<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A new Whatziss of a different color.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:44:47 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A new Whatziss of a different color.</title>
            <description> Give it your best shot....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:15:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Best of the sites I found while getting beat on this one (Some you have to save off as full html files to get the pics)  Lot of good images!

<a href="http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys" rel="nofollow">http://www.tygers.cz/jeep/show_page.asp?page=jeep_willys</a></a></a></a></a>

<a href="http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.homeusers.brutele.be/mithril/GPA%207177%20photos.html</a></a></a></a></a>

<a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3" rel="nofollow">http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_vehicle_id_amphib.php3</a></a></a></a></a>

<a href="http://arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.arrowhead-mvpa.com/Arrowhead%20Members.htm</a></a></a></a></a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55353</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55353</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:41:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                A Willys MB 6x6 variant (yes there were), tested by Ford as a step up from a GPA, c. Korean war era...?

BTW, I didn&apos;t think it was fake, but just in case you were getting clever... and, well, I&apos;m stumped...  Though it does look like two vehicles, the driver looks too big...

If nothing else, I found LOTs of cool milvehicle pages...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55341</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55341</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:04:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Moose on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                I googled around a bit and I&apos;m just throwing a guess out here.

Is that the Brazilian CAMANF?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55340</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55340</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:53:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Sanger - the properties say Photoshop because I resized the image in photoshop.

Other than that, the image is un-fiddled with.

Sergeant B - good catch on the GPAs.  I was waiting for someone to get that.  It was all part of setting up this one.

Y&apos;all&apos;r gonna hate me in the morning.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55337</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55337</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:42:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sgt. B. on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                But, again, there&apos;s something wierd about it...  If I could see the details on the side of the hull, I&apos;d be able to figure it out...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55335</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55335</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:10:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sgt. B. on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                The DUKW HAS a central tire air pressure system...

It may not be a TOE DUKW, but it&apos;s a real close relative...

The DUKW (unlike the 1/4 ton Ford GPAs in the previous amphibious what-izzit) was a 2 1/2 ton General Motors chassis with a boat hull and a rear mounted prop...  There were some fitted with experiemental hydroplane gear, but they never got past the testing stage...

I&apos;ve worked on (and driven) restored vehicles of both classes...

As far as I can tell, it&apos;s the proper scale, with the proper fittings (down to the snorkle and canvas supports.  The gun is the right scale, but the gunner should be inside the ring, with the backplate almost in his chest - you aim the thing by forearm pressure, braced against the rest of your body...  That gunner wouldn&apos;t hit SQUAT like that, not while the beast was in motion, either on land or water...)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55334</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55334</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:09:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                ok...  Closer look, no bars that I can see down the side of the &apos;hull&apos;  Guy in short sleeved shirt, looks like maybe shorts too, almost a motorcyle helmet, w/ a microphone.  Gun does not look like a real 50, but I&apos;ve been wrong already...   

Also, looking at some of the pics linked too (BTW, just back up to the directory, then scroll the list of images... for some reason it won&apos;t let you link direct, but you can view the directory..?)

Anyway, the windshield is the key, I think.  On teh DUKW, there was a small split windshield, with a sizeable plate below it.  On the image we&apos;re seeing, the windshield (glass parts) is much taller, and swpet back) .. this almost looks like an old willy&apos;s or CJ5 windshield?  and that said, the scale of the vehicle looks off, as if this is a mock up attached on top of an old 5/4 ton truck or something about that size with the hull and other crap tacked on.  Also, that guy on the gun looks too small, almost as if that ring and guy had been photoshopped on there (where are the support poles for the ring?  Same with that air-vent stuck on the side, that has a different color than the rest of the image, and looks out of place....  Also, the fact that the properties list this image as a product of photoshop... hmmmm....

I won&apos;t call foul on this, &apos;cause I&apos;d just as likely be wrong, but close-up, this looks awfully fishy...

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55330</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55330</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:56:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Actually, I did go so far as to look up PLA amphibious vehicles on Wikipedia, but did not see anything like that. Did not want to waste time with Google, what with all of the blogitudiness.

Yah, I know that there are other search engines. Wonder what Clusty comes up with for this one, seeing as how they don&apos;t seem to be so bloggily and commercially oriented.  I would *love* to see an image-based search engine, that worked right.  I don&apos;t think they have it, right yet.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55329</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55329</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:55:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Grownups, always spoiling the fun.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55326</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55326</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:13:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Heh.  It ain&apos;t 20 questions, JTG.  This is Adult Swim time! 

*You* tell us!  Is it Chinese?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55325</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55325</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:07:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                 XM147 DUKW “Super Duck”?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55324</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55324</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:07:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Ok, it&apos;s weird, it&apos;s strange, is it Chinese?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55323</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55323</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:03:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                JoA, you ,uh, &quot;awkward person&quot;, I will look up MajMike and we will come getcha!

Really, this is a weird difficult one. Dang!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55322</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55322</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:55:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                MajMike *did* however, ruin the next Whatziss post, which, building on this one, *was* going to be the Russian version.  

I shoulda planned better.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55321</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55321</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:53:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Oops.  Rod is correct - late model DUKWs did have CTPR.  My bad.

Lessee.

This one is *not* based on a GM product.

JTG - what part of &quot;No Slavic Accent&quot; was confusing?  I assume your comment and mine passed in the ether.

MajMike is *not* the winner.  As of this comment - there is no winner.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55320</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55320</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:51:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                MajMike wins.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55319</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55319</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:47:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Add on to previous.  Even though the DUKW was based on the duece and a half, it had single tired rear axles not duellies.  It in fact used unique wider tires and wheels to help maintain reduce ground preasure.  Still didn&apos;t work well enough, so the CTPR was added.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55318</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55318</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:47:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Late WWII DUKW&apos;s also had CTPR.  Nothing real special there.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55317</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55317</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:43:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[[Smiles smugly to self]

To this: <em><blockquote>Definately a DUKW...</blockquote></em>

I respond with the caveat from the Flash Traffic:

<em>Ask yourself, would I make this as easy as it looks? C'mon!</em>

This is a case of it looks like a DUKW, it drives like a DUKW, it swims like a DUKW, but it doesn't Honk like a DUKW.  Nor does it have a Slavic accent.

Which is why I'm smiling smugly to myself.  But you guys hunted up lots of stuff for me to look at!

Keep working at it.

Here's a hint - unlike a DUKW, this vehicle has central tire pressure regulation.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55316</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55316</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:33:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[got a lot of junk in the trunk in these pix here:

<a href="http://www.autogallery.org.ru/m/bav.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.autogallery.org.ru/m/bav.htm</a>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55314</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55314</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:25:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                It got sent into moderation because of the number of links (3 or more).  

It&apos;s published now. (d-uh)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55313</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55313</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:24:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                What happened to my other post?  Should have come up with some links... That&apos;s a DUKW in the orginal pic, but late model, and almost certainly in demo or test mode...  No gear on it, and the equipment is newer (the helmet) onthe guy...

Anyway, when I posted the other one, I got a note that said it was sent to moderation...

waaaaa
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55312</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55312</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:16:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I don't know, Maj Mike.  <a href="http://www.autogallery.org.ru/k/z/bavvn.jpg" rel="nofollow">This picture </a>of the ZIS model seems to indicate a longer troop carrying area and it does not have the wave deflector though the depth looks similar.  But that could be because it is based on the DUKW.

Is it a DUKW 353?  That was an early model and I've seen several photos that show similar ring mounted machine guns.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55311</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55311</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:12:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Steve - the guy is standing on a platform, not the cargo deck.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55308</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55308</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:34:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                ZIS/ZIL 485 Bolshoi Avtomobil Vodoplavajushchii
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55307</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55307</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:05:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                A troop transport truck with some boat like add on&apos;s bolted to it.  Like the sad attempt to make tanks float.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55306</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55306</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:04:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SangerM on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Definately a DUKW, with the side-skirts over the wheels, which made it a better swimmer; gun guy looks to be wearing a korean-war/early nam-type CVC and canteen on his belt, though he's standing outside the turret ring, which could mean he's on watch or posing rather than having just come up out of the water.  There's no gear on the thing, no ropes, no cans, nothing.  Looks like an OT of some kind.

Cool pic links: <a href="http://www.swapmeetdave.com/Ahl/Albums/ATHS9-03/slides/4-DUKW-Side.jpg" rel="nofollow">Here</a>.

Also back into this, site and check out all the cool other pics LOTs of old stuff:

<a href="http://www.rongeorge.com/albums/ww2armorref/DUKW_1.jpg" rel="nofollow">Dukw</a>, More <a href="http://www.rongeorge.com/albums/ww2armorref/M3.jpg" rel="nofollow">Like this</a>, <a href="http://www.rongeorge.com/albums/ww2armorref/Lost_Guns.jpg" rel="nofollow">This</a>, <a href="http://www.rongeorge.com/albums/ww2armorref/Smoke_Break_Tiger_222.jpg" rel="nofollow">This</a>, 
Etc..
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55304</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55304</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:32:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Is this a DUKW in the desert?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55303</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55303</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:30:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Armorer:

No, of course you wouldn&apos;t make it as easy as it looks.  :-)  Therefore I suspect that this is some variant of the SIL Amphibious Truck, a Russkie copy of the DUKW produced in the USSR both during and after WW2.  They got a few hundred DUKWs via Lend-Lease, and liked them enough to imitate &apos;em.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55301</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55301</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:11:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from KCSteve on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                It may have 6 wheels but it&apos;s too shallow for a Dukw - at least the most common version.  Those things were made so you could stand up in &apos;em and not have your head show over the side.  The ones they use for tours they have to build a raised floor in (wonder what they store &apos;below decks&apos;?)

This also looks a bit more sea worthy than the dukw so I&apos;m thinking it&apos;s one of the amphibious vehicles that was made to transition from the water to the land rather than vice versa - probably a Navy thing rather than Army.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55298</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55298</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:18:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                AW1 Tim - check those glasses again.

This thing&apos;s got 6 wheels.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55296</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55296</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:01:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Gwedd on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Comrades,

     Oooppsss... I guess it would help to put on the correct glasses. It's, I believe, actually a LARC. See here:
<a href="http://www.olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_larc.php3" rel="nofollow">http://www.olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_larc.php3</a>
     Dukw's got 6 wheels... this one has 4.
     Respects,]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55293</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55293</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:56:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Gwedd on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Comrades,

    It ain&apos;t a dukw... it&apos;s a Weasel.. seriously...

     Respects,
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55292</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55292</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:50:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                to meet emerging needs for a vehicle optimized for engineering surveys in rough terrain, the initial proof of concept DUKW (and the pre-production model DUKW II), it finally came into service as the Geographic Observation Over Severe Environments vehicle (GOOSE)...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55291</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55291</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:40:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Yeah .... like one of those old &apos;50-&apos;60&apos;s  B sci-fi horror / Japanese &quot;Godzilla vs Mothra&quot;-style flicks? 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55289</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55289</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:37:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Or bright red? Is this the attack of the Killer TOEMATER?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55281</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55281</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:10:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Are we meant to find an earlier instance of this image on the Web, in color? A weird, arty, pastel color, perhaps?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55280</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55280</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:07:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                It is generally not recognised that the US 1st Army Group, commanded by Gen George Patton, included a Naval Task Force. This is probably one of the Battleships in that TF, possibly the USS Cascadia.

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55277</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55277</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:30:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Nope, AFSis - it&apos;s real.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55276</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55276</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:23:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from afsister on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                looks like a model.  the dude on top looks rather thin
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55272</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55272</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:52:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SDP on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Isn&apos;t this the new patrol car used in the New Orleans area to monitor the levees?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55271</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55271</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:42:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The gunner's helmet makes it look like this photo was taken during testing, and it almost looks post-war.

But this site states that some DUKW's (perhaps among the DUKW-353 variants?) were used thusly:

<a href="http://london.iwm.org.uk/upload/package/4/dday/vehicles/veh1.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://london.iwm.org.uk/upload/package/4/dday/vehicles/veh1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://london.iwm.org.uk/upload/package/4/dday/vehicles/veh1.htm</a></a>

" ... They were sometimes armed with a .50 calibre Heavy Machine Gun (HMG) to provide Anti-Aircraft defence on a ring mount above the cab."
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55270</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55270</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:35:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                Aw, c&apos;mon, DE, JoA already forbade that answer; it&apos;s gotta be more subtle than that. Beats the hell outta me, though.

Oh, BTW, glad to see the comments show up immediately again.  My smart remarks and stupid comments are subject to immediate rebuttal and ridicule, as before, before I forget what I wrote.  

Anheuser&apos;s syndrome is a heavy burden to bear.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55268</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55268</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:05:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                John,  LOL!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55267</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55267</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:04:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from DE644 on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                It looks like a WW2 amphib designated as a DUKW and known as a Duck.  It has a propeller in the back and when you drove it into the water to a depth where it floated you shifted a transfer case of some kind and engaged the prop.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55265</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55265</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:49:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                C&apos;mon, Frank - give &apos;em the full name.

The Terran Observation Expedition Mars All Terrain Exploration Rover.

The TOEMATER.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55264</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55264</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2007-01-19</title>
            <description>
                That&apos;s NASA&apos;s new Mars All Terrain Exploration Rover (code name - MATER) for expeditions planned in 2012.

Amphibious for all the newly-detected water at the ice caps, you know ..... and the firepower is for the &quot;unexpected&quot;.

LOL
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55262</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2007/01/a_new_whatziss_2.html#comment-55262</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:30:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


