Comments for Drudge: ISRAEL PLANS NUCLEAR STRIKE ON IRAN

Drudge: ISRAEL PLANS NUCLEAR STRIKE ON IRAN

Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:13:03 -0600

Me: D-uh. And Syria. And Egypt. And Saudi Arabia. And Jordan (well, maybe not, but probably). And... they still have their Iraq plan in the safe, too. Just like we have nuke target folios for... Russia. China. North Korea. And they're secret, too. The Israel Defense Force General Staff would be incompetent not to have a plan. The question - thus far unanswered... is it a CONPLAN, or an OPLAN. Contingency, vice Operation. The current one, or an old one, if contingency. If it's an OPLAN, *then* it's a story. And whoever leaked it should be locked into a very...

Comment from ry on 2007-01-08

Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:46:52 -0600

Sometimes it's hard to believe you're older than I, JOhn. Geez. Perv. EIther that or I'm mentally locked at an age when sexuality didn't matter (9) while you're locked into an age when it's the epitomy of funny and high import(16). Sounds about right now that I think about it.

Comment from Harvey on 2007-01-07

Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:56:06 -0600

Seconding your D-uh. Not really sure how much hard news got leaked in this story. More of a dog-bites-man item, really.

Comment from Maggie on 2007-01-07

Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:19:20 -0600

This is funny. I'd like to second your D'uh. Last night Jen and I were watching "Iran:The Next Iraq" on the History Channel and one of the commentators said in a voice that was almost breathy "They are in the Pentagon right now wargaming an attack on Iran!" LOL D'uh!

Comment from BillT on 2007-01-06

Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:52:38 -0600

Betcha James Earl Carter's blood pressure just went through the roof -- Jimmeh dislikes Israel almost as much as he dislikes the US.

Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-01-06

Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:17:39 -0600

And whoever leaked it should be locked into a very small, dark, hole. With rats. And snakes, preferably a type whose poison isn't quite strong enough to kill. Scorpions would also do. (Vicious? Me? Why, whatever gave you that idea?)

Comment from Bill Faith on 2007-01-06

Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:01:52 -0600

You're probably right, but I hope you're wrong. It's a shame to have to wait for the Israelis to do what we should have already done. I linked.

Comment from J-P on 2007-01-06

Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:51:01 -0600

Heh, I like the part of the Times article that says "retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world." The retaliation for using NUKES against Iran would be a bit more at the pump and more terrorism (maybe they aren't already trying to hit everything they can)? Personally, if the Israelis thought it was that painless, I think they would have bombed Iran long ago.