<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for You airplane geeks are no fun...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:53:32 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>You airplane geeks are no fun...</title>
            <description> Yep, it&apos;s an R/C aircraft. Heh. With you guys, I&apos;m going to have to resort to posting pictures of the hydraulics in a small corner of a landing gear bay to give you any challenge at all... Oh, and JTG, take a look - there *is* a hint of the geodetic structure in there. But mostly not, as you observed. Perhaps not *quite* as obvious as this one... And for those who&apos;d like to see a Fleet Air Arm paint scheme......</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:23:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from CDR Salamander on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I like <a href="http://www.teambanana.co.uk/b52rob.wmv" rel="nofollow">this</a> better....but, sadly, it does remind me of <a href="http://media.putfile.com/b52-crash" rel="nofollow">this</a>.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49773</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49773</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:22:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                Aha! I see I mixed up CC paint schemes with US Navy schemes. 

I&apos;m not sure the geodetic framework is all that clear in medium to far shot; most of the photos I&apos;ve seen (where it&apos;s apparent) are fairly close-in, and/or show the clear panels on the fuselage over the wings. 

At least I&apos;m assuming they&apos;re clear panels; I&apos;ve seen them in quite a few shots, and I can&apos;t imagine the RAF leaving great big holes in the side of the bomber... :)

It is a very nice model. Reminds me of that turbine-engined RC B-52 which crashed a while back. You see that thing airborne in a film clip and it&apos;s quite convincing.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49769</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49769</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:31:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                Well, d-uh, me!

S&apos;okay, I&apos;m working on one for you guys!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49761</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49761</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:33:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>You airplane geeks are no fun...</i>

Now would that be meanin' fun for you, or fun for us?  [chuckle.wav]
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49758</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49758</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:12:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

