<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for More problems for the &quot;Guys In Front&quot;...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:52:28 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>More problems for the &quot;Guys In Front&quot;...</title>
            <description>...as part of &quot;Trolling for Dusty Week&quot; today&apos;s installment is... oh-oh! Unmanned inflight refueling is a reality. Lex? Dusty? Anyone? Anyone? From the comments of Chap&apos;s post: I submit that now there is absolutely NO reason to have a human pilot in an F-18. : -) - They already take a cat shot with no hands - They already land Mode 1 no hands - They can now tank no hands (major airmanship challenge for a hornet/hornette pilot) - JDAM falls off automatically - All our enemies bury their fighters in sand dunes when we attack- no need for A-A....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:25:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-09-14</title>
            <description>
                Yay, scored both the Eagles!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50453</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50453</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:27:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from lex on 2006-09-14</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[So long as all you sojers are content with robo-pilot rolling in on yer posit carrying heavy heat when the bad guys are "danger close," I'm OK with it.

After all, my days of providing CAS are pretty much over.

But if it was me trying to describe that the bad guys who were giving us so much grief while DivArty is doing <em>God</em>-knows-what were on the north end of the east-west road by the low hilltop - no, the <em>other</em> hilltop - I'd want a set of eyeballs that could take it all in at a glance and with some of that depth perception that they screen us for.

You ever try to abort a drone when it's on final attack? It's <em>ugly.</em> ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50449</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50449</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:53:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-09-13</title>
            <description>
                ...and thereby implying that the sole remaining use for fixed wing jet jockeys is--entertainment?

Heh. Do I hear an A-10 inbound?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50397</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50397</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:38:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-09-13</title>
            <description>
                Snerk!  Excellent point, Stormy!  Lord knows we tolerate Hollywood&apos;s attempt to dictate policy as it is...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50384</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50384</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:22:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Stormy Dragon on 2006-09-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[As a comparison of <i>Stealth</i> to <i>Top Gun</i> will clearly show, our entertainment industry still requires having pilots in our military aircraft.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50383</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/09/more_problems_for_the_guys_in_front.html#comment-50383</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:19:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

