<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Sigh.  Oh no, not again...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:53:04 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Sigh.  Oh no, not again...</title>
            <description>Just as in &quot;The Hitchhiker&apos;s Guide to the Galaxy,&quot; I find myself in this dilemma: Curiously enough, the only thing that went through the mind of the bowl of petunias as it fell was Oh no, not again. Many people have speculated that if we knew exactly why the bowl of petunias had thought that we would know a lot more about the nature of the universe than we do now. I just had an &quot;Oh no, not again&quot; moment. This time regarding the USAF/Guys on the Ground Of Any Army and their liaison (or the whole system) for working...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:53:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Damian on 2006-09-06</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>Might have tricky to get visual confirmation in a misty, mountainous environment.</i>

You're right, that's quite possible.  So what's the default at that point?  Fire anyhow?  Lay off and reconfirm coordinates?  RTB?  These guys are in uniform, so I <i>know</i> there's a procedure - what is it?  And was it followed?

After the fiasco in April 2002 with Schmidt and Umbach <a href="http://www.vcds.forces.gc.ca/boi/finalv2/fr-33_e.asp" rel="nofollow">disregarding procedure and disobeying their controller's orders</a>, I can't take it on faith anymore that the pilots didn't <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/friendlyfire/verdict.html" rel="nofollow">screw up</a>.  I'm not rushing to judgement, but I'm not inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt on this one either.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50111</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50111</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:06:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-09-06</title>
            <description>
                David - was that about *this* incident or the one a month or so ago, where troops were knocked about but only one slightly injured?

Regardless - it shows that Allied Air/Ground support needs to be looked at closely.

I have to make this observation - but, AFAIK, Marine pilots don&apos;t have near the problem working with their guys - which isn&apos;t quite the slam on the AF it sounds like, as it is a suggestion that if you are going to be getting Close Air, you need the level of training and integration that the Marines have.

But on a completely unrelated note - sign me up for CAMRA! (click the DWMF link and look at the page)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50092</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50092</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 06:13:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from DWMF on 2006-09-06</title>
            <description>
                I heard about this on the Canadian Forces Network radio in Europe. Sounds to me like the controller on the ground gave the A10 pilot the wrong set of GPS coordinates. Mixed up those of the target with the troops to be supported. Might have tricky to get visual confirmation in a misty, mountainous environment. 


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50089</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50089</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:05:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2006-09-05</title>
            <description>
                ....not only could you be jumping the gun, but you&apos;re also very eager to get your comment out...twice.  darn echo.

In all honesty though, I agree with you.  I&apos;m anxious to see how this all plays out.  At least it&apos;s not being covered up though.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50072</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50072</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:31:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Damian on 2006-09-05</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I know I shouldn't jump the gun - there's going to be an investigation, and I'm sure it's going to get to the bottom of this incident.

But I'm <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com//servlet/story/LAC.20060905.AFGHANMAIN05/TPStory/TPInternational/Asia/" rel="nofollow">with my bud Abthorpe</a> on this:

<i>It's hard to imagine, however, how a pilot might have mistaken Canadian LAV-3 armoured vehicles for a cluster of insurgents, Major Abthorpe said.</i>

<i>"They're supposed to make visual contact," he said. "The LAVs were out on an exposed open slope, so what actually happened is hard to say. . . . Confusion, chaos, smoke on the battlefield, early morning mist, and everything like that all probably played a factor."</i>

How do you mistake a cluster of armoured vehicles used extensively by your main ally in this area for Taliban?  Not only do they not operate any LAVIII's, they don't have anything even close.

I understand it's a "complex geometry," as John says.  I'm just really frustrated - the preliminary details of this suggest more than just a garden-variety mistake.

Part of me actually hopes it was the Canadian soldier controlling the A-10s from the ground who screwed up instead of the pilots - I'm sick of hearing about "cowboy Americans" in the Canadian press, over backyard fences, and around water-coolers at work, like somehow human error is limited to USAF pilots.

But...how the hell do you mistake a bunch of LAVIIIs in the open for Taliban yahoos with AK-47s?  I'm having a tough time with this one.

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50071</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50071</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:35:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Damian on 2006-09-05</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I know I shouldn't jump the gun - there's going to be an investigation, and I'm sure it's going to get to the bottom of this incident.

But I'm <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com//servlet/story/LAC.20060905.AFGHANMAIN05/TPStory/TPInternational/Asia/" rel="nofollow">with my bud Abthorpe</a> on this:

<i>It's hard to imagine, however, how a pilot might have mistaken Canadian LAV-3 armoured vehicles for a cluster of insurgents, Major Abthorpe said.</i>

<i>"They're supposed to make visual contact," he said. "The LAVs were out on an exposed open slope, so what actually happened is hard to say. . . . Confusion, chaos, smoke on the battlefield, early morning mist, and everything like that all probably played a factor."</i>

How do you mistake a cluster of armoured vehicles used extensively by your main ally in this area for Taliban?  Not only do they not operate any LAVIII's, they don't have anything even close.

I understand it's a "complex geometry," as John says.  I'm just really frustrated - the preliminary details of this suggest more than just a garden-variety mistake.

Part of me actually hopes it was the Canadian soldier controlling the A-10s from the ground who screwed up instead of the pilots - I'm sick of hearing about "cowboy Americans" in the Canadian press, over backyard fences, and around water-coolers at work, like somehow human error is limited to USAF pilots.

But...how the hell do you mistake a bunch of LAVIIIs in the open for Taliban yahoos with AK-47s?  I'm having a tough time with this one.

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50070</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/sigh_oh_no_not_again.html#comment-50070</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:35:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

