;t the most coherent comment I&apos;ve ever made here, but like I said in comments on another post: my lack of posting on my blog recently is a public service, haha!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55866</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55866</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:47:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh, and here's some more great thinking from that side of the Aisle.  Biden says it's not undermining military strategy and using the troops as political pawns/props that emboldens the enemy; it's "<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070128/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq" rel="nofollow"><strong>failed strategy</strong></a>" that does that.  Good to know that the yet-to-be-implemented strategy has already failed.  Maybe he's just making sure we don't attempt anything new because if it doesn't work right our enemies might be emboldened--'cause you know if we do nothing then they just relax and start being nice to us.  I'm just so glad he's on our side... *barf*]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55865</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55865</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:45:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                What Carrie said.  :)  Nice!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55861</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55861</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:08:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Carrie on 2007-01-28</title>
            <description>
                I love it almost as much as the &quot;have a nice hot cup of...&quot;
Considering all of the weekend&apos;s activities, this is a tonic.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55859</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/heres_a_thought_1.html#comment-55859</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:55:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


